Sign-In  or  Create a Free Account
Sign-in with:
 
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
 
Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

One Leader, Lots of Consolidation as CIGS Market Emerges

Do you like this news?

 
 
6 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 6
January 26, 2012
We all saw the efficiency ratings of some solar PV, as going to the low 30% level, tested last year. However, where are these highly efficient PV panels, and at what cost trade are we looking at, to make them cost effective over their life cycles? We all would perfer the highest efficiencies for the lowest cost, but so far ASES hasn't come up with a reasonable gauge to show who is really making the most difference in Residential solar. In Commercial solar, however, in both the Industrial Utility side and the Commercial energy conservation side, there are clear winners and not so clear losers. So, how do consumers compare which is best for them? If you are a residential customer, will life cycle reliability trump cost per watt? I think it should...Great if you can do both, why not be able to compare them technologically better. So coming up with clear standards for all factors in PV should have been done years ago by the US Department of Energy. The fact that it chose not to is another weakness which causes significant harm to the Solar Great Light Wave! But given the financials of these companies, which offers the best value per install for Residential and Commercial? And is this a regional issue or is it true nationwide?
Comment
2 of 6
January 26, 2012
Gentlemen,
First year, first day, of Journalism 101, teaches 18 year-olds that for clarity of writing, one NEVER uses an abbreviation prior to using the entire words explaining that for which abbreviation. As a journalist, one does not assume

If you wish to remain obscure and small, continue to use "PV" and "CIGS" with no referential explanation. This has been brought to my attention by registered engineers(PE's) in my office for whom English is not the first language. English is my first language and multigenerationally a family love. Reading the article to which my attention was directed,I too was frustrated. Not only was there no antecedent wording prior to "CIGS", there was not use of full wording in the article.

Please have your writers review Introductory Journalism's canon-writing is then both clear, considerate, and enhances understanding of we who are not cntered in your industry, and may lead to broadened readership.

Thank you,

Harvey W. Goolsby, Architect
No image available
Comment
3 of 6
Anonymous
January 27, 2012
Really Harvey,
With such a detailed and obviously trade focused article, you expect the author to go back and explain that there are different types of Solar Cells. CIGS has become the name of these types of cells, not an abbreviation of the name. Same as LEDs or NASA. I highly doubt that you expect a explanation when reading Architecture trade journals that discus changes to HVAC systems or AIA regulations. We need to be moving the industry forward, not dumbing down our trade journals.
No image available
Comment
4 of 6
Anonymous
January 29, 2012
I note that the very next article spells out LED on this news site.
Comment
5 of 6
January 29, 2012
I have been following these news developments fairly frequently, but like Harvey, have no idea what CIGS is an acronym for. His comment is appropriate and the criticism of it is pretentious and inconsiderate. If you want to keep alternative energy discussion amongst only those in the "know", then continue to speak only in deeply technical terminology but don't expect to create a groundswell of enthusiasm for your cause.
A one time spelling out of any acronym in an article is appropriate and necessary in this new industry. As an alternative, why not highlight such acronyms as launching links to something like Wikipedia.
Comment
6 of 6
ecl
February 1, 2012
CIGS refers to Copper Indium Gallium Selenide solar cells which are a subset of Thin Film Solar Cells (TFSC). Agree, I was baffled by the lack of it being spelled out but Wiki to the rescue as usual:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_indium_gallium_selenide_solar_cells

The other major TFSC categories are:

Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) - led by First Solar
amorphous silicon (a-Si) - Xunlight leader

see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_film_solar_cells

thx
ed
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

James Montgomery

View James Montgomery's Profile
About: Jim is Associate Editor for RenewableEnergyWorld.com, covering the solar and wind beats. He previously was news editor for Solid State Technology and Photovolta... more »

Advertise With Us

Apricus, Inc. GoGreenSolar.com Reed Exhibitions Demand Energy marcus evans Active Communications International Renewables Academy AG (RENAC)
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters