The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

American Exceptionalism and Renewable Energy: What the Tea Party Missed in 2011

Scott Sklar, The Stella Group, Ltd.
January 04, 2012  |  32 Comments

In the political gladiator wars within the U.S. parties, there is mostly heated mud-slinging. This fighting may make great sound bites, but it doesn't make much sense. Republicans are attacking everything "green" mainly because the president has made "green" a major theme of his administration. But many republicans over the decades have embraced green: If you heard former California republican Governor Schwarzenegger speak recently at the ACORE dinner or sitting Governor Haley Barbour (former head of the Republican National Committee) speak about the new biofuel and PV manufacturing plants in Mississippi, you'd wonder what all the fuss is about.

But with the end of 2011, it’s time we address the issue of “American Exceptionalism” that many within the republican party have been touting. I want to say loud and clear that I, too, strongly believe in American Exceptionalism.  Immigrants from most every country have moved to America since its founding, and while some came as indentured servants, prisoners, and slaves, most left their homelands for a new start or religious, economic and personal freedoms. 

With that independence, vision and fortitude, our democracy has blossomed — with some hiccups — and we are one of the freest countries on this planet, with open exchanges of ideas, and the most unencumbered media.

But wait, that’s not all.

American Exceptionalism about the environment is one of the shining stars of our democracy.

The Road So Far

The environmental movement came after a groundswell of popular clamor in the 1970’s following civil rights movement turmoil. From the book release of Silent Spring to the celebration of Earth Day, the movement drove the political process kicking and screaming for the passage of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. This was the first time a country put teeth into environmental legislation and established enforceable standards — and the rest of the world is following our lead. Public school students pushed for recycling against multimillion-dollar campaigns by the glass, bottling, and plastic industries. And today, almost every local government and large business recycles — it has become a societal norm. 

The United States became the unparalleled leader in renewable energy from the space program in the 1960’s when PV panels were used on early satellites. The U.S. has had the largest concentrated solar plants, the largest wind turbines and wind farms, and the most geothermal plants. 

And contrary to recent media accounts, these industries are growing — from biofuel innovations to leaps in marine tidal, wave and freeflow generation; astounding advances in battery energy storage, to super capacitors to compressed storage; and cutting edge efficiency technologies from LEDs to CHP.  The U.S. is not only a world leader with more than 100 new manufacturing plants that opened in the last three years, but it is still the cauldron of innovation that sets us apart. Again, American Exceptionalism. 

Over the last few years, the Department of Defense has earned publicity for its use of biofuels in planes and tanks, net zero energy and water military bases, and hybrid renewable systems at forward operating bases. In the national security seminars I have co-facilitated at National Defense University over the years, we have had generals and base commanders, intelligence directors, and security analysts re-affirm the need for on-site, reliable energy without the need for logistics, heat or noise signatures. The U.S. leads the world in utilizing the depth and breadth of high value energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to meet their mission — defense of our country. Just another step in American Exceptionalism.

A REN21 report released in November 2011 by the Worldwatch Institute concluded that over $250 billion of private sector investment in 2010 went towards renewable energy, with similar conclusions by Pew and Bloomberg. The New York Times reported on studies that discovered how photovoltaics are surpassing nuclear affordability, while wind farms are competitive with natural gas and coal plants. Again, this shows how exceptional we have become. 

The Road Ahead

But while I am optimistic about what America and countries around the world can contribute, we have some very stark challenges ahead.

In December 2011, Russian scientists reported a chilling event regarding our changing climate. According to The Independent: 

Dramatic and unprecedented plumes of methane – a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide – have been seen bubbling to the surface of the Arctic Ocean by scientists undertaking an extensive survey of the region. The scale and volume of the methane release has astonished the head of the Russian research team who has been surveying the seabed of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf off northern Russia for nearly 20 years. 

Igor Semiletov, of the Far Eastern branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told the Independent that he has never before witnessed the scale and force of the methane being released from beneath the Arctic seabed. 

‘Earlier we found torch-like structures like this but they were only tens of meters in diameter. This is the first time that we've found continuous, powerful and impressive seeping structures, more than 1,000 meters in diameter. It's amazing,’ Dr Semiletov said. ‘I was most impressed by the sheer scale and high density of the plumes. Over a relatively small area we found more than 100, but over a wider area there should be thousands of them.’ Scientists estimate that there are hundreds of millions of tons of methane gas locked away beneath the Arctic permafrost, which extends from the mainland into the seabed of the relatively shallow sea of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf.

Just this year, we gained and surpassed the seven-billionth person on our planet. And according to a February 2011 report from the American Lung Association, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) has surpassed stroke as the third leading cause of death in the United States — and a major culprit is emissions from diesel fuels and coal.

And my interdisciplinary GWU course on sustainable energy this year concluded that 24 peer-reviewed studies over the last three years show the world can meet most or all energy needs through the use of high-value energy efficiency and renewable energy that is commercially-available today. And guess what? Most of those studies were conducted by American academic, think tank, and laboratory sources. Yes, American Exceptionalism rising to the occasion. 

So at the end of 2011, I am weary of the political gladiator wars, mud wrestling and intemperate comments.  I stand by the basic values that we are all Americans and we are worth listening to.  I am unabashedly proud of where our country has stood in environmental and technology leadership, in spite of global climate change denial. But while the feds are stymied, state and local governments are moving forward to address the climate, environmental and renewable energy challenges. We need to acknowledge them and “keep on plugging.”

We owe it to those before us who worked in the sweatshops, on the farms and in the factories, who fought for our freedoms to keep the vision, be exceptional and move our own country along into the next generation of energy sources for our national security and economic well-being. But don’t fall for the swan song that American Exceptionalism draws from the past. Remind those pontificators that the “Exceptionalism” was a dogged individualism with the highest doses of innovation and science — not deniers or those looking in the rearview mirror.

32 Comments

Register To Comment
Tim Gard
Tim Gard
January 9, 2012
OK etcgreen, I'll bite. Is this bio diesel energy renewable positive, negative, or neutral?
And simply because you have 'the federal government' on your side (*spend a great deal of time with the DoE and USDA.
*) does not make you all knowledgeable by the way. You can take that from an x military guy ... Goooood morning Viet Nam!!
Linda Guthrie
Linda Guthrie
January 9, 2012
Social movements are effective vehicles for change and will provide the needed momentum to reach the clean energy tipping point. The movement is growing slowly now with voices of the average consumer (all of us) holding corporations to higher standards and savvy investors moving money away from dirty, resource-insensitive, high-liability industries with bleak futures. I must correct the author of this brilliant article about the seeds of American environmentalism, which also sprouted as a social movement as a result of the Hetch Hetchy dispute. In 1913, preservationists were overruled by Congress and the flooding the Hetch-Hetchy Valley in Yosemite was authorized to provide water for San Francisco. Americans were left unsettled, awakening a collective voice that said the environment was worth preserving. What will the new social movement's mantra be? It's still about environmental stewardship, but the stakes are a lot higher this time, with money, politics and protectionist guarantees more embedded, obscuring the real dangers. Change can't happen top-down this time. The new movement's voice could be more ethics focused since today, our situation has become so corrupt as to swallow whole every single elected official or leader who has set out to put us on a new tack. I can give you a litany of respected names whose careers have been ruined by those who must, at all costs, protect the status quo. It's disheartening at best, which is why I believe it will take a populist-style social movement of better thinkers to effect the tipping point.
Steve Frazer
Steve Frazer
January 8, 2012
@larryofgalaxy - to respond to your specific Q's...

"Without getting into too much detail just let me ask where will the seed oil come from just to offset with B20 levels of biodiesel?"

Currently there are projects in 30 nations to plant about 300M acres of 2nd generation, high yield orchards, primarily yellowhorn and jatropha (http://etcgreen.com/biofuels). ETC has orchards in 4 states and 2 foreign nations.

"Does the US actually have the required mineral resources to do massive mining anymore?"

The U.S. is one of the most mineral rich nations in the world. The required mining is a few thousand square miles while the U.S. total area is 3.8M square miles. All about perspective.

"And what impact will this mining have on our diminishing levels of clean water and air?"

So few people understand that a primary reason many of the U.S. renewable energy manufacturers have gone out of business is due to the Chinese nationalizing their mineral mines. They are giving Chinese companies a lower price on raw minerals than any of their International clients. You cannot create a solar panel without gallium, dysprosium, ..., and 95% of the rare earths are extracted and refined in China today. Even when Molycorp is in full production, they will only supply a single digit % of U.S. demand. So the net result of U.S. mines is cleaner water and cleaner air both from higher U.S. mining environmental standards than Chinese and the renewable energy products we can manufacture with these domestic raw minerals. It also creates thousands of new U.S. jobs.

Regards
Steve Frazer
Steve Frazer
January 8, 2012
@tim-gard-25916
@arryofgalaxy

Gentlemen, most of my Team and I have been working in the energy industry for decades. We have projects in 5 states and 2 foreign countries and spend a great deal of time with the DoE and USDA.

Your comments do not reflect any real-world knowledge of the issues. I strongly suggest you spend some time and embrace a proper perspective of our global energy situation. You should review the DoD J.O.E. Report. Our world is migrating to biodiesel from 2nd generation feedstock - everything else is noise.

Join the Migration - http://etcgreen.com Article: U.S. Migration
William Fitch
William Fitch
January 7, 2012
Hi:

Larry, interesting energy circle you have going there... nice...
Waste is only waste as long as you decide not to use it...

.....Bill
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
January 7, 2012
@keller

'spend vast amounts of taxpayer money on efforts of doubtful value.'

I'm not sure what the definition of a conservative is and I know most who tell me they consider themselves one have never been able to in any way give me a definition that reflects the values I see espoused by those calling themselves conservative.

Most of what I see of conservatism is more akin to a religion or a cult. Just mindless dogma and obedience to leaders who like to dictate and control the sheep.

And as for 'pigs at a trough'

The Trilion dollars that is squandered every year on our military terror campaigns the Department of War and contractor welfare is truly 'pigs at a trough'

But of course a so called conservative will ignore this as any criticism would be seen as being a heretic to the cult.

The lousy Democratic party bestowing pocket change on renewables is more akin to 'mice at crumb dropping'.

If a mandate that every person in the country must install solar panels paid in full by Uncle Sam, with refusal punishable by firing squad,was put into law by a member of the conservative cult then the conservative zealots would think the idea was as great as sliced bread.

Conservatism = Feudalism.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
January 7, 2012
@phil-manke

Correction. Not all, as you call it "burn -tec", is inherently polluting.

Example

I can do gasification of cellulose (wood chips etc) using pyrolitic methods in controlled air or even industrial micro waves that produces essentially zero particulates or VOC's.

Matter of fact in a properly controlled system you produce bio char that actually sequesters far more CO2 than would be produced and released if open burned. In essence you have a CO2 scrubber system whose end product can have dramatic positive affects on agricultural productivity.

I have a fairly simple gassifier design now running that uses cast off hazelnut shells that produces gas that is burned in an ICE for power and waste heat used to increase COP on a heat pump. Changing some features it can serve as a heavy producer of bio char as well.

Virtually no nox or particulates emitted from the gasifier ( a little nox from the ICE)
Any particulates are actually captured in the condenser filter that uses sawdust as filter media that then is recycled as briquets to be re-burned.

I make use of otherwise wasted hydro carbons and produce both energy and bio char.

Where is the downside to that??
Michael Keller
Michael Keller
January 7, 2012
I am not a member of the Tea Party, but I am a conservative. Renewable energy is more-more-less the poster child for the Democratic Party, to wit: spend vast amounts of taxpayer money on efforts of doubtful value. That is why conservatives dislike renewable energy in its current form. If renewable energy would get out of the Federal pig trough, then most conservatives and Tea Party folks would be happy to support the use of cost-effective green energy.
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
January 7, 2012
Before you give yourselves a hearty pat on the back for various fuel sources, remember one life destroying aspect. It is still burn-tec, and will raise pollution levels (unless it is hydrogen), and will interfere in the circle of life on our, as yet, ONLY life supporting rock..
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
January 7, 2012
@etc green

A reality check, As tim-gard stated passion is no substitute for reality.

As for petroleum substitutes and putting in lots of study time.

I too have lots of experience here with one of my better paying investor clients.

There's actually just as much 'potential' in developing MSW to fuel technology using gasification,water/gas shift reactors,fisher-tropes etc than bio based oil to B20.

Hell there's a huge potential just developing pyrolysis of tires.How about the plastic waste to diesel now being developed.

All these 'solutions' have legs to stand on. They all have potential. Are any one of them the proverbial silver bullet?

NO!

So keep on working on what you love but my statements still stand.

You don't save a life by seeking more blood when a persons arteries are hemorrhaging.You also don't save the life with a bandage which bio diesel certainly is. You save the life by coming to grips with the big gaping slashed artery killing the patient and covering you with blood and get busy with the serious work of tourniquet and lots of stitches.

As I stated our country's energy systems are hemorrhaging massive waste on a daily basis.First objective should be to get out the tourniquets and getting to work while still seeking new supplies.

Problem is in this Country With A Death Wish, or at best a country with a perverted longing to return to the 17th or 18th century, very few folks want to do the hard work required to achieve true energy freedom . Just like winning the lottery for many is thought to be a way of avoiding saving for retirement, most American's would rather look for that silver bullet that solves all problems. It's classic

Bio diesel is the lottery winner of the fuel world.
Tim Gard
Tim Gard
January 7, 2012
ETC Green, I understand your passion. But please consider this ... the amount of time and money you and your people spend on a concept has very little to do with its viability. Trust me, you are not the first to make this mistake. There were thousands of man hours and dollars spent on steam powered cars before Ford got off the ground with his gas powered beast. The steam engine people, like you, considered their idea superior, but no matter what the strength was of that passion, they failed to produce. Then consider the VCR / BETA issue of the 70s ... the BETA was superior but even it failed to excel. Your passion is necessary for you, but realize others are not locked into your passions the way you need to be. I have my own passions just like you, but I understand the proof is in the pudding, not the recipe. If my recipe does not create passion then it is a waste of time to try to talk someone into passion ... In other words, I will need to make that pudding so they can try it. If perceived passion is your mission, then prostitution is your game. But you do not really want a perceived passion, do you? Its nothing like the real thing. Make the pudding and give them a taste. But this site is not a pitch opportunity access. Investors *probably* do not live here anyway.
Thanks for your comment ETC Green, it caused me to think which is the most important thing I can do, this is the real value of this site. Seek Truth ETC Green, and good luck!
ANONYMOUS
January 6, 2012
American Exceptionalism does not refer to America's greatness in industry, ingenuity or military might. That is a common misperception among those that like to knock Republicans.

The term refers to the fact that American government was the first in human history to recognize that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are basic human rights granted to us by God. Our government was created to protect those rights, not grant them.

Prior to our founding, human history are filled with tyranny, oppression, servitude, etc. That is how we are exceptional.
Roy Browning
Roy Browning
January 6, 2012
As I have been checking the sources for this story (sorry, I have learned a deep distrust for articles in the media), I find that there are virtually no quotes available from Republicans or Democrats that the news media have not spun up and distorted. "Republicans do not like Green", is a completely false statement.

It appears that this story too, is a manufactured article to make money but has no foundation in fact. When is the American news media going to quit playing politics just to make money?
Steve Frazer
Steve Frazer
January 6, 2012
@tim-gard-25916

@larryofgalaxy

Actually, this is the only attitude that will solve the problem. You do understand that the reason virtually all the renewable energy product manufacturers in the U.S. are going out of business is because they have to buy Chinese minerals and rare earth products and the Chinese nationalized all of their rare earth mineral mines last year - then dropped the price to in-country manufacturing firms and raised the price to International customers.

The only scalable, environmentally friendly, sustainable and economically viable replacement for petroleum is biodiesel. My engineering team and I have worked on this problem for about 200 man-years. We have orchards in 4 states and 2 other countries today. About 300 million acres of such 2nd generation feedstock orchards will be planted world-wide over the next decade. Yes, this will mitigate the end of the petroleum era on all our lives.

Seriously, if you have not already, you should join the Migration. http://etcgreen.com Article: U.S. Migration
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
January 6, 2012
'The article unnecessarily slanders Republican's'

When I read this posted by anonymous (I can see why no name)I nearly spit up my coffee laughing.

Slander?

According to Webster's

Slander is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image.

For at least the last 30 years Republican's have knowingly or unknowingly created a monster of vast proportions. Or better yet a vile and poisonous vector that has infected the minds of so many that now up is down,black is white, war is peace,and zero taxes equals vast wealth to the national treasury.
They have completely destroyed even a semblance of fiscal responsibility and when it comes to morals and decrying abortion, engage in mass murder ie Iraq,911,Afghanistan etc.They now expect us to think Republican's are all Mother Theresa.

Like I said when I saw the word slander connected with speaking truth about Republican's I found it hillarious. Similar to having someone tell me they just were abducted by little green men. You know they are lying. You just don't want to get into a shouting match with them.

I challenge anyone who has so little self respect as to admit to finding anything Republican's stand for being above contempt,to show me one thing,just one thing that a Republican has done for our country in 30 years that is not only positive but is something most civilized countries would not find criminal at the very least.

Don't present something you learned from viewing an altered universe as created by Fox.
As Jack Web stated may times 'just the facts mam!'.

Any Republican's willing to take on what amounts to a monumental challenge? Can you find the proverbial gold in that lead mine your so proud of?

Good luck.

And BTW I certainly am no liberal by the definition most CONservatives would like to use to define it.
I can barely stand most Democrats.
George Reynoldson
George Reynoldson
January 6, 2012
This American exceptionalism discussion says volumes about what is both constructive AND destructive about America's evolution. A lot of us solar advocates are also conservatives but by earlier standards of conservatism (fiscally, morally, etc). Conservatismis not about yelling louder than those you might disagree with. As such, a W. F. Buckley debate from the 70s would likely not only be drowned out by the conservative movement today, but also be over the heads of most Tea Party joiners as is Ayn Rand's likely intended messages today.

I recommend a Climate Progress series (see website) on Debunking Myths for insights into this problem. Messaging environmental issues is closely connected with prior and strongly held belief systems and world views. For example Tea Partiers may be screaming anti-environmentalism but polls indicate that they strongly support "earth stewardship." Why? Because their source of information is not formal education, but the Bible.

Messaging of political memes is a huge industry (and problem) as "drill baby drill" like slogans indicate... and their impact can create huge distortions of the original purpose of nationalistic based myths: i.e. American Exceptionalism.

Thanks for a great discussion!
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
January 6, 2012
'The US economy will only stabilize when we have returned to large scale mining, manufacturing and we have migrated at least 50% of our vehicles to run B20 biodiesel. Everything else is just hype and noise.'

Wow! That simple? Who'd a thunk it?

It is this simplistic attitude that penetrates so much of our 'leaders' thinking that will ultimately lead to our collective doom.

Without getting into too much detail just let me ask where will the seed oil come from just to offset with B20 levels of biodiesel?
Does the US actually have the required mineral resources to do massive mining anymore?
And what impact will this mining have on our diminishing levels of clean water and air?


I equate most of our problems in all of this discussion to our foolish acceptance of essentially having someone tell you that the huge gaping hole in our fuel tank is causing us to consume far too much fuel so the answer is to just look for a better source of fuel.

Most of the world and especially America is hemorrhaging energy from every artery because of out dated technologies and energy use patterns.

No quantity of simplistic fuel substitution will have any net positive effect on our overall energy consumption.

Until we abandon this non sustainable,less than 150 year old 'reality' fossil fuels have created and learn to adapt to the new paradigm a post fossil fuel reality requires , we will as the commenter said be engaged in nothing more than hype and noise.

If the average person involved in the purchasing of new office equipment had allowed their myopic view of the future to have an affect on acceptance and embracing of new technology like we have with fossil fuels we would still be using Selectria typewriters and people would be saying 'what's a PC'?

Just remember that Einstein said 'problems will never be solved by the same minds that created the problems in the first place'.

Let's not just think outside of the box.
Let's ask 'what is a box'?
ANONYMOUS
January 6, 2012
The article unnecessarily slanders Republican's while assuming that RE has prospered under the Democrat's. In fact, the RE industry arguably got a far more important "start" under the Bush administration....under which wind installations went from 350 MW/year to thousands of MW/year. With the Democrat's not fulfilling their responsibility to present (much less pass) a budget, nor fulfilling the ultimate responsibility of politicians to make spending CHOICES, wind and other RE installations are likely to collapse again in 2013.
Everyone is for a cleaner environment and fewer oil wars, the real question is what are the most effective policies to get there and how do we get them implemented. Writing divisive and inaccurate accusatory articles is not a great way forward.
Tim Gard
Tim Gard
January 6, 2012
etcgreen .. we will never shake the shackles of fossil fuels with that attitude. I do not do things because I can, I do things because of my will. I will eliminate fossil fuels forever, or I will die trying, petroleum economy or not ...
Steve Frazer
Steve Frazer
January 6, 2012
We love to read positive articles about renewables, but much of the information presented here is something less than real-world factual which seriously effects the credibility of the author and the entire effort - esp. in the eyes of people who work in the industry and have worked through the numbers and business models a few thousand times.

American Exceptionalism is our heritage, however, we all still live in a Petroleum Economy. Over 1/3rd of the entire world GDP is directly tied to the price of petroleum. The migration away from the Petroleum Economy will require decades and hundreds of $T's in infrastructure changes. These are the simple facts.

More in-line with the issues in this article, the world is dependent on China for rare earth minerals. Once MolyCorp is back in operation (sometime this year), they will only supply about 3%-5% of the U.S. demand and at a price that may be a factor of the Chinese mineral cost. My firm currently has 37 mining claims we are developing for rare earths with another 50 claims in negotiation. The US economy will only stabilize when we have returned to large scale mining, manufacturing and we have migrated at least 50% of our vehicles to run B20 biodiesel. Everything else is just hype and noise.

What is the most effective way that everyone can help? Join the Migration... http://etcgreen.com Article: U.S. Migration
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
January 6, 2012
In reference to americandoo:

NO! We do not need another demonstration of a model city. What we need is for the average person to quietly do the right thing. The right thing? How about taking your impact on our environment seriously and begin a process to reduce your use of fossil fuels on a personal basis.

No amount of fancy demo's advance our goals without the existing demand for fossil fuels going down and going down at a high rate.

Can it be done? Of course it can even under the current economic decline. I now don't use enough fossil fuel in a year to power a lawn mower for two minutes. I did it by applying existing off the shelf technology. I did it without a loan. I did it without government assistance. I did it on a modest salary. I live far more comfortable and secure than any of my neighbors who consume huge quantities of fossil fuels.I don't make a big deal of it with allot of flash and splash. I willingly share my knowledge of how I did it and I promote it at every turn. Unfortunately most would rather have that new jacked up gas hog pickup or a new plasma TV rather than spend the money and time doing the right thing. Enough talking the talk. Now 'the people', especially allot of folks crying loudest for 'the government to save us from global warming' need to make a stand and do everything they can to get off of fossil fuels. It's allot easier than some would have you believe. Start today. You won't regret it one bit.

And tim-gard25916: Yes I'm certain you hear the rumblings. I do too and from what I'm seeing and hearing on my level so called conservatives (essentially mental defects)and corporate parasites (sociopaths) and the apologists for the eight years of the Bush Crime Families' reign of terror and criminality are about to pay the piper. One can only hope so.

Now if we could just see as much righteous anger over how we are all destroying what is left of our planets fragile biosphere.
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
January 6, 2012
After seeing the NOVA program, "Volcano", it occured to me that we may have handed the game plan to the planet to write the final chapter for life as we know it. The few degrees of warming the Earth experiences may encourage the advents of super-volcanoes that, in the past, have devastated the earth's life forms.
This info again means nothing tho, because it is money that sets the course for weak and desperate people who believe their power comes from wealth in money and war instead of truth..
Tim Gard
Tim Gard
January 6, 2012
I am reminded of 'the sleeping giant' in reference to the bombing of Pearl. The US was heavily embroiled in the second world war in Europe, but the bombing of Pearl awoke a giant? Well, the deceit of the American people by our demo / pub leaders is a long way from that attack, but they had better be careful, I hear rumblings in the bedroom ...

Excellent article Scott, as usual Renewable Energy is a great source for info and character! Happy New Year all!
William Fitch
William Fitch
January 6, 2012
Hi:

Until you get the money completely out of politics, you are pissing in the wind. Everything that will be tried is just smoke and mirrors, no matter WHO is trying. The money has to leave. Until then we are just amusing ourselves...

.....Bill
Sam Salamay
Sam Salamay
January 6, 2012
Btw, I would like to nominate, I mean MANDATE Sir Chris Hedges as our new leader. This man knows the truth, knows how to fix our ills and most of all, has the courage to tell us all about it. PLEASE, EVERYONE, see him on YouTube being interviewed by C-Span on New Years Day. Truly a great man!!!
Sam Salamay
Sam Salamay
January 6, 2012
As usual, a great article from a noble man. Hopefully, Our president will mandate all new homes and other structures to include solar, geothermal or wind while congress is in recess. Seriously, as long as lobbyists are parasites to DC, nothing will be done. STARTUPS will continue to beg for funding, VC's will continue to beg for a 90% share, and the media and academia will continue to naysay all things good while being funded by big oil and coal. We are truly screwed because of our goody-goody exceptionalism. You know, MANDATES would be great for RE because if we continue to bicker and lie to the American people, we will all be under water and on life support...sorry...
F SC
F SC
January 5, 2012
Grants and incentives create bureocracy both on government and on industry. Some companies have more workers dedicated to apply for grants than they have installers. A better way would be to have a carbon tax compensated by lower income tax. The only sure things of life are death and taxes, so why not tax polution instead of taxing work?

Grants and incentives are better than nothing, but they are not that good.
ANONYMOUS
January 5, 2012
I tend to put renewable/solar first and party affiliation second, so I'm annoyed that solar/renewables seem to be becoming a partisan issue, and would strongly urge that everyone who wants a renewable future work to make sure green does not become synonymous with the Democratic party in the US.

Viewing opposition to a particular idea or plan as opposition to renewables as a whole is likely to push people in that direction. There is a legitimate argument to be made that there are better ways to get to expanding renewable energy than our current policies. For example: I think that the Federal and state governments should support renewables, but I think the primary way they should do that should be through mass buys, not grants and loan guarantees. Federal and state governments have enormous energy requirements, as do local schools that get a lot of subsidies from the feds and states. Why aren't we seeing enormous buys of solar panels and/or wind power installations for schools and state and federal offices and installations with competitive bidding (and maybe requirements for total carbon generation that keeps the subsidized Chinese suppliers out, rather than grants and loans to particular solar companies? Giving particular solar companies or battery companies access to cut-rate loans and grants distorts the market in favor of who has the political clout or sophistication and leaves and opening for charges (baseless or not) of political corruption. Mass buys are how the feds helped establish several industries historically. It works. I'm not at all sure that having the feds and the states trying to pick winners among competing solar tech works. I'm not sure it's a net positive for the industry as a whole. Certainly it adds an extra layer of uncertainty for investors if the companies they invest in don't get federal bennies.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
January 5, 2012
'This was the first time a country put teeth into environmental legislation and established enforceable standards' - this is way over the top and not accurate. You have to go back 2500 years to find the first recorded law regarding protected species and much farther to find the first law regarding forest reserves. The Romans certainly had laws with respect to pollution of drinking water (up to and including punishment by death) as well as the notion of waterways being public property. US water protection laws are a slap on the wrist by comparison. The Romans also understood the principle of air pollution - similar to the US they left it to individuals or groups adversely affected to make legal complaint in most, but not all, cases. They also had laws creating forest preserves and other natural preserves. Americans weren't the first to notice that pollution can be harmful and contrary to the public good or that nature in and of itself had intrinsic value that should be preserved. Even in the dark ages, environmental protection in the form of law existed in many places. One salient difference to modern times is how often despoiling public or state owned land, flora or fauna resulted in a death sentence. Modern law embodies the notion of an acceptable level of damage and exemptions where a sufficiently large scale of commercial benefit is involved - that's progress!? To be fair, in Roman times, if a citizen peed in the well he got the chop but an emperor probably got away with it. The public good, even in great democracies, is too often subjugated to the 'needs' of the rich and powerful.
Jane Twitmyer
Jane Twitmyer
January 5, 2012
Here Here to the first 2 comments.
- Over my voting lifetime corporate power has taken over all our governmental decisions ... starting in the 80's the rules have been avoided and delayed. Why else has the mercury poisoning from coal been allowed to occur .. for one example. Another ..Virginia will not have solar until the utility rate rules are changed and that takes Delegates action.
- The artic news is alarming and yes so is the newly found deep resevoirs of carbon dioxide in the canyons of the sea. As we stop producing more the atmosphere will still have to absorb those stores.
Jerry Klinken
Jerry Klinken
January 5, 2012
Australian scientist Tim Flannery warned us in his 2005 book "The Weather Makers" about the potential release of massive amounts of methane from melting permafrost due to warming temperatures. That it is already starting to happen is beyond alarming. The absorption of carbon from the atmosphere by the oceans, making them increasingly acidic, is equally alarming.

The IPCC in its 3rd Assessment Report predicted a rise in global average temperature from 2.5 F to 10.4. According to IPCC scientists, the worst case scenarios based on the IPCC 2007 report is already happening.

We desperately need to start taking climate change seriously because it no longer reasonable to deny it when dire predictions are already starting to come true. Once the permafrost starts to melt, we will have reached the tipping point. Climate change shouldn't be about politics, it should be about science. There is too much at stake to continue to ignore it.

Read more about studies on the impacts of permafrost melting here … http://www.global-warming-forecasts.com/underestimates.php
Paul Morini
Paul Morini
January 5, 2012
I believe another reason the republicans are against green initiatives is because they receive much of their financial support from oil companies who would rather see piplelines and fracking rather than alternative energy.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Scott Sklar

Scott Sklar

Scott, founder and president of The Stella Group, Ltd., in Washington, DC, is the Chair of the Steering Committee of the Sustainable Energy Coalition and serves on the Boards of Directors of the Sustainable Buildings Industry Council, the...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Canadian Solar Inc.
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • Photovoltaics World
  • Demand Energy
  • Solar Electric Power Association
  • Navigant
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information