Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Alaska's Untapped Hydro Potential

By Russell W. Ray
January 6, 2012   |   13 Comments

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Page 1 of 3

PennWell's Hydro Group publishes Hydro Review and HRW-Hydro Review Worldwide. Hydro Review, the magazine of the North American hydro industry, offers practical, useful information, helpful examples, and constructive guidance from experts. Each issue has an average readership of more than 50,000. HRW's mission is to share practical, technical information and expertise on hydroelectric power to the international hydro community. The magazine has circulation of more than 10,000.

Page 1 2 3 Next Page »
13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
January 6, 2012
Alaska WIND POWER potential ,specially for rural and smaller towns seems just as big if not bigger than HYDRO
Comment
2 of 13
January 6, 2012
The tidal range in Alaska should stimulate more power generation for those port cities.If they could connect with the grid and distribute this power inland it would greatly help those villages located along the Yukon where ice stiffles hydro power initiatives.
Comment
3 of 13
January 11, 2012
Hyro power in Alaska may not be practical. Most every stream in Alaska is a spawning ground for salmon. So any obstruction of the river would not pass environmental review.
As to wind power, it is not really practical in areas where there is no backup power source. And to build both wind power and a backup power source for a small community is not cost effective.
Comment
4 of 13
January 11, 2012
As usual a 'green' proposal that will have major impact on flaura and fauna as well as many other negative issues. It cannot be called green when thousands of acres of river and surrounding areas are dammed and affected. Better than some solutions but still incrediblly damaging. Why not consider reducing 'power' allowances to people so we dont have to constantly impose cahnges on the environment. Even better put some money and moral support into voluntary family planning to stem the poplulation explosion going on globally, then we wouldn't have so many of these problems of finite resources now and in the future.
No image available
Comment
5 of 13
Anonymous
January 11, 2012
'Restoring salmon' is no longer the paramount goal it once was; esp. since the vitality of the salmon is more affected by their time at sea than their migratory runs...so the energy of the water MUST be shared with any restoration effort. It is no longer and either/or situation.

The goal of 'wild and free' rivers was partially met this fall in the North East with a record rainfall from Hurricane IRENE that raged through hundreds of bridges and roads; except on waterways contained by systems of dams.

Given the ever increasing pace of paving paradise, including the clear-cuts for wind farming, we will need to restore dams that include fish ways.

Time to move on; Fish & energy generation and mitigation of storm runoff are coterminous goals now.
Comment
6 of 13
January 11, 2012
With temperatures reaching 40 below zero that water will freeze real quick and real hard and real fast. The biggest problem I see is transmission lines from the water source to the users facilities.
What should be investigated is the transmission network rebuilt at least modernized using "cold-flow" lines. Low ambient temperatures don't interfere in electrical transmission, but every degree upwards reduces the capacity those transmission lines can carry.

On the matter of concern about global warming that was touched upon by GENO, he mentioned the fact of population, I do believe that the population explosion on the entire globe has caused this temperature rise, remember, every human produces on average 98.6 degrees F.,of heat,and the population growth recently marked at 1 Billion additional humans has added to that temperature rise, and it is a significant number when examined.
Remember, for every action, there is a direct opposite reaction.
No image available
Comment
7 of 13
Anonymous
January 12, 2012
Aside from potential impacts on the Susitna River, the other projects (mostly in Southeast Alaska, aka the Alaska Panhandle) mentioned aren't salmon or other anadromous fish unfriendly (The Susitna site is above known salmon spawning habitat). The majority of the projects mentioned are alpine lake tap projects, which means they have an essentially vertical drop down steep mountainsides - so there are no known negative impacts on salmon and other fish species normally associated with traditional hydroelectric projects.

The projects mentioned are amazing potential renewable power producers and notably there were two other major private projects and some others which weren't mentioned in this article which are seeking Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licensing.

One, being sought by Alaska Power & Telephone is on the Soule River, near Hyder, Alaska and Stewart, BC. Another, being sought by Alaska Hydro, a Canadian TSE traded company, is near Thomas Bay near the communities of Kake, Petersburg and Wrangell Alaska.

The Alaska Native community of Angoon, Alaska holds two other preliminary permits for sites for potential hydro projects in Thomas Bay, at Ruth Lake and Scenery Lake. In addition, the region has significant wind production potential that might be linked to these projects, thus providing the ability to add storage opportunities for any wind production.

Southeast Alaska has significant potential in biomass, geothermal, tidal and wave energy, which means the region has a significant renewable energy portfolio quite unlike any other region in North America.

Just across the border from Alaska - BC Hydro is undertaking the construction of the Northwest BC Transmission Line, which with other regional developments, will only require 65 more miles for a connection between the two jurisdictions.
Comment
8 of 13
January 12, 2012
Really? Hydro Alaska? Really? The US is taking down tens of dams per year because of their disruption of fisheries and their various dangers, apart from silt-up. So we're thinking we're smart to build dams in distant, natural areas like Alaska? Really?

Anyone not know why our dams in the continental US are largely dysfunctional? Take the Colorado River dams (please take them). Their forecast storage was done in anomalous years, which is one reason they're now just 1/2 full and lowering. The other reason is they're very silted, lowering actual water storage more. The effects of climate change on dams isn't pretty or well predicted.

So sure, build more, far away from loads, so we waste even more than the 10% current hydro, wind, etc. waste in transmission alone. Sure, let's build more to disrupt food sources more. They're also great fun in major quakes. Let's continue with foolish ideas, as long as they're subsidized.
No image available
Comment
9 of 13
Anonymous
January 12, 2012
I sat in a session on the construction of high dams in B.C. and Alaska. Salmon is not an issue since they rarely get up that far...Watched one get constructed using helo's avoiding access roads.

No food resources disrupted.....quakes? enuff with your childish hysteria. We have 100 year old dams that are healthy, and five year old wind turbines that need daily maintenance.

Silting will prevent taking down dams, espec. with heavy metals, toxins, and other contaminants in the silt unleashed downstream.

Wild rivers are way too destructive; and after IRENE's devastation, new systems of dams for flood control are being planned.

The bottleneck is a transmission corridor from B.C. to the Pacific N.W.; and one over mountains from Alaska to connect with it.

Dysfunctional? your irrational comments are far worse.
No image available
Comment
10 of 13
Anonymous
January 12, 2012
One interesting consequence is that power generated is being conduited to larger Alaskan islands at such a low cost, that not only will diesel generators be relegated to emergency backup status, but they are experimenting with electric fishing boats!!...all made possible by hydro power.
No image available
Comment
11 of 13
Anonymous
January 13, 2012
Re: The issues addressed by DrAlexC

Transmission is a constraint and loss is an issue, however DC transmission isn't nearly as inefficient in transmission and that is what it will take to move energy more efficiently from more remote locations. While I don't ascribe to build, build, build, if we are to even start to wean ourselves off of coal and other fossil fuel generation, we need to look at everything. We are starting with conservation, be it using smart meters, insulating better, using more efficient lighting sources and technology which is making glass, for example more flexible in terms of allowing/blocking heat transmission and reflection through windows. We've got to look at it all.

Yes, there are being dams removed, because they have been deleterious to salmon and other species. We're simply not going to remove every one immediately, nor are we going to remove them all. Just like we can't simply shut down nuclear reactors even though they were unknowingly placed in tsunami inundation zones facing the Pacific Ocean. If we were to shut them down, California would be in a huge energy deficit. Must we address them and the hazards they present? Of course! Do we need to get started, absolutely! There are implications that must be considered either way you look at it - in all of this.
Comment
12 of 13
January 15, 2012
HYDRO ALASKA NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
13 of 13
January 15, 2012
Just one "!" short of being convincing, DMM... ;]

Then we have Anonymous, who somehow thinks folks should listen when someone hasn't the gumption to use his/her name. But the convolution of the argument there is interesting, since Anon somehow knows what salmon do "rarely"; and that building dams causes them to lose capacity due top silting, but we can't take them down because of the silt. Maybe there's a 3rd side to the argument you missed ol' boy?

In any case, the reality of dam construction places a great deficit in fossil-fuel emissions on each dam, if one understands the materials/methods used. Relevant calculations also go back to realities like available flows and that even filling all of Ontario Province with dammed water 60 meters deep won't generate as much power as do the modest number of Canadian reactors today.

Our descendents are indeed looking back at us from the future.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Hydro Review

Hydro Review's goal is to provide readers with reliable, relevant information on the issues and challenges encountered in the hydro industry. Hydro Review offers practical, useful information, helpful examples, and constru... more »

 

Advertise With Us

KYOCERA Solar, Inc. Total Energy USA GoGreenSolar.com Solmetric Corporation Rolls Battery Engineering Mannvit Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters