Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Value of CSP Increases Substantially at High Solar Penetration

By Stephen Lacey, Climate Progress
December 20, 2011   |   4 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

4 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 4
December 21, 2011
You may also try the analysis with CPV (concentrated Photovoltaic) or just using a tracker for regular panels. A regular PV system with a tracker will provide about 30% more energy than one without. For a CPV system, that is already built into the cost and typically have a lower LCOE.

Anonymous from comment 1 - good comments.
No image available
Comment
2 of 4
Anonymous
December 21, 2011
Cost are going vary depending on the size of tanks/customers; it will be large than an oil storage tank made from special steel which will require maintenance. The cost will not be cheap
Comment
3 of 4
fsc
December 22, 2011
Storing energy as heat using unrefined table salt is far better than using batteries made up of nasty chemicals. Today, on a dollar per watt basis, the best battery technology continues to be the lead-acid battery. Just the name of that and the mental image of battery banks large enough to power an entire city give me the shivers.
That is why I believe that CSP will play a big role in the future. I am about to go way out on a limb but I actually predict that at some point in the future the massive salt storage tanks will be built with resistors inside. That way they can collect excess energy when the wind and sun are available to release later on. Today, domestic solar water heaters use that technology: hot tanks with supplemental resistors inside.
Comment
4 of 4
December 22, 2011
The dispatchability and storage benefits of CSP w/TES are something that PV/CPV will still never be able to provide. And chemical batteries are not the solution. What needs to happen is for the cost of CSP/TES to continue declining so that developers do not need to promote a superscale CSP plant before the technology gains traction. It appears to me that we would gain more from developing modest size CSP/TES facilities (< 100MW), which would also be easier to finance, and learn as we go down the learning curve driving costs down incrementally than from relying totally on supposed economies of scale.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) Growth Energy Natural Power Geothermal Resources Council HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C. Solar Power International 2012 Leybold Optics
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters