Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Solar PV Outlook 2012: The Race To Go Mainstream

The North American industry continues its steady march toward the lucrative consumer market

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
December 15, 2011
"TIME FOR BIG INVESTORS TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE LEAD AMERICA BY
INVESTING IN AMERICA" "WHEN YOU INVEST IN AMERICA YOU INVEST IN YOUR CHILDREN'S
FUTURE"

"INVEST IN A LARGE PROJECT THAT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR THE FUTURE"
Similar to this idea; In past history when the USA needed a Moral Boost to our
Country we built such things as; The Largest Bridges, Dams, Statue Of Liberty,
Worlds Largest Futuristic Fair, Landed on the Moon etc.

It is overdue for us and time for us to build the Largest & Best Futuristic
CITY IN THE WORLD, using ALL

OF OUR CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY AND ALL OF CHINA'S, GERMANY, RUSSIA and all other


Countries CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY and BEYOND ALL OTHERS ! !

Find a location in the USA somewhere that has the space for our "FUTURE CITY
PROJECT"

Where Our Future City will Utilize all of the Newest and Cutting edge combined
technology in the world to build our City using entirely GREEN energy with ZERO
POLLUTION ! ! !

Our City Could Have A NEW VERSION OF THE STATUE OF LIBERTY, Holding
the torch in one hand and our GREEN PLANET EARTH in her other hand, her head
raised high looking Up at the sky.

This would make a GREAT FILM & Could be based
on a True Story with the help of A TEAM OF BIG MONEY INVESTORS ! ! !

Use your Imagination and think how; GREAT THIS WOULD BE FOR AMERICA & OUR
ECONOMY ! ! "

COULD BE A HISTORICAL EVENT IN OUR HISTORY BOOKS FOR OUR NEXT GENERATION TO
FOLLOW" "DREAM BIG...DO BIG"

Thank You, Respectfully, Michael V. Caldwell, Proud
American Inventor/Dreamer..Dream Big..Do Big ! ! !
Comment
2 of 13
December 15, 2011
Well now I can see one of the big problems with wind and solar is its complexity. You either have to do it yourself, which next to impossible unless your technically oriented, or you have somebody else do it which will be expensive. Also getting the parts over the web sucks big time. It's totally disorganized, and there are no solar wind retail stores that exist. Here is the outline spec for my system.

-(2) 230W, 24V, amorphous solar modules in parallel .
-existing 300W wind generator and charge controller to be connected to new system.
- Charge controller and load regulator (I would like to find one that is hybrid, 24VDC input, and with transfer to other loads when batteries are charged, but can't find one).
-(4) flooded cell lead acid batteries in parallel for 24VDC output. (24V is for voltage drop and wire size)
-1000W continuous load or larger inverter, pure sine wave, heavy duty.
-All American made is not possible at these prices.

I figured 27 years simple payback at 10 cents a KWHR. And that's doing it yourself and using all energy, about 130 average continuous watts.
Comment
3 of 13
December 17, 2011
US and China are advancing in Solar PV.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Comment
4 of 13
December 22, 2011
In the rural and low income areas of America, people are just trying to get by with what they can easily do. Year after year, we tell them about the benefits of solar, but the truth is, even the lowest cost systems are not within their economic range, when they suffer from automobile costs of gasoline and insurance and simple upkeep. How does this impact solar? Easy, it just does not exist, first, because it is physically inaccessible to try-out in a real life demonstration unless you go to one of three cities in Oklahoma, those being, Tulsa, OKC, or perhaps Ada. All other cities in Oklahoma have absolutely no access to seeing the real thing working and producing serious energy outputs. Unless the Solar Industry leaders find people like me, who could set them up in cities via demo-systems and connect real businesses to real people, solar in Oklahoma just will not grow. In Oklahoma, there are three companies that are active, and business is very slow, tetering on the brink of not being maintainable, because either the customers are so distant, they have to expend most of their profit margin to get to them, or the costs of installation reduce the desire to get a payback in 10-14 years, which is the average in Oklahoma, due to unfavorable Energy laws and unfavorable tax incentives. Feed-in Tarriffs in Oklahoma are one very positive solution, but MARKETING by ASES and NABCEP and other groups like Renewable Energy World.com, that will center on needs based approaches and innitial legislative lobbying in Oklahoma, that marketing, is the solution that will work to start getting the infrastructure for building solar, started in Oklahoma in a major way. There are customers who CAN buy solar in Oklahoma, and financing is a big issue, but it is surmountable when people get together. Contact me...
Comment
5 of 13
December 25, 2011
It's time to tell the truth about solar power – it isn't making ANY difference. In the last 10 years more than $1 trillion was spent worldwide and yet new demand outpaced this solar capacity by 3:1.

It's clear something needs to be done, but even if we spent $500 billion on solar in the next few years the reduction in CO2 emissions would be less than 3%. Insignificant.

We should be looking at burning natural gas cleaner with the proven technology of oxy-fuel combustion (replacing coal and conventional NG), which has very low emissions of CO2 and no NOX. $500 billion invested in that idea would cut CO2 by +70%.

I'm following a guy in Austin, TX that makes a lot of sense. He has a solution. The Introduction is here:

http://www.solutioneur.com

Let's make some real progress and stop pretending solar is going to solve the problem – it cannot.
Comment
6 of 13
December 27, 2011
Truth is SOlar is making a dent in local eco-systems in California and other places where there is concentrated efforts to build solar structure. The problem with solar expansion is that other energy businesses are deliberately killing efforts to spread it and expand its role. Germany has already achieved enough that now they do not have to deal with the Nuclear industry any longer, and can concentrate on infrastructure conservation processes, because their Feed-in tarriff laws have worked tremendously successfully. So that small dent of 3% may look bad, but just two years ago it was only 1%. It has doubled in just two years worldwide, which for any industry is remarkable, even if it has not met the implied goals of other industries to cut CO2 rise in the world. Blame China and their efforts to raise coal use by 100% every year, with plants being constructed ahead of their efforts to keep in pace with their rising population needs, even with a single child growth policy! So, it isn't as if solar has failed, it just has not gotten the same care and help as petroleum and natural gas has gotten, a symptom of Republican politics, and not of solar insufficiencies. Realize the very same requirements in every state, and suddenly feed-in tarriffs will grow industry in every state, since states decide their choices and easily pick their winners, and block their competition, so that they do not have a loss of re-election dollars, not so much to help all Americans get better energy choices! If we could just get all elements of energy fairly treated, then solar would outstrip the growth of oil and gas industry elements, and the USA would be stronger job wise and in safety, free from coal burning plants, as new technology of Hydrogen co-generation replaces the need for coal, replaces the need for even Natural Gas, and reduces losses of water resources and improves the clean air and clear skies across America for generations to come.
Comment
7 of 13
December 27, 2011
Gregors: That's simply wishful thinking. We can't afford solar energy. Until it can compete - reliably, with fossil fuels (esp NG) it will never even meet increased demands.

Some communities have invested heavily in solar energy and they have the highest electricity prices, too.

The solar-scam is almost up.
Comment
8 of 13
December 27, 2011
There is no scam Alex, but there is misinformation by people such as you. Solar competes reliably with all energy varieties, provided you show its value over time. What fossil fuel providers try to do is say it is wasteful because it does not pay back within some short period, and somehow that doesn't work for the customer, but it does, immediately. The customer gets their electricity for the going rate offered by the electrical utility. That energy is basically free. What the customer pays for is the equipment, and just like any equipment that does tremedous things, it costs money to run. You fossil fuel guys scream at the costs of solar, but do not bat an eye at the $Million dollar sticker on an Oil or Natural gas well, and that is just the innitial core drilling! You are such deceptive people to deny such costs are forcing the US into debt at enormous rates, with demands to go into deep Sea wells that cost $Millions a day, not per well, and the US Taxpayer is paying for it! And then you are dependent on the customers to pay for that oil through such a protracted process, few if any can truly estimate the true cost of that oil or the processes to get it's eventual products. We do need fossil fuels, but we also need solar and wind and hydrogen and a dozen other forms of good clean energy. We clearly do not need coal, however. We do not need Nuclear either. We do not need to stay dependent on oil or natural gas, but because we are not willing to invest in the future, we are stuck with some use of it. You realize we are at a crossroads of benefit, and solar Thermal and Solar PV and Solar Concentrated power will make it possible to provide vast levels of power across the world, but being cost effective is comparative by time and result, and the results of fossil fuels have been danger, deaths, and illness. Shouldn't you rethink your opposition to the better way? I hope you can. Solar will win for our future.
Comment
9 of 13
December 28, 2011
Why do we keep looking at solar as a cure all. Like tools, they are good for certain applications. Solar is great for remote sites with no utilities. This is where ROI means nothing. Its like taking a shovel and using it to build an entire building. Just use it to dig holes.
Comment
10 of 13
December 28, 2011
Solar isn't ready. Burning NG cleaner (oxy-fuel) would cut CO2 emissions 70-80% in the near term. Twenty years from now solar still won't make a difference.

I'd rather have an 80% reduction, than nothing. But, people working in the solar scam industry don't believe in math, they believe in hype.
Comment
11 of 13
December 29, 2011
Hikerweirdo, the Solar industry isn't trying to change everything, and as Solar progresses, so will Hydrogen Fuel cell technology, which is the best replacement for Coal, Oil, or Natural Gas, once the sheer explosiveness as a common element is resolved. Just as with any tool, however, the user determines its purpose, and that includes many variable means towards an end, and solar addresses so many options, it is quite the diverse product, whether it is for street lighting, or remote energy uses, whether it is for danger signs seen everywhere in the USA, or where it makes sense to offer better choices for heating and in some cases cooling, solar has shown it can compete and succeed nose to nose, to most any product for energy from fossil fuel industry salesmen. The very same should be said for oil which works well as a lubricant, but you don't like it in your water or air, do you?
And Alex White contends that solar is some sort of Myth, or does not use good math skills to prove itself, which to a Physicist is quite a surprise! You do not use Physics and math? I assure you both accurate science and mind-boggling math are key areas of emphasis with solar! We work on improving it every day, and results show there is a move to better efficiencies.(33%) But even at the least efficient (7%), at least you get a return on investment, whereas with all fossil fuels, you just get smoke and CO2 and nothing to show for your investment but temporal energy. You can do better by buying the equipment to make more energy, which by all economists is the smartest route. Solar defeats fossil fuels every time in this point.
Comment
12 of 13
December 29, 2011
If it can prove itself as you say, that's great. But to replace a concentrated energy source such as petrolium or coal or nuclear will be hard to do. We will run out of these sources anyway. When we do, and solar or wind don't prove themselves, than we will have to live much more sustainably, which is what we strive for anyway. Some things will be better, and some worse. As far as physics go, and I am not a physicist, I think the problem is the overall efficiency of solar and wind. From a thermodynamic point of view, it's not just the efficiency of a solar module. It is a multiplier of all other efficiencies involved. Logistics (20%, oil 60%, food prduction (?%) and so on.
No image available
Comment
13 of 13
Anonymous
March 13, 2012
True, solar alone will not fix all the issues that have evolved over the years. But combined with other renewable and sustainable resources, in combination with higher efficiency et al, it will. Believing that something cant make a difference will predispose us to failure.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
 

Steve Leone

View Steve Leone's Profile
About: Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California. more »

Advertise With Us

Westinghouse Solar American Electric Technologies, Inc. (AETI) Solar Energy International (SEI) Solar Electric Power Association SolPowerPeople, Inc. Endurance Wind Power Enphase Energy
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters