Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

First Atlantic Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Deployed

By Renewable Energy World Editors
December 7, 2011   |   7 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
December 7, 2011
Not sure this would work in the Gulf of Mexico or off the East Coast of the US due to the hurricanes that make a visit every year.
No image available
Comment
2 of 7
Anonymous
December 8, 2011
Does the phrase "and towed more than 217 miles to open water " imply 217 miles from the closest shore? If so, that would seem like an excessively long distance given the need to transmit the energy to the grid....
Steven
Comment
3 of 7
December 9, 2011
Wind harvesting in deep water offers enormous potential for storage of the energy for use when wanted rather than just when weather provides.

By pulling buoys down to a depth mechanically rather than generating electricity, the buoys can be allowed to rise to generate the electrical energy when wanted.

Firm seabed anchors must already have been installed, thus this scheme merely requires more to hold down pulleys and locking devices. All other items can be floated into position.
Comment
4 of 7
December 9, 2011
Not the world's first floating wind turbine. Norwegian company Statoil deployed a 2.3MW turbine off Norway over 18 months ago. The Hywind project was the first full scale floating wind project in the world.
They are now in discussions with the Scottish Government about deploying Hywind II, which will be 5 turbines in over 100m water depth.
No image available
Comment
5 of 7
Anonymous
December 15, 2011
I like the idea of storage, although I think we really want these offshore farms to serve as Utility plants and be on all the time. I don't think there is so much "calm" in offshore. However, if storage was needed, would not ballast tanks work well? Like on a ship or sub, you could use energy to blow out the water with very simple pumps driven by electricity, and then reverse the process to use electricty when needed. Tanks can be quite big and they also float, so it is easy to envision incorporating them into the floating design as part anchor, part flotation devices as well. Just a matter of how much water is allowed in.
Comment
6 of 7
December 15, 2011
No costs are mentioned. Isn't that a significant issue? Any offshore wind is expensive- according to the EIA it's twice as expensive as land based turbines. The world average capacity is 33 for wind. In Europe lately it has been closer to 25.

Baseload power providers capacity factors are 85-90. They run all the time and can be controlled. Wind is weather dependent and usually provides the least ammount of power when most needed. There is no storage of electricity from a wind turbine.

High costs with low corresponding benefits for consumers is consistently the story for wind. Check out the "True Cost of Cape Wind." not exactly a manufacturers dream come true: significant rise in electricity costs don't create jobs, don't make companies competitive, and don't entice other manufacturers to settle in that state.

Costs matter.
Comment
7 of 7
December 16, 2011
Like Hywind & others, these systems are inadequate, expensive, unreliable, dangerous to sea & air species & shipping, and wasteful of resources, fossil fuel and transmission power.

The Hywind animation is a must-see, to gain an idea of the absurdity. The amount of fossil-fuel-processed resources (coal, iron, limestone, aggregate, etc.) is remarkable -- about 700 tons per MW peak for land-based windmills, and more for sea based. Then there's the insurance, maintenance & permanent waste of power in long transmission for all wind 'farms' anywhere. Couple all this with the low power density of wind in general and our descendents will rightly view us as chumps.

http://tinyurl.com/bl9vlc7 (can't handle wind even when off?)

This will fade as the subsidies from taxpayers & ratepayers fade. But, a few do stand to make $, eh?

PS, the present axial prop generators aren't even close to optimal... http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/13430

And, oops, get ready to rebuild/move somewhere else...
http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/wind/a-less-mighty-wind
www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/us/21tttransmission.html?_r=1&hpw

Aaaah wind, so much hot air, so little juice/$.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

REW.com Editors

View REW.com Editors's Profile
About: Renewable Energy World's network editors help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S. and the UK, th... more »

Advertise With Us

UnThink Solar Idaho Department of Commerce Alpha Technologies Florida Alliance for Renewable Energy    Cantsink Manufacturing Via Expo Solar Power International 2011
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters