Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Survey Says ... 9 in 10 Americans Want More Solar Energy

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
10 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 10
November 1, 2011
Very good study. Thank you Kelton. You did it right. It takes real guts sometimes to ask the right questions. I hope the right people are getting this message.
Comment
2 of 10
November 1, 2011
Hi:

I don't think Americans were ever against solar energy, they just have a habit of not putting their money where there mouth is when it comes to purchases.
I mean come on, its the sun, which at a genetic level means life to us and all life forms on this planet. Hell, we get "for real" depression, when we don't see enough of it do to just clouds!!
One more big shove is required to propel RE to where it needs to be. I think you can count on Nuclear energy to do that. We are running about one "bad ass" nuke accident per 20 years, so by 2030 the S should hit the fan, again. Maybe by then it will mainstream without dissuade....

.....Bill
Comment
3 of 10
November 2, 2011
Maybe people are beginning to realize that as old fashioned responsible 'family planning' is now a 'dirty' word where will all that energy come from for all those extra billions of new consumers known to be on the way (and allready here ie. 7 billion now - only 1.6 billion in 1900 AD). Peak oil and gas is practically here, cheap fuel is no longer a future real option. Hey - its a no brainer even for those who dont want to think about real global issues of population, its effect and the future.
Comment
4 of 10
Survey of one: 100% of Americans want FREE, effortless solar power.
Comment
5 of 10
November 2, 2011
The last question is loaded. A more accurate but less flattering phrasing could easily drive the response below 40%.

The other questions are full of unquantified feel-goodness. You'd get similar responses if you substituted "Ferrari" for "solar".
Comment
6 of 10
November 2, 2011
My question would be, Why or Do you want or need the gov. involved in your purchase decisions?
Waiting on the gov. to issue policies on purchasing or installing solar just seems like nonsense to me. Choosing to be energy independent should be every individuals choice and not left up to the gov. to decide who gets what.
Comment
7 of 10
November 2, 2011
to doggydog world:
Really?? You think 9 out of 10 americans support spending tax dollars on developing ferraris? I would wager that you are extremely incorrect.
I do agree that there is a level of "unquantified goodness" but realistically, the point of a survey is get an overall feel of the peoples mood. Burying the questions behind truly quantifiable measures would not add clarity to overall mood - it would simply give people on all sides the opportunity to debate the numbers instead of identifying the overall mood (which was the intent of the survey)



Regarding the last question, I expect the number would have been even HIGHER if we were given the option to subsidize solar INSTEAD of Oil, Nat Gas ans Coal.


I , for one, am happy to know that these opinions cross party lines so clearly - which makes it harder to for either party to ignore it in the upcoming elections. I expect neither party will run on a platform which included further deleoping the Ferrari...
Comment
8 of 10
November 2, 2011
These results cannot be explained away by supposed ignorance on the part of the public.

Arizona Public Service Co. conducted an intensive investigation of customer energy preferences earlier this year (http://morrisoninstitute.asu.edu/media/news-events/aps-informed-perception-project-report-released). In the first phase, a standard opinion survey like the SEIA survey was done, with almost identical results. Next, they had a smaller sample of customers (300?) go thru an educational process with study materials and lengthy seminars from experts on the pros and cons of different energy resources. With education, support for more wind and less coal both decreased somewhat (but still commanded majorities). Support for more solar after intensive education was still over 90%.
Comment
9 of 10
November 3, 2011
Hydro seems to be missing.

In Arizona, solar makes a lot of sense. In the Dakotas, I would vote for wind, and in New England, I would encourage people to move from heating oil to natural gas.
Comment
10 of 10
November 7, 2011
I cannot see any further involvement by the government until after an election now. Adding more incentives for individual house conversion to solar power would really help the change to take place quicker and would increase employment if the incentives where geared towards purchasing only American made Solar panels and maybe a little help with the installation costs would help too.
And yes I do agree with the majority - more incentives and people would be able to breath a bit easier too.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Steve Leone

View Steve Leone's Profile
About: Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California. more »

Advertise With Us

ClearEnergy Inc. Solar Electric Power Association Fairtrade-Messe Leybold Optics Met Office Hydrogen Education Foundation Quick Mount PV
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters