Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Scientists Genetically Increase Algae Biomass by More Than 50 Percent

By Daniel Kuester, ISU News Service
November 23, 2011   |   12 Comments

Do you like this research & reports?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
12 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 12
November 23, 2011
So what happens when these manipulated algae start doing what they are designed to do and begin reproducing uncontrollably in soils? To make matters worse, let's tack on a new gene that produces oil or butanol in the soil. And we thought the Exxon Valdez was bad. We may solve our energy problem, only to create a much bigger problem.
Comment
2 of 12
November 23, 2011
I find it interesting the author uses a car anology when describing increased carbon dioxide requirements for the new algae.

And Jim, stop being so worrisome. The worst that can happen is the mutated algae grows exponetially in the topsoil, reducing all surface material to an oily muck, thus extinguishing all life on earth.

Happy Thanksgiving!
Comment
3 of 12
November 25, 2011
Interesting, statement, Douglas,"...mutated algae grows exponetially in the topsoil, reducing all surface material to an oily muck...". Isn't that oily muck the stuff that Exxon is farming? And Jim, your fear "To make matters worse, let's tack on a new gene that produces oil or butanol in the soil..." forgets one thing, Butanol is not very soluble in water, thus easy to harvest, and is a direct drop-in replacement for gasoline. And besides that, Butanol, like other alcohols, burns cleaner than does Gasoline. Type "algae fuels" in Google and see what you find.

As for me, I prefer Methane as a hydrogen transport and storage since the hydrogen is easy to remove from the carbon and the carbon remaining is easily sequestered for other uses including converting back into methane via PV cells and water through the RSOFC.
Comment
4 of 12
November 26, 2011
Its possible to engineer the "enhanced" algae to require certain cofactors for survival which is rare or unavailable in the wild. Or as with the nasal flu vaccine where the virus is "cold attenuated" and cannot survive in the warmer parts of the human anatomy.
Comment
5 of 12
November 27, 2011
Let's assume this 'super algae' escapes from the lab environment into the wild. Certainly it will if put into commercial production. However, this is not a doom-and-gloom scenario as others suggest. First a little lesson in global warming. The Earth thrived for millions of years without ice at the poles and atmosperic carbon dioxide levels 6-10 times higher than today. Spend an evening surfing Wikipedia and you'll be amazed what you learn about the Earth's climate history. Look up 'the Azolla event', and you will learn about how a massive bloom of freshwater fern Azolla 49 million years ago brought down CO2 levels so dramatically over an 800,000 year span, that the polar ice caps first formed.
A seemingly out-of-control bloom of super-algae in the wild might actually solve the global warming 'problem' in a similar manner. Granted, there might be a dramatic change in life on Earth due to such an algae bloom, but humans have already brought about dramatic change.
Now regrading the global warming 'problem', there is no problem. Life has thrived with carbon dioxide levels dramatically higher than today. Humans are changing the Earth, but we do not have the capacitiy to ruin it. Life is so resilient that it can withstand anything we mere humans can throw at it. Humans, with our large brains and larger egos, like to think that we are some kind of demi-gods and stewards of planet Earth. But you see, we are just one of Earth's many algae blooms over its 4.6 billion year history. Humanity and its contribution to climate change is just another chapter in Earth's long history of radical climate changes. We are insignificant, but our egos won't allow us to accept that. So we wring our hands over global warming while life on Earth moves on as it has for billions of years through changes more radical than we can bring to bear. Remember that the simple Azolla fern brought about bigger climate change than humanity.
Comment
6 of 12
November 27, 2011
John-g, your are so very, very correct in your analysis with Global warming up to a point that too many are wringing their hands because of it. What is the real concerns is the overall situation we are facing because of our addition to fossil fuel consumption. Fossil fuels are a natural phenomenon that has taken most of earth's history to create, thus making it finite for the short term. At the current rate of consumption major changes are put into motion that stretch through four billion years of natural occurrence in the Earth's (and the solar system, too) history. These changes not only effect the climate as we are observing today,but also effect the entire environment in which we live, it is radically altering the world economy, stressing the physical (and mental) health of many life forms which is causing survival mutations within the smallest to the most complex. By drawing a line in the sands of time for right now, we are facing major crises that include economic, education, employment, energy, health, nutrition, and more issues which require our immediate attention if humanity is to sustain itself and its current level of civilization. The solutions to these crises demand cooperation of the whole of mankind. Call it trite but this is a simple truth which history has shown time and time again; divided, we fail, united, we succeed. God, however you might conceive Him (Her), gave us reason for a reason, He will not help us further He expects us to help ourselves. Humanity's future in in the hands of humanity.
Comment
7 of 12
November 27, 2011
chtank, unfortunately, I believe past examples show that humanity has already entered a cycle that is 'irreversible' in the human perception of time. NatGeo recently presented evidence of the PETM millions of years ago where a sudden spike in atmospheric CO2 took 150,000 years to subside. The evidence presented suggest that it might take 10,000 years for current CO2 levels to return to pre-industrial revolution levels if we stopped all deforestation and stopped burning all fossil fuels immediately. Pandora's box is open. The genie is out of the bottle. It might take an INTENTIONAL release of super algae in an effort to practically sequester enough CO2 to make a measureable difference. People will call me a heritic because my reasoning is ahead of the consensus. Mark my words, it is already too late to reverse global warming. The Earth will change in a way that seems dramatic to humanity, but will in no way threaten the existance of life on Earth.
Comment
8 of 12
November 27, 2011
John-q
True to some extent, but again, we do have the intelligence; what we lack is the universal wisdom. Woodrow Wilson had the dream in the League of Nations, Truman and the free world has the dream with the United Nations, and some of us still have the dream. However, those with the dream remaining as called 'whining, bleeding heart liberals'. I am proud to be one who does care and my heart bleeds for the world I am leaving behind me. You see, this old dinosaur is about to go extinct, too. If I live to the age of my parents, both of whom died at age 85, then I have but seven years left - too late for me to do anything but whine. But, if you wish to see my whimpers, then visit http://chtank.org.
Comment
9 of 12
1. Start up above ground plankton farms around the globe to grow plankton
globally, reason; (plankton is a natural oxygen plant that contains the most
oxygen in the world) we can start to incorporate our plankton farms using our
current fish hatcheries immediately, fish will love it and it is a win win
bigger healthier fish as
well ! !
2. EPA challenge to clean up our contaminated soil and grow more food & produce
more clean air... a done deal ! ! All we need to do is the following; (my idea
will need to be verified by scientist) Mix, Plankton, Ilmenite soil, Peridotite
soil and proper fertilizers into our contaminated land, this should clean up the

soil and produce the best farming soil as well as adding clean air to our
environment in every way and as a bonus Boost the economy by adding more jobs.
Why this would work ??
Common sense, the more above Plankton farms the more clean oxygen to the
atmosphere.



Another Idea that I STRONGLY Feel Needs To Be Done Immediately & If We Use
Team Work And Get All Of The Boats and Ships In The Spill Area To start This
Procedure Immediately IT WILL MAKE A BIG BIG DIFFERENCE IN OUR OCEAN OXYGEN
LEVELS IN THIS AREA ! ! !


Ocean, Lakes & Canals Oxygen Aerators That WILL Help Replace The Needed Oxygen
To Our Oceans, Lakes, Reservoirs & Canals ! !

( I have designed and used THESE SIMPLE PVC Plastic Pipes That Have small Holes
Drilled In Them and they WORK AWSOME, CHEAPLY & EFFECTIVELY ! ! )


We can fabricate hundreds of these inexpensive, easy, fast to build Ocean,
Lakes, Canal & Reservoir Aerators.
Comment
10 of 12
Common sense, the more above Plankton farms the more clean oxygen to the
atmosphere.



Another Idea that I STRONGLY Feel Needs To Be Done Immediately & If We Use
Team Work And Get All Of The Boats and Ships In The Spill Area To start This
Procedure Immediately IT WILL MAKE A BIG BIG DIFFERENCE IN OUR OCEAN OXYGEN
LEVELS IN THIS AREA ! ! !


Ocean, Lakes & Canals Oxygen Aerators That WILL Help Replace The Needed Oxygen
To Our Oceans, Lakes, Reservoirs & Canals ! !

( I have designed and used THESE SIMPLE PVC Plastic Pipes That Have small Holes
Drilled In Them and they WORK AWSOME, CHEAPLY & EFFECTIVELY ! ! )


We can fabricate hundreds of these inexpensive, easy, fast to build Ocean,
Lakes, Canal & Reservoir Aerators.


All that is needed to build these Aerators is an air compressor, attached to a
plastic capped off at one end PVC plastic/galvanized pipe that you drill several

holes in to fabricate these simple Aerators, then just lower them in place and
crank up the air pressure.


(similar to your home fish aquarium, that supplies the needed oxygen for fish
and plants to live)

Just Imagine How Much Oxygen That We Can Put Back Into Our Oceans If We Do
This Just By Using The Resources That We Already Have In Place... Our Fishing
Fleets & Ships Are Already In Place And Most Of Them Already Have Air
Compressors On Board ! !


We Can Install These Aerators On All Of The Oil Drilling Rigs In The World That
Are Already Built ! !

Please Pass This On To Whoever Is In Charge And WILL TAKE THIS PROVEN IDEA THAT
I KNOW WORKS BECAUSE I HAVE BUILT AND USED THESE UNITS ! !

Thank You, Respectfully, Michael V. Caldwell... mikezz32@yahoo.com Hope these

ideas help and can be added to your ideas....
Comment
11 of 12
November 29, 2011
Everyone is forgetting one little point of interest that does affect nature and is made by man - the compounds we make to control pests both insect and floral do not break down as well as advertised. We may solve the carbon issue and even come up with cheap clean fuel but I'm afraid it might be too late if we've killed of the bees and poisoned the soil. We have to eat and the world population is growing faster. Some time between blogging on energy take a minute and look at what Bayer and some of the other chemical companies are doing in the US - with the EPA's blind eye looking on; it will scare you and make you wonder if we're worrying too much about energy and not enough about life itself.
I'm one of those people who believe the all of the above approach is needed to become energy independent and that the majority of energy should be "green"; I also believe we need to reduce if not remove as much harmful emission out put as possible as we strive toward a clean energy world, but my eyes were opened when the bees disappeared, the frogs went way as did the birds when local government started spraying new mosquito control chemicals in my region. After some research I found that France Italy and other European countries banned these chemicals but our own EPA left it up to the manufacture to provide studies showing how harmless it was thus allowing the application to continue. The point I'm trying to make is - we need to look at every option before buying a ticket. We may not be around to enjoy clean air and water if we can't grow food because we killed Mother Nature.
Comment
12 of 12
November 30, 2011
Besides the extreme dangers to the entire world's ecosystem foundation posed by any engineered algae escaping (or even purposely released) into the wild, this particular version of engineered algae of course is meant to increase biofuel production when grown with the exhaust gas of fossil fueled power plants, which is enriched with CO2.

In other words, it's not even meant to be used to allow algae growing in ponds using ambient air, without an extra CO2 source, to produce more biomass. It's designed to rely on the continued burning of coal, etc.

But it certainly is capable of escaping into the soil and making an oily muck (or escaping into the ocean and making a sustained and expanding oil spill there), just as previous commentors have pointed out.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

US Solar Institute RES Offshore Solar Electric Power Association Michael Best & Friedrich LLP Intertek REC Solar Idaho Department of Commerce
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters