Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Developers Warm to Small-Scale Geothermal

By Chris Webb, Contributor
September 20, 2011   |   10 Comments
Ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) and their relatives offer smaller, more compact heat pump technology for domestic, commercial and industrial buildings.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

With 26,000 subscribers and a global readership in over 170 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine is targeted at those who make growth happen in renewable industries. Covering policy, technology, finance, markets and more, Renewable Energy World magazine covers all technologies and all markets. Published six times per year, a special Directory of Suppliers Issue is published in July/August which is distributed year round at key renewable energy events worldwide.

10 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 10
September 20, 2011
I heat my house in a Minneapolis, MN, USA suburb with a GSHP. I have made it a hobby to study these. First, well costs have risen dramatically in 10 years. When my system was installed, boreholes were $1000 each (2001), today they are $2500 each. I suspect there is a lack of competition in the business. Second, profit margins for the installers are substantial. There needs to be a bit more competition here also. I talked to a woman recently who had installed a 3 ton forced air system for $22,000. The heat pump would have cost the contractor $5000. The inflated price of the loop field would have been 3 x $2500 = $7500. That is a total of $12,500. There might be an additional $1000 in material, for a cost of $13,500. There is probably one days labor, maybe two, but unlikely, in installing the heat pump. $22,000 - $13,500 = $8,500 for one or two days labor??

I also have a suggestion. Even if costs come down to a reasonable level, these systems are still going to cost more due to the loop field. The loop field should last 100 years with no maintenance. Rather than give tax credits, sell bonds and loan homeowners the money for the loop field. Have the homeowner that installed the heat pump responsible for 1/3 of the cost of the loop field, and the same for the next two owners of the house.
Comment
2 of 10
September 21, 2011
'Energy Piles' is the most cost effective approach to ground source heating and cooling as only the piping and circulating pump equipment figure into the cost of installing the system. Of course its application is applicable only to sizable buildings with a foundation of drilled piers. However, given the cost advantage of energy piles, I don't know of any reason why every building with a drilled pier foundation and heating and cooling loads would not install this natural, on-site energy system. I have advocated this years and its gratifying to see its emergence - a no brainer that has taken the energy crisis to to flip the swith in the heads of mechanical engineers and buuilding developers.
Comment
3 of 10
September 21, 2011
The problem here seems to be one of actually really proving these things work in the short term and the very long term. I hear all sort of comments from engineers about long term reduced efficiency and not being able to prove things properly without resorting to 'spin'. The industry needs to really spell it out as it really is.
Comment
4 of 10
September 21, 2011
There is no spin. The problem is cost. Depending on the cost of capital, they may or may not make economic sense, but I have yet to hear of any valid criticisms on a properly installed system. The real issue is the up-front cost.
Comment
5 of 10
September 21, 2011
I've read that the depletion of ground heat in the bore holes over time is not a trivial concern with GSHP systems. For this reason, GSHP system don't typically garner the label of "renewable energy." Any thoughts on coupling solar water heating collectors to the bore holes to replenish ground heat in the summer months?
Comment
6 of 10
September 21, 2011
I have not heard that there was permanent degradation. The loop field does degrade with long runtimes, but the systems are rated at their minimum. My system was installed 10 years ago. It has a COP of 3.3. In the spring and fall with short runtimes, it operates at a higher efficiency. On a cold January evening with long runtimes, the water/antifreeze solution entering the house drops down to 32 or 33 degrees. The system is rated to have a COP of 3.3 with entering water temperature of 32. I would be interested as to the source of your information. The ground does conduct heat, so I cannot imagine that over the course of a summer the loop field does not completely recover. I have seen no indication that my loop field has degraded. I suspect the real reason geothermal has not garnered the total support of the green crowd is the concern over the source of the electricity. In many areas, if you do nothing special, you may cause more pollution than a high efficiency furnace due to the electricity being generated by coal. I get all of my electricity from our local "WindSource" program, which makes my carbon footprint considerably less than the best furnace on the market. Again, there is no need for solar water heater collectors anywhere in the continental US to replenish the loop field. I would love to see the study that shows permanent degradation of the loop field.
Comment
7 of 10
September 21, 2011
Adding to v-bruce's comment, I would suspect that the issue of heat depletion is one of an undersized / over-demanding system relative to the density of the earth or embedment medium and/or piping that is not spaced far enough apart. The idea of coupling to solar for replenishing / storing heat in the ground is an option assuming this would occur in off heating modes and only if cooling is not needed; otherwise, I think you would be better off coupling directly to the solar collectors for heat exchange in a heating mode. If this is a practical option, then ground source heat exchange would not be. The earth is not an effective storage medium, but it is a heat sink of infinite capacity. Therefore, its storage capacity is limited and for short durations and it may not effectively retain heat stored during off heating periods.
Comment
8 of 10
September 22, 2011
An additional comment. I doubt permanent loop field degradation is ever an issue. With my system, heat is reinjected into the ground during the summer from the heat pump. I have a forced air system so that in the summer the heat pump operates as an air conditioner and removes heat from the house and puts it into the ground. Even if it didn't, I doubt the loop field would permanently degrade. Heating season ends sometime in April, and does not start again until October, that is 6 months for the loop field to recover. There are people who think that the heat source is like a bowl of water, and if you siphon too much out, you have to put it back in. That is not the case. For residential heating, you have an infinite heat source. What you do not have is infinite "bandwidth". How fast you can extract heat is dependent on the size of the loop field. On a properly sized and installed closed loop field, it will stabilize at about the freezing point of water. There are two reasons for this, first, the loop field is going to be passing thru water tables. Water when it freezes gives up considerable heat. Second, the thermal conductivity of ice is 3-4 times that of liquid water, so that as the water in the ground freezes, you effectively increase the "bandwidth". If the loop field was a bit too small, it might stabilize at 30 degrees rather than 32, if it was a bit smaller it might stabilize at 28. There are limits, but the limit is somewhere about 15 degrees. If the loop field is stabilizing at 15, it was grossly undersized. You should be able to install a ground source heat pump at a hospital or health club to preheat water, and run it 24/7 365 days per year, and if the loop field is properly sized and installed, it will operated at its rated COP.
Comment
9 of 10
September 22, 2011
Thermal retention is an issue in the degradation of a loop field. You can read real life data in the book "Geothermal HVAC, Green heating and Cooling". However, it is not difficult to engineer the system in a such a way as to solve the problem.
Comment
10 of 10
September 22, 2011
Some of these comments are a little foggy. First there is open loop and closed loop. The comments above relate to closed loop only. I have open loop off an existing water well. None of the above apply. My system also delivers most of my hot water via an integrated desuperheater to an electric resistance tank at 100 degrees F with an electric boost to 120. Thermal retention mentioned above in the Geothermal HVAC book relates to Florida only, which is a special case and can be cured by using extra loops. The earth can in fact be used as a thermal storage system but probably on a large scale only. The Canadians have done two 40 plus house projects using solar thermal in the summer stored to a system of vertical bores in bedrock (another limitation) and pumped out in the winter with no compressors. There is a decline over the winter with the houses needing a booster system in late winter, but this is in central Canada. A new company has come in the market with a thermal power agreement, similar to a power PPA. They pay for the vertical bores for large commercial projects only and the customer pays for the thermal energy over time. The up front cost is eliminated for the bores making GSHP the cheapest installation for big projects.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With over 50,000 subscribers and a global readership in 174 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine covers industry, policy, technology, finance and markets for all renewable technologies. Content is aimed ... more »

 

Advertise With Us

GoGreenSolar.com Talesun Solar Schüco Natural Power Asia Solar Expo Geothermal Resources Council Latin American Wind Energy Association (LAWEA)
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters