Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

The Path to a Sustainable 'Total Biomass' Advanced Ethanol Industry

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

10 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 10
Biofuels do not get a very good review in the August,2011 issue of Scientific American. Is the whole industry based on hype and subsidies? The latest refineries are not subject to EPA emission regulations? Isn't this what biofuels are supposed to address? Something seems dreadfully wrong here.
Comment
2 of 10
August 3, 2011
Mr. Gralenski:

Some biofuels have a long way to go. Some are on the cusp of beating gasoline. I don't know where cellulosic ethanol stands, too many people looking for capital have unproven claims, technology.

There is not so much a conspiracy as a plethora of bad research and research done to the specifications of opponents of ethanol. Remember that leaded gas was deemed 'harmless' for almost half a century because the 'experts' were picked by Ethyl corp.

Many of the "Scientists" are borrowing from previous research [Pimental, et al] with questionable data.

Corn is also part of the problem. The corn lobby is more influential, politically, than ethanol, Obama's constituency in Illinois had a large percentage in corn growing, seed sales, pesticides, farm equipment....

Sorghum, sugar beets, other non-traditional crops require less spraying, irrigation, and have higher sugar content than corn, much better for ethanol production.

The fact is, ethanol is a better motor fuel than gasoline, and the otto cycle engine could be made much more efficient if it were built for ethanol alone. Rather than apologize and seek 30% compromise, we may have to look to the performance market, where the benefits of ethanol have been put to use. Make ethanol popular, the OEMs will notice.

Shelby is one example of a performance-only identity that the OEMs paid to use, there are others. Want to promote ethanol? Look to boat racing, motorcyle speed records, drag racing, NASCAR. Tiny engines, a lot of boost, high compression, a lot of power.

No reason an OEM can't replace their 5+ liter gasoline and 6+ liter diesels with 3-4 liter ethanol engines. They need to see the market for it, first.

Get the EPA off the backs of the engine conversion companies, spend their time watching pipeline quit crying about 'Evil' racers, and see the issue for what it is - a battle between entrenched political interests and real transportation efficiency.
Comment
3 of 10
August 3, 2011
Using farmland for "growing fuel" instead of food is at the very least a bad idea, and many would say downright evil when you consider 1. there's a growing worldwide food shortage; and 2. there are better options for transportation, including electric vehicles with new tech batteries (like Vanadium), hydraulic hybrids ( see http://lightninghybrids.com/about ), natural gas vehicles, and hydrogen/gas mixture systems that are retrofitted onto existing engines, and increase mpg of gas engines about 20%.

With all these other options, why would anyone with a conscience want to ADD to the growing global food shortage by using up more farmland for making fuel?
Comment
4 of 10
August 3, 2011
Dear Jaysenergy,
I like your responce. By my wild and crazy calc's : I believe it would be better to collect agra-waste(and other burnable waste), burn it to spin turbines,create electricity to fuel eV's ,than it would be to process the biofuel and burn it in an ICE. I do hold out hope for Algae Oil, cellulosic ethanol and other second and third generation biofuels that can fuel PHEV's of the future, but only to fuel the back-up generator motor. I'm hoping that we go towards eV's powered by domestic green electricity ASAP, and abandon the oil powered ICE. Remember, we didn't leave the stone age because we ran out of stones. We should wake up to the idea that eV's are all around better than ICE's and get past this 150 year old technology sooner than later.
Comment
5 of 10
August 6, 2011
Actually, there is probably enough arable land to grow enough food for every one on earth including population growth for the next century.

The problems in getting food to hungry people begin with the fact that these people can't afford food, and their governments don't want to spend the money to import the food.

Fuel crops can be grown where food crops are not, and alcohol can be made from a number of waste products, as well as algae.

Alcohol fuels face the same troubles as electrics right now. Both had a lead on gasoline at one time, both got sucker punched by the oil industry. Rockefeller, the DuPonts [They ran GM for a while.] and others played dirty pool, look up the history. No way the companies built on that are going to allow free market competition now.

That electric motor? As "antiquated" as the internal combustion engine, [Farady, 1821; Sturgeon, 1932; Davenport 1837] and our fire-to-steam electric generation methods are even older.

Remember fuel cells? Remember their drawback? Gaseous, pure, hydrogen, which is most economically obtained from natural gas, which is the favorite replacement for that non-existant "clean coal".

Guess what, ethanol is a fuel cell fuel.

We could have ICE engines with the efficiency of diesels today, hybrids tomorrow, and fuel cell vehicles after that, all on one fuel, ethanol.

Too bad we would rather repeat the myths perpetuated by the Ethyl Corp, Standard Oil and others from the 1920s on.
Comment
6 of 10
August 7, 2011
Efficiency of :
gasoline ICE ~= 20-30%
diesel ICE ~= 25-40%
electric motor 85%+

what do most of the new clean technologies generate?
electric power
Comment
7 of 10
August 7, 2011
Attn: David Larson...
It's not as much a question of land use as it is water use...which is a much more precious commodity. If they can economically make ethanol out of waste products, then stop talking about it and get to it! Stop using food for making fuel! This wrong-headed practice is driving the cost of food up to the point that poorer countries simply can't afford to buy enough food anymore...as you aptly point out yourself.
Comment
8 of 10
August 10, 2011
None other than Scott Sklar, head of the Stella Group, and author of "Consumer guide to Solar Energy" can point out many reasons EV supporters should not be fighting against ethanol.
Look up "The Forbidden Fuel" bisonbooks.com

Water used in producing any crop, or ethanol, returns to the earth and atmosphere. We need to remove [or replace with biologicals] the pesticide, herbicide, and fertilizers.

What ruins water, returns it to the earth poisoned and almost unredeemable? Fracking, steam extraction of tar sands and oil shale, coal mining.

There are many alternatives to corn, it just happens that corn has friends in Washington. Ever hear of Pres Obama, former Senator from Illinois, where over 25% of his voters depended on corn for their livelihood?

The "FOOD" being made into fuel is #2 feed corn, and not food for people. Producing ethanol and high protein distillers grains for livestock food are complementary processes, neither destroys the other.

There ARE companies making fuels, biodiesel, natural gas, methanol, butanol, and ethanol, from waste. Their methods also return water to the ecosystem. In fact, there are water treatment plants that produce fuel as a by-product.

As stated, there is surplus food, please give today to one of the charities shipping it to the hungry. There is also unused farmland. The US turns millions of acre starvings a year to McMansion developments, and other nations with starvation sell food rather than feed their own, and farmland is converted to industrial use and mining. Why? In the global market, human life is cheap, there isn't any money in people.

Why don't you already know this?

1] $$ = advertising = votes = political power = favors owned = legislation

2] $$ = advertising = profitable media company = favors owed = news editing

RESULT --> Ethanol fights biodiesel fights solar fights wind, wind biomethane.... Oil and coal laugh up their sleeves and brainwash another generation.
Comment
9 of 10
August 10, 2011
I think the present white house wants to make it appear as if it is in support of eV's. But like the war on drugs, they just say no. They don't do anything about it, just say no.The problem is that on the federal level WE MAKE NO ENERGY DECISIONS.Our energy policy is dictated by big oil. Please note that we are the largest economy in the world and have no energy policy. Please notice that the CITY of San Diego is putting 300 ELECTRIC smart cars into car sharing. Please note ZIP CAR has just had one of the biggest IPO's ever. Please note that numerous city and county gov't. organ. have helped put up eV charging stations. My city regularly buys Prius's for their local vehicles. But has the federal postal system converted their fleet of mail carriers to eV's? Why not? ( those ugly old GRUMAN vans would be the easiest conversion possible and they stop and go all day burning thru starter motors) Any other fleet vehicles? Why not? BIG OIL OPERATES THRU LOBBYISTS IN WASHINGTON. Our eV 'revolution' will come at the individual level, then the local level, then the state level and when the white house and congress is embarassed into it, only then real change will occur on a national level. I have faith in biomass and biofuels helping to replace part of our oil consumption.But the industry is on it's own. I'll bet of BEV's and PHEV's. I still think burning scrap wood with well managed crops of the 'Btu Bush' to make electricity, might be better than processing ethanol.
In conclusion.: We're talking about it. Initially it was just hippies and geeks that cared. Then scientists got funded to get involved. Early adaptors are coming on board all the time.Now the main stream wants to transform Exxon,BP,Shell,etc. into 'energy companies'.I'm still amazed that more economists aren't discussing what happens when we stop importing $700B / year in foreign fuel.
Think we could pay down a debt if we made our energy domestically?
Comment
10 of 10
August 10, 2011
Mr. Poppitz.

Of course Washington only gives lip service. Oil is an ugly date that foots the bill and offers great sex. Everyone wants to go out with, nobody wants to be seen with.

Alternative fuels is the gorgeous date with no money and no fun.

Alternative vehicles and the fueling thereof is up to us. The government will not, its not even their job, and The Market in motorized transportation never was a free market, not for electrics, not for ethanol. Oil, only oil.

Yes, its all lobbyists or campaign money. That's the scam -- this country BY, OF, and FOR the people is being run for only the groups that can pony up the biggest bids.

"Attention shoppers, there is a blue-light special on Senators...."

Scientists? Long before the hippies and geeks, there were the Engineers. They ran IC engines on ethanol when gasoline was a brand of stain remover. They built electrics, steam cars, so many different kinds of cars I can't list them.

Wouk built a hybrid in 1977. It was the first I heard of, but probably not THE first. Wouk was an engineer.

Solarroadways offer on-the-go EV charging, and solar panels, and a power grid, all in one. Brusaw is an engineer.

The engineers have built fuel cells that you pour ethanol or methanol into, get electricity out of. No batteries! Of course, they are being pushed to make fuel cells that run on gasoline -- ask yourself why.

That thing about paying down our debt, what makes you think we will produce anything domestically? We ignore engineers, we hate manufacturing, anything that actually MAKES something we despise.

Scientists, theorists, bankers, politicians, actors, singers, athletes, artists, those that can't fix or build or design, THEM we listen to, them we love. EV=rare earths= China. Look it up.

Gotta go, I'm building something.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Robert Kozak

View Robert Kozak's Profile
About: Robert Kozak is an environmental scientist and the President and founder of Atlantic Biomass Conversions, Inc. Atlantic Biomass develops sequential enzyme syste... more »

Advertise With Us

European Wind Energy Association DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners Sol Systems LLC Natural Power Renewable Energy World Europe
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters