Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Sun Strikes It Hot: What's Happening in the Global Solar Thermal Markets?

By Jackie Jones, Consulting Editor
August 18, 2011   |   18 Comments
Growth in solar heat is still on an upward curve - provided you take the global view. Yet while China is booming and India and Brazil are positive, key European markets are still experiencing worry.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
18 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 18
August 18, 2011
The statement of: "domestic hot water - the simplest solar thermal application" is quite incorrect. At least for residential applications.
Solar Hot Air is unquestionably the simplest solar thermal application and installation. I have researched and trained in solar technologies (thermal and PV) for several years earning certifications for solar installations in the State of Maine. 5 years ago I came across a design for hot air panels, using aluminum dryer duct as the transfer medium - (http://www.atlanticenergy.ca/projects/WayneLangilleSolarAirCollectors/tabid/72/Default.aspx). Using that basic idea, I designed, built and installed a system with 3 panels on my roof that have saved at least 400 gallons of heating oil every year for the past four years. They savings paid off the system cost (around $3000) in the third year of operation, with a savings of around $1700 this past winter, alone.
Solar Hot Air is cheaper and easier to install than Solar hot water PERIOD! You just need some Flexi-duct and air blowers to deliver the heated air. There are commercial units out there for between $1000 - $2000 per panel, or it is easy enough to build your own - many plans are available at www.builditsolar.com
Solar Hot Air, it works and is cheaper than, and has a faster ROI than, Solar Hot Water. Just imagine how much heating oil will cost next year! Remember, Solar Saves!
Comment
2 of 18
August 19, 2011
Why is ground source heat pump technology, which uses solar thermal stored in the earth, not included in this article?
Comment
3 of 18
August 19, 2011
Solar air may be better, but the article is about solar hot water.....
If the article was about solar air, I think these comments would be appropriate.
Comment
4 of 18
August 19, 2011
@richard-carter-81497
With the title of:
Sun Strikes It Hot: What's Happening in the Global Solar Thermal Markets?
The article is about Solar Thermal. Last I knew, Solar Hot Air is Solar Thermal, so I believe that my comment is quite appropriate for this article. Heck, the first two sentences of the article talk about 'heating and hot water'.
I'm trying to point out the huge benefits of Solar Hot Air, because no one else does. No one is talking about how much money can be saved with rather inexpensive and fairly quick ROI of solar hot air panels. So I make a point to comment whenever an appropriate articel fails to mention it.
The yearly $$ savings of my Solar Hot Air panels, far surpass the possible savings from any Solar Hot Water system.
Comment
5 of 18
August 19, 2011
Yup, it's all fluid dynamics in conjuntion with friction. Air, water, electrons, everything, all flowing in currents within the universes' constant motion. A BTU is a BTU no matter how you gain it. Keep it simple....as they say. And the more simple, the cheaper it gets, and usually the better it works.

Gumby, mirrors are great too, and simple and can work with no moving parts. Some times they call them heliostats. You can look that one up. Try making shutters with mirrors attached, not only can they increase outside light coming in, they can reflect nightime light and heat from leaving when closed.
Comment
6 of 18
August 20, 2011
The article is correct in saying we had a huge uplift in solar hot water in Australia as a result of government incentives. This was obviously a good thing but it did have its downside. As quickly as the government introduces incentives it removes them (after they have extracted the right number of votes and brownie points). What happens is that the market is left in a mess. The removal of incentives disadvantaged those who sought to make a living on the government promises of renewable investment. As a result of this huge upsurge in solar hot water the market was flooded with renewable energy certificates (REC) that greatly reduced their value. This in turn affected the confidence of investors who wanted to invest in other forms of renewable energy (PV market affected the most)but the low value of the REC reduced project returns.
I guess my point hear is that we need to have the government give some sort of certainty to the market to keep investments in renewable energy viable.
Comment
7 of 18
August 20, 2011
JohnGiannasca,
Interesting information. I can see where that can easily happen. When the REC system was created, did they put it under the existing stock market regulations, or did they allow the REC system to exist outside that system?
Comment
8 of 18
August 20, 2011
Hi Richard, it exists outside the system. I hope this helps.
RECs are produced by accredited renewable power stations at the rate of 1 REC for every whole MWh of renewable energy produced above its baseline. Owners of renewable energy generation assets hold the RECs until traded and RECs remain valid until surrendered. A REC is therefore an additional income stream for a generator of renewable energy, sold in addition to actual electricity produced. RECs are not a physical certificate, but exists only in an electronic form and are traded separately from electricity market, via the Office of the Renewable
Energy Regulator, the Government body also responsible for determining accreditation of renewable power stations.
Comment
9 of 18
August 20, 2011
John,

Thanks for the background in your country. It is similar here.
Even though I'm a strong advocate for solar, and have spent much time (and funds) supporting it, I think the area you have touched on is yet another Achilles Heal of the process. How can it be remedied? The most obvious solution seems to be by keeping the tax credits (in many forms) separate from the core investment and base cashflow calculations; but, if we do that, since solar is yet to be on parity with conventional energy sources, we appear to be non-competitive. Yet, if we do include those credits (including RECs) into the calculations for breakeven, reasonable Internal Rates of Return, and payback, the dependence of the value of those credits on investment trading schemes is just too fragile and unpredictable. I think we need to redefine the REC system, and somehow take it outside of a market commodity.
Thoughts?
Comment
10 of 18
August 20, 2011
Excellent news on Solar Thermal. Solar Thermal is the simplest application of Solar Energy.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Comment
11 of 18
August 21, 2011
Hi Richard, I agree with the need to redefine the REC environment. At the moment we are working with project acquisitions where we need to take a view on energy prices 20 years forward. The complication comes when you have multiple factors at play. We firstly need to take a view on black price trends taking into account normal supply demand issues then factor on top of that the effect of the newly introduces carbon tax and the likely effects it will have. Then we need to forecast Renewable generation and the amount of RECs that will be generated and factor in future policy settings. Its a bit of a three dimensional chess game and one way out of my area of expertise. Unforunatly you do need a level of understanding just to consult with external advisors. All these factors make the financing of energy projects difficult as both project developers and finaciers need to understand the future risks. I think the role of government is to takle a measure of the uncertainty out of this process. Unfortunatly I dont have a view right now on what this should be. In Australia the carbon tax is unpopular but at least of its own provides a known cost factor that can be taken into account. Unfortunatly because taxes are unpopular they are easy tagets for tinkering with as political opponents try to get a sence of public opinion as they try to get elected.
Comment
12 of 18
August 22, 2011
Not trying to sound trite, but 'better you than me'. I cannot comprehend how much stress that must create, and wondering how much hedging must go into the calculations. I would think it quite a moving target, given the changes in the economy, not just nationally, but on a global scale. Add on top the ebb and flow of international inventories, market demands, and not to mention, changing governmental policies. I agree that given our limited current options, the REC needs to be better applied; re-defined perhaps. I'm just wondering if there might be more benefit in making the output of solar PV and wind, more of an Options Market, as compared to solely a tax scheme. Just spit-balling a bit.
Comment
13 of 18
August 22, 2011
We are currently working on the hedging option for our acquisition and am happy to say others will make a call on that. Well out of my league there. Not sure how the options market would go in changing project risk profile. Right now my focus is getting the operational cost forecast right for wind farms. I am a truly appaled that the wind business has got to the equivalent of the razor/razor blade business. The way O&M costs are treated make meaningful EPC comparisons dificult and their desire to lock you into long term contracts at high costs and little transparency also make the process difficult.
Renewable projects are a challenge!!
Comment
14 of 18
fsc
August 23, 2011
What kind of tax break do I get for a south facing window?
Heating up the water, and then pumping around the building in dedicated piping to eventually heat the air seems is an expensive solution. Admittedly sometimes that is necessary because of your building orientation etc., but many times it done the expensive way because you do not get tax incentives or glitz for using more effective low tech approaches.
We need to gradualy get away from subsidies and have energy pay full price, then consumers will make wiser choices, like siting your new building correctly.
Comment
15 of 18
August 23, 2011
It seems the brokers of energy credits are careful to keep the public offerings of solar heating credits "broker" than themselves.
the striking theme of this interesting article is the paltry lack of participation and intention of the US solar thermal distributed concerns. The bottom line is that implementing distributed solar thermal could make the general public much better off, while not enhancing so much the profits of brokers, traders, hedge fund managers, and their attendant politicians. In the frame of paradigm shift, profit streams will be disrupted and perhaps the general welfare may be enhanced, which will make life support on earth better for all. To me, establishing a modest national SREC trading scheme with adequate floor supports , if left alone to function stabilly, would establish the basis for a new economy of energy provision. The only choice is weather our infrastructure moguls are dragged into it by the rest of the world, crying, resisting, and wailing, or open mindedly accepting the challenge. So far, fear trumps wisdom.
Comment
16 of 18
August 23, 2011
Gumby; Allot of the delay in waking up the national scene could also be the voter inteligence quotient as well. Politics sucks money, and as long as politician can dupe voters the cash is their's to grab. The established returns to them call the policies. Would you ask people to stop buying gas and electricity? Good luck with that.
Meanwhile, cover your butt with solar thermal and PV and hope the voters wise up. You can't change the world. You can only change what you do yourself.
Meanwhile, Thanks for keeping it all going.
Comment
17 of 18
fsc
August 23, 2011
After reading the numbers, it is incredible that solar water heating continues to be perceived as the ugly sister of photovoltaic. I installed a simple low tech vacum-tube system in my house in Mexico, and it paid for itself in about two years and a half. That is a 40% return WITHOUT any tax breaks.
Comment
18 of 18
August 23, 2011
I can supply the hardware to heat the average 12 to 1600 SF home for 16K. Less than 10 Yr payback for many, but not all. That is a 50KBTUHr heater on sun, with storage. Yah, installation will double that (for plug and play, the US consumerist way). Many people do make the mental leap right away. If solar heating works, then why not go for the largest load. That's nice alright, but then trust and guarantees come up and fear sets in. Still more understanding needed about solar energy.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With over 50,000 subscribers and a global readership in 174 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine covers industry, policy, technology, finance and markets for all renewable technologies. Content is aimed ... more »

 

Advertise With Us

Green Power Conferences ESI Inc. of Tennessee Trojan Battery Company HUBER+SUHNER AG Rotork plc PLANSEE SE Via Expo
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters