Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Commercial Solar Power 2.0 – The Rise of the Solar Power Provider Network

By Andrew Barron Worden, CEO, Barron Partners LP
August 11, 2011   |   15 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

15 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 15
August 12, 2011
I am in complete agreement with this article's description of the future of renewables in the US and the world. Anyone who can't see it is a blind fool.
No image available
Comment
2 of 15
Anonymous
August 12, 2011
While I agree with the article, I do not feel it is necessary to antagonize non-believers by calling them "blind fools". I do not think a statement like that will win many people over to our way of thinking. Perhaps just stating your opinion about the article, and not the article readers (about whom you probably know very little) would convince more readers to your point of view.
Comment
3 of 15
August 12, 2011
I agree with the article on all fronts yet I'm wondering how the author feels about the growing residential solar market, as it was not mentioned. The google fund that was mentioned was set up specifically for residential solar.
Comment
4 of 15
August 12, 2011
Here's one situation with Great New Solar Technology moving ahead well - making good use of the tax laws - converting tax liability into "cash" and an asset in renewable energy - (eliminating taxes) here: powertaxcredit.com
Comment
5 of 15
August 12, 2011
Hey, anonymous! Stifle yourself, you blind fool!
BLIND FOOL, BLIND FOOL, BLIND FOOL!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

...but seriously, shut up.
Comment
6 of 15
August 12, 2011
That being said (blind fool), this is an excellent time to invest in AltEnergy stocks, if you have the money. Even if you don't have the money, a lot of RE companies out there are trading as penny stocks because Wall Street cottons them to upstarts and outsiders. Nobody says you can't buy just a few bucks in stock, you don't have to spend millions.

Numerous articles have been written over the last 3 months about this - how these RE companies are severely undervalued and, given the context of things to come, as stated in this article as well as those, a few sheckels nowadays could have big bennies down the line. And, hell, it'll feel nice to "play the market" without feeding the hogs at the trough.

I plan on putting $40-50 into some penny stocks this next week and see what happens.

Hell, I'd be a BLIND FOOL not to!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Comment
7 of 15
August 15, 2011
Why is there no feed in tariff energy policy here in the US as there is in the rest of the world (Germany, England , France, Italy, Spain, Canada, China etc etc etc) A feed in tariff energy program has proven time and time again to be the most successful program to date in stimulateing the alternate energy sector. It has the ability to be fine tuned and encourages both the private and commercial sectors. Has anyone been to Germany lately where solar panels proliferate on just about every roof? It is eerie that there has been virtually no political debate on it in this country. Could it be possible that somewhere in the murky background, Big Oil and Coal lurk? Everytime, I write my congressmen, I receive platitudes about how he endorses alternate energy and little else (Yes, I am talking about you, Scott Garrett) The US had the perfect opportunity to become the world leader in its development but blew it. I haven't found a person yet that doesn't want to see us become more reliant on alternate energy but our elected leaders have completely steered clear of the issue with the possible exception of Al Gore. Good night America!
Comment
8 of 15
August 15, 2011
Solar PV is slowely coming out of an infancy that has been supported by a number of disparate Federal and State incentive programs that have generated significant economies of scale in both panel manufaturing and BOS. As this trend continues Solar PV will eventually become the power provider of choice because of it direct and indirect cost savings.
No image available
Comment
9 of 15
Anonymous
August 15, 2011
Andrew: I am a huge fan of PV but I wonder about the accuracy of this claim:
The difference in the cost of a kilowatt from a solar array compared to a kilowatt from the local utility has grown ever narrower. Today, the two are at effective parity at the retail rate level, and tomorrow, solar will be less expensive by a significant margin.

Are you saying PV is at grid parity where there are certain state and federal incentives, or that PV can compete on its own terms without subsidies? There may be grid parity in states like NJ and CA which offer substantial incentives, but what about other states?
Comment
10 of 15
August 16, 2011
I just love it when the US market is compared to the EU. Why don't we have FiT??? Where have all the incentives gone??? How about a reality check. Who do you thinks pays for all of these incentives - that's right - the ratepayers!! Who pays for all of the federal and state incentives - that's right - the tax payers!! Spain collapsed, Italy is on there way. Many states have revised or eliminated expensive incentives because they could not be sustained. You can't get something for nothing!!

Other than a few states NJ, NY, CA, CT Americans enjoys relatively inexpensive energy. Especially when you compare these costs to Europe. Utility scale solar is now cheaper than nuclear and we are knocking on the door of new coal fired plants. There is a long way to go to match gas. Another and maybe the largest problem is that there is no political will to change.

This is one of the best ideas for introduction of solar on a viable commercial scale. Solar and all RE needs to be able to stand on it's own merits, without subsidies or other artificial influences.
Comment
11 of 15
August 16, 2011
The same people that pay for oil, pay the FIT!!!!!!! What do you think is the real cost of oil??? How many aircraft carriers does it take to keep the straits of Harmuz open? Are aircraft carriers free??? Who pays for them??? Daaaaa!!!!
Comment
12 of 15
August 16, 2011
The price of oil has nothing to do with this discussion unless you want to talk abut the cost of generating electricity from diesel fuel. At least in America.

Oil is a transportation fuel not an effective fuel for power generation.

Oil has more to do with the cost of our foreign policy over the last 50 years, I agree, but has nothing to do with RE. You do understand that some of the largest oil companies have solar divisions right???
Comment
13 of 15
August 17, 2011
Have you ever heard of the new autos ie Leaf, Volt, Tesla? Do you think that this could be the beginning of the next generation of transportation? Do you think that the old whaleing crews were worried that they might be superseeded by fossil oil? Even a better question, "Is oil infinite?" Apparently Sarah thinks so!
Comment
14 of 15
August 23, 2011
The sun shines and we are the recipients! Capturing that endless energy coming down from our sky is the logical thing to do. Commercial solar installations are a diligent and financial real time solution for power as we all move into the future.
Comment
15 of 15
August 23, 2011
All very good points "tcernera, russell-judge-22243, EnterSolar" - tho the main concern about everything (not directly answering you guys) is the following:

Because the government has subsidized greatly the oil / Fossil fuels, those resources are much lower than they should be as well. Without the gov't meddling the best techs would rise to the top. The Gov't overall greatly distorts everything, and in sum is a great burden - and why the economy is tanking. We are much worse off than if we could shut it down. But too many people think the gov't gives them something for nothing and go along with that crap - essentially selling their votes - not realizing that it will cost them much MUCH more eventually. Obviously it would be justified for the gov't to attach some form of fee / fine / tax to the production / use of polluting fuels (because they are damaging everyone else) and then give some support to clean alternatives which would propel and would have propelled them to where we would not have the imbalances and oil addiction / dependence and pollution problems we have today.
Because of the immense corruption and distance from the constitution, this government, along with the economy, is collapsing, and needs to - the only way to get things straightened out. But it is going to be very painful, and much more so than most expect - as they still pay so much attention to mainstream "anal-ists" and media, etc. Things will not begin to turn around until the country gets behind people like Ron Paul and we get rid of the scamming FED.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C. Schletter Inc. Renewable Energy World Africa AltEnergyStocks Midwest Renewable Energy Association Schiller Growth Energy
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters