The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Renewable Energy: It's a National Security Issue

Thomas Buonomo, Contributor
July 26, 2011  |  38 Comments

As a U.S. Army veteran who has seen many fellow veterans suffer from the physical and psychological consequences of war, it is disheartening to observe an absence of discussion within the renewable energy community on the connection between the United States' oil dependency and its ongoing military engagements. Those who profess to support our troops cannot fail to learn the lessons they offer to the nation.

While Americans will no doubt continue to debate our military commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan, what is clear is that the antagonistic dynamics of the U.S. relationship with the Muslim world are not likely to change significantly in the near term, in large part because of oil.

This unfortunate reality, viewed in light of the history of dysfunctional relationships between the Muslim world and the United States, leads to the conclusion that if the renewable energy community does not broaden its political base in order to accelerate our nation’s diversification away from oil, the potential for future conflicts and regional instability in the Middle East and Central Asia will likely increase. 

The national security frame offers renewable energy advocates an opening to achieve this goal. While political conservatives tend to be skeptical of man-made climate change -- a phenomenon that can be attributed to the designs of fossil fuel interests -- they also tend to be more responsive to national security issues. 

While the average citizen may not possess the scientific expertise to verify the science behind climate change, in the Information age history is accessible to all of us.  The historical record clearly demonstrates that increasing reliance on unstable foreign governments for our energy needs has become a very serious national security liability.

The impending realities imposed by the federal deficit will likely make it essential for the renewable energy community to focus on free market solutions to our energy problems as public resources dwindle. And given the financial resources of the business interests we are up against, building a broad spectrum of political support for smart policy initiatives will be critical in this asymmetric fight.  What we lack in financial resources we must make up in votes. National security is perhaps the one issue that has the potential to bring a winning coalition together. 

Thomas J. Buonomo is a former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Political Science and Middle East Studies from the U.S. Air Force Academy and has spent the past six years researching the nexus between energy markets, U.S. interventions and political instability in developing countries, with a primary emphasis on the Middle East and Latin America.

38 Comments

Register To Comment
John Giannasca
John Giannasca
August 7, 2011
Fred, I agree with your sentiments. In Australia we have an economy that is resource based and a reluctance by the governments to make the hard decisions to transition us to a "clean" economy. The coal lobby is powerful. Their arguments are convincing because they can afford to mount slick and expensive campaigns. It seems that the main function of government is that once elected, it works to be reelected. That means putting their money where the votes are. Unfortunately sometimes we have to make hard short term decisions that provide long term benefits. This seems to be outside the thinking of our politicians. I don't know what the answer is. I think that the renewable advocates need to stop bickering among themselves and unify to change political opinion. This means checking egos at the door and working for a common goal. The renewable skeptics seem to be better resourced so to combat them we need to be better organised. These forums convince me that there are so many people that have a clean future as a common goal. The only problem is that at times I note the tension and conflict that should be reserved for our polluting opponents.
John Giannasca
John Giannasca
August 6, 2011
Good point Larry. We Australians unfortunately gave the world Rupert Murdoch so we are all too aware how the centralized control of media has created a narrow self serving platform to promote whatever agenda suits them. Governments fear them because they know the power they have to shape opinion. We have had so many well produced documentaries that show the problem but they get one token airing and then shelved.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
August 5, 2011
Yes! All the 9/11 anomalies that were so evident if you just took a look behind the tight knit curtain known as the media.
Those anomalies are that nagging itch you want to scratch but just can't reach.
My worst itch is the 16' hole the massive 757 magically entered with not so much as a single large piece to show for it at the Pentagon.

Best evidence first hand that "not all is well in Denmark"?

A cousin live less than two miles from Shanksville. I asked him about the 757 that was supposed to have crashed there. He said: "what 757"?
He went on to say that his neighbors who were the first responders on that day (police chief,emt's,fire/rescue etc) have all said in private that from what they saw there certainly was nothing looking even remotely like an aircraft of any size in the smoking 10 ft deep by 100 ft long trench.

Nuff said
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
August 5, 2011
I agree with everything you have stated except for:

'Each wind turbine or solar panel that is installed eliminates the need to mine coal'

The installation of both solar and wind have a very small affect on how much coal is mined. The biggest problem being that the coal plants serve to stabilize the grid as these plants are what is called dispatch-able power or power that provides the base for the grid.Turn down ratio of coal plants is limited (how much you can unload the plant in favor of wind power)and without the base the grid just collapses.

People need to get it through their heads that there is no 'silver bullet' in any of this energy discussion.

The low hanging fruit in all of this is simple conservation in parallel with letting energy prices rise to reflect true costs.

There are at least two dozen technologies available using off the shelf hardwre for base generation that would spell death to coal mining and coal plants but since the coal can be done 'cheaper' these technologies will remain on the shelf.

Remember that most folks have no idea that %50+ of every watt hour they consume is just pissed away in inefficiency.

One resource that today is in very short supply is education of the masses on some simple concepts about how energy is generated and consumed. Of course our masters who control the flow of information are the same group who makes millions off of wasteful energy use.

It's a catch 22. This of course will go on until finally the laws of nature catch up with the laws of capitalism and those who profit the most will suffer right along those who they profit from. Then things will change or we become just a statistic along the path of history as a species.

My bet's on our extinction based on past performance.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
August 5, 2011
Each wind turbine or solar panel that is installed eliminates the need to mine coal. And continues to do so throughout the lifetime of the equipment installed. It is making a difference. All ready coal executives are waking up to this fact. In order to maintain the myth of "cheap coal" they are resorting to a big push to make up volume sales by exporting coal overseas.

They are destroying America with strip mines, air and water pollution and mountaintop removal----to maintain profits.

When will Americans wake up to the fact that they are paying for the destruction of America---to send cheap coal to China, India and elsewhere, and maintain the profits of a few bankers and executives.

But COAL provides jobs. Ever notice that you only hear this from from the executives in the front offices who make millions? Just have a look at what the people who have to do the work get. Sometimes killed. In accidents which are not so accidental---a direct result of cost cutting to keep profits high. The Massey disaster in WV in which 29 miners were killed is a perfect example.
William Fitch
William Fitch
August 5, 2011
Hi:

Dead on Larry....
9-11 the press for truth, is an excellent doc if you have not seen it...
To me if you want to know the culpability of Bush, Cheney and Rice, just look at the footage of Bush's face in Kindergarten when he was told the news. In fact I had to laugh recently... there was a news release last week explaining the blank look on his face etc..LOL.. I did not read it... to me his face was not blank... in fact if you look at where the man was, surrounded by little happy kids, a wonderful environment to be sure, then look at his face BEFORE he got the news... tell me, was that the face of a man who had kids of his own being in a room full of happy little kids...???...don't think so.. if you look VERY CLOSE, it is the expression of a man waiting for a truckload of shit to be dumped on somebody's head. When he was told the news, there was no expression change because he already knew it was coming... I think all three of them should be acquired and shipped to Guantanamo so we can finally know all the parties involved etc. so some real Justice and apologies can be levied.

.....Bill
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
August 5, 2011
Thanks John.

I learn quite a bit about how the general populace is being manipulated by the main stream media(Fox,ABC channels,Limbaugh clones etc)by reading blog posts. # NOTE: There is no Liberal Media. It died along with the other freedoms this country once took for granted. Liberal media is similar to the free lunch,too cheap to meter, new and improved,all natural etc etc. It just does not exist except in the minds of the true believers. So far I would say the propagandists are winning some battles but have yet to win the war.When they do win, the evidence will be overwhelming as the country sinks into a new dark age.

Don't mean to pick on Chuck but in parsing his post I see some real evidence of effective propaganda techniques.


"With each new solar farm that is christened, the grasp that OPEC holds on Western society weakens"

First of all OPEC is a paper tiger with little if any real power over oil prices. The speculators on wall street drive up prices far more effectively. Secondly PV power displaces almost zero oil. Most oil is used in transportation.Little if any transportation uses electricity which is the only thing produced by a PV panel.

" Islam fundamentalists, bent on the destruction of the Western way of life"

Islamist's could care less about the western way of life and laugh as they see us do the destructing ourselves. What they care most about is driving out the American version of the German Wermacht who invades their country and slaughters their citizens. They're just meeting violence with violence. If we as a country really wanted security we would pull back all of our modern day Roman Legions from across the globe and put all this squandered money into renewable energy and education.
John Giannasca
John Giannasca
August 5, 2011
Chuck, if you were an Aussie I would say you must go to all the rugby matches because you think the guy's in the scrum are talking about you. Renewables and paranoia...I guess I never put it together!
John Giannasca
John Giannasca
August 5, 2011
Thanks Larry, best post I have read in ages
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
August 4, 2011
'Our energy purchases are strengthening the most intolerant, anti-modern, anti-Western anti-women's rights, and anti-pluralistic strain of Islam.'

Are you quite certain that you are not talking about right wing republicans here? Tea Party Zealots perhaps? Certainly fits the profile.

As for this irrational fear of terrorism,just where is the evidence that the US has ever seen anything but easiy avoided terrorism? 9/11? Who says they were Arabs? In this case the government is being truthful for once? Where is the real evidence of exactly what REALLY happened on that day.I don't know.You don't know. Someone does but they're either not saying or can't say due to having involuntarily reached room temperature soon after the staged event in question. The 9/11 National White Wash and Evidence Avoidance Commission raised more questions than it answered. There's as much real verifiable evidence of the existence of al queda or Islamic terrorists that don't have a legitimate beef with the west as there are little green men in space suits. Still many believe both exist. Proves nothing except human gullibility.Islamist's targeting solar panels is as likely as the tooth fairy showing up and leaving me a nickle. I know! The next terrorist attack will be some Islamist's carrying a load of Sharp 208's with bare MC4's,carrying a tub of salt water while praying to Ala for bright sun and threatening mass electrocution of the infidel's. Have a nice fearful day.
Chuck Scifers
Chuck Scifers
August 4, 2011
Most Solar Farm Projects are located in remote areas, where land is affordable and sparse population provides easier acceptance, permitting and operation. Unfortunately, these remote locations are vulnerable to attacks of theft and terrorism. Today there is an alarming increase in the incidents of theft and damage to solar farms, impacting the production of electric power.
1. The REAL THREAT is coming - Terrorism
With each new solar farm that is christened, the grasp that OPEC holds on Western society weakens. Most Petro dictators are Islam fundamentalists, bent on the destruction of the Western way of life. Not only are they involved in the Jihad war, but also in the economies that pay for this war. In Friedman's book, "Hot, Flat and Crowded", he states that the ability of Petro dictators to squash democratic society in their own nation, wage Jihad war on the West, keep their own people in oppressed poverty is a direct result of the demand and therefore , the price of oil. Our energy purchases are strengthening the most intolerant, anti-modern, anti-Western anti-women's rights, and anti-pluralistic strain of Islam. As the price of oil goes up, freedom goes down; as the price of oil goes down, the pace of freedom goes up. In addition, we are financing with our oil purchases their armies' initiatives against us – those of al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad.
Lessen the demand – through conservation, efficiency, and massive renewable energy projects, and you reduce the price of oil. Lower prices mean less revenue which weakens the Petro dictators' power to continue along their current Jihad path.
Our country utilizes major security measures on nuclear plants, refineries, seaports, airlines, etc but next-to-nothing is being done to protect solar farms. The next wave of jihad attacks will be directed at that very real threat to Islam – the vehicle that will put them out of business - the Solar Farm.
Chuck Scifers
Chuck Scifers
August 4, 2011
Most Solar Farm Projects are located in remote areas, where land is affordable and sparse population provides easier acceptance, permitting and operation. Unfortunately, these remote locations are vulnerable to attacks of theft and terrorism. Today there is an alarming increase in the incidents of theft and damage to solar farms, impacting the production of electric power.
1. The REAL THREAT is coming - Terrorism
With each new solar farm that is christened, the grasp that OPEC holds on Western society weakens. Most Petro dictators are Islam fundamentalists, bent on the destruction of the Western way of life. Not only are they involved in the Jihad war, but also in the economies that pay for this war. In Friedman's book, "Hot, Flat and Crowded", he states that the ability of Petro dictators to squash democratic society in their own nation, wage Jihad war on the West, keep their own people in oppressed poverty is a direct result of the demand and therefore , the price of oil. Our energy purchases are strengthening the most intolerant, anti-modern, anti-Western anti-women's rights, and anti-pluralistic strain of Islam. As the price of oil goes up, freedom goes down; as the price of oil goes down, the pace of freedom goes up. In addition, we are financing with our oil purchases their armies' initiatives against us – those of al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad.
Lessen the demand – through conservation, efficiency, and massive renewable energy projects, and you reduce the price of oil. Lower prices mean less revenue which weakens the Petro dictators' power to continue along their current Jihad path.
Our country utilizes major security measures on nuclear plants, refineries, seaports, airlines, etc but next-to-nothing is being done to protect solar farms. The next wave of jihad attacks will be directed at that very real threat to Islam – the vehicle that will put them out of business - the Solar Farm.
The current security
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
August 2, 2011
Well, you won't have to wait long to find out will you?
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
August 2, 2011
-------" So it's still a decade or so away, optimistically."----

No, 20% of natural gas needs, not 20% of all energy needs.

Expectation is to meet and exceed this goal by 2015.

However, complicating factor in trying to make statements of unchanging static statistics as you are wanting to see here are complicated by the fact that the entire situation is fluid and things are changing at break neck speed. I have seen statements that solar PV, which Germany only seriously began to deploy in mass in the last 2 years is moving at speeds that is astonishing even the Germans themselves. Solar PV capacity has more than doubled in the last year----30MW in the last month alone.

-------" That means Germany imported 87% of the natural gas it consumed. Not a model of national energy security."--------

This is the prime mover in the German push for renewable energy-------most of their NG comes from Russia. Overall, Germany imports 61% of their energy. They are increasing use of NG as vehicle fuel rapidly----aided by the cost factor vs. petroleum. So the goal is shooting at a moving target.

And now, they will be shutting down nuclear power by 2022.

The wind, solar and biogas are the big guns----but the biggest gun of all? Conservation and efficiency---doing the same things with less.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
August 2, 2011
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/07/biogas-flows-through-germanys-grid-big-time-53075

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/03/new-record-for-german-renewable-energy-in-2010

http://bio-gas-plant.blogspot.com/2011/06/biogas-plant-in-eastern-germany.html

The world's largest, and the world's second largest biogas production plants have commenced operations in Penkun and Konnern. These two plants together will be producing 20 million and 15 million cubic meters/yr, nearly doubling production. Total number of operating production plants has gone from about 3200 in 2007 to close to 4800 now.

Biogas production is relatively low tech and German companies specialize in modular designs that are quickly and easily adapted from small to large operations.
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 31, 2011
Hi Fred:

Your idea as to the realities of shale methane acquisition are very thin. The chemicals that go down the borehole in the water reads like a carcinogenic shopping list. Millions of gallons of water is used for the initial frack and millions and millions more for all the re-fracks that will follow. Not to go Hollywood on you, but did you see Gasland?? If you strip away the rather small amount of Hollywood that is present in that movie, Josh gives a rather good account of all the real world consequences that happen when thousands of wells are sunk. The Bitch of it is, that you can not even clean up the water with RO technology because the TDS is so high, not to mention all the VOC's eat the RO membranes in the RO system. The CH4 bubbling out of the water creates an incredible explosive hazard. Everyone has seen houses that have had Natural gas leaks and a spark. You can clean up the block and have enough toothpicks for the whole city. I have to say I am a bit surprised on your apparent position regarding fracking...
#23... an interesting history of experience.. Fred is for sure a glass half full person by his comments... Energy independence is probably a no brainer, when its comes to having a chance at surviving what is around the corner.....
But as history shows, 99% of the masses don't see the reality until they are in it up to their eyeballs....

.....Bill
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
July 31, 2011
(continued)

Fracking fluids are another problem. Chemicals in fracking fluids have led to a lot of speculation. We do need to keep an eye and a tight control on that. However---the main use for fracking fluid is as the liquid itself is used to physically move the pressure from the surface to the area below ground to be fractured. You do not need chemicals to do that, all you need is a liquid to hydraulically transfer pressure. Propane is now being used for this purpose. Propane is a natural component of natural gas---and at STP it exists as a gas, but put under pressure, it becomes a liquid. Propane is pumped down the bore hole and the liquid transfers pressure from above. When the NG is taken off by removing the methane, the liquid evaporates. The propane used as the fracking fluid will simply be recovered along with methane---which is where it came from in the first place.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
July 31, 2011
Bill----LOL, I don't doubt your descriptions at all. Just like any other gold rush, we will have our downside. And I agree with you, it is not good. However, I also think that just like other gold rushes historically have progressed, this side shall pass, order will return.

That is the time that I'm looking toward. What you perceive to be the downside of natural gas---I see as the upside. Methane, CH4, as you point is both a fossil fuel, AND a biofuel. If we already have infrastructure in place to use the fossil fuel---switching to biomethane is no problem whatever. All we have to do is make it. The means of distribution and use are already there. And since fossil and biomethane are the same stuff, we can make the conversion smoothly and seamlessly. Both can be mixed in any proportion with no loss of performance in any application.

Including petroleum replacement.


As for water----CH4 is mostly insoluble in water. Methane in groundwater is actually fairly common in areas where coal bearing seams lie close to the surface. Allowing water to set overnight before use will get rid of methane. This has been known and done for hundreds of years.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
July 31, 2011
Interesting you mention the Frack Attack on the east coast.
In 1976 I built my first PV panel from discarded silicon 'dice' left over from making SCR's and Diodes. Made them on the sly on third shift with help from the lab technicians and digging at the local university library. I was told by all who saw the admittedly anemic 700ma @ 16VOC from 4ft sq area on a cookie sheet serving as frame, that solar PV was silly,just hippy nonsense and would never amount to anything. I was told the same thing when I installed the first fully integrated Jacobs wind turbine in PA in 1978. In 1980 I had a gas company invade my 22 acres and proceeded to trash most of it to drill a gas well,have Haliburton come in and frack the well and destroy my 150 year old pristine spring and water well. I declared war on fossil fuels right there and the fools who use it and never looked back. I moved to Oregon in 1982 and got up to my neck in renewable energy in any way I could. Now I have no need for natural gas,grid power,propane or even gasoline. %100 of these needs are met with PV power.And that includes heating a home and shop off of modified heat pumps. I don't even use natural gas indirectly by virtue of buying food made with fertilizer supplied by natural gas as I garden organically. If I can do it most anyone can do it. Problem is they won't. What's a person to do?
At this point I have no idea. The earth as we have known it will have to bend over and kiss its own ass goodbye I guess.
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 31, 2011
Hi:

The problem Fred is that the masses don't understand the difference between Natural Gas from shale and Natural Gas from Bio. In the political and public arena it all just becomes natural Gas. I live in PA where the Marcellus Shale "gold rush" is in full swing. The new governor is letting all the solar incentives expire in favor of shale money. The Wellsboro area and all like areas in the Northern tier were beautiful pristine masterpieces of nature. Take a drive up there now.... it is fast becoming like some Middle east oil and gas port. Trucks 24/7 on little back roads where people used to live in quiet. The noise is so bad the people can not even sleep. They are totally trashing everything they touch, and they are just getting started... and then of course you have Cuomo and his food network petroleum mouth piece girl friend (Sandra Lee) helping out the people of NY so they can get there daily dose of CH4 and other chems in their drinking water down the road.
SO, in theory heavily promoting bio CH4 makes since (I am for it) but in practice you will not be able to do it without shale methane coming on for a ride.... and when you have lost your water, YOU HAVE LOST EVERYTHING.

.....Bill
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
July 31, 2011
Clee----natural gas(methane), is both a fossil fuel and a biofuel.

Methane can be used directly for transportation. We've been able to do it for over 90 years, and it is gaining wide acceptance in Europe, South America and Asia. Any internal combustion engine can be converted to use either methane and liquid fuel. Most natural gas vehicles are bi-fuel vehicles.

Methane is a quick and easy way to convert from coal for electric production. It can convert directly from coal, just remove the coal burning furnaces, and install gas burners---nothing else needs to change, buildings, boilers, turbines, generators, controls and connections all remain the same. And natural gas is the cleanest form of energy we have. Since it is a gas, it is easy and cheap to remove sulphur and other acid forming gases, it contains no toxic heavy metal residues, it produces no PMs(particulate matter) and it produces no ash to dispose of.

Natural gas is the cheapest form of consumer available energy by BTU content that we have.

Methane can be produced cheaply and easily from any type of biomass at all, including sewage. We've been able to do it for over 160 years. Germany is producing close to 20% of their natural gas usage this way now----and a sizable portion of German vehicles are bi-fuel, Germany has over 5,000 CNG filling stations in a country about the size of Missouri and Iowa.

Biomethane and fossil methane are the same stuff, CH4, and they can be mixed in any proportion with no loss of performance in any application.

We even have catalytic fuel cells that can use methane directly to produce electricity. The city of Portland, OR, has been using catalytic converters to produce electricity to run a sewage treatment plant for over 12 years---using methane produced from the sewage.

Yes, renewable energy can replace coal, petroleum and nuclear interchangeably, at low cost, cleanly and safely. We can produce as much as we need.
Tim Dolan
Tim Dolan
July 30, 2011
I am just going to go, some people have some sad delusions about the military. But ignoring that, because it is irrelevant.

First I am of the opinion that there are two basic flaws in humans that dictate our actions and why a lot of 'utopias' fail.
Greed and laziness. Free-Markets fail because of greed. Socialism fails because of laziness. The only thing that works is a balance of the two.

Since the object of this site is (I am presuming) to promote renewable energy, then what is needed is to change to majorities opinion (mindset if you will) that renewable energy is in their interests. Right now they are of the mindset that renewable energy can't be done, so why bother.

Talking about the environmental benefits is mostly abstract to most people and thus it can be ignored. But if you can show the masses that they will benefit from clean renewable sources then they will eventually want them to be put in place.

While the 'corporate masters' may have significant influence in telling the story, if enough people tell a counter story then eventually the masses catch on. If this is not the case, then we truly are doomed to extinction. I believe it is true that the masses can be educated to the actual facts over time.

I also believe one of the best mechanisms for convincing people to want renewable sources is to minimize the environmental, which is an abstract to most people, and emphasis the economic and security benefits of renewable energy.

Simultaneously, I support roof-top solar vigorously because I believe it will pull some of the power away from large in-human corporations and back towards the people.

But that is just my opinion,
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 30, 2011
Hi:

I think you give us to much credit Phil. We can not even understand our own existence. A universe/time that is finite is out of our mental reach, as is the idea of infinite or forever. We see the world as solid when there is space between everything. Belief will not get you there as a solution, for even if you say "GOD" absolutely exists without doubt, where did GOD come from (I am not saying GOD doesn't exist with that). My point here before it gets lost, is that no matter what we discover, we are by the rules of reality incapable of understanding our own reality, as to its "beginning" or "end". The very question in and of itself, might very well be like asking what flavor is the sky. We happen to be the most advanced species that seems to have come along on this planet, whether we will even come close to how long the dinosaurs were here, looks bleak at the this time.

.....Bill
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
July 30, 2011
Nice work, Billie, et al. Now to understand the only way the mind can change. Is is by force of fear (war), or pedantic instruction? Or would it be thru willingness to change by seeing that one's own ways may not be beneficial to the self, and will anyone see that if they are held to the precepts of fearful accumulation of needless power and wealth (belief in lack), or are guided to accept a different idea of what this world is for? I'd laugh at the waiting for DNA to offer a step up. Understand our true identity as co-creators with amazing power beyond the "individual self"(ego) is key to expanding the mind to this awareness level.
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 30, 2011
Hi:

To number 13, yes you are for the most part right. The actual military itself is just a willing/unwilling pawn.
Our world is controlled by the part of the very rich who seek power even more than the wealth.
Everything that is happening now with the debt fiasco is all contrived to move the "comfort" to the side of the few from the many. Whether they be dems or reps, its just a puppet show to give the illusion of choice to avoid the big "R".
Over the past 50 years from a macro perspective, whether red or blue is in the WH or congress, the wealth has been being taken away from the middle. Over the last generation this movement has accelerated rapidly. Employee benefits of all kinds are slowly being eliminated. The commons and the very idea of it are being destroyed etc., all for the wealthy few who want to control all this through their corporations. This mistake has been made time and time again down through history, each perpetrator in their point in history, always believing they can pull it off because things have changed, more technology is available, people can be controlled more, etc., etc.. Each time they fail of course, and "loose their heads".
But, all this is wasted type because nothing anyone writes or says will change our human nature and the inevitable outcome of this repeating cycle we go through as a species. The only question is can we survive long enough for our "DNA" to change.

.....Bill
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
July 30, 2011
"the military as a whole are the last people that want to actually fight wars"
Nice sentiment but misses the big picture. All military's are structured from the top down. Starting with the Commander in Chief right on down to a lowly private. It is a 'whole' as you say. A whole assembly of essentially mind numbed droids who are brainwashed (they like to call it training)into reacting like 'pavlov's' dog to be obedient and not let logic or morality result in questioning authority. As someone who had a ticket to Canada prepared during the Vietnam Mass Killing for Profit I dreamed of a day when a war would be declared and nobody showed up.I would be the first on the line the day our country is actually threatened but I'll not be a part of such a mindless construct as the military.
And yes there are people who join the military simply to kill legally. I went to high school with two examples. Did 3 tours in Vietnam and lived to tell about it. Truly sick individuals. More common than you think. Remember they were part of your 'whole' as you described it. I'm certain had Cheney not been a low life coward he would have been pulling triggers in Iraq just for the thrill. And as for the military 'advancing renewable energy'? Aircraft design,electronics,and plastics all advanced at light speed during World War 2 while at the same time millions were slaughtered and trillions in wealth was destroyed. And your point was?? Also I'm just thrilled that an entire carrier task force is powered by a 'welfare system that creates toxic waste lasting for the next two hundred centuries. Now that's my idea of real renewable energy advancement.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
July 30, 2011
The US Navy expects to be able to deploy an entire carrier task force fleet, petroleum free, by 2015 according to Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus.
Tim Dolan
Tim Dolan
July 30, 2011
Just feel the need to point out, the military as a whole are the last people that want to actually fight wars. They enjoy practicing for war and getting to play with truly awesomely expensive pieces of equipment, but they don't want to actually fight a war unless, some one attacked us or we otherwise have to.

And this is even more true of folks that have been to a war zone.

But politicians, especially those that avoided ending up in a war zone are more likely to want a war then the military does. And our current mess was caused by a particular politician thinking he could run the military like FedEx, just enough at just the right time. That was stupid.

Meanwhile, the military is helping the cause of renewable energy technology probably more then any other federal level right now, because they are trying to avoid having to move oil around the battlefield.
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
July 28, 2011
'And whether or not we have a military industrial complex that is in charge of the government instead of the other way around doesn't really matter as much as how it is used by the politicians. And if we get rid of the oil excuse, maybe we can down-size the military.'
NOT! Standing armies don't stand for long. They always look for action and not necessarily because of, and in many cases ,in spite of any 'patriotism' Having a Military/Industrial complex guarantees there will always be a politician/military type mentality that will create and then justify the mindless slaughter they are all too capable of delivering. Always has been so. Always will be until we wake up.Just remember that the vast majority of our national wealth squandered on the military has little if anything to do with real security.Just security for the well connected.Don't believe me? Then read WAR IS A RACKET by decorated marine Major Smedley Butler. Not a thing he wrote has changed in modern times except for getting far worse since he wrote this in the 1930's.
Tim Dolan
Tim Dolan
July 28, 2011
I agree with the article.
When I installed my solar PV system on my roof in Dec 2009, I have been telling people, I didn't do it for the environment, I did it because I believe the national security of the USA requires that we have a reliable and stable energy base. And I put in my system because I wanted to put my money where my mouth was.

The environmental benefits are a bonus.

In my case I am a retired USAF Imagery Analyst, which is probably why I agree with the Article. And I note our involvement and use of the military tends to be in direct proportion to the amount of oil involved in any situation.

And whether or not we have a military industrial complex that is in charge of the government instead of the other way around doesn't really matter as much as how it is used by the politicians. And if we get rid of the oil excuse, maybe we can down-size the military.

Lastly, the argument that solar and wind will not reduce oil because oil is only 1% of electricity is very short-sighted. If we change to an electricity based transportation system, then we can reduce our dependence on oil at the same time we reduce our dependence on other fossil fuels.
And the sooner the better so we can Conserve those fuels for what only they can do, which other sources can't.
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 28, 2011
Hi:

As a person who was in I.T. for over 30 years, seeing a "death" nail put into facebook and tweeter would not cause me to shed a tear. Its like the beginnings of the movie "Surrogate", where people prefer robot likenesses of themselves with no physical imperfections as their day to day reality. Personally, I like people in the flesh, far more interesting.

.....Bill
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
July 27, 2011
I personally feel the threat to national security as outlined above is a case of not seeing the forest for the trees. This countries security in many ways is teetering on a pin head and it's not based on threats from outside but more from within. The real threat we face is the myopia and tunnel vision American's in general exhibit ,including those who we call leaders being the most obvious examples. Over the years we have slowly destroyed our ability to feed ourselves without massive quantities of imported fuel.Locally produced food crops are having a mini renaissance but most would still starve with even minor disruptions since most can't even boil water let alone really cook from scratch even when food is plentiful. There's barely a single building structure existing or even being built that takes energy independence or real conservation into consideration. The only way most could be heated in winter without massive energy inputs would be to burn it down and stand in front of it.National Security is more than a standing army feeding at the national treasury trough and it's far more than the fake Homeland Security that's more security for the well connected contractors than actual security. Real security starts with an individual waking up from this current collective coma the main stream media keeps people in and getting real freedom through disconnecting from that umbilical cord of dependence we have all become attached too. At the very least security could be making an effort to even know your next door neighbor.And no I don't mean making their acquaintance over one of those brain dead social (more like anti social) sites like Facebook.
John Giannasca
John Giannasca
July 27, 2011
"Just because you paranoid doesn't mean your not being followed"
If promoting energy diversity on the basis of national security hits the right spot with people...well that great. The advancement of the renewable energy agenda needs to be multifaceted. Reduction in pollution, distributed generation, reduction in green house gases and global warming, energy independence. Whatever the reason, and there are many, we need to move forward. Just as there is no one renewable technology that will cover all needs, there is no one reason we need to do it.
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
July 27, 2011
This article exemplifies an insightful viewpoint IMO. Large corporate power bases in arm with the military seem to have control of the government adjenda. It seems that everyone is convinced that a democratic government cannot sustain in light of the self destructive fear mongering that serves corporate directions. Yet, do we not deserve to explore the real meaning of our National Constitution, the Declaration of Independance, and the Bill of Rights, and the common people it is to serve. This would be the "business plan" and "mission statement" of our founders, as well as anyone who has become a citizen by choice, instead of the plans of profit seeking corporations. I receive many, many mailers about the dangerous intentions of well meaning public servants, all paid for by special corporate interests, and then I also get many inquiries about my opinions and judgements to determine how they are working. It certainly seems like the whole political system is determined to control public opinion in a way that the populace will swallow. Yet, their are balances in the system to counter this strategy, but they must be used. It seems to me that another political party is needed to offer fresh light in a severely polarized government. I like the Green Party.
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 27, 2011
Hi:

In a somewhat side note, here is a link you might interesting:
http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/tim-dechristopher-this-is-what-hope-looks-like

.....Bill
lawrence elliott
lawrence elliott
July 27, 2011
When you think of anything called the military, just remember that 'when you are a hammer,everything looks like a nail'. Those who profit off of death and slaughter will always find a nail that the sheeple will rally to have hammered down.
The military like lawyers is a necessary evil. The secret is to keep both on a very short leash and see them both for what they are: an example of the shortcomings in the human specie.
William Fitch
William Fitch
July 26, 2011
Hi:

Despite our authors background, he seems to have the relationship backwards from a cause effect scenario. Governments need reasons for conflict so they can justify an "Army". Oil is a good one as is the whole Nuclear "thing". Conflict is the reason for a massive hierarchical based government. So when you can use one or two good "needs" as a reason for an Army, you don't exactly want those reasons to go away. Governments have to maintain control over their own people. After all, what government wants to have to build an Army when a Revolution is starting??? Bad Timing don't ya think... One "art" that we have down and are absolutely wonderful at doing as a species, is denying publicly why we do the things that we do. From sex to war and everything in between, we promote lies and misinformation in our day to day existence for social expedience and promotion...
But as they say, you can't teach an old species new tricks...

.....Bill
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
July 26, 2011
The last three wars that the US has become involved in have oil as a root cause.

The terrorist operative who killed 283 Americans over Lockerbie, Scotland was released from prison and returned to Libya in exchange for an oil drilling deal with Muammar Gaddafi.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Thomas Buonomo

Thomas Buonomo

Thomas Buonomo is a former Military Intelligence Officer with a dual degree in Political Science and Middle East Studies from the U.S. Air Force Academy. He is an ardent advocate for strong domestic energy policies to stimulate private...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets
  • 1
    EU Should Scrap Energy Subsidies to Fight Warming, Poland Says

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Natural Power
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • Green Power Conferences
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • Rotork plc
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information