Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

New Standards Are Here, But How Will Aviation Biofuel Market Evolve?

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
14 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 14
July 18, 2011
GreenGas.cc is 50 cents a liter and zero emissions.
It is not biofuel but has powered jets since the sixtys.
Why are we using food land to produce biofuel?
Comment
2 of 14
July 19, 2011
No doubt, biomass-derived synthetic paraffinic kerosene (Bio-SPK) works well. But many questions remain about its sustainability, both in terms of the environment and its cost of production.

The industry says it will use biofuels made only from certified sustainably produced feedstocks. Some, in isolation, like used cooking oil (the source for much of the bio-SPK currently being used on European flights) and bio-SPK from eucalyptus chips (planned to be used by Virgin Australia), have strong sustainability credentials. But as long as biodiesel continues to be subsidized and mandated, all that means is that the supplies get shuffled around: the UCO goes to aviation, and a greater part of the biodiesel mandates get filled with fuel made from soybean, rapeseed, and palm oils.

As for Camelina, the industry claims that this crop is not competing with food production. That is a weak claim. First, Camelina oil is highly edible, and in fact used to be grown in eastern Europe until it was supplanted by canola. Second, even if most has been grown so far in rotation with wheat, there is competition at the margin:

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_bcc0ccb7-2aa8-5a5e-bb36-c9dd60995167.html
Comment
3 of 14
July 19, 2011
Meanwhile, some of the emerging bio-SPK suppliers, such as BioJet International, have quietly bought up 'huge tracts of land in Southeast Asia and elsewhere to produce feedstocks'. South-east Asia usually means palm oil.

http://pacbiztimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2459&Itemid=1

Just as worrying are the policy preferences being given aviation biofuel. The Europe's Emissions Trading System (ETS), which will be extended to aviation in 2012, treats all biofuels, no matter the source as carbon-neutral. That is in stark contrast with how the EU treats road-based biofuels, for which the carbon credit depends on the feedstock and how it was processed.

Second, bio-SPK exports will benefit from the $1/gal biodiesel tax credit. No wonder then that KLM and others are procuring their fuel from a plant established in Louisiana.

And, while the media's focus is on the (currently) more expensive ethanol tax credit, a bill (the 'Biodiesel Tax Incentive Reform and Extension Act of 2011', S. 1277 and H.R. 2238) is working its way through Congress that would convert the $1 per gallon blenders credit into a producers' tax credit, extend it until the end of 2016, and apply it as well to 'fuel derived from biomass which meets the requirements of a Department of Defense specification for military jet fuel or an American Society of Testing and Materials specification for aviation turbine fuel.'

Subsidies, subsidies everywhere, and not a drop to drink.
Comment
4 of 14
July 20, 2011
well said by ronald. bio-SPK is not a biofuel, but an excellent qulity kerosene or diesel additive, produced from oils and fat like materials (it can be any of these, fresh or refuse) on the expense of severe hydrogenation. This is why the scale of such units extends the 150 kt/y and preferably will be produced in a petroleum refinery. This scale to economy makes me to think about suitability as supporting renewable energy objectives. The two must coexist by competing for the same feedstock. No one made a carbon footprint estimation. This and the carbon footprint are strongly related.
Comment
5 of 14
July 20, 2011
Please catch up with the biodiesel industry. First generation feedstock vs. 2nd generation feedstock.

For more information:

etcgreen.com/biofuels
Comment
6 of 14
July 20, 2011
here is no matter of process technology generations. there are basic differences between ester fuel (mainly composed of at least fatty acid chains of 18 carbons) and fully hydrotreated fuel (meeting spec of jet fuels with hydrocarbon chain length not really exceeding 14 carbons). Any first generation unit can be ravamped (retrofitted) to second generation, we and others in the field are claiming to be able and we and others are saying that the conversion produces impressive benefits. What is really matters is the willingness of producers for a change.
Comment
7 of 14
July 20, 2011
@andras-kovacs-26444 It is not a matter what can be done, but rather what should be done. 1st generation feedstock is low yield and uses prime farmland that could be used for food. 2nd generation feedstock is over 400 gallons/acre/yr (to over 14,000 gallons/acre/yr) and does not compete with food crops.

2nd generation feedstock for biodiesel is the only scalable, sustainable, environmentally friendly and economically viable solution we have today for petroleum replacement.

etcgreen.com Article: U.S. Migration
Comment
8 of 14
July 20, 2011
@Etcgreen

You write, "2nd generation feedstock ... does not compete with food crops."

That is not necessarily true. If the growing of the biomass uses arable land, or water that could be used to grow crops, it can be considered to be in competition with crops.
Comment
9 of 14
July 20, 2011
@ronald-steenblik-74298

We have been growing 2nd generation feedstock orchards for 3 years in the southwestern states. The yield of these trees would not be as high in the heartland of the US due to climate conditions and weather events - tornadoes, deep freezes, hail storms, standing water, etc. These trees evolved in arid climates and they produce 800-1,000 gallons/acre/yr (soy is 50 gallons/acre/yr). We are also working with micro algae technologies.

The concept of using water for biodiesel production is not understood by most as it is a matter of several orders of magnitude. Most of our farms have thousands of acre feet of water available so literally, just 3 of our orchard properties could in theory, based on resources, supply 100% of all transportation fuel for the entire US annually - sustained. Just 15 of our properties could supply 100% of all transportation fuels for the world. These are real-world numbers and over the next 5-10 years these concepts will be common knowledge.

We agree that we need to return 30M acres of corn crops in the US from ethanol production to food and 22M acres of soy to food crops.

Per your note above, if you do the research, you will see that virtually no organization is investing in palm orchards. Today, the more informed investors are supporting jatropha, yellowhorn and micro algae.

etcgreen.com/biofuels - follow the links for more information
Comment
10 of 14
July 20, 2011
@etcgreen

OK, I've looked at your website. First of all, not everybody would agree with your definition of 2nd-generation feedstocks: "by definition, non-food crops that will grow on land where food crops will not." But lets for the sake of argument adopt that definition. The key word in that definition is "will" -- i.e., that can. That does not mean that is where they will be grown. There are plenty of jatropha projects in Africa that are using land that will grow other crops.

Your web site refers to large areas of arid lands in the southwest United States that can grow jatropha and yellowhorn, and note that oil yields on such land when water is not applied are more in the range of 400 gallons per acre per year. But then you suggest that you can get water to those areas. Then I presume they could also grow citrus crops, if not other edible crops.

Later your web site says, "While 15,000 gallons of water might be pumped into a yellowhorn tree to generate 1 gallon of biodiesel, the vast majority of this water is never absorbed by the tree and returns to the watershed to be recycled so there is no real-world loss." That is an astonishing statement, from many perspectives. The vast majority seeps back into the ground and is not evaporated? Do you have some studies to prove that?

Perhaps oil grows on trees, but water doesn't.

From the rest of your web site, I see that your company is working with farmers in the southern Nevada region, "helping more than two dozen land owners with orchard design, control systems and centralized co-op services." Great, I wish you success. Let us know when you have some profit and loss figures.

(Continued below)
Comment
11 of 14
July 20, 2011
@etcgreen

In the mean time, I suggest YOU do some research. You will see that there are plenty of organizations, including those intending to serve the aviation biofuels market, who are investing in oil-palm orchards.

Have a look at Biofuels Digest's latest version of its advanced biofuels database.

http://biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2011/05/02/advanced-biofuels-capacity-to-reach-4-3b-gallons-by-2015-128-projects-latest-database/

Some of the largest capacity installations, such as those being built by Finland's Neste Oil, will use palm oil as their feedstock.

I'm interested in what is the here and now, what is actually happening as a result of policies, not what theoretically could happen.

Just a few years ago, everybody was talking as if switchgrass-based ethanol was right around the corner. So, where is it?
Comment
12 of 14
July 20, 2011
@ronald-steenblik-74298

Thank you for your interest.

The African jatropha and yellowhorn orchards are maturing - there has been a steep learning curve. Our staff have helped farmers in Zambia in past years.

Actually, citrus does not do well in a low humidity climate, so again, no, our orchards are not competing with food crops. Eventually we will install solar tubes over our orchards for dual revenue streams and that may allow enough sunlight control to grow food crops, but this is not our target.

Palm orchards can produce about 600 gallons/acre/yr, but harvesting is expensive, the number of years to full yield is less than attractive and the production life-cycle of the "trees" is relatively short. There are large palm orchards being ripped out today to be replaced with jatropha and yellowhorn.

You are likely aware of the amount of foodstock the US historically exported. I have read more than one article suggesting that much of the north Africa and Mid-East uprisings are the direct result of lower US food exports.

Certainly, we have studies on all of our orchards and projects. The irrigation systems are sub-surface to begin with - there is no surface water to evaporate. Actually, 15,000 gallons for 1 gallon of biodiesel is not abnormal. Your comments are not exhibiting a knowledge of standard agricultural measures. Any idea how many gallons of water and BTU's of energy are required to generate 1 gallon of ethanol? How about gallons per apple?

Water is not an issue if one understands the opportunities and business models. We have profit and loss figures and we are on target. We are producing biodiesel at $38 barrel equivalent from direct feedstock and about $20 barrel equivalent if recycled cooking oil. Yes, we are expanding rapidly.

I worked for the DoE when switchgrass became popular. We were not impressed and did not pursue.
Comment
13 of 14
July 21, 2011
'Highway Hay' and Green Algae 'scum/scuzz' to the rescue: Hwy Hay is the grass and plants that grow in the Right-Of-Way along our public roads [that we pay folks to mow 2-4 times each year!] It cannot be used as animal feed as it has chemicals, winter salt, and glass/metal litter in it: Sicklebar mow then bale it in 1 meter dia by 1.5-2 meter'round
bales' and thuck 'em to former ethanol plants nearby. Hwy Hay
is converted to hydrocarbons [not alcohol] then refined into a
fuel similar to gasoline but free of sulphur, lower in polution, and with up to 10% more energy per [gal/liter]. Browse 'Swift fuel' for more info...Green algae scum is everywhere--mainly on lakes, ponds, other water bodies: Using
a former fire engine, scum is 'skimmed' off surface, trucked to algae plant where it is 'bred', then refined--mostly by solar process..[Browse green algae fuel]Goodbye Hwy Hay and green scum--hello low cost, high quality 'gas' and 'diesel' fuel!! Now, add HHO gas generator and cut fuel use/cost by 30+%
Aaron Allen...
Comment
14 of 14
August 7, 2011
Pls add to my 'Highway Hay/Green Algae thots--Regions shud produce their bio-fuels with region-necessary specifications included. This is the 'Inside-Out' vs the 'Outside-In' concept where fuels are made
locally/regionally--not 'transported-in' by tankers, trains, longhaul trucks, etc...Think of buying local/regional produce, meats, dairy,
beers/wines--fewer middlemen, $peculator$, 'marketer$' etc...Local/
regional market is responsive to real needs--not what some outsider
wants to send you...Aaron Allen
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Steve Leone

View Steve Leone's Profile
About: Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California. more »

Advertise With Us

American Electric Technologies, Inc. (AETI) Growth Energy HelioSage Stoel Rives LLP Solar FlexRack Westinghouse Solar Solar Electric Power Association
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters