The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Monday, May 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Fort Felker: Driving Innovation in Wind Power

An unassuming guy, Fort Felker leads a high-powered research team for the U.S. Department of Energy that seeks to advance the country's renewable energy goals.

Jennifer Runyon, Managing Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
July 07, 2011  |  15 Comments

Talking with wind energy engineer Fort Felker about turbine manufacturing is like taking a breath of fresh air. A hearty fellow with a big voice and a slight southern drawl, he doesn't come across as someone who holds a patent in winglet technology, a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University and was instrumental in the design of the modern wind turbine. He comes across as someone who believes in the power that renewable energy has to change the world – and the important role that solid mechanical design and analysis tools play in order to make that happen.

Felker started his career at NASA, performing research on helicopters at the Ames Research center but switched over to work with Kenetech Wind Power in 1994. According to Felker, Kenetech was a powerhouse early on in the wind industry. “Some of the things that the rest of the industry is just now getting to, Kenetech was doing in the early 90s,” he said.

His work at Kenetech centered on turbine dynamics analysis. He said that when he joined the company, the simulation tools for wind turbine design weren’t that good. Having done simulation work for helicopters, he had “a pretty strong toolkit to transfer that technology into the wind industry,” he said.

Felker’s crowning achievement at Kenetech was his work as part of the Tiger Team design group that built the KVS-45. The KVS-45 was a 500-kW machine, which was big for the day. Felker said that the KVS-45 was the first turbine designed from scratch to have all the modern features that we see today. It was the first turbine that combined variable speed, full power conversion, variable pitch and tubular towers.

He is quite proud of how quickly the machine went from concept to prototype. “In a space of 10 months, we went from a clean sheet of paper to having two prototypes up and operating and acquiring test data. It was an amazing accomplishment to do all that in 10 months. Just astonishingly fast,” he said. “I’m really proud to have been part of the design team that pulled that off.”

But soon after the KVS-45 was up and running, the company closed up shop – a result of poor management and other factors, said Felker. “It was a number of things that really came together at the wrong time. Deregulation of the electricity industry was occurring at the time and it became very, very difficult to secure a long-term PPA because there was so much uncertainty associated with the deregulation process,” he said.

But other companies survive tough times. And Felker thinks Kenetech management could have done more. “[Deregulation] shouldn’t have been enough to bring the largest wind turbine manufacturing company to its knees. I fault the leadership for not being sufficiently flexible to adapt to the realities of a fast-changing marketplace,” he said.

So Felker left Kenetech and started a six-year entrepreneurial stint during which he founded Winglet Technology, a company based on his patent. The company is still thriving today but Felker is no longer involved.

For Felker, wind power was in his blood and once he noticed that the wind industry was on solid ground, he immediately returned to it. “I had always wanted to return to wind. You know, as an engineer, it gives me such a positive feeling to work on a technology that is making the world a better place and I hated leaving that and I wanted to get back to it.”

Engineer AND businessman, he chuckles stating that when an industry can boast global annual sales in the $100 billion range, it’s probably here to stay. And that’s what landed him where he is now, as the director of the National Wind Testing Center (NWTC), which is part of the Department of Energy.

The NWTC is an R&D execution center based at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory that delivers world-class research results for the DOE. “We focus on innovation that will reduce the cost of wind energy, on ways to improve the power production of wind turbines, ways to reduce the structural loads on wind turbines through advanced controls that allow you to put bigger rotors on and get more power out,” he explained.

One area that the center has focused on is gearbox reliability, an issue that Felker said was hard to pin down because manufacturers didn’t like to talk about problems they were experiencing in their gearboxes. “There were warranty issues, lawyers were involved, there was a lot of finger pointing about whose fault it is,” he said. To get beyond that, the NWTC had to develop its own non-proprietary, open-engineering architectured gearboxes that were representative of modern gearboxes, he said. Once the design was in the public domain, Felker said the center could then provide results to the wide range of stakeholders responsible for gearbox reliability: “turbine manufacturers, gearbox manufacturers, bearing manufacturers, consultants, universities, there’s got to be over 50 participants,” he said.

The results of the center’s testing have been very revealing, according to Felker. The center compared its actual controlled laboratory results and field test results to blind analysis results to see if the simulation tools that are in use in the industry reflected actual data. And they didn’t.

“These tools that would predict the dynamics of a gearbox are quite complex, quite sophisticated computer programs and there are a lot of choices available to the analyst about how to proceed with a test,” he explained. It is the choices that those analysts are making when conducting simulations that revealed the inconsistencies, he said.

In addition, the center has found that two nominally identical gearboxes can actually behave a lot differently, which also means more work for the engineer.

“It means that the engineers that are designing the system can’t just consider the average – you have to look at the normal variation that you are going to see in a production line, he explained. Since routine, acceptable production variations can make a difference in how a turbine operates, “you can’t just look at the nominal design case,” he said. “You have to look at it and say, ‘well if the tolerances happen to stack up this way, or the other way, how does that change things?’ People need to start considering that,” he said.

Felker considers these results very interesting.

In addition to gearbox testing, the NWTC is looking to make advances in the aerodynamics of turbines and reducing the noise associated with turbines. A less noisy turbine can spin a little faster, he explained.

Felker said that tip speed is a fundamental parameter for turbine noise. “The lower it is, the less noise it makes, the higher, the more noise it makes.” Felker explained that you want that tip speed to be as high as possible with acceptable noise. Higher tip speeds mean lighter turbines and lower torque on the gearbox and the generator. “The whole system gets lighter when you push up that tip speed,” he said.

A lighter system costs less, and lower costs are what will ultimately advance the industry, said Felker. “When we are investigating noise, we can actually take dollars out of the capital cost of the turbine so I think that’s a real important opportunity,” he said.

Felker said that another area that needs further study is advanced control systems and the center has “a couple of wonderful test beds,” on which to conduct those tests. Further, the NWTC is developing a 5-10 MW grid simulator. “Over voltages, under voltages, frequency droop, face-to-face faults, ground faults – all kinds of real-world bad things that happen out there – we’ll be able to test those explicitly here,” he explained.

For Felker, the real challenge for the wind power industry is simple. Get the cost of wind power low enough so that it can really compete with fossil-fuel generation. “We shouldn’t rely on policy or subsidies—we just need to beat the fossil fuels on price,” he said.

He’s optimistic about the future, indicating that over the next 10-20 years wind power costs will drop and soon fall in line with those of fossil fuel generation. He believes that once that happens, we’ll see the fossil fuels dropping in price in order to compete, which will put pressure even further downward on both technologies. “That’s going to be really interesting.” he said. 

15 Comments

Register To Comment
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
July 18, 2011
Being a few miles from Google and knowing some of the folks who decide where checks should go, I'll just say they have so much $ lying around (check their latest report) they don't really care if 90% of what they support are duds. If big $ went with wise decisions, we'd not have VCs aiming for 30:1 return on some ventures, just to stay afloat funding the dud majority.

Just FYI, they also support the Thorium MSR (e.g., see http://tinyurl.com/yb2qgex), which is reasonable, and the Bloom Box, which isn't. Reality does indeed demand thought, not just belief in hype.
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 18, 2011
DrAlexC,
Google thinks enough about these silly kites to write BIG CHECKS. And I think they are becoming a driving force in the alternative energy market. They have recently won one of the inventions of the year from the TED organization. They produce as much electric power as a static windmill weighing about ten times as much.They can be landed in about an hour and maintained on the ground.

In the 50's we were going to have so much nuclear power they wouldn't even bother to meter it.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
July 18, 2011
For Jim -- Greengas is ammonia (NH3) derived from various processes, like methane (CH4) from biodigestors. To quote the refreshingly honest comment here: http://theenergycollective.com/geoffrey-styles/46324/ammonia-alternative-fuel

'...energy density, which is less than half that of gasoline by weight, and about 40% by volume. So a gallon of ammonia would only take you about 40% as far...'

The problem, of course, is that Nitrogen doesn't burn readily and we don't want it to, since even in normal fossil-fuel burning in air, Nitrogen oxides are polluting emissions, even greenhouse gasses and even ozone-layer killers. So ammonia has no future for a major vehicular fuel.

Then too, the energetics of the process for making ammonia aren't sensible -- so much is wasted and energy density is low, while emissions are high, only some folks getting subsidies to put in their bank accounts benefit.

Much as the thankfully halted corn-ethanol subsidies produced energy at 0.3% efficiency (measured from sunlight to wheels), while just taking ordinary solar cells for battery charging for EVs nets over 15% efficiency, and improving.

On Steve's kites, they sound fun & are an old idea, even older than WWII barrage balloons, designed to make life difficult for aircraft (we don't care about birds, of course).

But any 'magic' energy solution has to pass muster on things like efficiency, power density, maintenance, lifetime, transmission loss, resource consumption, etc.

All wind fail on efficiency, power loss & density. Kites are even worse for maintenance, thus reliability -- none allowed in tornado or hurricane country (a lot of the country)! Potential for serious interference with aircraft, given the vast number of kites needed to make a dent in power use, is mind boggling. And, imagine a bad storm loosing a kite's strong tie cables, yanking them over to a main transmission line and pulling that down...

In the '50s, we all were going to have flying cars.
Jim Warden
Jim Warden
July 18, 2011
We use GreenGas.cc to store wind electric for time of need.
It makes wind electric much less intermittent.
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 17, 2011
dear lawrence miles & DrAlexC, If you google up 'Makani' you might find the next step in getting to a 'mature wind technology';similar power production per windmill, a small fraction of the weight (and therefore the expense), don't have to be in remote location (because they fly at high altitude) AND BEST OF ALL ; since they are at high altitude, there is more dependable wind available to harvest. They will be factory built, so there are closer manuf. tolerances,indoor conditions, etc. And when a repair or maint. is needed ; you reel in kite #1 disconnect it, reconnect kite #2 and put it back on line. Repairs and maint. is now done to kite #1 on the ground. Almost no down time, as opposed to wind mills.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
July 10, 2011
No matter how the PR pushes it, wind will never match solar PV -- it doesn't now and as a derivative of solar energy itself, it never can. Even forgiving its huge waste of land, necessarily remote siting, thus loss, and fossil-fuel dependence for hundreds of tons/MW of structural material (steel uses coal, concrete needs fueled kilns & generates CO2), wind can't reach even to 200W/sq meter now delivered by commercial solar PV.

Then come maintenance, reliability & insurance costs, control-system costs, and storage. And, as China is finding, how to move the wind machines miles away when the initial locale doesn't work as well anymore -- those 1000cu-yard foundations are a bear to drag elsewhere. Oh, just leave it? Right, now there's an environmental 'green' subsidy.
;]
When the govt. $ run out... Can anyone say 'corn ethanol'?

Signed, just another SU PhD.
lawrence Miles
lawrence Miles
July 9, 2011
Joel, Dr. Felker answers your question about the source of cost savings. "A lighter system costs less…" Wind is not "mature technology". Three-blade, upwind turbine technology is probably mature with most of the cost inefficiencies squeezed out as you say. But there is at least one system that meets Dr. Felker's lightweight, lower cost test and that is the two-blade, downwind design. If subsidies go away, and it seems like they might, perhaps the 2-blade design will finally get a true market test.

Larry Miles
The Wind Turbine Company
Ralph Perez
Ralph Perez
July 9, 2011
Just a question...is a large windmill with a geothermal base, that also utilizes a large (to enhance the surface area) solar collection system on the blades being developed or tested? Has one that uses its power to trickle charge its own battery and also pumps water uphill (either a storage tower or upstream from a large or small dam) been simulated? It would seem that one or the other energy source might make itself available at any given time.
Would the resultant energy outcome be more than what is projected from a simple magnetic propulsion perpetual motion scheme?
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
Anumakonda Jagadeesh
July 8, 2011
Excellent article on Innovations in Wind Energy. The research by
Fort Felker will help to improve the performance of Wind Turbines.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
John Armstrong
John Armstrong
July 8, 2011
Randy, I'm intrigued you climbed the MS-1 in 1983.... if you mail me privately at johnarmstrong@tidalstream.co.uk I would like to hear how that came about and what you thought...
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 8, 2011
I predict the next innovations in the wind industry will be replacing the tower as we know it.Watch floating platforms (Hywind etc.)replace on shore towers. And then, the holy grail of wind VERY HIGH ALTITUDE : sails, blimps, and gliders that are many hundreds even thousands of feet up, which eliminates the high costs of the tower and get to better wind potential.
Randy Tinkerman
Randy Tinkerman
July 8, 2011
Dr. Felker has done and is doing excellent work at NTWC, but his view of Kenetech and the KVS series is not correct. As John Armstrong stated, there were earlier turbines with similar properties, which were known by the global wind engineering community. I'd already climbed the MS-1 on Orkney in 1983, and can attest to its design.

Kenetech did not 'close up shop,' it went bankrupt for good reason. Management had destroyed the finances of the company, while at the same time using skewed figures to record performance. Additionally, the highly competent engineers were overruled on engineering matters routinely, resulting in the the failed KVS-33. Questionable management practice was the major culprit, not the minor role of 'deregulation.'

The bankruptcy, and the accompanying black eye to the industry, damaged the US wind industry for years. Not least, by splitting apart the center of engineering knowledge which was the the heart of the company. (I know, I went through every single page of the discovery in a fraud allegation case.)

I won't go into details in a comment post, but journalists should independently verify such important factors when interviewing a participant on one side.
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
July 8, 2011
Good article, especially the detail on reliability testing.

Where are the cost saving going to come from in the next 10-20 years? As a mature technology, wind appears to have already squeezed out most of the cost inefficiencies.
John Armstrong
John Armstrong
July 8, 2011
I'm afraid that Dr Felker is not correct that the KVS45 was the first wind turbine that 'combined variable speed, full power conversion, variable pitch and tubular towers.' The WEG MS-1, which we built on Orkney 10 years earlier - in 1983 - had all these features, as had various German and Italian machines. We supplied MS-2's, with variable pitch and tubular towers to Kenetech in 1986, and these were still running a couple of years ago. Kenetech's problem was that their technical concepts - including the KVS 45 - could not deliver to the aggressive marketing and reliability targets which management had embarked on. The European companies - which on the whole were way ahead of the US technically - continued to thrive while the Kenetech technology went through a series of fire-sales including at one point to Enron.
Jamie Schlinkmann
Jamie Schlinkmann
July 8, 2011
I like Dr. Felker and the work that the NWTC is doing, but it does beg the question: should the government be trying to innovate in the area of a commercial technology, and if so, how does it do this without interfering with commerce?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Jennifer Runyon

Jennifer Runyon

Jennifer Runyon is managing editor of RenewableEnergyWorld.com coordinating, writing and/or editing columns, features, news stories and blogs for the publications. She also serves as conference chair of Solar Power-Gen Conference and Exhibition...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Renewable Energy World (North America Edition) Magazine

This magazine is no longer being published as of May 1, 2012. To subscribe to similar renewable energy content click here. Or, subscribe to our worldwide Renewable Energy World magazine digital edition here. From May 2012, Renewable Energy...

  • Archives
  • About
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 10
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 5
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador
  • 3
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
  • Navigant
  • Prudent Living, Inc.
  • Schneider Electric
  • SolarEstimate.org
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • Active Communications International
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information