The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, June 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

For Offshore Wind to Thrive, Collaboration A Must

Steve Leone, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
July 28, 2011  |  25 Comments

Print

If the European Wind Energy Association projections prove accurate, offshore capacity across the continent will leapfrog past traditional onshore wind developments sometime after 2030. By 2050, it predicts, offshore will be the dominant form of wind development. There's no reason to believe that this trend will play out any differently in other parts of the world as the industry sets out to take wind energy farther and deeper than its ever been.

If it’s true that the winds of change are coming to the wind industry, and that developments will move farther offshore behind technologies currently in the research stage, the question remains: Who will lead this emerging sector of the industry?

To answer that, start with the current leader — in this case, the United Kingdom.

According to a report from EWEA released in this week, Europe added 883 MW of offshore capacity in 2010, giving the continent 2,964 MW in total capacity. A bit less than half of that rests off the U.K. coast. The U.K. is the global leader with a total of 1341 MW, followed by Denmark (854 MW), The Netherlands (249), Belgium (195) and Sweden (164).

 

This EWEA chart projects installed capacity, electricity production and share of EU demand

 

While there’s a lot of capacity at stake, there’s also a lot of money on the table. The industry, according to the report, was worth €2.6 billion ($3.77 billion) in 2010. Again, this puts the U.K. in the driver’s seat as the rest of the world considers its offshore future. But in the nascent industry, U.K. companies are marketing themselves as sources of experience for other European countries exploring offshore, such as France. More than anything, business leaders and government officials see the vast potential of the American market — particularly along the East Coast — as a way to move the industry forward as a whole.

U.K. Looking to U.S.

In the U.S., there’s been a lot of talk and a lot of hope for a place where the industry has yet to install its first offshore wind development. Still, U.K. companies have taken notice, and they see enormous potential in the waters that could eventually serve major markets like New York City, Washington and Boston.

One U.K. company that has crossed the Atlantic is PMSS, a global renewable energy consulting firm that recently opened a New York office to better position itself in the new market. According to Mike Rosenfeld, a Los Angeles-based vice-consul with UK Trade & Investment — the U.K. government’s international business development agency — PMSS is already working in a consulting capacity with prospective developers interested in exploring offshore wind. Scotland-based SgurrEnergy has played a prominent role in the yet-to-be-built Cape Wind development — the project that has come to define America’s movement in offshore wind.

Aside from individual companies looking to expand into American waters, Rosenfeld says it’s the unified vision of the two governments that has helped pique interest. Though the British government has traditionally been more supportive through policy, there have been some significant actions by American leaders to help kick-start offshore exploration. One of those — Smart from the Start — may have come later than some would have liked, but it has nonetheless laid the groundwork to facilitate siting, leasing and construction of new projects.

“There is already collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy and the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change on how to accelerate deployment of offshore wind,” said Rosenfeld. “There’s no need to constantly reinvent the wheel. If there’s an opportunity to collaborate on how to get this offshore wind deployed faster, this is a good example of how government to government collaboration will come into play.”

Not all innovation is flowing from Europe’s more established markets to the United States. Principle Power, a Seattle-based deep water wind platform technology company, has teamed with a group of international companies, including turbine-maker Vestas, on a 2-MW floating test installation off the coast of Portugal. The project could be completed in 2012.

Why U.K. has emerged as a leader

The nation undoubtedly is looking to maintain its role as an industry leader in engineering, research and manufacturing. The U.K. has broad government support, a strong cluster of universities and places like the Energy Technology Institute, where global industries and the U.K. government have teamed to work on developing new technologies.

Denmark may have installed the first offshore project, but the U.K. appears to have won the inherent advantage that usually comes with the first to market. Rosenfeld says this is partly due to strong government support and ideal conditions for offshore wind.

"The U.K. has a resource that is considered the most viable at the moment,” said Rosenfeld. “The resource, which is the wind itself, blows pretty consistently.”

But even as the U.K. develops more and more offshore farms, they realize the future is likely in the areas they have not yet reached. It’s those nations that support innovation, says Rosenfeld, that will allow companies to go after farther, deeper deployment in a quest to develop commercialized wind farms far off the coast where the wind blows the strongest.

“Right now, the engineering challenges of deploying in deeper waters clearly is the challenge,” said Rosenfeld. “We know how to do it because we’ve done it with offshore oil drilling production. The deeper you go, the more expensive and challenging it is. Then bringing the power back is also a question. How do you bring the cost down of deploying in deep water?”

25 Comments

Register To Comment
william cormeny
william cormeny
August 14, 2011
I really appreciate your information,for it opens a door I had failed to see.I had just read about Small Wind Turbines which can be put together.I had no idea about your company.
Only the successful marketing of this idea on the internet,and through the larger media outlets should be attempted. Much of the best ideas first appear in Popular Mechanics,but I think making your own videos and sending them to news starved outlets is the best solution.
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
August 12, 2011
William C, I encourage you and others to google up MAKANI POWER and see "the better mousetrap". Better wind generators with MUCH lighter materials. BUT , trying to stay on track : How does the world colaborate on this topic ?
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
August 12, 2011
William C, I encourage you and others to google up MAKANI POWER and see "the better mousetrap". Better wind generators with MUCH lighter materials. BUT , trying to stay on track : How does the world colaborate on this topic ?
william cormeny
william cormeny
August 11, 2011
Coastal towns and villages might employ onshore small wind turbines to charge their vehicles,their refrigeration units,and their computers.
The present technologies being developed in various nations,and the great materials research indicate much smaller units can be built at far less cost.
One would hope the larger and smaller wind turbines can be effectively used to help us reduce demand for carbon based electrical power.
Marie Burton
Marie Burton
August 11, 2011
Does it not matter that turbines interfere with communications of dolphins and I also believe whales? Again off-shore wind turbines need backup from some other source of power in case the wind blows too hard and they have to be turned off of in case of no wind. I totally agree with rolf-westgard-67277 in and it is a great scam when you read all the reports worldwide not to mention deaths caused by turbines both for workers and passersby. They really are not wind but industrial as they are being built bigger and bigger and still are proving totally inefficient.
rolf westgard
rolf westgard
August 5, 2011
It is possible to build off shore wind like oil platforms. But each oil platform produces many many times the energy of even the largest wind turbine. And
for each wind farm you need an almost equal backup gas peaker plant. You get one power plant for the price of two with high emissions.
Wind energy ranks with corn ethanol as one of the world's major scams.
william cormeny
william cormeny
July 31, 2011
It might be helpful if investors began checking out areas outside the constant hurricane zone of the Gulf.
It might be helpful if more attention were paid to tidal power in various parts of the US,or to the creation of tidal power in basins across this nation.
LA for example is an enormous port built by the governments.The same is true for the Panama Canal which has a gigantic basin. Or, you cannot imagine the Netherlands without hydraulic operations.Limited imagination on the part of the conservative apologists remains intact and they cannot perceive of their own tenuous hold on present technology.
Alexander Graham Bell,Thomas Edison,Henry Ford destroyed the old ways.It can be done with sufficient imagination.This is not Star Trek technology.
colin hardy
colin hardy
July 31, 2011
'Big Oil' has used and employed all types of offshore structures over the years, including of course 'Floaters' for deep waters.
Assuming the tethering issue can be resolved, I've heard no one yet consider the effect that storm troughs in rough seas will have on a floating structure. Wave loads are one thing, and a floating structure that's adequately anchored to the seabed can be designed to withstand the impact of even a large wave. But a moored floating foundation that encounters a sudden trough doesn't stand a chance. A sudden drop of the structure would be unavoidable, followed by a sudden lift as buoyancy is regained, both of which will induce extreme loads on the turbine and on the mooring lines. It would be arguably impossible to apply technology to compensate for this frightening condition.
By using mass produced Far East parts, assembled at dockside, TITAN platforms being self installing can put these big Turbines into play in these mid depth waters up to 400' far cheaper than anything else including floaters ( they're not cheap either ! ), providing the strongest proven foundation offshore available.
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 31, 2011
dear benzuli,
I think you are assuming that the wind industry wants to build foundations rigidly attached to the floor of the ocean. I disagree, the big boys at Siemanns, Vestas, Suzlon, etc. are designing and building protypes that float so that water depth will no longer be involved in site sellection ; WIND SPEED AND DEPENDABILITY will become the key factors in site selection.Getting out to deep water is where good wind is close to the earth.Those jack-up foundations cost millions per unit and are just to capital intense for this application. Look up MAKANI & MINESTO to find where I believe the wind industry is headed. Flying generators that are simply tethered to the ground, get to high altitude (where the wind is fairly constant) and weigh very little in comparison to 500' towers.
Get your generator up to 1500+ and you can get some wind. When they need maintenence, fly them down to the ground, disconnect them, reconnect a second one and send it up. Hours out of operation not days or weeks. The future will be a beautiful place...if we can get there.
colin hardy
colin hardy
July 31, 2011
Just to correct Steve. He is right about the offshore foundations, however, in the mid depths offshore, up to 380' UK North Sea for example, the oil industry has been operating very successfully and economically with Jack up rigs for over 30 years, and 'floaters' were only bought into play beyond this depth. Hence, the same can be done for the biggest wind Turbines 5,7,8 & 10 MW etc at these depths, with TITAN jack up platforms.
Thanks
william cormeny
william cormeny
July 31, 2011
The rising costs of coal pollution has impacted several sectors of the economy.The railroads, the utility regulators,the utility bondholders and shareholders,the personnel at the coal fired plants,the producers of coal fired turbines need to reassess their futures.
Everyone acts and thinks according to numbers which they produce in house.They also project and the double their potential losses.It is similar to the projections created by the medical industry.As usual nothing can be done.
william cormeny
william cormeny
July 31, 2011
There are still other options using the present grid connections of the larger coal fired or gas fired plants.
There's no reason some of these plants cannot be converted into
thorium reactors.
In addition it seems algae biofuels can be produced on many coal plant sites which produce enough captured CO2 to feed larger processors for the turbine needs.
Modifications would be far cheaper if the present locations could be recycled,or if the vast amount of land owned by the Defense Department could be utilized and brought into the grid.
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 31, 2011
The HISTORIC cost of off-shore foundations is to high ; which is why floating foundations and flying generators will change the industry. Watch for transmission losses to be minimized thru new designs in HVDC. BUT , I have to correct you on one point; when going off shore or high altitude the wind is NOT intermittent. The higher ups in the wind power business are already predicting the tailing off of the on shore, tower mounted wind generators and the real increase in off shore generation.No NIMBY's. More dependable wind source.You gotta go where the wind is.

And Mr.Keller, I whole heartedly agree : Any NegaWatt is better than generating a very clean MegaWatt. So, I see big future in LED lighting, more efficient HVAC,smaller smarter cars and houses, and to the dismay of many the drop-off of the SUV.
Michael Keller
Michael Keller
July 30, 2011
The wind may be free, but the cost to build an off-shore wind turbine and get the power inland is huge, particularly debt repayment. Couple that with wind's intermittent and unreliable generation and you have extremely expensive power. Also, the impact of wind power on CO2 global emissions is insignificant, while the affect of CO2 emissions on the climate is simply not known. If you are worried about CO2, better efficiency in energy use and generation is a vastly superior solution.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
July 30, 2011
To Steve -- yes! Except the investors may make out from subsidies, and we all know where that money comes from.

More references for those with a crush on windmills...

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/14/caltech-vertical-axis-wind-turbines-boost-wind-farm-power-efficiency-10x/
http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/wind/a-less-mighty-wind
www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/us/21tttransmission.html?_r=1&hpw
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/denmark/7996606/An-ill-wind-blows-for-Denmarks-green-energy-revolution.html
http://whitherindustrialwindpower.wordpress.com/
http://energy.sia-partners.com/?p=149
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 30, 2011
except of course that no one charges for the wind, and that natural gas is a limitted resource
OH YEAH, in the last few years a full 50% of all new power generation in the US has been wind generation. So Mr.Keller,do you think those foolish utility companies and their investors are being hood-winked?
Michael Keller
Michael Keller
July 30, 2011
Sounds like a good idea for the U.K. to be the leader in offshore wind as it is an island with few energy resources. Let the Brits spend their money, as opposed to the US wasting our money on a completely impractical and economically dumb idea. There is no reason to build offshore wind in the US as we have ample supplies of natural gas and power.
william cormeny
william cormeny
July 30, 2011
Companies selling one form of renewable resources remain fixed in their rut. They remind you of the nutritional gurus and vitamin gurus who insist only their method works.
For decades we have had oil,gas,coal, hydro,and nuclear sources.One should not be shocked if the renewable markets will be combination of several different sources--solar,wind,tidal which can be linked into a grid already in place.We will gradually cut down the carbon footprint just as coal very gradually cut into the wood sourced heat providers.
The utilities,railroads and coal miners will destroy coal as an option.
Doug Hines
Doug Hines
July 30, 2011
The facts are that we can build and install 5-10 MW each platform (designs are complete) for half the current cost of installation using the Titan, we been doing it for the last 30 years in the offshore oilfields of the world. The larger the turbine the more effecient the operation is overall, the insurence is considerable less becouse of no at sea assembly required, O&M is less than fixed sea floor foundations, sea floor cables are being tested at the U of Houston that are super conductive (effecient) and the overall business model for offshore wind farms in improving everyday, check our video at www.offshorewindpowersystemsoftexas.com its worth the time to type all those characters, let us know what you think.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
July 29, 2011
Sounds great, but every lb of that 200+ ft rig required 5 lbs of coal to make (steel needs coal). And even neglecting all the assembly & transport/erection fueling, the transmission loss to shore is permanent. All for just several MW of high-maintenance, variable power, with various insurance implications. But those subsidies are where the $ are (until they run out)!
;]
colin hardy
colin hardy
July 29, 2011
The TITAN 200 mobile self installing jack up platform designed by experienced Texas oil rig engineers addresses all the important issues relating to economic installation and operation of the biggest offshore turbines in waters up to 250' deep.
Platform, tower and turbine, all assembled onshore, and then simple tow to offshore site, where the structure is installed just like a jack up drilling rig. Legs penetrating the sea bed, and then the whole platform jacked up, high above the waves, forming the strongest and most economic operations platform available without the need of expensive heavy lift ships, piling and offshore cranes, severely reducing total costs and greatly boosting productivity.
Thanks,
Houston, Texas,
william cormeny
william cormeny
July 29, 2011
New techniques in building oil platforms indicate serious cost savings for offshore wind projects.
They have developed a method of creating a strong platform by driving pillars into the seabed.Then a barge transports the finished oil rig between adjoining twin pillars,and jacks up the the finished product.Everything can be constructed ashore,and the towing costs and the barge remain the sole expense.
Steve Poppitz
Steve Poppitz
July 29, 2011
Good article Steve Leone,
I believe the way to bring down the cost in deep water (and that is where the real wind is) is to stop making rigid foundations as they are made on land, and in shallow water (less than 30 meters).
Perhaps ; a) floating towers b) high altitude 'kites' tethered to the ocean floor. I'm leaning to the kite technology. Towers can't get to the height of the best wind, and they are to expensive.
A company named 'Makani' hopes to build kites that generate as much power as tower mounted wind mills for a small fraction of the mass and cost, and fly them much higher than a tower ever will get.
Dr. A. Cannara
Dr. A. Cannara
July 29, 2011
These wind promoting articles are so repetitive, so might as well also make the same comments...

What a waste. These white elephants of the millennial wind fad will surpass even the grand mess left here in Calif. (and other formerly nice country) from the '70s subsidized investments...

http://webecoist.com/2009/05/04/10-abandoned-renewable-energy-plants/

But who cares, if a scam nets aome folks some $, eh? Maybe read MacKay's "Sustainable Energy -- Without the Hot Air"?

Or maybe get just some updates from Forbes.com...

Commentary, A New Study Takes The Wind Out Of Wind Energy, Robert Bryce, 07.19.11, 5:00 PM ET

"Facts are pesky things. And they're particularly pesky when it comes to the myths about the wind energy business."

P. T. Barnum would be sorely tempted to expand into the wind biz from just simple circus cons.
;]

But, we can note that the lack of honest science in present wind 'farming' (subsidy farming) is gradually being even more exposed...

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/14/caltech-vertical-axis-wind-turbines-boost-wind-farm-power-efficiency-10x/

Wonder how many of all these 'green' projects will actually provide for cleanup bonds, to cover inevitable remediation? Or, how will true costs be adjusted to cover actual insured loss & liability upon the first offshore accident, shipping or otherwise? Or, will 24/7 transmission losses be included as part of their true cost accounting? Pesky, those realities.
Nigel Richardson
Nigel Richardson
July 28, 2011
Thanks for the mention of the ETI as one of the reasons the UK has emerged as a leader in offshore wind. However, we are the Energy Technologies Institute and not the Energy Technology Institute. This is an important distinction as we have projects in seven other programmes - marine, distributed energy, buildings, energy storage and distribution, carbon capture and storage, transport and bio energy - as well as offshore wind. Find out more at www.eti.co.uk or follow us on Twitter @the_eti

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Steve Leone

Steve Leone

Steve Leone has been a journalist for more than 15 years and has worked for news organizations in Rhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia and California.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 5
    Women in Power – It’s a Natural Fit
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 4
    Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Not Just Clean, It’s Necessary
  • 2
    Sir Richard Branson unleashes Plan B for the planet

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • marcus evans
  • Renewable Energy World Asia
  • Natural Power
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • SolarInsure, Inc.
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information