Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Enphase Energy Launches Third-Gen Microinverters with 25-Year Warranty

By Ucilia Wang, Contributor
June 6, 2011   |   12 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
12 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 12
June 6, 2011
Now we can finally see some competition in this field, which has been controlled by Enphase as a monopoly until now. Note that Enphase never produced 25 year quality inverters until competitors did so, although the technology to do so jhas been
known for years. Also we will undoubtedly see some price discounts now. Enphase was pricing its converters about double their value. I have suspicians about "new cabling methods" which sounds like something proprietary, used to lock the user into using only Enphase converters. That is a typical company strategy
to reduce consumer choices, raise prices and eliminate competitors. Unfortunately for Enphase, no one looks to them as leaders anymore and everyone is eager to switch to one of its many competitors offering better products.
Comment
2 of 12
June 6, 2011
@theBike: you are right, the cabling method is Enphase's own design and meant to be sold as part of its microinverter/monitoring service. I've added a line in the story to make it clear.
Comment
3 of 12
June 7, 2011
I'm still sold on SolarEdge with its much higher 97.5% CEC weighted efficiency, individual module monitoring, shade mitigation, communications over the DC lines rather than the noisy AC lines, higher powerbox capacity,(250 Watts versus Enphase's 215 Watts) and lower price per Watt.
Comment
4 of 12
June 7, 2011
I echo your thoughts on the welcoming of competition. I have installed (12) Enphase systems - mostly small 1.5 Kw school systems - and find them economical on a small, 7 module arrays.

I have also just installed a larger 6 Kw Solar Edge system and find it superior in many important ways (cost, safety, ease of installation and the better efficiency...).
Comment
5 of 12
June 7, 2011
Bravo! Enphase makes good stuff. I spec their micro-inverters all the time up here in Oregon. Their product line, and customer service, is quite good. I look forward to milking more power out of high-power 60-cell modules with STC DC output over 230W.
Comment
6 of 12
June 8, 2011
With micro-inverters, the biggest area for caution is reliability. While I would not wish to discourage their use or champion any one brand, a micro-inverter - even for domestic use has to be reliable for around 25 years whilst exposed frequently to high temperatures, possibly up to 90C for on roof and 110C for in roof arrays - harsh conditions for any electronics. The cost of identifying a failing inverter, getting up on the roof, getting to and lifting the affected panel and replacing the inverter will be very high, so lack of reliability will carry a large cost penalty - only part of which (the cost of a replacement inverter) is likely to be covered by any inverter warranty.
Comment
7 of 12
June 8, 2011
Yes,
Reliability is clutch. That's one thing i like about the enphase product—especially now that their enlighten monitoring package comes free. Isolating and trouble-shooting faulty array components is a breeze when there is a performance record for each individual module. We quickly identified a faulty SolarWorld module in one of our first Enphase installations out here in Portland, OR. The irony of the situation: it was on a system we had installed for a SolarWorld executive! ;D We were able to bring a spare module from our shop to the client's house, hop up on the roof (it was a 16/12 A-Frame so we had to, ya know, know what we were doing up there) and have the issue resolved in a couple hours. Like i said, bravo Enphase.

SolarWorld, of course, shipped a replacement module in a matter of days. Enphase doesn't pay me anything, but i know why they're product is worth more in the market place. And now that their warranty exactly equals a standard module warranty, it's a slam-dunk.
No image available
Comment
8 of 12
Anonymous
June 8, 2011
The only problem with products like SolarEdge are you still rely on a single point of potential failure in the central inverter used, and it only includes a 12 year warranty. It's great to save some money up front, but what happens in 12.5 years when it goes out and needs to be replaced at a cost higher than the difference between a central inverter and micro-inverter? For small residental systems, the Enphase system can't be beat. The article from June 2 shows a study of Enphase being much more reliable than central inverters. I've sold both, and now I only sell Enphase.
Comment
9 of 12
June 20, 2011
I attended the Intersolar in Munich earlier this month and I came across a Taiwanese company that provides micro-inverter similar to Solaredge and Enphase. However, their product called DPC connects to 4 panels instead of 1, and the output becomes 400VDC. They claim to increase the efficiency by 10%, has anyone heard of such product? Their website is www.aerofortis.com.
Comment
10 of 12
June 20, 2011
Thanks for the link, the aerofortis product looks very interesting as a way of maximising yield and easing design constraints.

The product uses a DC to DC converter which as you say manages 4 panels with maximum power point tracking. Several strings can be combined onto a central inverter which receives a constant voltage input. The inverter does not itself have to contain a maximum power point tracker, so can be of simpler lower cost design.

As strings are short, and independently managed, it does not matter if each string has a different orientation, or if the panels are a different size or from a different manufacturer, so eliminating much of the complexity of array design and reducing concerns regarding array losses with partial shading or panel mismatch.
Comment
11 of 12
June 20, 2011
'The only problem with products like SolarEdge are you still rely on a single point of potential failure' We've been a factory authorized inverter repair center for over 10 years and have a lot of experience repairing inverters at the component level not just board swapping. One thing I know to be true is that circuit simplicity is the key to reliability. With multiple microinverters you not only have a more complex device with a higher parts count attached to each module but now you're dealing with far more potential points of failure. Enphase may offer a 25 year warranty but somebody will have to pay an installer to replace those inverters once they've failed because the warranty does not cover product replacement labor. That somebody obviously will be the homeowner. 40 micro inverters means the potential for 40 paid potential service calls over the product's 25 year warranty period.

SolarEdge's power optimizers have a much lower parts count which potentially make for a more reliable device. Also when you consider SolarEdge's lower system cost per Watt, higher wattage capacity per solar module, higher rebate per Watt and the highest 97.5% CEC weighted efficiency rating for any 240 volt single phase inverter for a higher potential power yield, SolarEdge's increased savings and yield will probably pay for that replacement inverter down the road anyway. Keep in mind that many customers are installing solar modules with a higher output rating than what these Enphase inverters are rated for. Search the Internet and you'll find consumers who are questioning why they installed 230 watt or larger modules on M190 inverters, only to have the potential power from their 230 Watt modules maxed out by their microinverters at 199 watts. With SolarEdge you get a full 250 Watts or 350 Watts of inverter capacity per module. There's no compromise. Again I am sold on SolarEdge. After 13 years in this business, it's what we're going to install on our new sales office.
Comment
12 of 12
June 20, 2011
To gary-tulie-73445:

Yes I also think the product is quite interesting, and the most fascinating thing is that Aerofortis claim even with 1-2 panels of the 4 panels not working, you can still have constant 400VDC output, unlike in conventional string connection. I think I will test the DPC and see how it performs.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Ucilia Wang

View Ucilia Wang's Profile
About: Ucilia Wang is a California-based freelance journalist who writes about renewable energy. She previously was the associate editor at Greentech Media and a staff... more »

Advertise With Us

SkyFuel European Wind Energy Association Rich Hessler Solar Business Development Renewables Academy AG (RENAC) Asia Solar Expo AltEnergyStocks HUBER+SUHNER AG
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters