The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Advanced Energy Storage: What's the Value of Frequency Regulation?

Chris Campbell, A123 Systems
May 11, 2011  |  12 Comments

Print

Advanced energy storage, including solutions based on lithium-ion battery technology, are technically and economically superior to traditional generation-based mechanisms used for supply of ancillary services. Energy storage can also help accelerate the adoption of renewable energy by compensating for the variabilty of wind and solar. Energy storage makes these sources more predictable, allowing them to be more seamlessly integrated with the existing power grid.

However, there remains a lack of industry-wide awareness about these and the other significant benefits of energy storage. Some within the power industry still view energy storage as theoretically advantageous but not practically deployable. Thanks to the emergence of next-generation technologies, though, the business case for deploying advanced energy storage for existing applications is more compelling than ever.

For example, frequency regulation has historically been provided by traditional generation assets, including gas turbines or coal generation plants, often as a requirement for participation in energy markets. However, this has been an imperfect approach to regulation because traditional generators are slow to respond, often taking as much as 10 minutes to respond to a regulation control signal. 

Bulk grid-level generation and demand imbalance is measured by the area control error (ACE), typically on a second-by-second basis, and assets deployed for regulation are instructed to regulate up or down in response. Traditional slow moving assets are an imperfect mechanism for minimizing and managing ACE. Traditional assets performing regulation also exhibit increased wear and tear as well as reduced efficiency, which translates directly into higher operating costs and increased emissions.

In contrast, advanced energy storage systems are ideally suited for providing frequency regulation services. Since the ACE represents the short-term fluctuations in supply and demand, it is by-and-large energy neutral—over a measureable amount of time, an asset providing regulation service neither generates nor consumes energy. Therefore, a storage asset with a finite amount of capacity can provide the regulation service successfully. Energy markets are typically managed on an hour-by-hour basis, but a storage asset with robust energy management capabilities can successfully provide this hourly market-based service with as little as 15 minutes of energy stored.

Advanced storage assets are also capable of responding significantly faster than traditional generation assets, without the wear and tear or efficiency loss associated with continuously ramping up or down. In fact, with response times measured in milliseconds, advanced storage can provide significantly more value since the correction to the ACE is virtually instantaneous. In turn, traditional generator assets can be utilized at their optimal efficiency, improving asset utilization and reducing emissions.

In deregulated energy markets where the rules have been adjusted to allow advanced storage to participate and regulation services to be traded, storage has already demonstrated its fast response value. For example, in the New York ISO market, participants are completing the construction of 40MW of fast-response storage dedicated to regulation service using advanced lithium-ion batteries and other technologies. These are ideally suited for this use case because of their ability to ramp aggressively with short duration storage and cycle hundreds of times each day, with low round-trip energy loss.

The return on investment based on revenue generated from providing regulation services is expected to occur in as few as three years given today’s market conditions. And when ancillary benefits such as improved asset utilization and emissions are also considered, the payback time is accelerated. Without question, advanced energy storage technology is now an economically viable, next-generation substitute for traditional, fossil-fuel generators for frequency regulation.

12 Comments

Register To Comment
John Carr
John Carr
May 19, 2011
Chris,
Thank you for your kind comments. I think the future of transmission and distribution definitely includes companies with A123's capabilities.
Storage should be under the realm of T&D, and the energy transfered be sold back to the consumers on their bill as a per kWh surcharge. The surcharge would be based on the ratio of storage to generation energy output for the entire grid. It would raise rates based on the level of service provided, and not the installed capacity. Any reimbursement outside pay-as-you-go for installed capacity charges would go through the PUC for special approval as a flat fee for a fixed duration. Storage becomes a source of revenue for T&D through mark-up. The amount of mark-up can be regulated if necessary. Pay-as-you-go, prevents T&D from placing too much storage, and causing an inordinate hardship on consumers.
It's a big win for base load generators since storage generation can run at night while the load is light, and practically idle during the day when solar and wind are at their peak.
If every generator had a DC interconnect...
But that's another day.
Garth Barker
Garth Barker
May 19, 2011
CCampbell...
There is room for storage at all levels of the grid however the problem is - no utility wants to see it's asset base (fossil fuel) removed. The other stickler for utilities is sub-hourly markets; many just can't go that route with the assets they have and are fighting the integration of storage onto the grid. (this statement can be backed up profoundly) Storage can be pegged as a transmission asset or an ancillary service vehicle, or even a generation backup which has been the traditional use- until now. When storage benefits are assigned a dollar value and the market (bi- directional) created, the grid as we see it today will change and we'll be able to get on with addressing Ghg issues. Wind and solar folks need to face facts and sit down with storage developers and do some strategical planning for the future path of renewable energy.
Chris Campbell
Chris Campbell
May 19, 2011
Thank you all for your comments on this article. The issue posed by @John-Carr is a good one: does storage belong as a generation, transmission, or distribution asset? The related questions are: who benefits, and who pays for it? There is no clear or simple answer on how to classify storage, and this uncertainty poses both a challenge and an opportunity for the industry.

As pointed out by many observers, each situation is different and the value proposition for storage varies significantly depending on local rules and market design. In the sense that storage offers many benefits to the grid and ratepayers, it may make sense for it to fall under transmission or distribution. However, that same storage device could capture additional revenue streams through market-based services, such as frequency regulation or other ancillary services. However, in many areas, the regulated utility is prohibited from owning assets which compete for those market-based services.

One of the reasons why A123's grid energy storage systems were used initially for ancillary services is because of the clear value proposition and market design for such services. However, we see the need to have global transmission and distribution infrastructures evolve to become more flexible and receptive to alternative sources of generation. Therefore, over time we expect to see much greater usage by regulated utilities that recognize the value of storage and develop mechanisms to pay for these assets that do not conflict with market-based services.
Jasmine Williams
Jasmine Williams
May 17, 2011
I'm with mitch3. No need for the word "advanced". Does advanced mean we refer to other energy storage technologies with all their patents and applications "basic"? All types of energy storage are needed...
Garth Barker
Garth Barker
May 16, 2011
Extensive comment was offered when two of the largest PUCs' made news that 1) it would curtail wind at times of congestion, over generation and when there was too much environmental damage when spilling hydro; 2) the other PUC asked for rate increases due to the required build up of peaking assets to integrate wind; they did a wind integration study and stated that due to increased capacity required for integration of variable renewable energy they would have to increase their peaking fleet with three new plants.
Comments offered a solution which is bulk grid level storage that would store wind and dispatch it as firm shaped energy for ramp up or soak down. Storage becomes a transmission asset and a generation asset when used for balancing, it also allows a sub-hourly market to be possible; every one of the benefits would cost the PUCs' money in lost revenues but would create a workable system where renewable energy sources would continue to provide a good firmed product. Until storage regulation assigns a $ value to the benefits of storage, that market will remain a risk, however California is undergoing workshops to place a value on the benefits- the rest of the nation will accept those values and the grid will never be the same again.
John Carr
John Carr
May 13, 2011
I will repeat a post I made another article..mostly.
Here in Texas the legislature forced the large power companies to split their generation from their transmission and distribution. It was originally done to create competition in the generation market. It is a three tiered system.
1. Generation
2. Transmission & Distribution
3. Energy Sales
Unfortunately, the legislature didn't understand there is no free trade in a confined market. So, the prices went up, not down. It's not hard to imagine why the power industry made little, if no, protest at the time.

Even though I feel the system is flawed in many ways, it does some important things. It allows the T&D people some autonomy in creating new types of distribution networks. It separates sales from generation. This has gradually broken the monopoly of energy providers in Texas. Which, to their credit, was one of the outcomes the legislature wanted.

If California broke up the power companies in this fashion the relevant issue of distributed power would be in the hands of the T&D companies, not the generators or sales office. Storage should be part of T&D, not generation. T&D companies, such as ONCOR in Texas, have a lot to gain from distributed energy. Wires providers could sell storage. Storage could provide some revenue. More important the issues associated with T&D are treated as equal to the generation and sales within the electrical regulation community.

Storage is not generation. Using generation economics for storage is very risky. However, if storage is simply part of T&D, and provides distribution regulation only, it can be capitalized into T&D.

T&D providers need to determine how big the interconnects and storage is between networks and not the generators. Once this happens, the dream, albeit a premature one, of free trade in the electrical power generation industry can happen.
Tim Gard
Tim Gard
May 13, 2011
absolutely crtoca. But what if a company became both generator and storage system? see http://www.sustainx.com/index.html
Brandon Williams
Brandon Williams
May 12, 2011
Energy storage is the wave of the future, although has some very interesting ties to the past. Batteries store DC power, and our grid is AC powered... This problem goes back to the days of Edison and Tesla.

Edison found a solution to the storage problem over 100 years ago. He called his battery the 'ideal storage battery' We think he was on to something, and are bringing back this original Edison design for energy storage back to the market. My own small business is built on energy storage, and Edison batteries in particular. I ask you check out what is going on in the energy storage market today, and come check out my website.

The 25 year battery:
http://ironedison.com

Thanks, and keep these energizing articles coming!!!
Ron Peterson
Ron Peterson
May 12, 2011
Light weight batteries aren't needed for this type of application. It might be better to use battery technology from ZBBEnergy.com or other companies.
Charles Toca
Charles Toca
May 12, 2011
Energy storage technologies are at a potentially fatal disadvantage for providing ancillary services. Reason? The generators exist to sell energy. Ancillary services are a sideline business. They only offer their services when they can make more money on frequency regulation, etc., than by selling energy.

However, the energy storage provider must base his business decision entirely on the ancillary services market - unless he also has some other business purpose, like providing energy services behind the meter at a large industrial. The ISO's can only provide a market for A/S, not a firm source of revenue. Thus, the energy storage developer must decide to invest into a volatile market with no assurance of future revenue. The frequency regulation market has varied from $60 to $18 dollars per MW on an annualized basis in California. Until firm contracts can be sourced for service, only the foolhardy - or heavily subsidized - will build multi-million dollar energy storage systems for frequency regulation.
Jonathan Chance
Jonathan Chance
May 12, 2011
When the petro-banking warfare racket and other sectors of corporate-government graft are abolished, well-designed PHEVs with Elsbett turbo-diesel motors are among the best ways to provide efficient and practical transportation and distributed V2G renewable energy storage solutions.

As usual, the problems are political, not technical.

You can "make money" (create debt) or you can make sense, but you can't do both until money makes sense.

OpenSecrets.Org

Treasurynet.US
Garth Barker
Garth Barker
May 12, 2011
Chris... You didn't need the word 'advanced' in front of storage; energy storage is needed at all levels of the grid, however those utilities with fossil fuel based assets are fighting the inevitable incorporation of storage- from bulk grid sized to AGC user side storage. By integrating storage into the system utilities stand to lose a lot of money and won't be able to justify rate increases; an example would be the annual 24 million dollars lost by having to change generation practices in the north west when (not if) storage is added; now, when (not if) Ghg mandates are added, utilities will be forced to use the cleanest means possible, which is stored renewable energy when time shifted and dispatchable as firm. Its inevitable, I don't understand the reluctance of the large utilities to get on board.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell is responsible for A123 Systems’ global go-to-market strategy for the Energy Solutions Group business unit. He is defining and developing the worldwide markets for A123's energy storage solutions, exploiting a rapidly expanding...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 2
    Sir Richard Branson unleashes Plan B for the planet

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Renewable Energy Corporation
  • Tamura Corporation of America
  • Rolls Battery Engineering
  • Trojan Battery Company
  • Demand Energy
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information