Recent events in Japan have brought new attention to how national energy systems are vulnerable to natural disasters. But, one risk has largely flown under the radar: climate change. Considerable scientific research has looked at how our energy choices are threatening the climate, but much less attention has been paid to the other side of the equation.
A new report from National Wildlife Federation does just that by looking at how our energy infrastructure is threatened by changing climate. The serious impacts are yet another reason why renewable energy is in our national interest.
The scientific data show that climate change is already bringing more weather and climate extremes. For example:
These and other climate trends are projected to continue over the next century, especially if we continue the business-as-usual approach of relying heavily on fossil fuels to produce energy. Extreme weather events already cost the country $17 billion a year on average.
The problem is that most of the energy infrastructure in the United States was built to withstand the climate and weather extremes of the past, not the future. To date, there have been no comprehensive efforts to carefully assess the vulnerability of our energy systems to these threats. The National Wildlife Federation analysis highlights just four of the potential threats (charts that highlight these points can be accessed through the image gallery, right and also through the report, which is linked at the beginning of this article):
The threats to our old energy systems bolsters the rationale for investing in renewable energy. Shifting to renewable energy can help us to meet the dual goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, thereby limiting future extreme weather and climate impacts, and ensuring reliable, timely, and cost-efficient delivery of energy. It’s just a no-brainer that investing in renewable energy can have huge dividends for our energy security.
Off-shore wind and distributed solar photovoltaic are particularly attractive in that (1) they require negligible water to operate, a factor that promises to become more critical as water shortages become more common; (2) they do not require transporting fuel long distances across the country, thereby avoiding disruptions from flooding or storms; and (3) they do not rely as heavily on an extensive power grid subject to weather-related outages.
As the nation installs this new technology, it should be designed and strategically located to be more resistant to weather and climate impacts. For example, windmills could be designed to withstand higher wind speeds, off-shore wind farms could be sited in areas where hurricanes are infrequent, or new electricity distribution networks could be buried to minimize wind and heat disruptions.
While there is no way to prevent earthquakes and tsunamis, we can avoid the worst consequences of climate change by reducing carbon pollution and taking steps to prepare for anticipated impacts. Addressing these vulnerabilities to the energy system requires more than a Band-Aid. This is the time to be innovative and avoid the trap of building more of the same infrastructure with incremental improvements. Indeed, future investments must transform the U.S. energy infrastructure to be resilient in the face of more extreme weather and climate.
To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.