Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Watch Out California, Here Comes the Rest of the U.S.

By Stephen Lacey, Editor
April 6, 2011   |   9 Comments
California is still a very important solar market; however, it's losing ground to a diverse range of up-and-coming states.

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
April 6, 2011
Watch Massachusetts. I can only imagine it will be on the top 10 list of MW installed shortly.

Unfortunately, the fragmentation amongst state-by-state policies creates barriers of excess operating complexity for regional or multi-state companies. It also create a "death sentence" atmosphere for extremely small companies that operate in only one state. If the incentive program rug is pulled out from beneath those players....

There are a lot of smart people in the industry working on reducing costs on all fronts. Hopefully, these benefits will reach all the way the long tail of small installers, too.
No image available
Comment
2 of 9
Anonymous
April 6, 2011
Wonderful news. http://openpv.nrel.gov/
Comment
3 of 9
April 7, 2011
If you look back, this usually applies to most technologies. It starts in CA then MA and others in the NE follow. I think it has a little to do with money and education.
Comment
4 of 9
April 8, 2011
Pam's right, pull that rug out and then the real Market will show up.
The only trouble is I'm paying for that Rug........
Comment
5 of 9
April 8, 2011
@Buck -- In fact we're all paying for, and subsidizing, the continued use of "cheap" fossil fuels such as oil and coal, quite literally, with our health and via health care costs that add up to hundreds of billions every year.

But I guess you'd rather end up with cancer or a heart attack than build a clean, renewable energy economy that will literally save millions of lives, and billions of dollars around the world every year.

"Cheap" fossil fuels = a complete and total myth.
Comment
6 of 9
April 8, 2011
Buck, not quite what I was getting at. Let me explain.

Unfortunately, a big problem the solar industry has is that we are incentivizing at the wrong part of the value chain. For example, the companies that develop oil fields get huge tax credits and the cost savings there get passed down the line eventually to the gas pump. The true cost of gasoline is masked from the end user, and since levelized cost calculations are still a relatively "new" analysis to the game, the numbers aren't getting wider media attention yet. Gas costs are artificially low.

Unfortunately with solar, we have a system that subsidizes the end user, so the costs are visible all the way down the line and then a confusing attempt to mitigate them is met. Why not use those subsidize or provide tax credits to manufacturing or another part of the upstream value chain? Then we wouldn't need this piecemeal system of state incentive programs.

Of course, that would also mean we would have to have a strong national solar policy, a prospect that is looking increasingly gloomy as the federal government can't even come to an agreement on its operating budget for 2011.
Comment
7 of 9
April 8, 2011
Why do we need policy at all. Solar products are available for all to purchase and use just like any other unsubsidized product. We have to stop looking towareds out gov. for money and good advice, both of which they have none.
Comment
8 of 9
April 8, 2011
Most renewable energy advocates agree that subsidies are not the best method to promote a fair playing field. Most would also like to see all subsidies removed from all fuel types. The reality is renewables receive much less total $ subsidy than the fossil fuel industries. Period. Ask any group of people if they think the price of fuel will drop in the next 10 years. Nearly everyone agrees fossil fuel prices will rise. The price of deploying renewables is dropping rapidly. Period. It makes great sense for all where the price of energy is high and where there is large peaking energy demand. Eventually this will be all of America.
No image available
Comment
9 of 9
Anonymous
April 8, 2011
Also, there's a cost of conflict of rare earth materials, risk and other things?
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Ambient Technologies, Inc. 2GreenEnergy.com Comment:Visions AllEarth Renewables American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE) Schiller AEG Power Solutions
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters