The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Solar Frontier Opens Largest Thin-film Plant in the World

Japanese oil company hopes CIGS positions subsidiary to compete against First Solar in thin-film market.

Robert Crowe, Contributor
April 27, 2011  |  17 Comments

One of the world's largest solar module factories, perched atop the bucolic foothills of West Japan's bamboo and pine-covered mountains, began operating in February.

This fully automated facility – capable of producing about 1 GW of thin-film solar modules – is the result of more than three decades of research and development by an oil company, which hopes to eventually generate 50% of its revenue from sales of renewable energy products and services.

“We won’t take anything less than 10% of global market share” in the next seven years, said Shigeya Kato, chairman of Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K., which has a 100% subsidy in module factory operator Solar Frontier. “The market has grown so much that even a 1 GW plant capacity won’t reach 10%.”

Solar Frontier said it could eventually build an overseas plant, but it must first prove to Showa Shell’s board of oilmen that its uniquely black solar panels can translate into black gold in the competitive, global thin-film industry.

The company invested 100 billion yen, more than $1 billion, at its Kunitomi plant in Miyazaki Prefecture on the southwest island of Kyushu. Recouping that investment will be challenging, Kato said, because the Yen is trading low compared to the dollar and euro. Further complicating Solar Frontier’s efforts is the weak Japanese economy, which economists say will likely sink deeper into recession in the wake of the March 11 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis that caused an estimated $300 billion in damage. Still, Solar Frontier leaders say demand for solar energy could be a bright story for this struggling country.

Solar Frontier’s Kunitomi factory produces modules that use a version of the copper, indium, gallium and selenium (CIGS) technology. More than one-dozen cleantech writers last week toured the factory, which the company claims is capable of producing 112,000 modules (130 W to 150 W each) per week.

CIS Competes with CdTE

In recent press releases, Solar Frontier has said its copper, indium and selenium (CIS) modules are more environmentally friendly than conventional thin-film because they do not use toxics like lead or cadmium. That marketing strategy takes aim at conventional, thin-film panels based on cadmium telluride (CdTe). Squarely in Solar Frontier’s sights is First Solar, the world’s leading thin-film panel manufacturer, which has also invested in bringing to market a competitive CIGS module, though its current modules are based on the CdTe platform.

“CIGS will undoubtedly capture a larger fraction of total PV sales based upon these new levels of performance,” says Ryne Raffaelle, director of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Center for Photovoltaics.

That is due to rapid increases in efficiency as the industry moves toward alternative materials that use less cadmium and fewer rare earth materials.

“They’re looking to operate with better materials that are cheaper and less toxic,” Raffaelle said.

Solar Frontier’s 150-watt thin-film modules are rated at 12.2%, while the company claims to have achieved a record 17.2% on a 30-centimeter-by-30-centimeter research panel at its laboratory. First Solar’s CdTe panels are rated at 11.6% efficient. A spokeswoman defended First Solar’s use of cadmium.

“With respect to competitor claims regarding CdTe, we regard them as just that – competitor claims,” said First Solar’s Melanie Friedman. “It does nothing to advance the long-term adoption of PV technology, which should be the ultimate goal of our industry. Numerous scientific and technical studies and analysis consistently conclude that First Solar’s thin film PV technology does not pose a risk to human health or the environment.”

The move away from rare earths is especially crucial since China has cut back on exports. Though its panels are comprised of just 5% indium (most of which his recycled), Solar Frontier is working with IBM to replace indium with copper or zinc. The Solar Frontier and IBM research has achieved efficiencies of at least 9%, so there are still innovations necessary to replace indium, engineers said.

Solar Frontier’s Kunitomi factory and Sharp’s amorphous silicon (a-Si) facility in Osaka are being hailed by some as the return of Japan’s dominance in the solar manufacturing field. Sharp did not respond to a request to tour its factory in Osaka last week. More than a dozen reporters from Japan, Europe and the United States spent two days observing the Kunitomi facility through a tour funded by Solar Frontier.

Solar in the Nuclear Crisis

Experts say Japan’s investment in solar research and manufacturing is especially crucial while the country grapples with its energy policy in the wake of the nuclear crisis trigged by a tsunami that knocked out back-up power at reactors at Tokyo Electric Power Company's Fukushima reactors.

Some have criticized the Japanese government for not taking a more aggressive, European-style approach to renewable energy subsidies and feed-in tariffs, but Solar Frontier officials say it was the Japanese government that mandated parent company Showa Shell to invest in photovoltaic R&D decades ago, making its gigawatt-scale plant possible.

Japan’s 54 nuclear reactors generate 30% of the country’s current electricity. Up to 50% of Japan’s electricity could come from nuclear by 2030, according to Reuters. With little acreage for solar farms, most of the installed PV capacity in Japan – and Solar Frontier’s domestic sales – comes from residential systems.

The factory operators say Japan will be able to lessen nuclear demand by increasing roof-top solar arrays on commercial buildings and residences. Also, many reactors, including the damaged Fukushima Daiichi reactors and a handful across the north, are inoperable due to earthquakes.

“The fact Japan can move forward without those reactors shows we can live without some nuclear,” said Philip White of the Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center, a Tokyo-based advocacy group that has called for the gradual reduction of nuclear power.

There is also potential to install utility-scale solar arrays on the farmland and cities contaminated with radiation, Kato said.

Oil Company’s Solar Investment

Showa Shell’s last major R&D investment, about 150 billion yen in the 1990s, resulted in a fluid catalytic “cracking” process that increased long-term profits for its refining business. Showa Shell executives said the investment in the gigawatt-scale solar factory is a strategy for the company to cope with “peak oil” and the increasing expense of importing oil from the Middle East.

“We’re already facing peak oil,” said Hiroshi Yoshida, Solar Frontier’s vice president and CEO of manufacturing. “The oil will always be there, but it’s more expensive to get.”

Solar Frontier’s factory is comprised of robots, laminating machines, conveyer belts and other processes packed tight within 400,000 square meters of factory space on three floors. The company guards its technology secrets so well that it asked journalists to sign a non-disclosure release before touring the facility. Writers balked at the document, but the tour went ahead on the condition certain areas could not be photographed.

"We wanted to prove to the world that we can do what we say," said Native Texan Brooks Herring, Solar Frontier Executive Vice President of Communications and Operations.

He said the factory has been operating 24/7 since its soft opening in February.

The facility produced plasma screen televisions before Showa Shell converted it to house the custom-engineered solar process after scaling up from its 20 MW and 60 MW plants in nearby Miyazaki Prefecture.

All those processes require multiple megawatts of power. A 2 MW roof-mounted solar array covers the factory’s vast roof, but it provides just 1% of the plant’s energy needs. It is capable of providing up to 2%, but recent volcano eruptions in a distant part of Kyushu have dusted the panels with a thin layer of ash, reducing the efficiency.

Solar Frontier has joined its Asian competitors in marketing to the rapidly expanding North American market. Solar Frontier announced today that it will provide 1.2 MW of its CIS panels to Granite Construction in Coalinga, Calif. The system will provide up to 50% of the total energy required by the aggregate facility.

Solar Frontier is also competing against Suntech, Yingli and other Chinese companies, which are fast approaching the $1 per watt cost of installation goal set by the NREL. First Solar has said it is an industry price leader because its manufacturing costs are 75 cents per watt. Solar Frontier does not discuss its costs, but executives said the company’s panels offer a number of advantages, including a larger surface (3 feet by 4 feet) with higher efficiencies. (Left: A robotic arm applies a label to the back of a Solar Frontier CIS module.)

“Our key competence is productivity and also the CIS potential to achieve high efficiency,” said Ichiro Sugiyama, Solar Frontier’s head of product management.

Thin-film is leading the space race toward $1 per watt installation costs for utility scale, sun-powered energy plants. General Electric (GE) entered the race by investing in at least two thin-film platforms that have shown the ability to manufacture large panels at scale with energy efficiencies approaching 13% for the largest modules. First Solar’s modules are 11.6% efficient. Last year, GE announced that Solar Frontier will supply General Electric (GE) thin-film CIS modules bearing the GE name.

Don’t rule out cadmium telluride just yet, though. GE recently announced that PrimeStar Solar Inc., a startup that it invested in three years ago and now owns, recorded a record-high 12.8% efficiency for CdTe thin film solar panels. GE plans to take those panels to market with a 400-MW American manufacturing plant. First Solar says cadmium telluride is still superior to other technologies for cost competitiveness.

“CdTe PV has been shown to be successfully scalable and is currently the lowest-cost PV technology, which are important factors in ensuring that PV reaches its potential to displace the current use of fossil fuels,” said Friedman, the First Solar spokeswoman.

Solar Frontier is among a handful of next-generation solar manufacturers to graduate from research and development incubators at conventional energy companies. Oil giant BP, once the world’s leading solar module manufacturer, appears to be backing off its investments in renewable energy, however, while Showa Shell is doubling down.

Showa Shell began investing in research and development of solar technology during the energy crisis of the 1970s. It initially worked on cadmium technology, but the company in 1993 turned its solar focus to CIS after it showed potential for higher efficiencies. Showa Shell named its solar business Solar Frontier in 2007 before building manufacturing plants with 20 MW and 60 MW capacities. It scaled those facilities to the 1 GW Kunitomi plant in about a year's time.

Herring said the 1 GW plant is capable of producing 16,000 panels per day, 7 days a week. It will produce up to 600 MW of panels (140 W to 145 W) in 2011 and ramp up to a gigawatt of production next year. Since Solar Frontier began operations in 2007, it has sold 100 MW of modules.

“We feel this provides the economies of scale necessary to compete globally,” Herring said.

Solar Frontier says the CIS modules from the Kunitomi factory are about 12.2% efficient, while it expects to reach 14.2% efficiency in the next few years. On April 15, Italy’s Albatech announced plans to distribute and install Solar Frontier’s thin-film CIS modules. The deal enabled Solar Frontier to enter the well-established European market.

“We are extremely pleased to include in our product offering a competitive premium brand identified with innovation, efficiency and outstanding performance,” Raffaele Salutari, Sales and Marketing Director of Albatech, said in an April 15 statement.

Solar Frontier has also entered the Middle East market through a deal to supply Saudi Aramco with 10 megawatts of its solar modules, which will be installed atop 40 acres of parking structures. Saudi Aramco owns 15% or Showa Shell, while Royal Dutch Shell owns 35%. Multiple investors own the other 50% of shares traded on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

(Right: Japanese leaders and businessmen partake in a Shinto ceremony to mark the opening of the Solar Frontier plant.)

The Saudi Aramco solar array is expected to provide enough energy to power the large office building nearby, and it will serve as a proving ground for thin-film panels in the world’s hottest climates.

It could also lead to more investment in solar power by the Middle East’s petroleum industry.

“As long as you remain a global leader in quality and cost, you can basically expect a reasonable return,” Kato said.

(Note: you can see more images from the factory tour in the image gallery, about  three quarters of the way up this page on the right side.)

17 Comments

Register To Comment
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
May 5, 2011
Dear Debu,
Thank you for your pointer to Prof. Lean Hau. That is truly incredible work, and if innovations like this continue, it may be a very different world we are looking at in 2100 than a fossil-fuel-depleted scenario that would take us back 100 years instead of forward 100 years.
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
May 2, 2011
Thanks, Fire of Energy - yes, even 20% would be good.

"Can build on its own energy" - I'm still doubtful. And perhaps it could, but only to replace itself and not provide any or little useful energy for society. We need to know the energy a certain area of panel (film) could produce over a maximum lifetime and then the energy needed to produce the same film over the whole cycle from mining, building the plant, manufacturing the machines and so on. It's a big job, but it would tell us how far into the 22nd century we could expect to be using this technology (though it may be overtaken by innovations).
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
April 30, 2011
Hi, FireofEnergy,

1) Why would you think the molten salt reactor 'must' be better than the traveling wave? Molten salt reactors seem to hade experienced *many* problems. If you are having this discussion elsewhere, would you please let me know where so I can be aware of the discussion? Thank you.

2) Are there enough of the cigs elements to displace FF's on the terrawatt level? As a hypothetical question, it is interesting and it would take me a while to figure out how to do a rough calculation, but on the practical level, how are you going to mine those elements without fossil fuels, and even if you did and made the panels what sort of EROEI would you expect to get? (Effectively this is what we are doing now and the EROEI is something between 1.5 and 5 over the whole lifecycle?) I agree that using FFs to do this has benefits that make it worthwhile, but attempting to displace all FFs with cigs looks neither like a possibility nor something that 'we' should attempt to do. I'll be interested to see if anyone can do a rough calculation and has alternative opinions to mine.
ANONYMOUS
April 29, 2011
400,000 square meters of factory space is actually 4.3 million sqft, not 1.3 million.
Ken Higgs
Ken Higgs
April 29, 2011
Not to change the subject, but rather to bridge the subjects
mentioned, why is there 0 comments about:

http://www.terrapower.com/Technology/TravelingWaveReactor.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling_wave_reactor

Bill Gates seems to feel 'there is something in his future with
this tech., in accord with his investment in this company. Good
replacement for the older huge N-plants? And of pocket-nuclear?

Thanks for comments.
Robert Crowe
Robert Crowe
April 29, 2011
Ben, your point on the "electricity today" has been dually noted. Thanks. Good comments.
ANONYMOUS
April 29, 2011
Hello Robert

I have taught many courses on (amongst others) renewable energy at undergraduate as well as graduate University level. You have covered an important event, and were certainly right in comparing the electricity from the roof with that used to run the factory. As I already commented, the Solarex factory & headquarters at Frederick, Maryland was powered around 50% by PV panels on its roof.

The Solar Frontier factory has 3 stories, so that its roof has about one third of the floor space. This gives 400 000 / 3 = 133 333 square metres of roof space. Solar irradiation for some hours around noon at low latitudes on a clear day is about 1000 watt per square metre when that square metre of panel is at right angles to the incoming solar rays. When correcting for the fact the roof is not at this angle, a cosine factor of about 0.8 is to be added at the latitude of the south island Kyushu. This factor may in practice relate the inclined module (panel) area to the horizontal roof area.

Incidentally a SQUARE metre is a bit more than 10 SQUARE feet -- not around 3 square feet! It is not so simple to relate feet to watts as with square metres.

If the entire roof were indeed COVERED with PV of 12.4% efficiency, then the electricity delivered for some hours near noon would be 133 333 x 1000 x 12.4/100 x 0.8 watt = 13 226 634 watt, about 13.2 MW.

Of course it will deliver less when clouds obscure the sun, or far away from noon. But PV systems are rated by their performance under optimum conditions.

It is abundantly clear that the system covers only a small part of the roof.
Ben
ANONYMOUS
April 29, 2011
Hello Robert

Your Reuters reference says 'Japan's 54 reactors provide some 30 percent of the country's ELECTRICITY today' (my emphasis).

Any country uses also NON-ELECTRIC ENERGY. Your car, for instance. And iron smelting and steelmaking in industry, as well as gas . . for space heating. Not to mention solar water heating -- which is about 20 times more cost effective directly than via PV electricity.

In some (especially developing) countries the non-electric energy use exceeds the electric use, but in Japan's case the two are roughly equal. 30% of ELECTRICITY is NOT the same as 30% of ENERGY!

Ben
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
April 29, 2011
Hello Robert,
Yes, it is nice to see these issues discussed under your article! I'm learning a lot here. I hate to disappoint you, but the Reuters article you mentioned does say "Japan's 54 reactors provide some 30 percent of the country's electricity today". At the end, the article states, "This would lead to nuclear energy contributing about 60 percent of primary energy in 2100 (compared with 10 percent now), 10 percent from renewables (now 5 percent) and 30 percent fossil fuels (now 85 percent). That roughly tells you what the situation is now. Goodness only knows what the actual situation will be in 2100!!
Robert Crowe
Robert Crowe
April 29, 2011
Glad to see these issues are getting discussed in depth here. Thanks, Ben, for sharing that IEA report. Bear with me as I offer a rebuttal. I hope I don't sound too confrontational, but I just don't see a discrepancy. I specifically cited Reuters because 30% energy from nukes is what that news agency and others are reporting. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/12/us-japan-power-nuclear-idUSTRE72B1DG20110312

The article makes it apparent that Japan is not currently drawing 30% of power from nuclear because the Fukushima reactors and others are inoperable. That's why I cited CNIP. The interior of the factory is 400,000 square meters (about 1.3 million square feet). I don't know roof square footage, but I provided the number of panels 15,400 and wattage per panel 130 to show how they arrived at 2 megawatts. They are currently manufacturing 140-watt panels and plan to manufacture 150 watt panels with 12.2% efficiency (at some point). I'm not sure of the efficiency on the 130 watt modules, but I get the impression that it is less than 12.2% because those were likely an early generation.

Yes, it is ironic that that factory only gets 1-2% of its energy from the 2 MW roof-top solar array. That was a detail that could not be left out. It clearly shows the challenges facing energy policy as Japan seeks ways to displace nuclear and fossil fuels with renewable energy. We're talking about 1.3 million square feet of robots, conveyors and laminating devices operating 24/7. That's a lot of energy.

It's obvious that most renewable energy technologies currently rely on fossil fuel during manufacturing processes. What differentiates renewables is that significantly less fossil fuel (and often no petroleum) is required for wind, solar, geothermal, etc. to generate energy after the manufacturing process is complete.
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
April 29, 2011
Thanks, Ben,
I was able to download the Factsheet PDF. After the Fukushima disaster, I would be surprised if nuclear power accounted for 8% of all energy in 2035. The whole WEO looks far too optimistic; it always has. The trend looks to me more like 40 to 50% for renewables, total world energy consumption being significantly lower than it is now - 50 to 70% of what it is now. I.e. twice as much energy generation by renewables in 2035 than the WEO predicts. But that can only happen if there is a conscious effort to use relatively cheap fossil energy resources to manufacture renewable energy equipment. Once fossil energy shortage begins to bite - before 2020 even - this will become increasingly difficult to do. The whole thing is extremely difficult to predict, however.
ANONYMOUS
April 28, 2011
Dear Tonbo

Page 1 of their 2010 World Energy Outlook Fact Sheet says of the world's primary energy mix:

'The share of nuclear power increases from 6% in 2008 to 8% in 2035. The use of modern renewable energy – including hydro, wind, solar, geothermal, modern biomass and marine energy – triples between 2008 and 2035, its share in total energy demand increasing from 7% to 14%'.

It is clear that RENEWABLES ALREADY SURPASS NUCLEAR, and GROW MORE RAPIDLY.

Ben
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
April 28, 2011
Hi Anonymous,
Thank you for pointing out the discrepancy in Robert's article concerning Japan's energy/electricity. I am interested to know where on the IEA website they document that renewables have already surpassed nuclear as an energy source. Is it possible for you to give a more exact reference? Thanks!
ANONYMOUS
April 28, 2011
A most interesting article. But Robert states: 'Japan's 54 nuclear reactors generate 30% of the country's energy'. Actually, when fully operational they generate 30% of its ELECTRICITY, and provide only about 16% of its ENERGY. Road transport and industry consume vast amounts of non-electrical energy.

And 'a 2 MW roof-mounted solar array covers the factory's vast roof, but it provides just 1% of the plant's energy needs'. It is not clear from the first photograph whether the roof is in fact 'covered' with solar panels.

A 400 000 /3 = 133 000 square metre roof at that latitude COVERED with 12.2% efficient PV panels will generate at least 133 000 x 122 x .8 W = 13 MW near mid-day. Most certainly not a mere 2 MW.

And 2 decades ago the main factory & head office of Solarex (at the time a leading PV manufacturer) was powered more than 50% from PV panels on its roof.

Apart from the website mentioned in Robert's Comment, www.iea.org also documents that renewables have already surpassed nuclear as an energy source.
Robert Crowe
Robert Crowe
April 28, 2011
Thanks for the interesting comments. The situation in Japan demonstrates how complicated energy policy is for that region. To add some context on the potential of renewables, you might want to check out the recent Worldwatch report http://www.worldwatch.org/end-nuclear, which concluded that worldwide cumulative installed capacity from wind turbines, biomass, waste-to-energy, and solar power surpassed installed nuclear capacity. The question is whether renewable energy can realistically surpass nukes in Japan.
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
April 28, 2011
Dear Debu,

Thanks for your comment. I agree that the recycling of solar panels with help the EROEI, but unless there's some fantastic innovation over the next 80 to 100 years that gives renewable energy such a large EROEI that equipment can be reproduced while still providing useful amounts of energy for society they will always be a 'transitional' energy. I'm not playing down the importance of renewables. Their role in the transition from fossil energy society to whatever comes after it are crucial. We are all (those living, anyway) going to make that transition far better with them than without them.

I echo your congratulations and best wishes to this new company.
Tony Boys
Tony Boys
April 27, 2011
Thanks for the interesting article Robert. It is clear that solar is one of the useful transition energies for the post-peak-oil period, but at the same time it is also clear that it IS only a transition energy. For Japan, it may well be necessary, post-Fukushima, to replace some or all current nuclear with either more fossil fuels or with renewable energy systems. What your article clarifies for me (though this was not your intention, I am sure) is that solar panels cannot be manufactured from the energy produced by solar panels (insufficient electrical power + the need to mine and refine various minerals + manufacturing the plastics and other materials in the panels + energy and materials for the construction of the plant and all the machinery in it).

A complete society/economy run on renewable energy may be possible, but it will not look at all like the society/economy we have now. And that society may not be capable of reproducing the renewable energy equipment using just renewable energy systems. With fossil fuels we have an opportunity to "bank" renewable energy systems - just as this Solar Frontier plant is doing in Miyazaki now - but the end of fossil fuels (and there will be an end, I believe, this century, due to the falling EROEI of extracting fossil fuels) will essentially mean the end of the ability to manufacture renewable energy equipment. Thus, these thin solar films will be useful, I believe, till about the end of this century, but where do we go after that? Does anyone have a realistic response?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Robert Crowe

Robert Crowe

Robert Crowe is a technical writer and reporter based in San Antonio, Texas. He has written for Bloomberg, the Houston Chronicle, Boston Herald, StreetAuthority.com, San Antonio Express-News, Dallas Business Journal, and other publications....
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • EU PVSEC (European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition)
  • Renewable Energy Corporation
  • Green Power Conferences
  • Motech Industries, Inc.
  • Arena Solutions
  • Renewables Academy AG (RENAC)
  • SolPowerPeople, Inc.
  • Schletter Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information