The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Industry Leaders: SunShot's $1 per Watt Goal Feasible

Economies of scale, technological advancements needed.

Robert Crowe, Contributor
April 11, 2011  |  7 Comments

Rapid growth in solar photovoltaics has brought installation costs within sight of $1 per watt for large projects and closer to competing with fossil fuels.

Prices still hover around $3 per watt currently, so it will take multiple breakthroughs in technology, public policy and manufacturing processes before reaching the U.S. Department of Energy’s SunShot goal of $1 per watt by 2017.

Industry leaders say a lot can happen in six months, let alone six years, so that goal might even be achievable without a major technological breakthrough.

“Freefall is the only way to describe solar energy prices in the last couple of years,” said Ryne Raffaelle, director of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Center for Photovoltaics.

That “freefall” has been driven by the growth of solar installations, which is no longer a small business – it is a $100 billion industry worldwide, he said. The cost reductions are so dramatic, that Bloomberg recently reported that solar energy could soon rival coal, while it has also become competitive during peak times in Japan and California.

“Conventional wisdom said our current approaches, materials and efficiencies and cost structures couldn’t get us the metrics ($1 per watt) we were looking for,” Raffaelle said. “That’s changing.”

Economies of scale with incremental, but more rapid and consistent technological improvements, could soon drive costs down to $2 per watt. Bloomberg estimated costs would fall to $1.45 a watt by 2020.

 “From our standpoint, if you ask us globally, we believe you can get it down to $1 per watt,” said Helena Kimball, Yingli Solar spokeswoman.

Yingli is among China’s emerging solar giants, many of whom have rapidly lowered costs through vertical integration. Those companies stand to benefit from more scaling since the Chinese government has announced it could double solar capacity from five to 10 GW by 2015 in an effort to replace some nuclear power with sun power in the wake of Japan’s nuclear crisis.

Though the United States has been behind the curve, it is starting to nip at the heels of Asian and European manufacturers with the NREL’s PV Technology Incubator program and private sector research and development.

GE recently announced that PrimeStar Solar Inc., a startup that GE invested in three years ago and now owns, recorded a record-high 12.8% efficiency for CdTe thin film solar panels. GE plans to take those panels to market, announcing last week that it plans to build a 400-MW American manufacturing plant.

“Our plan to open a U.S. solar manufacturing facility further demonstrates our confidence in this technology,” said Victor Abate, vice president of GE’s renewable energy business. “We’re not only excited by the efficiency milestone, but also by the speed at which our team was able to achieve it.”

More U.S.-based startups are advancing technology with private investment and government support through the DOE’s SunShot initiative, which has provided $50 million to small businesses under the PV Technology Incubator program since 2007. NREL officials say the private sector has invested an additional $2 billion in those incubator companies.

Lower Manufacturing Costs

First Solar’s manufacturing costs per watt fell 75.5% from $2.94 in 2004 to 75 cents in 2011, according to spokeswoman Michelle Friedman. First Solar also increased efficiency of its thin film and glass solar panels to 11.6% this year from 10% in 2009.

The company’s roadmap calls for reducing the cost per watt to 64 cents by 2014. Friedman said First Solar does not discuss the costs of installing its panels, however. First Solar anticipates production of 2.9 gigawatts by 2012. It has expanded multiple facilities and also plans to build a new manufacturing plant in Arizona.

China’s Suntech has targeted 2015 for grid parity in global markets. In 2001, the average levelized price of solar electricity was 75 cents per kWh, according to Suntech spokesman Walker Frost. Solar electricity now costs less than 10 cents per kWh in some regions with abundant sunlight, he added. Suntech is reducing costs by using less expensive materials that are more abundant.

“The technology also allows us to use copper in the metallization process, which has the same conductive properties as silver but is less expensive,” Frost said.

Suntech also reduced energy and water use at production plants and invested heavily in building up to 1,200 MW of wafers in-house. Wafers typically account for 50% of a solar panel’s cost. Chinese competitor Yingli also produces much of its raw materials in house, including about 3,000 metric tons of polysilicon in-house.

There has been talk of an oversupply in the photovoltaic market, but NREL’s Raffaelle said that does not appear to be the case because unmet demand is keeping prices up.

“Demand continues to exceed supply, which drives costs up,” Raffaelle said. “The reality is [that] we use a lot of power. It’s hard to wrap your mind around terawatts of power. There is still much more solar PV manufacturing necessary to put a dent into terawatts of power,” which is currently generated by coal, natural gas and nuclear.

Technological Advances

While economies of scale seem to be driving cost reductions, researchers are still looking for “disruptive” technologies to increase efficiency and ultimately lower costs. NREL tests show 40% efficiencies for some concentrated photovoltaics (CPV). The CPV market is expected to grow from 1.5 to 75 MW in the next five years. That growth was historically limited to desert regions with consistent sun exposure.

The tracking and optical devices required for most CPV have also posed problems. Santa Barbara, Calif.-based HyperSolar Inc. claims it can achieve the same results minus the optical devices by installing an acrylic top sheet onto PV panels.

Researchers are also closing the gap in manufacturing PV “champion cells” with 20% efficiencies. Researchers, however, had difficulties in translating those high efficiencies to the largest panels. In 2009, the large panels could only get 12 percent efficiencies. Some companies are now demonstrating 14 to 17% efficiencies.

Policy Changes

As manufacturing costs decrease, solar panels will no longer be the “long pole in the tent,” Raffaelle said. Industry leaders are searching for ways to reduce costs related to labor, installation and public policy.

SunRun, a solar leasing and installation firm, recently said in a report to the DOE that installation costs on residential solar power could be cut by 50 cents per watt by instituting a standard permitting process. While the industry and NREL are targeting a $1 per watt installation cost for large-scale installations, residential and rooftop solar accounts for 70 percent of all PV deployed last year, Raffaelle said.

“Most of the action has still been in small, distributed stuff,” Raffaelle said. “That in itself poses a lot of challenges because our power system existed under large centralized power station models since its inception.”

Advocacy organizations, such as Solar San Antonio in Texas, have been working with utility companies, municipalities and local media to encourage solar-friendly policies and permitting processes that encourage use of distributed systems via feed-in tariffs.

“We think policy changes can go a long way toward reducing costs,” said Lanny Sinkin, executive director of Solar San Antonio.

Multiple megawatt installations can also benefit from consistent policies, incentives and permitting processes, experts said.

“We’ve found that solar installations areas are actually going up in some parts of the United States while they are going down in others,” Raffaelle said.

7 Comments

Register To Comment
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
April 14, 2011
Solar at least deserves a pat on the back for doing a lot with a little. Sunshot is a cheap program but one with a huge payback if it works.

Don't get excited: it's just a tad over $0.1B which looks small to DOE commitments to CCS technology under Ob totalling ~$2.3B. In one case, they're funding a CCS pilot at $0.5B to eventually get 180 MW of carbon free power - that's 5.56 $/W. You don't even need 1 $/W solar to compete with that.

As is common knowledge, you could knock 15% of the cost of solar immediately if the cost of red tape was brought in line with that for other technologies. There's a huge advance with no technical risk.
Susan Fredricks
Susan Fredricks
April 14, 2011
The guy that wrote the article is right. We have a lot to celebrate about. Triple digit growth in the solar industry in the US is amazing, but we should be doing more, way more. As a country we still do not have a viable energy policy! Something that makes so much sense and is so important to national security, the economy and also the environment. This should be one of the highest priorities for our country. But instead our politicians squabble about "clean coal" the cost of gasoline and forming foreign policy base on oil. Imagine eliminating our dependence on unreliable foreign oil, stimulating our economy creating millions of jobs instead of sending billions every day to counties that hate us and having an incredibly positive impact on the environment. We should be thinking about what we are leaving for our children and the answer is all around us! We are the Saudi Arabia of wind, we are swimming in Natural gas and enough sunlight shines on the US every minute to power us for a year. We need an energy policy that recognizes this, we need economic policies that support this and we need to educate the consumer to buy it and insist on it.
ANONYMOUS
April 12, 2011
Anon to anon. You're right. But don't expect everyone to see it coming. I have a property on the edge of an old mill pond built by the mill owner. At one point, he leased his excess flow to another company that produced electricity. The grist mill is gone, the saw mill is gone, the milling company expired 90 years ago. The electric company still exists in the form of a public utility serving ~300,000 and a generating company serving ~7,000,000.
Also, don't expect that there won't be any push back. Many do not like change and some would rather starve than eat meat. There has already been some remarkable push back including municipalities that will let you put almost anything on your roof or in your back yard as long as it isn't a solar panel - some of my faves do, however, heat municipal buildings with coal and oil. One big problem is that many utility scale generators are more expensive to shut down than keep operating, especially where regulatory non-compliance has been grandfathered or where operational entitlements persist indefinitely.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
April 12, 2011
Pity us poor humans: we're so lame when it comes to thinking about dynamics. Basic concepts like economy of scale seem impossible to grasp.
Supply chain workers know that volume == discount. They work at buying in channels to achieve volume which allows them to demand price breaks. Many suppliers compliment this by freely offering volume discounts. The ideal customer is an experienced high volume customer because this represents the least overhead to the supplier while large customers become knowledgeable and self-reliant to both party's advantage. Efficiencies are gained throughout the value stream based on volume.
And still, we see many 'rationalists' holding out for the next technological breakthrough and the next. Technological breakthroughs are rare and unpredictable. 95% of technological development is incremental not disruptive. But, technology is an expensive commodity. It only advances on cash flows that in part are a small slice of the margin on sales. At the same time R&D spending decisions are driven by potential market. Volume drives R&D.
Compared to technological evolution, economy of scale is a certainty - economists are right to claim it as a law.
The most important thing anyone can do to make a desirable technology more affordable is to buy in quantity.
Another misunderstood dynamic is time. Overnight cost is rarely a good indicator of total cost of ownership. We all know when we finance a house or car, that we end up paying is way more than the sticker price, yet, we blissfully ignore how much we really paid with occasional surprise if our 'investment' goes under water. Solar is as fast as it gets: the time from equipment purchase to producing revenue is by far the shortest of any option. Some options must be financed for 10 or 20 years before any production: true $/W cost is several times the sticker price. Worse, for the taxpayer, the tax credits and depreciation allowances have been paid out well before any new capacity comes on line.
Dennis Richter
Dennis Richter
April 12, 2011
For those of us making a business out of installing and developing solar, $1 a watt is the "Holy Grail" to really scale our business and open up the market to almost any application. The cumbersome use of government incentives slows the process down dramatically and of course adds cost and overhead to the installation. I am encouraged to hear that our government gets it and is spending our tax dollars on getting the technology to a point where the market will take it and run. They can spend money incenting the adoption or they can spend money making it competitive with conventional forms of energy. I vote for the latter.
Steve Fortuna
Steve Fortuna
April 12, 2011
Good point Dave. If the early adopters don't move and demand slackens, it will be next to impossible to drive price down through increased production efficiency. Historically, every $1 per watt decrease drove up solar demand >300%, but when we reach grid parity the sky's the limit. By the time that happens, I don't think they'll be a public incentive left. If you can afford it, let Uncle Sam be your 30% ITC friend and invest in a technology that will soon be as common as household appliances. Don't you want to be the first guys on the block who can make your meter spin backwards? Imagine the envy on your neighbor's faces when you tell them what you pay the utility each month. It's not about climate change, it's about having the vision and foresight to invest for the long term change. Renewables are the Internet of the 21st Century.
David Henri
David Henri
April 12, 2011
I wonder how many PV installations are being deferred waiting for the magic number of a dollar a watt. I run into potential customers every day that mention an article they read or heard on some new technology that will make today's PV obsolete. Not that reporting encouraging news is a negative, it is what it is, a reason for some to wait. Some policy makers see these types of articles as a reason to lower incentives prematurely. I just reassure my clients that breakthroughs are so far away that the incentives are most likely to be gone by then. Now is the best time to move forward. If they are referencing the specific breakthrough of the week, I can honestly say that the news release is related to that company looking to attract investors.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Robert Crowe

Robert Crowe

Robert Crowe is a technical writer and reporter based in San Antonio, Texas. He has written for Bloomberg, the Houston Chronicle, Boston Herald, StreetAuthority.com, San Antonio Express-News, Dallas Business Journal, and other publications....
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Apricus, Inc.
  • Quick Mount PV
  • SRECTrade, Inc.
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • UnThink Solar
  • SMA America, LLC
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information