Sign-In  or  Create a Free Account
Sign-in with:
 
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
 
Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Anaerobic Digestion: Unaddressed Opportunity

By Haley Sawyer, Senior Consultant-Energy, Navigant Consulting
April 28, 2011   |   25 Comments

Do you like this magazine?

 
 
25 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 25
April 29, 2011
Source seggregated food waste is expensive to collect. For AD to succeed, collection of appropriate materials need to be organised first and both household and business/catering/food industry wastes integrated to get economies of scale and input security.

Often collection efficiency is poor making surce seggregated food wastes uneconomic.
Comment
2 of 25
April 29, 2011
There are plants which can be used for Biogas production. Water Hyacinth which is regarded as menace is one. 80 per cent water hyacinth and 20 per cent Animal Dung can be used for biogas generation and then to run turbines for power production. Also Water Hyacinth can find many uses:

Water Hyacinth ( Eichhornia Crassipes)
Wealth from Waste
Water hyacinth which is generally regarded as a menace can
find many uses:
- in food production
- as leaf protein concentrate, which is rich in
protein and vitamin A,
- as a substrate for mushroom cultivation,
- by making soils more fertile which yield better
crops,
- by purifying water, in which fish can then thrive,
- through the production of silage, for fattening
animals,
- through vermiculture, producing feed for poultry
or fish,
- in regenerating degraded soils,
- as mulch
- as compost
- as fertiliser,produced by mixing with other
organic materials, and phosphate rock,
- in biogas production. 1 hectare of weed can
produce 100 tons of dry water hyacinth/year
which could produce 30,000 cu.m of gas
sufficient to supply cooking for 40 families. The
residual slurry must be used as mulch,
- as briquettes, which can be used for cooking in
kitchens for schools and restaurants,
- in providing employment and income, through
the production and sale of;
• a range of art papers and cards
• crafts and furniture
• (on industrial level), chemicals and liquid
fuels.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Comment
3 of 25
April 29, 2011
While I am a big proponent of renewable energy made from waste products, we desperately need that organic waste to fertilize our food crops, not for energy. Synthetic and chemical fertilizing must stop if we are to create a sustainable future.
Comment
4 of 25
April 29, 2011
That is the great thing about AD, it is not either energy or fertilizer, it is both energy and fertilizer. In fact the nitrogen that leaves compost as ammonia gas stays in the slurry of a digester so that nitrogen levels are higher than with compost. Usually the liquid and solids are seperated, the liquid having the nutrients is then field applied, the solids can be used as soil ammendment or bedding for the animals.
Comment
5 of 25
April 29, 2011
AD is a controlled process - similar to the uncontrolled generation of landfill gas - as such much more sustainable than incineration and as said the compost sludge is fertilizer material.

In some countries - China and India for example AD is prevalent at domestic and street level - biodegradable material from market, abattoirs, etc, given that many underdeveloped countries have no universal/organised waste collection systems, locations such as markets, hotels, college residences,etc,have started to install AD plants for local biogas generation.
Comment
6 of 25
April 29, 2011
To get a firm handle on uses of our waste streams, specifically Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW), production of ethanol needs to be thrown into the mix. Ethanol is a higher value product and its production can be done in a co-gen (CHP) process where processing heat and excess electricity are produced. When AD applications do not use CHP and have no use for heat lowers its economies. On the other hand, AD scales down better than ethanol production. On farm use is prevalent because it fits well - guaranteed source of lower waste volumes, electric and or heat needs exist and immediate adjacent use for fertilizer exists. These factors are not so readily present in a more urban setting. Use of our waste streams is unaddressed regardless of the technology. Focusing on this fact rather than a specific technology should remain our focus.
Comment
7 of 25
April 30, 2011
Is there any company that makes these digester on a small scale for a home owner to use? In India when I visited about 5 years ago had a large number of back yard "Gober gas" bio digester making enough methane gas for a family to use for cooking and some for heating water as well. I contacted the owners of Haase energy in Germany.( http://www.haase-energietechnik.de/en/Products_and_Services/Energy_Systems/). They are very reluctant to bring their technology to USA for fear of "being sued"
Comment
8 of 25
April 30, 2011
I am working on coming out with a line of modular digesters for small to medium farms. The smallest would be able to be used on a home owner scale. One of the original designers used the gas from a digester that was fed by the waste of 15 pigs to heat his house, provide cooking gas, hot water and electricity.
Comment
9 of 25
May 1, 2011
Bruce,

Please let us know when you come out with this. WE are looking to obtain small to medium sized units.

Thank you.
Comment
10 of 25
May 1, 2011
before getting excited about domestic scale AD, please check whether you will have sufficient and suitable input material, also the climate - designs suitable for warmer climates may be useless in Europe or N America particularly in the colder months and could require insulation/auxiliary heating to maintain required conditions.

Also the biogas produced may only be suitable for low grade heating and may require additional processing and compression to get to commercial pipeline standards compatible with commercial appliances.

Best to carry out some pilot tests to establish gas potential and operating range.

For small scale installations try custom design with minimal running equipment - possibly sunk in the ground to conserve heat.
Comment
11 of 25
I'm sorry, but this concept of keeping something at 100 degrees by burying it in a 55 degree (in summer) hole is not the way to do things. Ground is not insulation, it is an endless heat sink!!!
No image available
Comment
12 of 25
Anonymous
May 3, 2011
Bruce-Wilson - Ground IS insulation. That is why it stays at a constant temperature at a specific depth based on degree days. Burying something is the first principle of passive solar design. It is easier to insulate against a year round temperature of 55 than against a sub- zero temperature part of the year. Comment # 12 is correct - geography makes a difference as farmers in the north country can tell you. While it may be possible to make modular components, success will depend on tuning it to your exact inputs, conditions and uses. It is not like turning a light switch on.
Comment
13 of 25
May 3, 2011
"The outlook is positive." There is no doubt in this statement about the prospects of developing AD plants in United States, and even the whole world. But it takes time to both bring and imprint this concept into people's minds and train technician personnel for this field. AD is undoubtedly the best option to treat waste at present because it can not only dispose waste in an ecofriendly manner but produce electricity. Unlike landfill, it has no leachate; or incineration plant, it won't produce dioxin.
Comment
14 of 25
May 3, 2011
Farmscale AD is prevalent in the US I thought - basic designs using above or below ground pits or tankage and flexible diaphragms are the most economic and it is not that difficult to work out the heat balance.

It is natural that AD economics are more favourable where construction and operation are simple and heat loss low.

AD can be used mainly with food waste and although technically feasible with garden wastes, etc, pretty inefficient. AD process in colder climates may require nett heat input and additional pumping power and not too difficult to work out the costs.

Technology of AD is pretty basic process engineering and trial and adaptation needed with particular feed material for success. There is a cost for source seggregation of suitable material which may explain it not being taken up compared with comingled collection and either landfill or incineration.

As stated collection and transport costs dictate the economics of waste management.

The main thrust is to get rid of the waste and biogas is simply a bonus. Overall incineration is the most carbon-efficient as on average it displaces fossil fuels to the tune of approx 400kg carbon per tonne of waste material. AD balance is roughly 100kg per tonne of material processed.
Comment
15 of 25
Reply to comment 13, Though everything has an R value, including dirt, dirt is not an insulator, it is thermal mass.That is why it stays the same temparature once you get 5 feet down. Yes,"It is easier to insulate against a year round temperature of 55 than against a sub- zero temperature part of the year." The problem with most underground buildings is that not enough insulation is used. 55 degrees is not comfortable. The added cost of building below ground (excavation and the aded strength needed to withstand the compression of dirt pushing on the building) is a problem with below ground houses. Super Insulation, or Passive House construction is a proven technology and adds less cost (around 10%) than below ground construction. There are some 2400 SF super Insulated houses in our area of SE PA that only cost $150 a year to heat using passive solar and high levels of insulation
Comment
16 of 25
May 3, 2011
Bruce-Wilson - We are getting off track here. I have designed and build both passive solar types and know the parameters of each. Everything is an insulator, everything is a conductor everything is a mass. Dirt is not extreme in any of these properties. When you get down to running the figures you look at your particular circumstances.

To Bobkim, comment #14 - "Overall incineration is the most carbon-efficient" I must disagree with you on this one. Both major Incineration to power operators in the US are not building them now and are looking for 'conversion to liquid fuel' technologies, which is more lucrative both from a dollar standpoint and total conversion efficiency.
Comment
17 of 25
May 3, 2011
We are going round in circles here - as scientists, engineers, and constructiors we need to appreciate there is no one right answer and it all depends upon location and value allocated by the designer/buyer.

So Ad has a place for certain materials at particular locations, same as incineration, even landfill.

It may be cheaper to dig and put in a concrete or brick lined tank at certain locations compared with welded tanks - here in the U.K and in Europe above ground insulated tankage is the norm for AD. Many find it necessary to use quite a large part of the gas generated to heat the process.

AD in countries such as India and China where labour is cheap and factory fabricated materials, pumps, etc,costly, rely on passive designs and more civil works. Local materials determine design and construction all over the world - same as houses or anything else.

As you say liquid fuel conversion is actively pursued simply because the main use of fossil fuels is for transport and space heating - hopefully technological developments will balance out cost economics as we learn more. Same for PV which is falling in price per kW.

No one uses AD or incineration for generating electricity or heat excepting as a secondary benefit - the primary objective is to get lowest cost of dealing with domestic and industry/business wastes - and even recycling has to be economic to be sustainable.

In the U.K and Europe the drive towards recycling or different waste processing technologies are driven more by misguided political or social perceptions - not hard facts and economic analysis. Capital costs are the main cost of waste infrastructure, same as for power and people are still learning.

Whatever the technology, ultimately if it is not cost effective, people will not buy. Not many have all the facts about lifecycly cost and benefits and government policy is often decided by politicians who have short term view.
Comment
18 of 25
bonkim2003, Given that a 20% drop in temperature from optimal temperature leads to a 20% drop in gas output, to not insulate makes no sense. Though gas is not the only gain from AD, it is what untimately pays for the digester. Even if it is just a hole in the ground covered with a tarp, heat loss to the ground is too great for optimal conditions. That does not mean gas will not be produced, just not as much as is possible.
Digging a hole in the ground is not cheap, lining that hole with concrete is not cheap, a genset is not cheap. Manure is the worst fuel for producing gas, so mixing in other feed stocks can make more gas. Custom engineering fees are far from cheap and make small scale AD too expensive. Engineers have held back this industry by charging too much and designing inefficient AD's. There is a reason that Europe is doing above ground insulated AD, it works better.
A line of small scale modular digesters will revolutionize the industry by increasing efficiency leading to more gas, and reducing cost. Americas farmers are waiting for an affordable digester!
Comment
19 of 25
May 4, 2011
Anaerobic Digesters are varied in type and efficiency. We find the dairy / swine / food waste applications cannot ROI without electrical sales that are currently only obtainable in the northern USA. Modern Technology Methods has a poultry anaerobic digester which creates high percentage methane (70+) with the digestate a true premium organic fertilizer both liquid and solid. I have not seen anything else that can compare to the values produced on either side. Poultry manure is GREAT for energy production and any farmer will tell you that it's also the best fertilizer. The AD process "treats" the manure so no pathogens. The truly commercially valuable fertilizer by-products; in liquid form perfect for lawns, hay fields, and turf because of the almost negligible phosphorus content, and the solids concentrated perfect for corn and other row crops. Everyone benefits and all are positive aspects. The Poultry Anaerobic Digester works on all the levels needed for investment and broad installation, something that continues to be a problem for other types.
Comment
20 of 25
May 5, 2011
Bo problem with what you say Bruce Wilson Contracting - standardised modules would be cost effective and as with any process user will have to optimise operations with available material and cost effectiveness of generation.

My point was - gas or energy generated from such processes should be seen as a bonus - not the sole objective of the process which are inherrently inefficient. Even the best optimised AD will find it hard to squeeze 100% gas output of the chemical potential - typically 50%. In terme of insulation - cheap, yes ground loss is also considerable. As said all these are factors which the designer/constructor takes into account at particular location.

The problem with small modules are as you say - and I have tried to construct a small passive unit but temperature variations and complexity of maintaining production, feed, etc, requires quite a lot of effort with little return. In lower cost countries cheaper labour makes smallscale AD worthwhile. Efficiency is often not measured in such circumstances.

As you say it would be useful to promote standard designs and also look at cost engineering and managing operations to reduce effort. People always choose between available options and fossil fuels are still not prohibitive and the waste industry is also looking at maximising revenue for itself rather than reducing cost. Recycling is a catchword few understand but happy to pay an arm and a leg for.
Comment
21 of 25
May 6, 2011
Waste water treatment, when coupled to Solar Thermal, out to be a generator of peaking power, not a consumer.

Methane capture is a venerable technology and fuel cells are a natural partner. Avoiding methane release from any source is a good idea, but CO2 emissions capture from a fuel cell (as an industrial feedstock) is a better idea.

The same basic model can be applied to methane hydrates with the added advantage of a cold sink.
Comment
22 of 25
May 7, 2011
The city of Portland, OR, has been running Columbia Waste Treatment Facility on CH4 captured in the sewage treatment process using catalytic fuel cells that generate 200kW of electricity for about 12 years now.
Comment
23 of 25
May 7, 2011
Bonkim2003 seems not to have noticed the introduction of kitchen sink waste disposals. These have been at the heart of the system for a while.

Free Linn might be able to verify that.

These systems have also been used on farms, treating two problems at once. That combination of benefits changes the economic calculation, usually for the better. Indeed most solar systems are migrating toward multiple benefit systems, with EE built into the RE.
Comment
24 of 25
May 7, 2011
The city of Portland, OR, has been running Columbia Waste Treatment Facility on CH4 captured in the sewage treatment process using catalytic fuel cells that generate 200kW of electricity for about 12 years now.
Comment
25 of 25
May 7, 2011
Kitchen sink disposers have been tried in the U.K before but there is always conflict between different operators. Also domestic waste water/sewage systems have difficulty coping with additional material including fats which clog up the system.

But yes technically feasible to deal with kitchen waste that way subject to satisfactory design re-assessments and commercial arrangements.

One thing missing from all this discussion is that technically many things are feasible but commercial development depends on government strategy and providing commercial drivers for operators to implement such systems, also scale of operations necessary to justify new investment to replace existing systems however inefficient.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
 

Advertise With Us

Solar FlexRack Geothermal Resources Council Reed Exhibitions SMA America, LLC Intertek AllEarth Renewables Tamura Corporation of America
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters