The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Canadian Renewable Energy Market Overview

Hydro made the country a 20th Century renewable energy powerhouse (chart, right). Efforts now focus on a broad range of technologies and policy innovations.

David Wagman, Chief Editor, Renewable Energy World North America magazine
April 19, 2011  |  13 Comments

Renewable energy's fortunes in Canada lean heavily on government support, making 2011 a particularly crucial year in places like British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario where political leadership changes are underway and elections are scheduled.

As in the United States, renewable energy in Canada depends largely on public policy goals set not at the federal level but at the provincial and territorial levels. And on that score there's a mixed bag of support and initiatives across Canada's 10 provinces and three territories.

"The federal government has an extremely limited role," said Robert Hornung, president of the Canadian Wind Energy Association.

Canada's dominant energy resource (renewable or otherwise) is hydroelectric power, much of it generated in the sparsely populated and water-rich north for transmission to the more urbanized south and, in the case of Quebec especially, exported to the U.S.

Playing a smaller but growing role in the country is wind, solar, biomass and geothermal. By the numbers, Canada's installed generating capacity in 2009 was 125,485 MW with 60 percent derived from renewable resources, most of it hydro. In British Columbia and Quebec, hydro generation meets around 90 percent of electricity demand. But BC is a net importer of electricity while Quebec is a net exporter. Alberta and Saskatchewan are rich in oil and natural gas resources while coal is an abundant natural resource in Manitoba and northern Ontario. Nationally, nuclear generation comprises 20 percent of installed capacity, coal 15 percent and natural gas 5 percent.

Wind and solar are gaining footholds in Ontario, Canada's most populous province, through what may be North America's most aggressive feed-in tariff (FIT). The tariff, enacted in October 2009, has propelled Ontario to trailing only California in North American solar energy market activity.

Investors favor feed-in tariffs because they are sure of the money that will be flowing upfront into a project, said Elizabeth McDonald, president of the Canadian Solar Industries Association. "It's an excellent program."

In 2005, the government said Ontario would stop using coal for electricity in 2007, but later said that target was unrealistic and that some units were needed for grid stability. In 2006, the province pushed back the deadline to close 6,400 MW of coal-fired capacity until 2014. Four units, representing 2,000 MW of capacity, were shut last October.

Across Canada, an estimated 19,000 MW of generating capacity is likely to retire by 2025. Another 45,000 MW of generating capacity is expected to be needed to meet current growth projections. The federal government committed to seeing 90 percent of Canada's electricity generated by non-emitting sources by 2020. It also committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. That goal grows to 60 to 70 percent below 2006 levels by 2050.

Even so, an uncertain future remains, perhaps no more so than in Ontario where a provincial election is set for Oct. 6. The opposition Conservative Party has used rising electricity costs to campaign against the ruling Liberal Party. Recent polls show the Conservatives leading among likely voters with months remaining before the election. Political watchers note that as little as 35 to 40 percent of the popular vote can elect a majority government, which means renewables must enjoy broad-based popular support.

"Ontario is the largest province and it attracts a lot of attention," said Jon Worren, co-founder of ClearSky Advisors based in Toronto. The province's feed-in tariff aims to build popular support because it contains a local content requirement. For wind projects, 25 percent of total project content must originate in Ontario in 2011; that level rises to 50 percent in 2012. For solar, the domestic content requirement rose from 40 percent in 2010 to 50 percent in 2011 and is to reach 60 percent in 2012.

Designed to promote job creation in an area hard hit by declines in traditional manufacturing such as autos, the local content mandate has led dozens of manufacturers to set up shop in the province. The province now has 18 solar panel and 15 inverter manufacturers. Prior to the FIT the province counted one manufacturer each for solar panels and inverters.

"In terms of manufacturing, the domestic content requirement has been quite successful," Worren said.

Through the province's FIT program, the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) has approved 40 new large-scale renewable energy projects including solar, wind and water that will attract Can$3 billion (US$3.04 billion) in private sector investment, according to the Ontario Ministry of Energy.

These projects represent more than 872 MW of renewable power, including 35 solar projects totaling 357 MW, four wind projects totaling 615 MW and one 500 kW water project. The government said these projects will result in at least 240 more wind turbines and at least one million more solar panels in Ontario.

Canada's wind industry is expected to install 1 GW of generating capacity in 2011, CanWEA's Hornung said. Commitments suggest an additional 4,000 to 12,000 MW could be installed by 2015. What may happen after 2015 is "unclear" because, aside from Nova Scotia, no province has set a formal goal beyond that date. As a result, he said, few signals exist to encourage long-term planning, although developers need to be working now on projects that will sustain growth after mid-decade.

Ontario's photovoltaic market is expected to reach cumulative installations of 2,650 MW by 2015, according to a February report by ClearSky Advisors. In 2011, 455 MW of new PV installations are expected to be added. Delays during the permitting process will push most FIT utility-scale demand back into 2012 and 2013, the report said. An increasing number of suppliers along with reduced global costs and delayed demand have combined to drive down the expected cost of modules in Ontario. By the second half of 2011, module supply constraints likely will be eliminated.

With around 2,450 MW of existing solar contracts, Ontario's PV market will "experience strong growth from 2011-2012," the report said. After 2013, the market will "shrink significantly" in response to ratepayer concerns, transmission constraints and the limited size of Ontario's electricity market (the province's population of 13 million is less than one-third that of California).

Domestic content requirements restrict the amount of equipment available to developers in Ontario. Though there has been concern that development would be limited by supply shortages, sufficient supplies likely will be available to meet demand from 2011 to 2015.

The report said the foremost concerns of Ontario PV market participants are political and regulatory uncertainty due to three main factors: continual changes and delays in Ontario's FIT program, a FIT program review scheduled for 2011 and this autumn's provincial election.

"All of this uncertainty has combined to make Ontario a challenging market in which to operate," the report said. Long-term planning is "exceedingly difficult" for any business participating in Ontario's FIT program. A number of manufacturers have delayed investment in the province either by entering the market cautiously and waiting for more stability before expanding or by avoiding the market altogether.

"Uncertainty means risk," the report said. "This has made project financing more expensive and harder to come by."

As for wind power in the province, the Ontario government announced earlier this year it is not proceeding with proposed offshore wind projects to allow time for further scientific research to determine their impact on the environment. In a statement, the government said no renewable energy approvals for offshore have been issued and no offshore projects will proceed. Furthermore, applications for offshore wind projects in the FIT program will no longer be accepted and current applications will be suspended.

Onshore wind energy produced 1,056 MW of power during the 9:00 P.M. hour on Oct. 26, 2010, an all-time record, according to the Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator. Over the course of the day, wind supplied more than 5 percent of the province's electricity demand.

Canada ended 2010 with 754 MW of new wind energy capacity, representing $1.7 billion in new investment, according to CanWEA. This brings Canada's total installed wind energy capacity to 4,073 MW.

Canada currently has 3,549 MW of installed wind capacity. Ontario represents 1,248 MW, or one-third, of the country's total wind energy development. Another one-third comes from Quebec and Alberta with 663 MW and 656 MW, respectively. The remaining seven provinces account for the final one-third. CanWEA said wind energy has increased tenfold over the last six years.

One renewable technology that has yet to gain any foothold is geothermal energy. The country shares the same continental shelf and geology as the U.S., Mexico and Latin America and counts some 200 hot springs that have yet to be developed. But the federal government and the provinces both have so far failed to put in place policies and regulations to encourage geothermal development, said Alison Thompson, chair of the Canadian Geothermal Energy Association. She acknowledged the group's goal to have 5,000 MW of installed capacity by 2015 is unrealistic and said proponents hope instead that a similar amount of geothermal resource can be defined by that date. "We are quite comfortable with that number given production rates in the U.S. and Mexico," she said.

Educating policymakers remains a priority for Association members, she said. The Ontario FIT program includes every renewable energy resource available in the province but geothermal. And out of the C$1.3 billion allocated at the federal level as a production incentive, none was earmarked for geothermal. Efforts are underway to create permit and lease programs at the provincial levels and to have geothermal included in future feed-in tariff programs. One recent success came last December when the federal government offered tax breaks to resource exploration firms that drill for geothermal.

Unlike other renewable energy resources, Thompson said geothermal energy can be cost-competitive without extensive subsidies, especially in remote parts of the county where communities often rely on diesel for electric power generation. In portions of the Northwest Territories, communities can spend hundreds of dollars per megawatt-hour for electricity. "Geothermal comes in far below that," she said. In Alberta, which offers an incentive of $15 a tonne to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, geothermal could be competitive. And in hydro-rich British Columbia, which offers essentially no incentive, geothermal could be competitive on the grid, however, access to leases and permit remain major barriers.

13 Comments

Register To Comment
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
April 29, 2011
Great ... so you've identified that March is a month where the HOEP pricing is low. Why not look at the whole year? Why not look at the HOEP price distribution (price paid versus frequency that that price was paid) over the year or for the demand peak months?
DAVID LIBBY
DAVID LIBBY
April 28, 2011
Let's have a look at some sources for these numbers so we can get the facts straight.

IESO Month of March 2011 Report
http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/pubs/marketReports/monthly/2011mar.pdf
page 6
Hourly Ontario Energy prices (wholesale prices)
Monthly Weighted Average based on Ontario Demand = $31.62/ MWh or 3.16 ¢/kWh

Page 26
Global adjustment charge (extra charge to Ontario ratepayers regardless of where the power is sent.)
3.7¢/kWh


FIT Price Schedule
http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/Storage/11128_FIT_Price_Schedule_August_13_2010.pdf
Onshore wind 13.5 cents/kWh

Wind at 13.5 plus 3.7 Global adjustment charge total 17.2 cents/kWh
Wholesale prices 3.16 cents/kWh
That is 14cents lost on every kWh exported.

But the argument is: How do you know where the electrons came from when they are exported? Nobody knows. But anybody with a brain in their head knows what happens when the highest priced generators are shut down to reduce exports and costs.


The average person couldn't be bothered to look at all of these numbers.
Let's have a look at something simple. The monthly electricity bill where I work.
May 2006, $5644, 68100kw, 8.3 cents/kw
May 2009, $6772, 64000kw, 10.6cents/kw
March 2011, $8965, 66900kw, 13.4cents/kw
May 1 2011 10% increase, more for Nov2011 and March2012
Add another 20% for all of these increases? 16.1cents/kwh in 2012
That has doubled the bill in 6 years.
That amounts to a $60,000 a year increase. What does $60,000 equal? One person's wages for a year? There is one job gone from a very small company.
Or maybe the company can pass these extra costs along to the customers? Part of this company's product is kids sporting equipment. Anyone with kids knows how expensive sports are. Now there are a few less families that can afford it because the price has become even higher.

Solar panels and windmills give everyone a nice warm feeling. But the practical side of it in Ontario is not so nice.
ANONYMOUS
April 28, 2011
Talbot: get off the soap box and at least get your facts straight. First, the average price paid to producers was 4.2 cents / kWh with a 90% spread of 2.3 to 10.6 cents per kWh (nothing like 3-4 cents). Second, between 2005 and 2010, retail prices went from ~8 to ~9.5 cents per kWh (all charges in) - that's not even close to double. Even adding on the switch to HST (harmonized sales tax) after that only bumped that to ~10 cents. Really smart users might even reduce their cost in the last year by taking maximum advantage of TOU pricing.
Ontario does ship a lot of power to Michigan but this is hardly at a loss! A large part of this export is produced by an independent power producer that operates about 17 hydro dams in north central Ontario with Michigan being their only market. Last time I checked, they weren't losing money.
Everything is weather dependent - Ontario's summer load temperature coefficient is ~450 MW/deg.C.
DAVID LIBBY
DAVID LIBBY
April 28, 2011
The author wrote a very timely artical. Ont is starting to wise up to all of the hype. Most can't wait until the Oct election. It all sounds great but now we are getting the bills. A few new jobs, the government rigs up the numbers. Where's the jobs?
Wind output - 1056MW Oct 2010, 28MW Jan 29 2011.
Solar subsidies, 40 to 80 cents per KW, wholesale rate 3-4 cents for traditional generators. The sun doesn't shine at night, or in the winter, or on cloudy days. But we are paying for it. Electricty bills have nearly doubled from a few years ago.
The grid managers can't deal with the eratic power output so all of the green energy is sold off to Michigan and New York at huge losses. Average cost of wind 17cents KW, avg sale price 3-4 cents to US.
And after all of this, green energy has not been able to produce even 2% of Ont needs on a consistant basis.
If your area is 'going green" you had better look into this very carefully.
Keith Elliott
Keith Elliott
April 21, 2011
A sad fact, often not realised by B.C. residents, (I'm one of us) is that we are now a NET importer of electricity, and have been for a number of years. This, despite our huge hydroelectric potential.
Having had the luxury of all this cheap power for so long, my fellow B.C. residents have become complacent in their cavalier use of electricity.
My wife & I have been living off-grid for more than 13 years now and still cannot understand why everyone doesn't have some form of power backup system. Even something simple enough to keep lights running when the grid fails would be helpful.
Yes, I'm glad to see that solar water heating is slowly being adopted in B.C. with backing from the government.
For those of us with a modicum of DIY capability, building solar thermal collectors is really very simple and inexpensive. In the long run, this is something that can be used to heat not just your hot water, but your entire house, or your greenhouse. Just think of the possibilities.
Bruce Gray
Bruce Gray
April 21, 2011
Solar thermal should be the first pick as the low-hanging fruit in the Canadian renewable energy sector, but is nearly non-existent. I would like to see solar incentives remain stable, and a Canadian content for solar thermal like has been working well for Ontario's PV FIT.

A new solar thermal manufacturer has started in BC, that hopes to find at least a level playing field amongst imports. www.solar-hot-water.ca
shamil ayntrazi
shamil ayntrazi
April 21, 2011
Gary Dear

Have you heard of Collective Knowledge??
ANONYMOUS
April 20, 2011
It is nice to see Ontario is taking a leadership role in Canadian renewable energy. Unfortunately the province I live in, British Columbia is promoting the damming of the Peace River while giving no consideration to a feed In tariff system or the geothermal and massive tidal potential of its rugged coastline.
On the federal level the right wing nut we have for a Prime Minister is promoting carbon capture and storage so his now home province of Alberta can burn as much fossil fuels as possible. He cannot distinguish the difference between generating CO2 and votes.
The costs of removing a tone of CO2 from the atmosphere using carbon capture and storage is $126 using passive solar that price is brought down to $2.
Normally I would put my name on this post but the (regressive) Conservative party of Canada screens participants to its rallies on the internet and bars entry to those who do not agree with its policies. I would not want to ruin any chance to question their self serving arrogance or heckle their stupidity.
On a lighter note, the Canadian dollar is now worth $1.05 US so that 3 billion is now 3.15 billion US. If I had the money in the bank I would of made 110 million since this article was written. OH DARN !!!
ANONYMOUS
April 20, 2011
Note that out of the $1.3B federal investment, over 85% is for CCS (coal) technology. Given that the annual sales of coal for power generation is less than $4B, this seems a poorly justified distribution - until you consider that the ruling party is based in Alberta where much of the coal is as well as much of the coal fired power generation. While Ontario is ramping coal power down the folks out west are intent on making up the difference. Alberta, BC's left hand neighbor with much the same resource, makes almost as much of its electricity from fosil fuels as BC does from hydro. While southern Saskatchewan is Canada's prime location for solar power and northern Saskatchewan has more than its fair share of hydrology, it's mainly a fosil fuel burner. These two provinces are the egg and ketchup on Canada's face.
ANONYMOUS
April 20, 2011
The author is surely experiencing some geographic disorientation. It's very hard to find coal in the hard rock of northern Ontario where I come from. Coal is mainly in Alberta, BC and Saskatchewan in that order with a bit in New Brunswick and a fair bit offshore close to Nova Scotia. There's also a fair bit in the high arctic but that should probably be left alone.

Hydro is king in several provinces. In some of these cases, biomass is second. Ontario is conspicuously bracketed by provinces that can meet more than 90% of their own demand with hydro and have something left over for export - it's low number for hydro is entirely a matter of policy and not lack of resource. Noteably, the brackets are also increasing their capacity at a much higher rate, perhaps sensing a burgeoning market for renewable energy south of the border as well as in Ontario.
Viido Polikarpus
Viido Polikarpus
April 20, 2011
We in Estonia, Energy Smart, are watching what is happening in Canada with keen interest. We are building the first solar park here in southern Estonia and are fighting many of the same political and nuclear forces ourselves. We have put down foundations for Deger tracker towers and they should be up by June. We are hoping the Estonian farmer could start exporting clean solar energy into the European energy grid instead of having to stand in line for European agricultural subsidies.
We have the support of Tallinn Technical University as well as the Estonian Meteroglogical Hydrological Societies and are looking to work with any and all research facilities. viido.polikarpus@energysmart.ee
ANONYMOUS
April 19, 2011
The author writes: "Canada ended 2010 with 754 MW of new wind energy capacity, representing $1.7 billion in new investment, according to CanWEA. This brings Canada's total installed wind energy capacity to 4,073 MW.

Canada currently has 3,549 MW of installed wind capacity."

This looks like at least one mistake and does not even have the virtue of consistency. This source:
http://www.canwea.ca/farms/index_e.php

claims Canada's wind power currently at 4588 MW.

Steven
Michael V. Caldwell
Michael V. Caldwell
April 19, 2011
GREAT JOB..KEEP UP THE FUTURE WORK FOR OUR NEXT GENERATION..YOUR NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT DOING IT..YOU ARE DOING IT...

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
David Wagman

David Wagman

David Wagman is Chief Editor of Power Engineering magazine and Renewable Energy World North America magazine. He is also conference committee chairman for POWER-GEN International, Coal-Gen and Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Renewable Energy World (North America Edition) Magazine

This magazine is no longer being published as of May 1, 2012. To subscribe to similar renewable energy content click here. Or, subscribe to our worldwide Renewable Energy World magazine digital edition here. From May 2012, Renewable Energy...

  • Archives
  • About
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Enerquip
  • HelioSage
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • KACO new energy, Inc.
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Associated Renewable
  • Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information