Skyline Doubles Solar Concentration with New CPV DesignCalifornia, USA -- Two years after installing a pilot system to test its concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) technology, Skyline Solar is rolling out its next-generation design, bumping up the concentration factor and, interestingly, relying on glass mirrors rather than the metal reflectors it used for its initial offering.
"In fact, the fin for the previous design might have been too big for the job."
-- Tim Keating, VP, Marketing and Field Operations, Skyline Solar
The Mountain View, Calif.-based company announced the launch of its new concentrator Tuesday and dubbed it Skyline X14 System. The X14 refers to the system’s ability to concentrate the sun 14 times, which doubles the concentration of its previous system, said Tim Keating, vice president of marketing and field operations at Skyline. Skyline executives used to say its gen 1 technology could concentrate the sun 10 times, but turned out that figure actually included power that could be generated from using a tracker. Each Skyline X14 system runs 11.6 meters long; the distance from bottom to the top of the mirrors is 2.6 meters. The system contains 20 solar panels with a total of 3.6 kilowatts of generation capacity. Like the previous system, Skyline X14 still uses monocrystalline silicon cells and sits on a single-axis tracker that tilts the mirrors to follow the sun’s movement. It even uses the same metal fin for passive cooling. Silicon cells lose their efficiencies when they get too hot, and most of the sun’s energy becomes heat that needs to be dissipated (generally, monocrystalline silicon cells run between 18-20 percent efficiency).The cooling fin only needs to be “slightly larger” than the one for the previous system, Keating said. In fact, the fin for the previous design might have been too big for the job, he added. What is markedly different with Skyline X14 is the use of glass mirrors. These are curved mirrors that look similar to what concentrating solar thermal developers use for their parabolic trough systems, Keating said. Why switch from aluminum reflectors to the glass version? Keating said there are three key reasons: glass has become cheaper; it can generally reflect a slightly higher percentage of light; and it’s a more bankable material. Glass mirrors still aren’t as cheap as metal reflectors, Keating noted, but they are worth the cost because the system is designed to double its concentrating ability. Project investors would consider glass an older tech because it’s been used in concentrating solar thermal power plants for a few decades now, including the world’s largest: the 354-megawatt SEGS in California. Still, companies such as 3M are working on coatings and other technologies to boost metal reflector’s reflectivity. Skyline plans to use X14 in three projects. Two of them, at 100 kilowatts each, will be built at the Edward Air Force Base in California and Fort Bliss in Texas under a $1.58 million contract. The third project is a newly announced 500-kilowatt system in the Mexican state of Durango. Skyline will supply the equipment to contractor DelSol Systems. DelSol is building it at a new industrial park for the Durango government, a project that reportedly will cost $28 million pesos. (US $2.3 million) The plan is to start construction within 60 days and complete project by the end of the year, Keating said. Durango has expressed an interest to expand the project to 10 megawatts, he added. Skyline has steadily increased the sizes of its projects, and the one in Durango is the largest announced to date. It unveiled a pilot sytem with its first-generation technology, a 27-kilowatt system, in Silicon Valley in May 2009. Founded in 2007, the venture-backed company is among a slew of CPV technology developers who set out to provide an alternative to conventional solar panels, which at the time commanded higher prices largely because silicon price was high. The price has fallen more than half since, and that in turn has made solar panels more attractive to project developers and financiers. This silicon price decline happened during the time when many CPV technology companies were rolling out their first system. As a result, these companies have struggled to compete. As new technology providers, they have to amass large enough sales volumes in order to drive down manufacturing costs quickly. Skyline claims its X14 can produce electricity at less than $0.10 per kilowatt-hour. But that only happens under certain conditions: the project has to be at least 1 megawatt and take advantage of the federal incentive that covers 30 percent of the project’s cost, Keating said. It also has to land in places with a super sunny climate that can provide a DNI (direct normal irradiance) of more than 6.0 kilowatt hour/m²/day. “There has been a continuing interest in this space and projects are getting built,” Keating said. “We are mostly an alternative to the flat-plate system. For the same amount of money, you can buy a Skyline system with 20-30 percent more capacity.”
9 Reader Comments
|
Ucilia Wang
Recent News |
1 of 9
The manufacturers' of Solar Panels and other forms of renewable energy with related support products manufactures/suppliers - should have at least the decency to practice what they preach what they market to the public.
That would be the best marketing approach I can think off.
If they believe in the product they manufacture/sell, they should utilize it to its fullest potential.
It will give the manufacturer the actual experience of utilizing the product on a daily basis, view and experience any shortcoming or improvements that are needed, implement the improvements and capitalize on that revision to improve the product and its performance.
This will instill confidence in the public to purchase the product.
YJay Draiman, Energy Analyst
PS
What kind of car are the executives of the automobile industry are driving.
As with any new technology, PV will become more efficient, cheaper and cleaner to produce. In order for this to happen we (Governments / NGOs / Individuals) need to invest more time and money into making PV viable, e.g. through increased incentives, regulations, technical standards, R&D, manufacturing processes and generating consumer demand.
Just like the automobile industry, the manufacture used its own product.
Over the years the automobile industry and technology has evolved from the early 1900 to what it is today the year 2011.
I predict that in 10 years the automobile we know today will change drastically for the better, with new fuel technology and other modification that will improve its scales of economy and features.