The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Advent of Ultracapacitors Signals Change in Wind Turbine Capabilities

Brendan Andrews, Ioxus, Inc.
March 23, 2011  |  17 Comments

The pitch of a wind turbine's three rotor blades can be adjusted to respond to current conditions and create electricity. Pitch adjustments allow wind turbines to maximize the amount of clean energy they can generate. In order to adjust the blades, turbines need power. To date, wind turbine manufacturers have relied on battery-driven energy storage systems for that power.

The wind turbine market, however, has been constrained by the challenge of creating consistent, reliable stores of energy from an unpredictable natural resource. The industry has hungered for an energy storage system that responds quickly, regardless of current meteorological conditions, to the needs of wind turbines.

In addition to the problems associated with battery-powered energy storage, which I outline below, often energy storage systems for wind turbines are sized to meet the highest possible power demands, even if those rates only occur briefly and sporadically.  This changeability also creates waste.

Drawbacks of Battery-powered Energy Storage

There are other problems raised by battery usage in these types of applications, including the following:

  1. Batteries struggle under moments of high peak power and perform poorly in low temperatures.
  2. In extreme conditions, the operating life of a battery is extremely limited, creating a situation in which engineers and maintenance crews must frequently swap out components under potentially dangerous conditions.
  3. Batteries do a poor job of delivering the frequent, short power boosts wind turbines need to make rapid rotor blade adjustments and create electricity.

Ultracapacitors, on the other hand, offer a highly reliable option that reduces overall system size. As the market continues to grow, ultracapacitors will become an increasingly important ingredient in wind-generated power production.

As more wind turbine applications employ efficient ultracapacitors, the wind power market is poised to reach its potential.

Five Facts Wind Turbine Manufacturers Should Know About Ultracaps

Ultracapacitors, like all capacitors, have a high power density.  What differentiates ultracapacitors from their traditional counterparts, electrolytic capacitors, is their high energy density, allowing them to store a vast amount of energy in a small package.  In general, the use of an ultracapacitor in combination with a battery is an excellent way to increase the overall power density of the power source and decrease the strain on the battery. 

The most important facts about ultracapacitors are these:

  1. Functionality: Ultracapacitors are similar to traditional film capacitors as their energy storage is based on surface area electrostatic charge accumulation at the positive and negative plates.  Highly porous electrodes in ultracapacitors enable significant charge accumulation in comparison to traditional capacitors.  The release of energy in capacitors and ultracapacitors is achieved at high rates due to this loose charge accumulation attraction.  The resistance to the energy release is primarily driven by the resistivity of the electrolyte system used.
  2. Lifespan: With no plating or chemical reactions occurring in ultracapacitors, there is no wear mechanism in the technology.  Therefore, ultracapacitors can complete millions of charge and discharge cycles with limited degradation.  Any performance fade in the devices are predictable and easily monitored so that any end of application life is easily predicted.  While the replacement period for batteries is between two and four years, the expectation for ultracapacitor lifespan is more than 10 years.
  3. Temperature range: Ultracapacitors operate optimally at a temperature range between -40 C and 65 C, whereas batteries function best on a modest spectrum of -20 to 40 C.
  4. Cycling capability: Here, too, ultracapacitors dwarf batteries. A battery can only offer 10,000 to 50,000 cycles to an ultracap’s million-plus.
  5. Price: Increasingly, ultracapacitors are also besting batteries in terms of price.  In the past decade, the price of ultracapacitors has fallen by 99 percent.  The cost of a 3000 Farad ultracapacitor 10 years ago was $5,000.  Today, the component sells for $50.  During the same period of time, battery price reduction measured only 30 to 40 percent.

Market Growth Calls for Ultracapacitor Adoption

Wind turbine installations worldwide remained relatively flat during the past few years, but estimates for new installed capacity through 2015 suggest a rebound in growth. The trend in these new wind turbines will favor ultracapacitors for several reasons. 

Within the turbine, pitch control of each of the blades ensures optimum positioning for efficient use of wind speed for both performance and safety.  Engineers accomplish the pitch control either mechanically or electrically, but electrical control systems replace mechanical movements with more reliable electrical systems.  However, when electrical control systems rely on battery-based backup systems, the potential maintenance advantage over hydraulic systems is not necessarily realized.  For this reason, designs for backup in the past few years have included ultracapacitors rather than batteries. 

Electrical pitch controlled systems have certainly won the favor of the market; current estimates show that 60 percent of newly installed turbine systems are electrical pitch controlled systems. This share should continue to expand as more new turbine developments focus on electrical-based systems enabled by ultracapacitors.

Ultracapacitors Offer a Bright Future for Wind Energy

One of the detractors for wind turbines has been the potentially costly and dangerous maintenance requirements. With longer lifecycles and greater temperature tolerance, ultracapacitors deliver safer operation. Ultimately, this will drive more widespread wind turbine adoption. Of course, this is a cost issue, as well, particularly for difficult-to-reach, offshore turbine installations. 

With more than 14,000 turbine installations, ultracapacitors have confirmed their many benefits over batteries, enabling electrical-based pitch control systems to fully capitalize on their inherent reliability advantages. As the use of modern wind turbines continues to expand, manufacturers will embrace ultracapacitors as the best option for simple, long-lasting, cost-effective and reliable energy storage.

Brendan Andrews is the vice president of sales and marketing at Ioxus, Inc.  He is responsible for the leadership and coordination of Ioxus’ sales and marketing functions and for educating the global market regarding existing and future ultracapacitor technologies.  Previously, Brendan served as Maxwell Technologies’ director of sales and marketing Americas.

17 Comments

Register To Comment
ben ben
ben ben
April 24, 2012
so who currently makes turbines with ultracaps designed in?
shanmugham kangala
shanmugham kangala
March 14, 2012
There were a no. of accidents due to 'run away' condition caused by long network interruptions in India. It can be attributed to improper Battery maintenance. 'Ultra capacitors' may not improve the situation. My suggestion is that Solar PV systems can be utilized as alternate power sources for control supply. Recent trend with lower Solar PV system cost would work out as a cost effective solution and may also improve the overall power yield, or lower cost / kWh taking into consideration life cycle costing.
sasi kottayil
sasi kottayil
September 15, 2011
Nick wrote: "Taking the example of a 12V battery with a capacity of 100Ah at the 10-hour rate, (about 1.25KWh of energy storage) this will discharge from about 13.6V fully charged to 12V discharged at 10A (C/10) for 10hours, or put another way, 1.6V voltage drop for 36,000 seconds at 10A, this would be equivalent to a 13.6V capacitor of 225,000 Farads (10 x 36,000/1.6)."

Is the equivalent capacitor of 13.6 V or 1.6 V, if it has 225000 F?
Nick Cook
Nick Cook
April 8, 2011
Further correction.

Gary, I certainly agree with your statement regarding the balancing etc of ultra-caps in a string but with regard to your first statement what I said originally is correct, for n equal value capacitors connected in series (in a string) but the capacitance of the string (in Farads) is the capacitance of a single ultra-cap divided by n, although the stored energy does add up. There is however a slight typo in my original post in that I said "this will reduce the capacity by a factor of 6" it should read 'capacitance' not 'capacity' which is ambiguous in this context.
In general, when you connect capacitors in series, whether they are ultra, super, or ordinary ones, the effective total capacitance of the string (Ct Farads) is given by the formula:

1/Ct = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + …. 1/Cn

e.g. for 2 Capacitors of 1F each then 1/Ct = 1/C1 +1/C2
or Ct = C1xC2 / (C1+C2) = 1x1 / (1 + 1) = 0.5F

The other use formula is for the energy stored in a capacitor which is
E = ½ x C x V x V.
If the farad level (capacitance remained the same the voltages added then connecting 2 charged caps in series would result in a fourfold increase in stored energy instead of a doubling (compared to a single cap)

i.e. energy in 1 cap = ½ x C x V x V
energy in 2 caps separately = 2x ( ½ x C x V x V) = C x V x V
And if Farads' stay the same and voltage doubles then:
energy in 2 caps in string = ½x C x (2xV) x (2xV) = 2 x C x V x V
which disobeys the principle of conservation of energy!
Gary Tulie
Gary Tulie
April 8, 2011
Can I just make one small correction to Nick's post calculating the number ofultracapacitors needed, and that is to point out that if you put 6 ultracapacitors in series, you retain the farad levels, with each additional ultracapacitor boosting the voltage. Any parallel strings will increase the farads proportional to the number of strings.

One more thing to point out, making up a high energy ultracapacitor pack is not a simple as stringing together battery cells as they have to be carefully balanced, therefore the cost of the ultracapacitor pack is significantly higher than the cost of the ultracapacitors
Nick Cook
Nick Cook
March 28, 2011
HOWEVER If! EEStor (a high voltage KV+super/ultra capacitor)beccomes a reality then the situation could be very different.
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 27, 2011
Hi:

No problem on the detail... most of the time on blogs I keep it pretty "loose", especially when it comes to calcs and units.
Running the calcs exemplifies the power in chemically stored energy vs a dielectric.

.....Bill
Nick Cook
Nick Cook
March 27, 2011
A quick point on units first, energy is stored in KWh not KW and cannot be converted into Farads, my apologies for being picky but to get the correct result you need the correct units.

Having said this you are right Bill, it will be "a whole giant big number and probably extremely expensive" and also very bulky. You can however calculate what size/capacity of battery is equivalent to what size of capacitor. Taking the example of a 12V battery with a capacity of 100Ah at the 10-hour rate, (about 1.25KWh of energy storage) this will discharge from about 13.6V fully charged to 12V discharged at 10A (C/10) for 10hours, or put another way, 1.6V voltage drop for 36,000 seconds at 10A, this would be equivalent to a 13.6V capacitor of 225,000 Farads (10 x 36,000/1.6).
The middle ultra cap shown in this article is 800F (which even for ultra-capacitors is pretty big) at 2.3V, so you will require 6 of these stacked in seies to equal the battery working voltage, the trouble is that this will also reduce the capacity (Farads) by a factor of 6. So we now have a 13.8V/133.3F capacitor made from 6 800F/2.3V cap's.
So to replace your 12V/100Ah (1.25KWh) battery will require about (225,000/133.3)*6 = 10,125 800F/2.3V ultra capacitors, or about 800,000 to provide a 100KWh energy store. If you were to extract all the energy from the ultra-caps by completely discharging them to 0V you could get away with about 5 times less, about 160,000, still a big number. From my past dealings with these devices your 800F ultra-cap will cost significantly more than $10 a piece, enough said.

The reason they work for turbine blade adjustment is that this requires moderate to large power levels but only for short (few seconds) periods of time so the energy storage (power x time) is quite small, e.g. 10hp for 5 seconds is about 0.01KWh requiring about 20 800F ultra-cap's which is possible.
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 26, 2011
Hi Joel:

One other thing you should keep in mind when comparing batteries to caps, is the discharge voltage characteristics. As a cap discharges, its open circuit voltage runs linear to the amount of charge (energy) lost. That is, as power is used the voltage drops in a straight line until all power is gone. The discharge of a battery is curved and retains most of its open circuit voltage until almost completely depleted. The battery gives a much more constant voltage over discharge than caps. Its just a difference between the energy stored chemically vs electrostatically.

.....Bill
Maurice Turgeon
Maurice Turgeon
March 26, 2011
Great article! Ultracaps solve the battery temperature problem and have a great future in electric cars as well. They can charge much faster than a battery and are much lighter.

If a bank of ultracaps were installed in and electric car (along with the main battery) they could store the energy normally lost in braking by using the wheel motors as generators (regenerative technique).

During acceleration, they could save battery power by getting the car up to cruising speed , where 10 hp is all that's needed.
Good Luck from Columbiana, Alabama
Maurice Turgeon
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 25, 2011
Hi Again:

I will tell what I think. For the moment, getting to your specific application of Off grid PV, you are looking at storing multiple days of energy in what I am guessing is a residential environment. That can put you in the 100 KW range depending on the exact "home" and occupants. As far as how many ultras you would need to do that, you would have to convert KW to Frads. Off the top of my head, it will be a whole giant big number and probably extremely expensive. But, putting $$ aside, the leakage rates as of about a year ago were no where near as small as low loss AGM/gel tech or even a high quality wet cell lead/acid. But, the ultra cap technology is changing very rapidly and they may get to a point where they are in the ball park for main load electrical storage.
Those are just my thoughts... If you want more specific info, you will have to go digging around....

.....Bill
Christopher Lee
Christopher Lee
March 25, 2011
Please can we have less commercial hype and more science?
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
March 25, 2011
The author doesn't state ultracapacitors are not for line balancing. Instead, their reliability for electrical blade pitching is the icing on the cake.

Regardless, I'm genuinely curious about leakage rate as compared to other storage technologies, with price factored in. Can you enlighten me, Bill?
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 25, 2011
You have to look at what they are using the ultra caps for on the big turbines. Read the article again. They are NOT doing line balancing of the main load/gen. They are using it to assist in blade pitch control.
Different animal.....

.....Bill
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
March 25, 2011
How would the leakage factor handicap small-scale but not grid-scale applications?
William Fitch
William Fitch
March 25, 2011
Their leakage rate is too high...

.....Bill
Joel Fairstein
Joel Fairstein
March 25, 2011
Is there a reason ultracapacitors are not currently applied to small off-grid PV systems?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Brendan Andrews

Brendan Andrews

Brendan Andrews is the vice president of sales and marketing at Ioxus, Inc. He is responsible for the leadership and coordination of Ioxus’ sales and marketing functions and for educating the global market regarding existing and future...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 9
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 5
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador
  • 1
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • marcus evans
  • Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
  • Intertek
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • Rotork plc
  • Alternative Matters
  • Greenpower Capital
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information