The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

2011 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards -- Projects of the Year

RenewableEnergyWorld.com Editors
March 09, 2011  |  6 Comments

The nominations have been reviewed; the editors votes are in and we are now pleased to announce the winners of the 2011 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards for Project of the Year. This year's Projects of the Year Award winners represented facilities that signified excellence in 5 technologies: Solar, Wind, Biomass, Geothermal and Hydro.

Editors from the Renewable Energy World network, which includes five print magazines and four websites, selected the winners from among the five finalists in each technology category. “So many cutting-edge projects are announced, funded, constructed and finalized each year, it’s great to take time out and actually recognize the best ones for the way in which they advance the industry,” said one network editor.

To be eligible for an award, a project needs to have been completed in 2010, be in North America and make a significant impact on the entire renewable energy industry.  When judging the finalists, network editors considered the innovative technology that was employed as well as the projects’ impact on the industry at large and on the communities in which they were installed.

The award winners were announced and recognized at the Renewable Energy World North America Conference and Expo, in Tampa, Florida. Video interviews were conducted with the winners during the show and will be posted on RenewableEnergyWorld.com in the coming weeks.

Solar Project of the Year – Sempra Generation’s Copper Mountain Solar Facility           

When the 48-megawatt (MW) Copper Mountain Solar facility, located in Boulder City, Nev., about 40 miles southeast of Las Vegas went online in December 2010, it became the largest utility-scale PV power plant in the U.S.  Construction of the project took less than 1 year and at peak, 350 construction jobs were created.

Engineering, procurement and construction contractor First Solar of Tempe, Ariz., supplied the 775,000 solar panels that were installed on the 380-acre site. During construction, 103,000 steel posts (which hold the brackets that hold the panels) were installed using lasers and GPS technology to ensure the rows of panels (some ~2.5 miles long) were straight.

Power from the project is sold to Pacific Gas & Electric in Northern California under a 20-year contract.  California utilities are required to get 33% of their power supply from alternative sources like wind and solar by 2020.

 “Safely completing construction on a solar power facility of this magnitude in less than a year is an unprecedented achievement,” said William R. Engelbrecht, Sempra Generation’s vice president of planning and construction in a press release.  Engelbrecht accepted the award on behalf of the companies involved.

“This is a massive project, and Sempra Generation’s construction team, working with First Solar, did an outstanding job of meeting our aggressive goal to build the entire project by the end of the year,” he said.

Wind Project of the Year – The Greensburg Wind Farm

In May 2007, an EF-5 tornado leveled Greensburg, Kansas, destroying 95% of the town and leaving a path of devastation two miles wide. Eleven of the town’s 1,400 residents died in the disaster. In their communal search for meaning in the days that followed this catastrophe, the people of Greensburg individually and collectively agreed to rebuild their town as “the greenest town in America." In his first address to a joint session of Congress, President Obama said, “Greensburg … is being rebuilt by its residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an entire community – how it can bring jobs and businesses to a place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay.”   

The Greensburg Wind Farm—which includes 10 Suzlon wind turbines, 1.25 MW each—grew out of this vision.  The project was developed by Exelon Wind, LLC (formerly John Deere Renewables, LLC) and went live in March 2010.   Total project cost was $23.3 million, with a loan from U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development providing $17.4 million and the remainder of project funded through an equity investment from John Deere Wind Energy and gap funding from NativeEnergy, Inc.

NativeEnergy is the Renewable Energy Credit (REC) marketer for this project.  A portion of the project’s REC output will provide the town with wind power to help it achieve its goal of being the “greenest town in America.”  The majority of the RECs will be purchased by NativeEnergy for its clients, for whom the energy generated by the wind farm will displace fossil-based energy and reduce hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon pollution that otherwise would enter our atmosphere.  

Biomass Project of the Year – The Wild Center’s High Efficiency Commercial Scale Wood Gasification Boiler Integrated with a Solar Thermal Collection and Storage System

The Wild Center is a 54,000 square foot natural history museum in Tupper Lake, NY.  In July 2009, the Center embarked on a project in which it built a 1.7-million-BTU Advanced Climate Technology boiler that would fired by locally produced FSC certified wood pellets.  In addition the center incorporated a solar-thermal hot water array and storage system to further boost the efficiency of the heating system and provide low-emission heating in moderate-temperature months.  The project was finalized in May 2010 and has won the 2011 Biomass project of the year.

The project combines a low emissions commercial scale wood gasification heating plant, the first of its kind and size manufactured in the U.S. and installed in a visitor experience facility, with a 0.35 million BTU/day solar thermal collection and storage system. The solar thermal collection system contributes BTUs to the wood boiler's hydronic heating water loop during the shoulder season heating months of April - May and September-October, reducing boiler cycling. 

The project incorporated an unusual solution for the storage of wood pellet fuel. Rather than construct a tall and conventional silo-like structure on facility grounds, the museum opted to purchase a recycled 40-foot long shipping container and placed it on edge in 4 steel cradles, providing an inexpensive, yet practical and attractive alternative for storing 22 tons of wood fuel. (See image, above.)  

The Wild Center also created and installed a public information display on the project including two tabletop exhibits that highlight the benefits of the biofuel and solar thermal technologies. Given the blending of two renenwable energy technologies, coupled with the exposure of the project to the museum's nearly 100,000 annual visitors, the project is a prominent and educationally valuable bioenergy/solar energy demonstration project.

Geothermal Project of the Year – Ormat’s Jersey Valley Geothermal Power Plant

While 2010 proved to be a slow year for geothermal development in the U.S., Ormat Technologies, Inc. successfully brought online its 15MW Jersey Valley geothermal power plant in December.  Jersey Valley was the only utility-scale geothermal plant completed in 2010. (See image, right)

The project, known as a Greenfield geothermal project, began in 2006 and encountered a number of obstacles along its development path. A Greenfield geothermal project is defined as an area where the productivity of a geothermal field is unknown; similar to drilling for oil where no oil has ever been found.

Located at the northern end of Dixie Valley, Jersey Valley rests along the Pershing-Lander County, Nev. line.  The geothermal area encompasses the Jersey Valley Mining District that had been the focus of gold and silver mining and mineral exploration since the district was founded in 1873.  Ormat’s geothermal power plant is located next to the remains of one of these old mining settlements.

Initial testing on the site indicated a good resource but once drilling actually began, engineers realized that the resource was potentially much larger and more complex than they had anticipated.  This resulted in a flurry of activities that needed to be accomplished to accommodate the new, more complex model than the one that had been predicted.  Engineers needed to reevaluate exploration techniques by calibrating the models from drilling results.

Today, construction is complete and Jersey Valley is utilizing the Ormat Energy Converter to generate electricity. Throughout this project, the team’s ability to adapt to the changing resource models proved key to completing the project on time.

“While Ormat encountered problems with potential to halt the project, something typical of the geothermal industry, the company accomplished this feat because it has the tools needed to create positive results when the situation may not be ideal,” the company said in its nomination statement.

Hydro Project of the Year – The Toba Montrose Hydroelectric Project

The 235MW Toba Montrose Hydroelectric power project is made up of two sites that together make it the largest independent Run-of-River hydro project in British Columbia.  Construction on the project took 3 years.

The Toba site was completed 5 weeks ahead of schedule and Montrose (shown, left) was 3 months ahead of schedule.  The construction contract with Peter Kiewit Sons was worth $497 million.  During construction of the project, direct employment peaked at over 600 people, with as many as 450 people on site at any one time, including up to 30% in local hires, with many from Canada’s First Nations. 

Total project cost of $663 million came from Plutonic Power Corporation, the project developer, with much of the debt financing from GE Energy Financial Services.

The local community reaped significant benefits from the project in terms of services provided, including housing, supplies and more.  A “buy local” procurement policy was in place and over 15% or $75 million was spent locally.

Project challenges involved complex permitting and environmental monitoring issues and adapting and performing construction on the remote, rugged terrain. Project developers also had to educate the public on the benefits of run of river development in the province of BC. 

According to the company’s nomination form, “It is a testament to the partnership between Plutonic and GE EFS, the dedication and skill of the people working on the project and the commitment from everyone involved, that this project was completed on time, on budget and is now operating efficiently. 

Renewable Energy World Readers’ Choice Project: Pocono Raceway Solar Farm

The 3 MW Pocono Raceway Solar Farm is the largest solar PV project installed at a sports complex globally. And considering that Nascar racing is one of the most popular sports in the U.S., the system has one of the highest profiles as well.

Commissioned in August of 2010 in Long Pond, Pennsylvania, the $16 million Pocono Raceway project was constructed by renewable energy developer EnXco and features 40,000 thin-film modules from First Solar.

The system is expected to generate around 72 million-kilowatt hours of electricity over the next 20 years, providing enough energy to power the stadium and 1,000 surrounding homes. That will save the Pocono Raceway around $380,000 in energy costs.

In December of 2010, EnXco announced that the 25-acre system had already generated 1 GWh of electricity.

The project proves that solar works and can save organizations money. It's also novel in that it exposes the technology to a wide range of car racing fans who come to the Pocono Raceway and RenewableEnergyWorld.com readers agreed.

After tallying almost 9,000 votes for the Reader's Choice Award, the 3-MW Pocono Raceway Solar Farm came out as the clear winner.

To recognize its novelty, its economic benefit and its popularity among our audience, the 2011 Reader's Choice Award goes to the Pocono Raceway Solar Farm.

To see the complete list of Excellence in Renewable Energy Award winners, click here.  Innovation winners will be profiled on Thursday, March 10th and Leadership winners will be profiled on Friday, March 11.

For more on the projects of the year, play the video below.

 

 

To see more on the Pocono Solar Raceway, the 2011 Readers' Choice award winner, play the video below.

 

6 Comments

Register To Comment
Glenn Doty
Glenn Doty
March 14, 2011
Ron Las,

I agree with you that there should be some alternative rating system. The current rating is "peak watts", which means that in an ideal solar insolation (equator at noon) the system will produce that many watts - or that many Whs/hr. The ideal insolation against which the panels are rated is 1kW/m (1kWh/m2/hr).
From that, you use solar insolation maps to determine how much energy the panels will receive over the course of a year.

I think it would be hard to find a better rating for the panels themselves - as the manufacturer has no idea where they will be installed, nor does the manufacturer know if they will be installed fixed or with one or two axis tracking.

However, when a field is quoted, they should quote how much electrical energy the panels will produce during any given year... for the Ponoco system in question the company that quoted it should have purchased 3 MWs worth of panels from First Solar, then rated their assembled field as: ~4000 MWhs/year system.

But that's not likely to happen.

As for the illiterate troll, he's correct only insofar as that I am consistently informed and he is consistently mis-informed... ergo I'm often correct while he is wrong. Otherwise I hope for the best for solar, I just don't believe solar advocates do any favors by lying about the cost effectiveness of their technology.
ANONYMOUS
March 13, 2011
ron-las,
Glenn Dotty has significant anti-social tendencies. Don't waste your time with his rants. He is "always right".
Ron Las
Ron Las
March 11, 2011
I don't work in the solar industry so I'm not disputing your statements but if a system is rated for 3 MW it should be an average output based on a year for the place it is installed. If instead, it means something else like 3 MW peak in the Bahamas then it is a false rating. Would anyone buy a 400 Hp car that only puts out 200 Hp? You are saying it puts out half of the rating on average which would be far less in the winter.

Size of the array should not be a factor since it should be sized to produce the rating, which would require a bigger array in northern latitudes. Maybe there needs to be a truth in ratings law for solar.
Glenn Doty
Glenn Doty
March 11, 2011
Ron-las,

You are over-estimating the insolation of PA by a great deal. National solar energy maps indicate that most of PA receives a yearly average of ~3.5-4 kWhs/m2/day. So a rated 3 MW system cannot average more than 10.5-12 MWhs/day over the course of the year for its first year (before degradation occurs) Obviously, that production will be heavily weighted towards the summertime.

If we assume 2-axis tracking, so that the super-majority of available solar energy is recovered (10.5 MWhs/day), then this system would generate energy worth ~$460,000/year. It's not terribly surprising that the racetrack would take the super-majority of that energy. You are talking about a several square mile area which is lit up by hundreds of thousands of high energy light bulbs quite often.
Ron Las
Ron Las
March 11, 2011
The farm is rated at 3 MW and using the assumption that racing dows on go on all day or every day, then most of that power is available for surrounding homes, most of the time.

During hot summer days I would expect there to be an average of 2.5KW be used per home (some people are at work, etc)so 3 MW/ 2.5 KW equals 1200 homes. When the race track is using power the homes run off the grid.

During the winter, there should not be any racing but days are shorter so the farm might have reduced output. At the same time power usage should drop unless they use electric heating (hope not). If the panels were effective 8 hours a day and produced 2.5 MW that would be 20 MWHrs per day during the winter. If this was sold to the power company at 12 cents per KWH, that would be $2400 per day. This may be an over estimate because I don't know the weather there.
It's hard to imagine the raceway saving $380,000 per year. That would imply they are using 1.52 MW of power, 5 hrs per race and 50 races per year.
Glenn Doty
Glenn Doty
March 10, 2011
Ok, well... you deleted my comment and changed some of the problem within the article, while leaving some of the rest of the problem behind.

Originally, you had stated the Pocono solar field would generate 72,000 MWhs/year, which I lambasted you for (and had fun doing so, btw...).

You've now corrected that to a more probable 72,000 MWhs over 20 years. Thank you.

However, in the previous article, you had stated that it would save Pocono $380,000 in energy costs and provide enough energy to power 1000 additional homes. That might have worked with the comical 72,000 MWhs/year figure, but in PA the price of electricity for commercial facilities is ~$100/MWh. That means that the racetrack itself will consume 3800 MWhs/year, leaving ~400-600 MWhs for the first year, then less every year after that, to be sold to provide energy for other houses... I don't know what you assume to be the average annual household consumption of electricity, but I can absolutely assure you that most homes use more than 400-600 kWhs/MONTH, much less/year.

The solar field will produce energy to offset the energy consumed by the raceway - as intended. There will be very little remaining energy in the first year, and there will likely be a net energy deficit by the 20th year (depending on degradation rates).

So you still need to work on the article a little in order to be realistic.

Thanks for paying attention.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
REW.com Editors

REW.com Editors

Renewable Energy World's network editors help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S. and the UK, the team is comprised of editors from Pennwell Corporation's myriad of publications...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • PLANSEE SE
  • Fairtrade-Messe
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • Solar Electric Power Association
  • Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems
  • EcoFasten Solar
  • Enphase Energy
  • Apricus, Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information