The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

UK Feed-In Tariff Enjoys Early Success

Andrew Williams, Contributor
January 26, 2011  |  10 Comments

A recent report has revealed that, since its introduction in April 2010, the United Kingdom's renewable energy feed-in tariff has enjoyed record levels of success.

The latest official figures published by UK energy regulator Ofgem (PDF) show that an impressive 15,468 installations have registered to take part during the first six months. 

The scheme, designed to promote the uptake of small-scale renewable electricity generation, has already paid out more than £2.5 million (around US $4 million) to applicants – with the subsidies proving particularly popular in the solar PV sector, which has accounted for the lion’s share (around 60%) of participants to date.

Solar has proved increasingly popular for several reasons.  Firstly, prices for the technology have decreased, making it much more attractive for consumers.  In addition, solar panels are now much more widely available across the country, meaning that people can buy them at their local DIY store and either hire a contractor or self-install, although it is important to remember that, in order to be eligible for the FiT, they must be installed by a company accredited under the Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS).

“Solar PV has become like any other household energy investment, like energy-efficient windows or insulation,” says David R. Jones, editor of Platts Renewable Energy Report.

“What makes it especially attractive now is that, with the guaranteed rate of return [offered] by the FiT, you can sit down with a calculator and figure out roughly when the investment will pay for itself,” he adds.

However, amid a climate of global financial austerity, similar FiT schemes are being gradually reduced across Europe.  In this light, it is perhaps likely that the UK will follow other countries, notably Germany and Spain, in scaling-back subsidies.

Many in the industry predict that FiTs will eventually be phased out as the various types of renewable energy approach grid parity – the price retail consumers pay for conventional energy – meaning that subsidies will no longer be necessary.

“Large-scale power plants, like offshore wind farms, and early-stage technologies, such as marine energy, will probably need some form of subsidy for some time to be viable,” says Jones.

“The key in phasing out FiTs – along with subsidies for conventional energy, which the International Energy Agency estimates far exceed renewables subsidies worldwide – is a gradual reduction in subsidies, to avoid any sudden shocks that would send investors fleeing, and to avoid retroactive cuts,” he adds.

10 Comments

Register To Comment
Neil Hollow
Neil Hollow
March 19, 2011
Irritating as it is my calculations suggest that I will get my money back within 25 years with the 9p and 3p. I'm worse off than I was last year but at least some of this will be made up by power increases....
Joe Bloggs
Joe Bloggs
February 3, 2011
I was directed here by a link on the most recent mailshot from CIBSE in the UK. I don't know the author of this article or his general take on the whole FITS issue. I apologise in advance if the following characterisations are unfounded.

"The scheme, designed to promote the uptake of small-scale renewable electricity generation,"
Certainly that is the stated aim of FITS. However, FITS is implemented through the Microgeneration Certification Scheme. The MCS is nothing other than a QUANGO designed to fleece the source of the revenue (taxpayers/electricity consumers) whilst enjoying a state sponsored monopoly. their monopoly position encourages their members to price-gouge because they know they are protected by the state. They do nothing to encourage the uptake of renewable schemes that is not already there due to the attractive tariffs.

"with the subsidies proving particularly popular in the solar PV sector,"
This is unsurprising since PV benefits from the largest distortion of the free market(highest tariff).

"solar panels are now much more widely available across the country, meaning that people can buy them at their local DIY store and either hire a contractor or self-install."
Now this is where we part company. Either you are misinformed or a shill. The implementation of FITS through the MCS absolutely eliminiates the possibility of self-install or indeed install through non-MCS contractors by predicating FITS eligibility on only MCS installed and MCS approved equipment. The MCS element of the scam not only rules out DIY installations after 31 Mar 2010 but, as it appears from other responses here, it also detrimentally effects schemes installed prior to this date.

As has become habitual for state interference, the rules are organised to benefit the few at the expense of the many. It has nothing to do with saving carbon at all.
Viido Polikarpus
Viido Polikarpus
February 3, 2011
It seems to me, falling victim to energy monopoly entrenchments and their government lobbyist, many are panickying andlooking to scramble away from FIT supports. Somne of us here in Estonia are still lobbving for a decent FIT to encourage solar development.

I believe anyone investing today in solar will be pleasantly surprised in the near future because they will already be placed in the grid the moment a significant breakthrough in solar energy storage or effieciency occurs- which, considering how many dedicated minds are working on this, should only be a matter of time. Once the rush is on, so will come restrictions and limitations for the benefit of monopolies so this is still the time to go for solar.
Paul Truelove
Paul Truelove
January 29, 2011
The early adopters had a "justifiable expectation" that they would eventually recover their financial investments through the Feed in Tariff (FIT). Prior to the FIT they were receiving Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROC's) and had the commercial freedom to choose a utility supplier who offered a reasonable "buy" rate for exported electricity (their property). This justifiable expectation and commercial freedom has now been removed by the policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change regarding the FIT, its implementation and the instillation date of the 15 July 2009. Systems fitted before this date are now forced into a payment system that will not allow them to recover the financial outlay; therefore they have been deprived of their property.

It would add £0.07p annually to everyone's bills over the 25 years of the scheme to include the early adopters. To put the £0.07p into context, it would represent less than the cost of one third of one cigarette a year.
rolf westgard
rolf westgard
January 28, 2011
The only way those solar roof panels recover costs is by sticking it to other rate payers
Allen Gerhardt
Allen Gerhardt
January 28, 2011
With payback times of ten years and less the move to PV installations will increase even without the government support. But when considering public investment the rising costs of fossil fuels and the cost of pollution induced health care costs must be considered. Short term deficit fears are driving short term solutions, but increases long term overall costs.
Solar PV is the best choice for homeowners who can cover their investment in less than 10 years and then make money off their investment, unlike regular utility bills which always go up. Even with reduced payback, it is still better than the no payback from the present system of grid supplied power.
rolf westgard
rolf westgard
January 28, 2011
Those early installers don't need courage, just up front money. The program amounts to all rate payers coughing up so the wealthier can decorate their roofs with subsidized solar panels. It's a kind of wealth distribution in reverse. Germany's few hundred thousand installations don't reach 1% of Germany's electric demand. When you are at the cloudy 60th parallel the whole thing is an expensive joke
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
January 27, 2011
French government strangles PV


From 9th December 2010 onwards and until further notice, no PV installations with a capacity exceeding 3 kW will be connected to the grid in France. By March 2011, the French government wants to fix new solar electricity tariffs for the "larger" PV installations. Until then, a moratorium is in force for systems with a capacity exceeding 3 kW. The reason is that the government regards the present development of PV as too fast. This year, around 500 to 550 MW of photovoltaic capacity has been connected to the grid in France. Additionally, there are plans to put a cap of
500 MW on newly installed PV capacity per year.

Further restrictions are ahead for the sector in the field of building-integrated PV: in future, any financial support will require that the module and the frame actually constitute the roof of the building. No auxiliary elements such as additional films may be used. As evidence of compliance, corresponding certification will be required, but none of the manufacturers has such a certificate so far. This is reported by the French PV association Enerplan (Association Professionnelle de l'Energie Solaire).

As an explanation for this step, Prime Minister Fran~ois Filion said in an announcement that the current tariff for solar electricity was a burden for the public and the power consumers and that it was designed very much in favour of the operators. The aim was to prevent a veritable speculation bubble.

In order to improve solar energy research and development, the French General Commissariat for Investments and the Environment Agency have been asked to conduct two "appeals for the expression of interest" (appels a manifestation d'interet) regarding photovoltaics and concentrator technology by the end of the year.

Reported in Sun & Wind Energy 1/2001 page 6

Cave Politicus
Andrew Hague
Andrew Hague
January 27, 2011
Can't agree more with the previous post from mcfi5dhc. The way that those who had the courage and believe to leap in and pioneer renewable technology have been shafted by the present government is outrageous. We are all pleased that more people will be installing renewable tech, but unlike us they'll be doing it because it's a great investment, not particularly because of a passionate belief. As I write this, I have just heard that our wonderful coalition masters are considering scrapping the fuel duty escalator introduced by the last government. So on the one hand they decide to renege on an unambiguously given promise to pay early installers equally, even though it would cost virtually nothing and on the other prepare to make a decision that will significantly reduce government income, whilst contributing to greater pollution. Fabulous! Can't wait for the budget to see what else is in store.
Darren Curtis
Darren Curtis
January 26, 2011
Whilst it is encouraging to read of so many people taking up the Feed-In-Tariff, 4500 or so "pioneers" are still receiving a reduced rate of 9p a unit fixed for the next 2 decades, even though the current government had promised to increase this to a fair rate if elected.

These people were receiving a higher payment before FIT, and/or were promised FIT when they installed their equipment. Few, if any, will ever get payback on their systems (unlike those on 41.3p, who will make a decent profit from year 10+).

This is despite the government not paying the FIT. Even if it were implemented in full, it has been calculated that the increase in consumer bills would be so negligible, it would barely be worth passing on by the energy companies.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Andrew Williams

Andrew Williams

Andrew Williams is a freelance journalist based in Cardiff, Wales, UK. His work has been published in a wide range of publications including The Guardian, The Ecologist, Green Futures, 24 Housing, Professional Broking and Strategic Risk....
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Navigant
  • Arena Solutions
  • Solar Wholesalers
  • Eaton
  • Kipp & Zonen
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • Talesun Solar USA, Ltd.
  • OnGrid Solar
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information