Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

France Could Be Next Offshore Wind Powerhouse

By John Blau, Contributor
January 26, 2011   |   7 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
January 27, 2011
That country's name is spelled 'Belgium'.

"According to a recent report by PricewaterhouseCoopers, one megawatt produced by offshore wind power costs €3.5 million, compared to €1.6 million by onshore wind power"

That is a useless statement, as offshore wind has almost twice the capacity factor of onshore. Price per kWh is more relevant, but still does not tell the entire story. Offshore wind has a more steady production with less variability, that is worth something. Another big advantage is that offshore wind encouters less resistance from local residents that think it spoils their view.
Comment
2 of 7
January 27, 2011
Avanderbom makes a good point. Also, as offshore development moves forward, turbine size is being pushed up to 10MW. This type of development will push down both the unit MW cost and the cost of servicing (because there will be less units per MW). In the end, offshore development will push down prices, and advance the field.

When authors write articles, they shouldn't just attempt to be truthful, they should also make sure that their truths are representing the full picture.
Comment
3 of 7
January 28, 2011
>>>>That is a useless statement, as offshore wind has almost twice the capacity factor of onshore. Price per kWh is more relevant, but still does not tell the entire story. Offshore wind has a more steady production with less variability, that is worth something. Another big advantage is that offshore wind encouters less resistance from local residents that think it spoils their view.<<<<

The reason Denmark has quit all onshore wind is the NOISE, not the view. The noise drives residents up the walls that those low frequency sounds penetrate. As to offshore capacity factors, they aren't much. The UK has the best winds and off shore capacity factors are only slightly better than on shore at about 30%. Wind is a costly boondoggle no matter where you put those turbines - bring taxpayer money. See Cape Wind - $600 million up front and rates 2-3 times the going rate per kwh.
Comment
4 of 7
January 28, 2011
It is a shame that people like Rolf try and spread lies about renewable energy, citing imaginary figures and misconceptions, in order to protect their vested interests. Not much of a "free market" attitude. The Cape wind project has sold half the projected output so far and it will raise the cost of customer electric bills by just under 2%. The turbines are more than 5 miles off shore, so noise is not a concern and even on a clear day they are not visible without binoculars. The long delays on that project were due to oil industry contrived resistance using just the kind of false fears that Rolf uses here.
Comment
5 of 7
January 28, 2011
That 50% sale by Cape Wind is rates above 20 cents/kwh, far above the going wholesale rate - plus the 30% cash handout. And nobody else is crazy enough to buy the other half. You don't need the oil industry to raise fears about off shore wind. Those fears arise quite naturally. The AWEA wants "predictable" government policies. Translation: consistent very large taxpayer subsidies.
Comment
6 of 7
January 28, 2011
We now have the 2010 numbers. Wind generated about 85 billion kwh. Name plate capacity averaged 37 GW. so capacity factor for U.S. wind was 27%, the same as 2009. Altho the turbines and technology are improving the capacity factor won't. As in all real estate, the best sites go first, so new wind farms will be on lesser wind sites. And the sites get closer to residences whose occupants are driven nuts by the noise. And as the % of wind on a grid rises, the tougher it gets to integrate into the delicately balanced grid. It's a scam foisted on energy ignorant politicians.
Comment
7 of 7
January 28, 2011
Great News hoping France can cover all its electricity needs with nuclear ,hydro and wind power generation saving big on ever more expensive oil imports!
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Rittal Corporation Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems US Solar Institute Nextronex, Inc. UnThink Solar Das Haus: Innovation in Renewables and Energy Efficiency
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters