The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 18, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Measuring Wind Turbine Noise

Are decibel levels the most important metric for determining impact?

RenewableEnergyWorld.com Editors
November 22, 2010  |  12 Comments

There have been a number of stories recently about how turbine noise impacts people who live close to wind farms. Inevitably, the conversation comes back to whether the turbines are too loud.

Measuring decibel levels is extremely important, as it is an objective way to compare the sound to everything else around us.

You may have seen this nifty diagram released by GE last week:

As you can see, a large wind turbine isn't very loud from an objective standpoint. According to this data, at a very close distance of 300 meters away, a turbine will be somewhere between an air conditioner (50 decibels) and a refrigerator (40 decibels). At about 500 meters, the levels drop to about 38 decibels, which is well below the typical 40-45 decibels of background noise in a populated area.

So if wind turbines aren't any louder than what we're already used to, why are some people complaining about them?

It comes back to subjective factors that decibel measurements don't account for.

The quality of wind farm noise is one factor. Researchers are looking at whether the low-frequency woosh, woosh, woosh of blades has a different psycho-social impact than noise from highways or airports. It's very common that people living close to turbines call the sound “penetrating.”

Of course, different people handle the sound in different ways. Many residents are unfazed by turbines at close distances. Others find them unbearable. For a developer, reaction to a project depends on what kind of people you have living in close proximity to the machines.

The other major factor is communication. If a developer doesn't accurately describe how sound levels or sound quality may change, the potential for backlash becomes far greater. For example, a handful of residents living near three GE 1.5 MW turbines on the Maine island of Vinalhaven say that the developer, Fox Islands Wind, mislead residents about sound levels. A lot of the outrage (which has gained national media attention) was over poor communication about how the turbines would impact the soundscape of the rural island.

Clearly, these highly-variable factors are just as important as objectively measuring decibel levels.

12 Comments

Register To Comment
jim douglas
jim douglas
February 15, 2011
Even as a wind power skeptic I found the noise from the blades very pleasant. Like a bird going by. All the distracting noise I heard was from the generator and transformer.
ANONYMOUS
December 2, 2010
We should not get enamored of objective sound level measurments on human perception. The classic example is comparing the effects of Beethoven's 9th and a five-year old learning the violin, both at the same db level. Subjective perception cannot be ignored. Of course, that's what the GE diagram does. The authors may be engineers, but they are not human interface engineers. More than a sound level meter is needed.
ANONYMOUS
December 2, 2010
The Wikipedia entry on infrasound is interesting. Apparently its regognition goes back to WW II, at least.

C:\Users\Tom\Documents\OUTDOORS\Energy, Renewable and not\Wind Energy\Infrasound
ANONYMOUS
December 2, 2010
Turbine noise increases when turbines are placed too close together. For instance, on Vinalhaven the turbines are placed in a triangular formation within a relatively compact site so that the turbines are down wind of each other. Consequently, some engineers believe that the Vinalhaven turbines may be particularly noisy due to excessive air turbulence.
While scientists debate the reasons for wind turbine noise, one wonders how and when those individuals whose homes are close to wind turbines are going to be offered some relief? Rather than spending time developing best case scenario sound charts in order to sell GE turbines, perhaps the GE engineers' time would be best spent working on how to mitigate the noise from their existing turbines. For those people who happen to find themselves, due to inadequate state noise regulations, living too close to wind turbines, the noise question is not hypothetical. It is a day to day reality which needs to be addressed now.
Jim Cummings
Jim Cummings
November 25, 2010
Most of the noise from modern turbines is air flow/turbulence off the trailing edge of the blades: it mostly sounds like rushing wind, not unlike distant road noise. There is not much that traditional dampening can do here, though of course new designs are likely to reduce it, as noted above.

Very little if any mechanical noise at any realistic distance (probably even the 200-300 feet to the ground). However, there are times when a mechanical issue presents itself and various clunking kinds of noises can occur; these can be sharper and seem to travel further than the air/blade noise. Sometimes a hole forms in a blade (lightning is often the cause), and this can create a whistling noise until repaired.

There remains some uncertainty about the source of the periodic nature of the noise, the "amplitude modulation" (ie it gets louder then softer over the course of a second or so). It clearly appears related to the rotational speed of the turbines; earlier thoughts that it had to do with blades passing through a low pressure area behind or in front of the tower have been largely disproved. Some feel it's a directional effect (the noise off the blades shoots off largely in one direction, so you get a pulse of it as each blade points its noise at your location). Others think that wind shear over the height of the blades rotational diameter may be a factor (ie, higher wind speeds at the top of the blades, lower at the bottom). Wind turbulence across the blade diameter could also be a factor (caused by natural wind variation/currents/patterns or by disruption by other turbines in the field). It's often been noted that amplitude modulation is strongest to the sides of the turbines, rather than front or back.
Ken Higgs
Ken Higgs
November 24, 2010
To Frank Heller:

The 'thump-thump' is due to the tri-blade construction.

Owning large marine propulsion units, we find those thumps
are vibration stresses on shafts and bearings. Hence, overlapping
("Highly skewed") blades are used, whence the loading~unloading
does not occur along the full length of the blade at any given
moment, as is the case with these 'First-generation'?? wind units.

If they skewed the leading edge, plus adding two more blades,(yes,
I know, expense!) in 'delicate' locations, the loading-unloading
along the length of the blade occurs sequentially, to where the
hub-area unloading of one blade is almost coincident with the
tip-loading of the following blade.

Gear box failure,I have read, is a huge problem on these wind
machines. There would be far less stress on the boxes if the
blades were of this highly-skewed design.
ANONYMOUS
November 24, 2010
So far, I have heard no breakdown of noise source.

Is it only the blades, or the gears, also? Are direct-drive (without gear-transmission) devices quieter?

Is a wind-machine with blades within a nozzle-venturi quieter?

If the machinery has a substantial portion, what noise-attenuation
efforts such as 'Silent Running' coatings, etc. are used within
the nacelle?

Thank you.
Frank Heller
Frank Heller
November 24, 2010
Decibels are the least important aspect of the various sounds that wind turbines make....as everyone should know, outlaw bikers have consistently beaten back attempt to regulate the exhaust sound from their modified bikes by arguing 'decibels'.

Like Chinese water torture; the thumping sound of turbines will drive a lot of people 'crazy', esp. at night. These people include people who live in rural settings for the quietude, esp. artists, musicians, writers, gardeners, and teachers.

In a democratic society, the 'victim's' must be included in siting discussions so that appropriate mitigation strategies can be built into the overall design of the 'farm'.

Just don't fall into the decibel trap!
ANONYMOUS
November 24, 2010
In general, people do not live close to nuclear reactors or to coal fired plants, either. While the problems associated with wind turbines, solar farms, geothermal sources or ethanol plants may be more benign than the problems associated with older power plants, we should not be surprised that there are still some minor problems with alternative energy plants.

The vibrations (aka "noise") from a wind turbine may be much less harmful than radiation from a leaking nuclear reactor, but it is still a nuisance.
Jim Cummings
Jim Cummings
November 23, 2010
A couple other important factors: even within audible sound ranges, the sound spectrum of wind turbines is heavily weighted toward the lower frequencies. Turbine noise is often clearly of a lower overall frequency than the ambient noise in bushes and trees; this is one reason it is not as effectively masked as often is assumed.

Perhaps the most important metric is whether the turbine noise is more than 5dB above the background ambient (in the moment; averaging sound over time can miss the fact that for parts of a day and especially night, ambient noise is lower than an averaged level). As it moves past 5dB over other sounds, it becomes distinguishable; as it reaches 10dB over other sounds, it will be readily noticeable and likely to cause some annoyance. 15dB or more is quite intrusive.

Expectations are obviously crucial, as noted here. If peace and quiet is a prime reason many people in the area live there, then any audible intrusion from large industrial installations will trigger discontent. If most everyone nearby is more actively working the land and using machines in their daily life around their land/ranch/farm, then it's probably going to be less of an issue to hear turbines added to the mix at the low level they are heard.

The GE chart appears to be a relatively best-case scenario; I'd be interested to know what noise attenuation assumptions are behind it. It's quite common to see noise maps that predict 40dB levels at much more than 400m (eg, a map in Ken Kalinsky's NEWEEP webinar last July shows 40dB at locations 1800-3700 feet from turbines, and 45dB at locations from 1700-2900 feet; note: estimated using blown-up copy and distance scale on the map). Such maps, as well as repeated reports from neighbors, suggest that turbines can be audible to over a half mile, and at times to a mile.

Finally, the subtle pulsing nature of the sound, especially when several turbines are audible with differing peaks, can be quite disconcerting or disorienting.
Alec Salt
Alec Salt
November 23, 2010
A key part of this graphic that most people will not appreciate is the "A" after dB (i.e. dB (A)). This means that all the infrasound (< 20 Hz) generated by the turbine, which undoubtedly affects the ear at levels below those that are heard, is totally ignored by the measurement. This measurement is equivalent to considering only the visible portion of sunlight and concluding that sunlight cannot harm you. We all know that the invisible portion of sunlight (the ultraviolet light) is the portion that causes skin and eye problems. Similarly, it is the unheard infrasound component of wind turbine noise that causes problems to nearby residents. Until the industry starts taking note of this, the problem of wind turbine noise on nearby communities will not be solved. Long term infrasound exposure disturbs sleep and this graphic completely ignores this fact. So it may be a clever graphic, but it misrepresents the true (infrasound-dominated) nature of wind turbine noise.
ANONYMOUS
November 23, 2010
Touring Europe we saw a lot of wind farms. So far as I noticed wind turbines and human habitation were always separated by a pretty good distance. That would seem to make sense.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
REW.com Editors

REW.com Editors

Renewable Energy World's network editors help deliver the most comprehensive news coverage of the renewable energy industries. Based in the U.S. and the UK, the team is comprised of editors from Pennwell Corporation's myriad of publications...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 9
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 5
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador
  • 1
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • GoGreenSolar.com
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Associated Renewable
  • Active Communications International
  • Met Office
  • Everblue
  • ExxonMobil Lubricants & Specialties Europe
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information