The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

What's Behind Record-Breaking Solar Cell Efficiencies, Part 1

In this two-part series on solar cell efficiencies, we examine laboratory and commercial solar cell efficiencies of Crystalline Silicon, CIGs, Amorphous, Cadmium Telluride and Multijunction Concentrator cells

Jennifer Kho, Contributor
October 08, 2010  |  24 Comments

In solar, it's hard to go a month without hearing news about conversion efficiencies. In September, for example, Oerlikon Solar and its partner, Corning, said they broke the world efficiency record for a lab-created tandem-junction amorphous-silicon cell. The cell, which was tested by the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, delivered 11.9 percent stabilized efficiency.

Meanwhile, Conergy said its new selective-emitter technology could boost solar-cell efficiency from one of its German factories by "up to 0.5 percentage points." And scientists at Yonsei University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology announced new technologies that could one day enhance cell efficiencies by up to 65 percent, in the case of Yonsei, and that could double cell efficiencies, in the case of MIT. 

"Everyone's working on efficiency," said Paul Wormser, senior director of product engineering and system solutions at Sharp Electronics' solar division. "You would be hard pressed to find a manufacturer that hasn't stated publicly at least once a year something about an efficiency improvement program."

Martin Green, a professor and executive research director at the University of New South Wales' Photovoltaics Centre of Excellence, said he's seen cell efficiency improvements in the labs accelerate in the last few years, with about 10 new "highest confirmed efficiencies" for different photovoltaic cell and module technologies every six months.

Commercial cells lag behind the efficiencies achieved by labs in so-called "champion cells," or best of breed cells, and companies don't expect cells produced in high volume to reach the efficiencies of those top lab cells. But the efficiency gains in the labs have translated into commercial gains as well: First Solar, for example, reported that its panels grew from 10.9 percent efficiency to 11.2 percent efficiency from the second quarter in 2009 to the same quarter this year, Green pointed out.

The upcoming October edition of Progress in Photovoltaics, which tracks the highest confirmed lab efficiencies for solar cells and panels, cites new records for the top concentrator cell, the top large-area crystalline cell, the top copper-indium-gallium-diselenide (CIGS) cells and the top tandem-junction amorphous-silicon cell, among others.  Let's take a look at the best efficiencies that the labs – and factories – have produced so far:

Crystalline Silicon

For crystalline-silicon technologies, efficiencies suddenly become far more crucial starting around 2005, during a worldwide shortage of solar-grade silicon that lasted until 2008. Silicon supplies were limited and expensive, and that gave manufacturers a huge incentive to eke as much power as possible out of each panel. "Pre 2008, getting silicon at all was a challenge, so you needed to squeeze as much as you could out of the silicon," said Jenny Chase, lead solar analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Because solar panels are sold per watt of peak capacity, not per panel, manufacturers that boosted their efficiencies could grow their production capacity – and profits – without having to make more panels or access more silicon.

Looking at the natural limits of the materials, crystalline silicon could reach a theoretical efficiency of 28, 29 or 30 percent, scientists say. Theoretical efficiencies are based on lab conditions that will never be found in commercial production, warned Lars Waldmann, director of public relations for Schott Solar. But in the labs, researchers are three to four percentage points away.

The University of New South Wales, which holds the record for the most efficient crystalline-silicon cell, created a cell with an efficiency of 25 percent. Sandia National Laboratories tested the cell in 1999, and it was also used in a record-setting solar panel with 22.7 percent efficiency, according to the university's School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering.

Meanwhile, SunPower makes the most efficient silicon panels on the market with 19.3 percent efficiency, according to Photon's annual module overview, which came out in February. (Some efficiency is always lost when companies combine cells into panels.) In May, the company announced a new line of panels rated for up to 19.5 percent efficiency, and in June, SunPower announced it had set a new world record for large-area silicon solar cells with a conversion efficiency of 24.2 percent measured by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

The drive toward higher efficiencies is less critical now than it was a few years ago, during the worldwide solar silicon shortage, Chase said. "Now companies can get as much silicon as they need at reasonable prices." Silicon prices were $59 to $60 per kilogram in September, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Companies were rumored to be paying spot prices as high as $400 per kilogram in 2007, according to the Prometheus Institute at that time.

But when the silicon shortage ended in 2008 and panel prices started falling, companies had another reason to boost efficiencies: to lower costs. If manufacturers can increase their panel efficiencies, the same factory can produce more megawatts worth of panels without having to add production lines. Aside from the potential to lower the panels' cost per watt, higher efficiencies can also reduce the cost of installation – including the pieces such as racking and mounting, wiring and inverters – because fewer panels are needed to deliver the same amount of power, Chase said. And the highest-efficiency cells and panels can also sell at a premium, a major advantage as manufacturers' profit margins are being slashed.

While the lower panel prices may be a driver for efficiency, they also could limit the amount that efficiencies can grow. Companies will only take steps to raise efficiencies if those steps cost less than it would cost a developer to simply add more panels to achieve the same result.

CIGS

The new Progress in Photovoltaics edition includes two new results for copper-indium-gallium-diselenide cells, which have demonstrated the highest lab efficiencies of any thin film. In April, a CIGS cell on glass, made by NREL, tested at 19.6 percent efficiency, replacing an NREL record of 19.4 percent from January of 2008.

Meanwhile, ZSW Stuttgart produced a cell that delivered 20.3 percent efficiency when it was tested by Fraunhofer this summer. That cell had an aperture area of only 0.5 square centimeters, making it too small to be accepted as an outright record, Green said. Measurement errors are more likely to happen with small areas and the champion cells can also be less representative of the group because it's possible to make thousands on a single substrate and sort through them for the "flash in the pan," he said.

But the high efficiency – confirmed by Fraunhofer – won the ZSW Stuttgart cell a spot on the publication's "Notable Exceptions" chart, which notes highly efficient cells and panels that don't meet the standards for class records. The cell replaced another ZSW Stuttgart cell, tested by Fraunhofer just six months ago in April, with 20.1 percent efficiency.

The top commercial CIGS panels, made by Q-Cells using Solibro cells, get up to 11.2 percent efficiency, according to Photon's February overview.  Würth Solar also sells a copper-indium-diselenide cell, with no gallium, that delivers 11.8 percent efficiency, according to the overview.

Amorphous Silicon

In August, Oerlion Solar's above-mentioned 11.9 percent cell, measured by NREL, broke the previous record of 11.7 percent efficiency set by Kaneka back in 2004. Oerlikon's cell included a new, thin light-trapping glass from Corning. Chris O'Brien, head of market development at Oerlikon Solar, said the company also improved its tandem technology with a better (and cheaper) reflective backsheet -- the sheet at the back of the cell that reflects the photons that get past the silicon layers back into the silicon for another chance to convert those photons into electricity – and a thinner silicon layer, which boosts stabilized efficiency. And the technology has the potential for even higher efficiency: The cell didn't include the usual antireflective coating to enhance the capture of light, O'Brien added.

The top commercial amorphous silicon (a-si) and microcrystalline panels are made by Pramac, an Oerlikon customer, with 9.2 percent efficiency, according to Photon in February. Sharp – as well as IBC Solar using Sharp cells – makes the next most efficient panels at 9 percent efficiency, according to the overview. These types of cells have the potential to reach more than 11 percent efficiency in 2012, said Thomas Block, production manager in strategy and business development for Schott. Waldmann added that the technology could reach a panel efficiency of up to 12 percent in the coming years.

Meanwhile, in Progress in Photovoltaics' "Notable Exceptions" section, Uni-Solar produced a tandem-junction cell with 12.5 percent stabilized efficiency last year. The cell, tested by NREL in March 2009, had layers of a-si and nanocrystalline silicon. But it only had a designated illumination area of 0.27 square centimeters, which is why it isn't listed as the official record. Uni-Solar claims it also holds the world record for flexible a-si, with a cell that demonstrated 15.4 percent efficiency in the lab.

In production, Uni-Solar's current cell efficiency is 8.2 percent, with a panel efficiency of 6.7 percent. Photon's February overview lists the top amorphous-silicon panels as tied at 7 percent efficiency from Iscorn (using triple-junction Uni-Solar cells) and Viessmann (using single-junction Schott cells). Schott already has a tandem-junction a-si cell with more than 10 percent efficiency, Block said. Meanwhie, Uni-Solar plans to deliver commercial panels with  12 percent efficiency by 2012 and in June released a roadmap anticipating efficiencies could eventually rise above 20 percent, at a price of 95 cents per watt.

In Part 2 of this article, we’ll look at cadmium-telluride and multijunction-concentrator solar-cell conversion efficiencies and examine why efficiencies are both important and not-so-important in the marketplace.

Look out for this article in its entirety, with additional information not presented here, in the next issue of Photovoltaics World magazine, which should come out in early November.

Jennifer Kho is a freelance reporter and editor based in Oakland, Calif. Aside from RenewableEnergyWorld.com, her stories have appeared in The New York Times' Green blog, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, AOL's DailyFinance, MIT's Technology Review, The Christian Science Monitor, Reuters.com, Earth2Tech and other publications. She has more than a decade of journalism experience and has been covering green technology since 2004.

24 Comments

Register To Comment
Neal Gima
Neal Gima
November 23, 2010
We at Energywyze have testimony with a client with Solar and have installed our Intelawatt module and the meter turned backwards even quicker. Feel free to take a look at our website for all the Solar efficiency information at http://energywyze.us/technical-points.html and any questions give us a call.
Tony
Jerry Cheesman
Jerry Cheesman
November 10, 2010
We are seeking a specific market ready newly developed product to install a 1.5 MW solar electric facility. The owner of the project wants tracking capability to maximize gain per day.
We will consider; suncatcher or similar technology as a point focusing path to achieve this level of output. We will consider Solon tracking panels or similar technology as there is a 2 MW Solon non-tracking solar field within 1200 yards of the proposed site. We are also interested in a thin film application which applies the Cal Tech lab breakthrough, in a pilot project here. We seek this information with an emphasis on KWH/Sq. Meter/day potential output For Vacaville Ca. JerryCheesman@yahoo.com
Drew Haney
Drew Haney
November 1, 2010
Guys, let's not miss the forest for the trees. Maybe 20% efficiency in solar panels isn't the Holy Grail, but we must remember 100% efficiency = PERPETUAL MOTION! Here are some "Low" efficiency devices that have made a few bucks over the years:

Automobile 18% (gasoline engine, w/o A/C)
Incandescent light bulb (2%)
Fluorescent "green" tree-hugger bulb: 9%

Also, it's not all about the efficiency, it's about the economics. Solar panels now retail for ~$1.00 per output watt. That's 3 times better than 10 years ago.
A really precise cost analysis comparison is hard to do because (in USA) the federal government leases mining land to coal companies for as little as $1.00/acre (that is not a typo), whereas progressive energy companies that utilize solar pay about $200-$500 per acre of land/year. So, you pay your coal-fired power bill monthly and again on April 15 (well, some of us do,anyway). In North Carolina, you can now do better than break even on a 20-year amortized solar investment that powers a single home (you can make about %4 ROI if you include federal/state incentives, and this does not bring to bear the Economies of Scale of acommercial Solar farm or large rooftop array.
OS maybe the glass is not half-empty, it's about 1/4 full...and rising.
Just my two cents worth......
Anne van der Bom
Anne van der Bom
October 16, 2010
fireofenergy,

Robots provide flexibility, but at a high cost. Flexibility that you hardly need for a product that is mechanically as simple as a solar panel.

Robots are used in car manufacturing where you have to deal complex shapes that change every 5 years or so. That's when you need the flexibility, not in solar panel manufacturing.
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 16, 2010
Hi:

Any concentrator technology, electric or thermal is useless except in clear sky country. A majority of the USA geography has too high a diffuse component... The efficiency gained through concentration is lost through reduced total available energy to the target...

.....Bill
Kanga Gnana
Kanga Gnana
October 15, 2010
We like to see these in your nest article-- Concentric Solar
Spectrolab has developed a new multijunction concentrator solar cell with a sunlight-to-electricity conversion efficiency of 41.6 percent, a new world record in solar cell efficiency, costing as little as $3 per watt to install and producing electricity at a cost of 8 to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multijunction_photovoltaic_cell

There Data sheets

http://www.spectrolab.com/DataSheets/PV/CPV/C3MJ%20CDO%20Products%2020100810.pdf
http://www.spectrolab.com/DataSheets/PV/CPV/C3MJ%20CCA-100%20data%20sheet%2020100828.pdf
Kanga Gnana
Kanga Gnana
October 15, 2010
A research on Solar Cells for Water pumping was done by me in 1969. This work was undertaken as Solar Energy is intermittent due clouds and rain etc and is only available in the day time. Water pumping enjoys the benefit of storage in tank for later use. The costs of Solar cells were of the order of $100/Wp with efficiency of 4% and we had only few cells of the thinfilm variety. The costs were high for the large number of Cells necessary to drive a standard 230V DC water pump that is normally used in Sri Lanka. A DC amplifier was designed and this was connected in series with the the few cells that was available at that time the same current through the cells went through the pump. The amplified Voltage was fed to the different types of pumps which had the same current through the cells. This provided the effect of large number of cells to drive the different pumps. The positive displacement pump the tube pump type was found to give the best out put. Solar Cell efficiency has come through a great way now! We observe now there are triple junction devices which captures most of the wave lengths of Suns spectrum giving higher efficiency.
This is a great effort to summarize all details in a single article. Great Job. Waiting to see the second part.
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 14, 2010
Hi DW:

Thank you for the reply but I was not talking about concentrating solar.
I was speaking about 1 sun tech..
The problem is achieving a high enough black body temp to produce a high enough band IR that is smaller than the band gap in the PV. I did some digging and some talking since the post. The problem is that a good enough "perfect absorber"/"no emissivity" coating and a coating that starts at the beginning of a "the cells" turn on point does not exist. Right now there are cells tailored for the IR band that are used with combined heat/power devices. That is, they do VERY well in IR but the heat source is 1200 DegC capable. This usually is a conventional heat source device or high sun (1000X+) device.
I using just a simple single wall evac tube with the heat pipe cut off, measured temps over 320 DegC inside. Yes, there is a long way between 320 and 1200, BUT it is an Aluminum absorber with common AL/N/AL coatings. Those do not approach Black Nickel on Bright nickel, 95%A, .07% E on some super light Nano thick ceramic or carbon substrate, or whatever. The E number of Black on Bright is almost 2 orders of magnitude better than the simple off the shelf thermal tube I was using.
To put it simply, how hot has someone to date, got a surface under one sun in a vacuum??
If someone can say without losing their job, that would be an interesting number.... as a place to start....

.....Bill
Jennifer Kho
Jennifer Kho
October 14, 2010
Thanks Bob! What a difference 46 years makes, huh? :-)
Bob Condon
Bob Condon
October 13, 2010
Jennifer,
Your article concerning the efficiency of PVs is most encouraging. I read a great deal about Solar Technology and consider the growth of that industry very exciting. Efficiencies now appear to be the focus, coupled with cost, these are challenges that some of our best minds will continue to address in the years ahead. The progress I have seen since 1964 when I purchased a single "solar cell" from Edmunds Scientific, which cost me about $8 and had an output of .10 watt, has been remarkable. I marveled at the characteristics of my "solar cell", and spent about $10 on a multi meter so I could measure it's output in various conditons. We have come a long way!
Eric Yue
Eric Yue
October 13, 2010
Thanks a lot.
Donald Wagner
Donald Wagner
October 12, 2010
william-fitch-22587 - You are correct in that tens if not hundreds of millions are spent on cell technology, but relatively little on optics. I believe that current record for a system is 42.8% set by University of Delaware in 2007. ( http://www.udel.edu/PR/UDaily/2008/jul/solar072307.html )
Sol Solution uses one Fresnle lens to create a "Rainbow Concentrator" that seperates and concentrates the spectrum. You can see pictures of the prototype at http://www.sol-solution.net/Prototype2.html.
http://www.sol-solution.net/Prototype2.html
I agree that this is probably where concentrating solar will move toward in the future.
ECD Fan
ECD Fan
October 12, 2010
Dear Ms. Kho:

Mr. Green misled you if he claimed that "there's consistent evidence that amorphous-silicon panels produce 5-10 percent more kilowatt hours than crystalline-silicon panels with the same rated capacity." Given the significantly higher long-term performance degradation of a-Si panels, over the life of the system, it is crystalline that delivers more kilowatt hours with the same rated capacity.

You should have challenged Mr. Green to provide you with 20-25 year data (the warranted life of a system) comparing a-Si and c-Si performance, and then it would have been apparent to you that he is spreading misinformation.
Jennifer Kho
Jennifer Kho
October 11, 2010
Rogelio:

I hear what you're saying and I think you're right that we have to carefully avoid hyping lab experiments as something that will be available soon. But I do think it's still interesting and important to communicate what's going on in the labs, even though those modules aren't available yet, because they have a traceable impact on the industry (and on science as a whole).

I tried to help set more realistic expectations by including the commercial efficiencies of panels actually available today, according to Photon's last overview in February. Those numbers were independently confirmed by Photon and they're conservative considering that some of then have already grown since then, as ecdfan pointed out. I also emphasized that "Commercial cells lag behind the efficiencies achieved by labs in so-called "champion cells," or best of breed cells, and companies don't expect cells produced in high volume to reach the efficiencies of those top lab cells."

Do you have suggestions for how I can better cover these lab results in the future?
Jennifer Kho
Jennifer Kho
October 11, 2010
MacAfrican: Good point. This is something that I discuss a bit in Part 2 of this series, which I'm hoping will be posted soon. Kilowatt-hour has indeed become an important metric that many solar developers take into consideration in addition to peak efficiency. In terms of rating and comparing different modules industry wide (not on a per-project basis), researchers say it's harder to figure out what the KWh of a module is going to be because that changes significantly depending on factors -- such as where the module will be installed -- that are out of the manufacturers' control. But, for example, Green said there's consistent evidence that amorphous-silicon panels produce 5-10 percent more kilowatt hours than crystalline-silicon panels with the same rated capacity. Some thin-film companies have been talking about finding a way to standardize the KWh measurement. Still, all the folks I spoke with said that the peak efficiency measurement remains important. Many policies still assess incentives by rated capacity, for example, and peak efficiency remains important in projects aimed at meeting peak demand.
Johan Buys
Johan Buys
October 11, 2010
The issue of STC efficiency is anyway misleading as STC represents a condition that exists for a tiny fraction of the daylight hours per year. In the real world a 12% CIS module will outperform a 12% any-other-technology module by a significant margin. For proof check out the Stuttgart tests.

Why do people fixate on module efficiency % when that's not what the user is after. KWh is the goal, so start focusing on KWh per KWp in real world rather than standard test conditions...
Roger Moore
Roger Moore
October 11, 2010
Jennifer, thanks for the reply on the time to market question. I see this in my field, biomedical research, also. We tend to report on new observations and minor breakthroughs (publish or perish), and then patients who are actually dying of disease get the wrong idea and think that cures are in hand when they are really some years away.... In the long run, I wonder if this results in less trust from the public? When can I get some solar nanofibers in my window without taking out a loan, rather than just reading about some lab at MIT.
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 10, 2010
Hi Again:

I felt guilty not giving you some kind of "visual". Take a single wall evac solar tube, like a Sunda. (No not endorsing the "S" word) Now remove the metal end cap, heat pipe and take out the absorber. Now what you have is a big empty test tube. Turn it and look straight down inside. So, closest to you is the open end, which is a circle of course. Using standard clock references do the following. Bond the PV cells of choice to the inside of the glass from top to bottom but only from 3:30 to 8:30 passing through 6 o'clock. Anotherwards, almost half a circle from top to bottom. The cells need no encapsulation on the inside because at the end of the day, all the air will be sucked out. The standard physical bonding is used to bond them to the glass tube so the small amount of energy that does not go into elect can be conducted to the outside easily, very much the same as in current PV panels, just much less of it. Now, you create an "absorber" in a 9 to 3 half circle, top to bottom, 1/4" smaller in diameter so as not to contact the glass, as is done when these tubes are used in a thermal application. The trick is to put a low emissivity coating on the outer side of the absorber (High solar absorb, low emissivity, like a standard coating for a thermal app) and coat the inside with a coating that is designed to start to be "radiative" at the beginning of the cells peak area. The absorber should be of a material of very low mass, low specific heat, at least a moderate heat conduction coefficient and a pretty high melting point. This absorber gets placed in the tube (opposite side) suspended much like a standard thermal app. There is no heat pipe and the hole for the heat pipe exit becomes the exit for electrical and maintains its structural influence as well. Cap it, remove air, electric connections. Problems are suitable absorber material and coatings. Done right, this could be exiting the right frequencies on the back side towards PV, in a minute, full sun.
William Fitch
William Fitch
October 9, 2010
Hi:

Just to throw an idea out there, that has kind of been churning around in my mind for a while, regarding cell output.
Everyone (and I apologize in advance if someone is working on this) seems to be focusing on how can we make a solar cell more efficient. There seems to be a rut that research is in regarding this issue. From an inventer's perspective the goal is correct but the chosen path seems to be a bit uni-directional. Standard solar cells are not inefficient, period. In fact they are very, very efficient at a certain part of the spectrum, specifically the mid and high band IR part of the electromagnetic spectrum. So rather than focusing on how can we make a cell that has a high efficiency from IR to UV, why not tailor the "light" source to target the cells max efficiency wavelength..??.. Now, I am not suggesting we perform electromagnetic surgery on the sun. The mid and high IR bands have a black body temperature associated with them, as do all light wavelengths. It is very easy to heat under one sun intensity materials that reach the black body temp required to radiate IR at a cells max eff area. So this does not become a multi message post, I will try and put this in one sentence. By using a combination of vacuum technology, selective surface coatings and standard PV cells, it should be possible to create at cell output of 70% or greater. The materials to do this all exist today, most of them in the solar thermal market, at least in the basic form. The only one missing that is not in the thermal market is a selective surface coating that is designed with a split frequency emissivity, I.E. one that will start to radiate at the frequency that a PV cell is most efficient at...
The mfg of them would be more expensive of course, but it offers the possibility of tripling the output eff.. that can offset a whole bunch of cost...
Well, there it is.. probably someone is already working on it, but it is now out of my head in the open....

.....Bill
Jennifer Kho
Jennifer Kho
October 9, 2010
Rojelio: I will touch on this issue in Part 2 of this series, which will be posted here soon. For multijunction concentrator cells, Spectrolab says it has been able to bring lab cells to the market in about two years. The times vary among technologies and companies, of course, and commercial efficiencies are never expected to reach the ultimate top lab efficiencies -- and then you lose more efficiency when the cells get turned into panels. (Green says about 80 percent of lab cell efficiencies should be achievable at the module level.) I'll work to get more data on this for other technologies soon!
Jennifer Kho
Jennifer Kho
October 9, 2010
Earth4Energy: Some types of crystalline cells degrade as much as 6 percent in their first few days of illumination, and then their efficiencies stabilize. So a reference to "stabilized efficiency" means the cell was tested after being exposed to that light (instead of before). I hope that helps!
John Mackinnon
John Mackinnon
October 9, 2010
I would be interested in a detailed explanation of "stabilized" efficiency vs just "efficiency". Thanks.
Roger Moore
Roger Moore
October 8, 2010
Could somebody do a story on how long it takes some of these advances to get to market. I'd like to get a better perspective on that. We see articles every week about new breakthroughs in this or that. However, excitement wanes when we see on the street that solar is actually out of reach for most people, other than a toy flashlight or a $500 backpack.
ECD Fan
ECD Fan
October 8, 2010
Dear Ms. Kho:

You have been misinformed again, and are using stale data.

First, Sharp has been making and selling the NA-V142H5 module which is a-Si and 10.0% efficient (panel efficiency). For comparison, Unisolar's most-efficient module is indeed 6.7% (PVL-144), and Oerlikon's most-efficient module is 9.8% (Inventux X 140). And, of course, the most-efficient Schott a-Si module is just 7.1% efficient (ASI TM 103) and the most-efficient Kaneka module is 6.3% efficient (GSA-60), nowhere near the made-up numbers given to you.

Second, of the CIGS modules, Wurth's WSG0036E092 module is 12.6% efficient, followed by Avancis' Powermax 130 which is 12.1% efficient.

Third, Unisolar is simply misleading you when they claim they will deliver 12% efficient commercial modules (forget about 20% and 95c per Watt!). What they are actually saying now is that they would deliver 11.4% efficient module in calendar year 2012. But they fail to explain why Unisolar's current Chairman promised in 1985 (that is, 25 years ago) a 12.2% efficient cell in "large area production" soon ( http://docs.google.com/View?id=dwv7q4q_119crf97jd7 ), yet Unisolar's current modules are just 6.3%-6.7% efficient.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Jennifer Kho

Jennifer Kho

Jennifer Kho is a freelance reporter and editor based in Oakland, Calif. Aside from RenewableEnergyWorld.com, her stories have appeared in The New York Times' Green Inc. blog, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, AOL's DailyFinance,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 13
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
  • AEG Power Solutions
  • Borrego Solar Systems, Inc.
  • ImagineSolar
  • RevoluSun
  • Solar Power International 2013
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Karbone
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information