Cambridge, MA, USA --
Researchers at MIT have revealed exactly how a molecule called fulvalene diruthenium, which was discovered in 1996, works to store and release heat on demand. This understanding, reported in a paper published on Oct. 20 in the journal Angewandte Chemie, should make it possible to find similar chemicals based on more abundant, less expensive materials than ruthenium, and this could form the basis of a rechargeable battery to store heat rather than electricity.
The molecule undergoes a structural transformation when it absorbs sunlight, putting it into a higher-energy state where it can remain stable indefinitely. Then, triggered by a small addition of heat or a catalyst, it snaps back to its original shape, releasing heat in the process. But the team found that the process is a bit more complicated than that.
“It turns out there’s an intermediate step that plays a major role,” said Jeffrey Grossman, the Carl Richard Soderberg Associate Professor of Power Engineering in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. In this intermediate step, the molecule forms a semi-stable configuration partway between the two previously known states. “That was unexpected,” he said. The two-step process helps explain why the molecule is so stable, why the process is easily reversible and also why substituting other elements for ruthenium has not worked so far.
In effect, explained Grossman, this process makes it possible to produce a “rechargeable heat battery” that can repeatedly store and release heat gathered from sunlight or other sources. In principle, Grossman said, a fuel made from fulvalene diruthenium, when its stored heat is released, “can get as hot as 200 degrees C, plenty hot enough to heat your home, or even to run an engine to produce electricity.”
Compared to other approaches to solar energy, he said, “it takes many of the advantages of solar-thermal energy, but stores the heat in the form of a fuel. It’s reversible, and it’s stable over a long term. You can use it where you want, on demand. You could put the fuel in the sun, charge it up, then use the heat, and place the same fuel back in the sun to recharge.”
In addition to Grossman, the work was carried out by Yosuke Kanai of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Varadharajan Srinivasan of MIT’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Steven Meier and Peter Vollhardt of the University of California, Berkeley.
The problem of ruthenium’s rarity and cost still remains as “a dealbreaker,” Grossman said, but now that the fundamental mechanism of how the molecule works is understood, it should be easier to find other materials that exhibit the same behavior. This molecule “is the wrong material, but it shows it can be done,” he said.
The next step, he said, is to use a combination of simulation, chemical intuition, and databases of tens of millions of known molecules to look for other candidates that have structural similarities and might exhibit the same behavior. “It’s my firm belief that as we understand what makes this material tick, we’ll find that there will be other materials” that will work the same way, Grossman said.
Grossman plans to collaborate with Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy and Professor of Chemistry, to tackle such questions, applying the principles learned from this analysis in order to design new, inexpensive materials that exhibit this same reversible process. The tight coupling between computational materials design and experimental synthesis and validation, he said, should further accelerate the discovery of promising new candidate solar thermal fuels.
In the video below, Jeffrey Grossman explains how this material can be used to store and release energy in the form of heat. Video: Jeffrey C. Grossman; additional editing: Melanie Gonick
No energy densities were mentioned, so its unknown at this point exactly what the boundaries would be with respect to
various applications. 200 degrees C is pretty hot. If the density is great enough and can store the heat fast enough, it's not beyond the realm of possibilities that autos might employ such a heat battery. The Stanley Steamer lives!
keep up the good work guys. It's nice to see we can at least still do research in the USA. I'm glad you raised the point that this might be subject to scarcity in precious minerals and metals. Just like with batteries and PV and so many other things. To what extent are we now at the point that compounds can be screened in silico or is it still mostly an empirical process where each molecule has to be painstakingly synthesized and tested?
Comment
3 of 8
Anonymous
October 31, 2010
IT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO COMBINE THIS WITH THE JTEC ENGINE.
Very impressive. Is it possible to understand more fully, how the material is stored and how and what catalyst is added to created the heat reaction ? The energy density question is prime to understanding the implications of this discovery.
Additionally, if one is thinking energy storage, go further and discover how the storage component and catalyst can be an integral part of the structure it is used to heat or supply energy for. This way, if it's a building structure, efficiencies are improved and materials are minimized. If it's for motive power, then weight/mass efficiency are maximized to some extent...
Sustainability, which is strongly linked to energy use, is all about doing more with less... and eventually we'll understand, doing less with less than what true sustainability requires - i.e., reparation...
Interesting, but how practical.Somebody would have got his PhD and nothing more.
In a world where real wages is on the downward trend,what chances has these researches of success and acceptable to the vast majority
All these technologies need water, from where are going to get that water - Moon perhaps.
Research for research' sake is interesting, but be more down to earth.
I find most of the publications in the REW.com too theoretical. Are you waiting till your citizens die of thirst before you come down to the earth.
There are better, cheap and time tested technologies available, bat for them. they can be implemented world over in 2-3 years.
The technologies that REW.com speaks of will take another 50-60 years to mature and at that time there may not be human beings to enjoy the benefits of such research.
The Venezuela, Brazil, Gulf of Mexico has oil so does north America.But can that oil be harvested cheap and within the next 10-15 years.For one there is no proven technology.
So stop playing about but be more practical and sensible
Energy density is quite high. The original 1996 paper indicates an enthalpy of 30 kcal/mol. Water's enthalpy of vaporization is less than 1/3 of this at 9 kcal/mol
I have been designing, selling and installing solar equipment since 1977 and the prospect of a heat battery is viewed by me as of prime importance. One idea which comes to mind immediately is a closed loop system which allows a fluid to transfer the heat from a solar collector to the battery. Of course if the stored heat is inside a heated area, it is of no great advantage over water as the previous comment alludes to. Still the concept of integrating the battery into the design of a product which uses energy could make this very attractive. For example, this principle could be applied to the storage of hydrogen as a solid in chemical combination with say sea-salt or some other element wherein it could be released by catalytic effect to replenish a small fuel cell to power an electric car. JerryCheesman@yahoo.com
Perhaps your catalyst is acting in a different way. Since you are looking at a heat problem, use a little more thermal dynamics and heat transfer than material science. Most mass, as far as I know, can absorb and store heat. Your molecule changes form when it absorbs energy, then releases energy when it changes back. Sounds like basic solar to me. I heat a mass, it expands, changes shape and stores energy. Once the surroundings energy level drops to a different lower state the mass releases it energy.
So perhaps the catalyst is not doing a chemical effect, perhaps it is doing a cooling effect.? What temperature is the catalyst when introduced? Or if it is acting as a catalyst, is the chemical reaction between your substances endothermic or exothermic?
Add Your Comment
Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions.
If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!
1 of 8
various applications. 200 degrees C is pretty hot. If the density is great enough and can store the heat fast enough, it's not beyond the realm of possibilities that autos might employ such a heat battery. The Stanley Steamer lives!