Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Is There Still Hope for PACE?

By Jennifer Runyon, Managing Editor
October 11, 2010   |   5 Comments
NRDC takes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a fight to keep property-assessed clean energy financing programs alive.

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
October 12, 2010
To add to your post ...
NRDC's suit joins "similar federal lawsuits already underway in California, and pending federal legislation aimed allowing states and localities to move forward with PACE programs."

"Two factors differentiate financing of privately owned renewable energy and energy
efficiency improvements through PACE BONDS from other types of financing:
1. the addition of an assessment or special tax on the property tax bill backed up by a lien on the property, which makes the investment extremely secure.
2. the attachment of the repayment responsibility to the property instead of the individual, which encourages the owner to invest in energy upgrades even if he or she is going to sell the property before recouping his or her full investment." (RAEL UCBerkeley)

The Treasury Department's complaints, written in a memo to the CEO's of all national banks and government regulators, believes that the bonds raise "safety and soundness concerns" for mortgage holders. Their complaints are in large measure erroneous.
PACE loans, many used for on-site solar and geothermal heat pump installation do not bear any relation to the mortgage/assessed value ratio the OCC is worried about. In fact energy improvements add to the value of the home and on that basis alone are not a cause for caution.
Qualification for a PACE loan requires the same financial review that other personal financing requires; income qualification balanced against obligations.

Finally, the loans are not paid off when the home is sold or the mortgage lien is altered in any way, another concern of the OCC. As in #2 above the loan is attached to the property, not the property owner. The principle of PACE bonds is similar to a sidewalk assessment that can be charged against your property over time by your local government, but it is a voluntary action by the homeowner.

OCC's action have stopped the market and it's potential to sell efficiency and on-site production. Lobby Congress for PACE
Comment
2 of 5
October 13, 2010
In addition, our regulatory agencies are way behind Europe with integrating mortgage and utility structures. As we move toward zero and low energy construction front end costs are higher but more than offset by very reduced utility costs over time.
Comment
3 of 5
JFS
October 13, 2010
Remember the concept "Follow the money?"
Well, here it is in spades -- until recently, the banking community didn't feel threatened by PACE programs' impact (read that as loss of income) from the reduced flow of loan origination fees.
But with the number of states, counties, municipalities realizing the advantages of PACE-based energy financing exploding, the banking community suddenly realized they were going to be cut out of a whole lot of revenue they have come to expect from home improvement lines of credit (HILOCs).
Nobody said the banking community would give up easily.
Bottom line: the issue of safety and soundness concerns of mortgage holders is a smoke screen for the banking community's realization that they will loose their monopoly on large scale home lending activities throughout this country. Figure this easily in the Billions of dollars of lost fee income to them.
Comment
4 of 5
October 19, 2010
PACE sounds too workable to discard. In states like NJ, with long term SREC potential, loan payback might be configed in some accelerated fashion, thus reducing the property tax burden to a shorter timeframe. Right now leases seem to be the no down payment alternative but the financial returns aren't near as great as the outright buy. Where was FHFA when they were needed 2 years ago - playing spoiler now doesn't make sense. The agency should be disbanded.
Comment
5 of 5
November 16, 2010
Last week HUD/FHA did a conference call on their new PowerSaver Loan Program. It is a 2 year pilot starting in 2011 with no set portfolio limit.

$25,000, 100% LTV, 20 years, 2nd position. For a link to the recording visit: www.PVSolarSalesTraining.com/solarfinancing.php

To JFS's point above, the PowerSaver Loan Program feels like to provides financial institutions the revenue they want and 90% insurance against default.

One interesting point, the pilot will be judged by whether the home upgrades have a financial benefit to the homeowner and increase to property value. However, the criteria to get the data and evaluate it have not been established.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Jennifer Runyon

View Jennifer Runyon's Profile
About: Jennifer Runyon is managing editor of RenewableEnergyWorld.com and Renewable Energy World North America magazine, coordinating, writing and/or editing columns, ... more »

Advertise With Us

Admirals Bank Solar Energy International (SEI) American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE) Mannvit The Interstate Renewable Energy Council Richardson RFPD, Inc. 2GreenEnergy.com
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters