Our Magazines Article Archives
 

FIT for Ontario

By Colin Andersen, CEO, Ontario Power Authority
October 11, 2010   |   8 Comments

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
October 12, 2010
Bravo Colin and the OPA team. I am glad you're getting the word out on the success of your program.
No image available
Comment
2 of 8
Anonymous
October 12, 2010
Too bad the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development can't get its mind around products like Solyndra, and have not provided any indication that an assembly plant similar to that used for Crystalline panels would be acceptable under the 60% requirements for solar panels in 2011.

In a very quietly issued note, the OPA cut off the applications for rooftop solar under the 2010 Ontario Content regulations on October 8, while sending out the notifications to all parties on its contact list on October 9. Seems a bit underhanded, don't you think? So, only panels made in Ontario will be used on projects with applications after October 8, 2010. And where are these going to come from? There have been lots of announcements, but very little in the way of production of panels.

The Ontario government, and all of its departments and agencies, is completely screwing up the process of getting cutting edge technology into the renewable energy field. If it doesn't fit in their pre-determined box, no matter how innovative or cutting edge the technology, you don't get to play in Ontario's sandbox. Ontario will be installing crystalline silicon panels long after new technologies have taken the lead.

A structural engineer in Ontario told me that only about 30% of industrial roofs that he's been asked to review can meet the loading requirements because of the need for ballasted systems. So, we'll be getting lots of "nameplate capacity", but very little in the way of power production per roof, since the roofs will be lightly loaded, or the panels will be very nearly horizontal to minimize the ballast requirements.

Good luck to all of us in the renewables business in Ontario if the government can't open its eyes and ears to new and cutting edge technology.

Respectfully,

A disenchanted renewables developer.
Comment
3 of 8
October 12, 2010
It will be interesting to see the impact on the Canadian economy as consumers and small businesses start putting back the $2-300 per person savings, (after break even point) back into the local economies. The dollars coming from the sun's energy will certainly help pay for other ambitious programs.

http://www.cleanfleetreport.com/renewables/ford-focus-electric-car-plugin-hybrid/

The manufacturing sector should also step in and join in the savings.
Comment
4 of 8
October 12, 2010
The OPA has been working hard and should be commended.

Significant issues remain, however. The Ontario microFIT rate reduction sharply reduced demand for both rooftop and ground-mount.

http://d-bits.com/rate-drop-reduces-applications/

These projects benefit voters directly. While three-quarters of projects are now stalled for a lack of Transmission capacity, with no clear schedule to resolve the problem, the biggest challenge may come following next year's Ontario elections.

Regards, David (http://d-bits.com
No image available
Comment
5 of 8
Anonymous
October 12, 2010
I continually hear how important renewable energy needs to be "sustainable" and "fair to ratepayers". It seems 19,000 MicroFIT applications responding to the highest FIT rates in the world are not sustainable.

When too many angry rate-payers threaten to overturn elected government officials at the next election - this is also not sustainable. To stay in power, the government just changes the rules.

Since renewable electricity under FIT costs more that from a coal or nuclear plant, since Smartmeters and Time-of-Use pricing encourages conservation, and since more electrical infrastructure is needed to replace outdated equipment, every consumer is naturally afraid their electric bill will go higher.

The opposition will continue to use this fear to get enough FIT program cuts...until the program is a small fraction of its current size, which is sustainable and fair enough to ratepayers.

For renewable energy developers, this is a confusing time.
Comment
6 of 8
October 12, 2010
I agree - it is hard to see that the need for a sustainable and fair to ratepayer plan could be a 'lesson' from the program. Should that not have been a fundamental consideration from the outset?

Of course, ratepayer is old utility-speak for customer.

At one point, the OPA and MEI (now ME) boasted of the praises received from Deutsche Bank, "Two of the most advanced FiTs in our view at present are Germany and Ontario." That praise was wrapped in a very clear message - a need for TLC (Transparency, Longevity, and Certainty) in FIT programs.

http://d-bits.com/ontario-german-fit/

While even 19,000 microFIT installations will barely impact the 'ratepayer', what of the companies that are now investing billions to meet the Domestic Content Requirements?

How sustainable will their businesses be at a fraction of current interest? How temporary will the jobs be that they are creating?

Program 'Certainty' is being eroded by signficant program changes that are announced at 5 minutes to midnight on the Friday before a long weekend. This was the case for the notice on ground-mount rates, and again with last Friday's early switch to 2011 Domestic Content requirements.
Comment
7 of 8
October 15, 2010
I agree that come January 2011, with all the investments all of us who are in the solar industry in Ontario, now are going to leave it back to a monopoly? The only panel manufacture in the province is Canadian Solar? Wasn't the point of the province to stimulate the economy? If there was to have other name brand companies to invest in a new manufacturing plant it would be at least 2 year to get up and operational. Where does that leave the thin film market and the technology to be introduce. I think they have reached at point were the inverter and racking should be enough. I won't be surprised in 2011 Ontario sink in solar.
Comment
8 of 8
October 25, 2010
Nothiing but a bunch of bashers on here. True that the jobs may or may not be shortt lived. Germany has had a FIT for over 10 years now, thats half ones career, and Japan? Not bad.

Satcon has had manu in the province for some time, and Sustainable Energy Tech, one of Canada's longest standing inverter companies will be manu in Southern Ontario even after the FIT dries up.

To the person who says there is only one panel firm in the province. HAVE YOU NOT DONE ANY DUE DILIGENCE? THERE ARE TONS!!! I cant believe one would make such an uneducated comment on a public forum like that.

Either part of the problem or part of the solution. Thin film may or not be here.

Take care my friends.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
 

Advertise With Us

HelioSage 3TIER AEG Power Solutions KYOCERA Solar, Inc. groSolar Rolls Battery Engineering AWS Truepower, LLC
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters