Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Mighty Micros Make Their Mark: PV Inverter Scene Overhauled by Micros and the AC Module

By Chris Webb, Contributor
September 29, 2010   |   14 Comments
Central inverters may currently dominate photovoltaic installations but a distributed inverter architecture using either micro-inverters or AC-DC solutions is set to mount a growing challenge.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

With 26,000 subscribers and a global readership in over 170 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine is targeted at those who make growth happen in renewable industries. Covering policy, technology, finance, markets and more, Renewable Energy World magazine covers all technologies and all markets. Published six times per year, a special Directory of Suppliers Issue is published in July/August which is distributed year round at key renewable energy events worldwide.

14 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 14
September 30, 2010
Naysayers beware. When the architecture of a system is changed by an innovative component, whole industries can change. We were witness to a very similar phase in data network devices in 1994 when ALANTEC Corporation engineered the first "switching hub" in which each port in the hub was its own full wire-speed collision domain. "Huh?", you say? Well, before that, whole departments would share a single networking collision domain at 10Mbps, and a single-path router link would move data packets between them. The data packet traffic and throughput performance could get very ugly. ALANTEC changed he whole market, making "collapsed backbone switches" the norm in the industry. And now, the little "wireless router" in your home has a very similar architecture but delivers up to 1Gbps to each cabled desktop! The cost in 1994 was about $25,000 per 10Mbps port with 6 cable ports. Today, your home wireless router has 4 or 5 cable ports running at least 100Mbps each, for about $50 all told. Call it $10 per port. Sorry for the long-winded comparison, but it illustrates how a new architecture may become the absolute norm once it is adopted throughout an industry that desperately needs its costs slashed and performance increased.
Comment
2 of 14
October 1, 2010
Exactly when was this piece written. Much of it is obsolete. Two panel micros are not in the future - you can buy them now from Enphase. And the stated MTBF is now 331 years, not 119.
Small systems that are not standalones would be insane not to use micros. As for larger systems, the current expected price point for micros, once Enphase's monopoly is broken, is roughly 1/3rd their current price. THAT will have an impact on system suitability. But incorporation into the panels is the next logical step - that would reduce installation costs and further simplify what has become almost a plug-and-play technology. The remaining piece that needs addressing is the connection
between arrays and main panel. Those pieces, except for the conduit and wire, should be shippable as a kit. Paying over $40K for a paltry 5.6 KW system is insanity. That would bankrupt the country and accomplish nothing, certainly not the "energy independence" these scammers claim.
We don't make electricity using foreign (or domestic) oil these days
and half the oil we use has nothing to do with energy, a point "Greenies"
ignore, along with a host of other significant energy issues. Unless some intelligent thinking comes into the Green movement, it is headed for disaster - as a quasi-religion that believes nonsense and wastes tax dollars for no obvious benefit.
Comment
3 of 14
October 1, 2010
Micro-inverters have already become part of the design and delivered systems from several key suppliers, with a primary emphasis on smaller plug & play homeowner PV systems(as noted in the article). One example is www.greenraysolar.com .

Cost reduction, increased performance & efficiency, miniaturization of components, and simplification of procurement, setup and installation are all extremely important to drive adoption of distributed electricity generation. And, as noted in comments by "theBike", such improvements will make "alternative energy" a more economically feasible choice for adopters and policymakers in our government.
Comment
4 of 14
October 1, 2010
Other than the ones mentioned in here, there are several ther companies who also works seriously on this marvelous Micro-Inverter technology like; Array Converter, SolarBridge, Enecsys,GreenRay Solar, Azuray Technologies, Petra Solar,Direct Grid, Accurate Solar, OKE/SMA Netherlands, Exeltech, National Semiconductor, Larankelo.

The high-lighted ones are ENECSYS (Which is a U.K. company has already targeted to be Europe's number 1) and OKE (which was acquired by SMA 1 year ago and about to finalize the last tech-studies for the market.

In conclusion, competition has already began. And this will led us to almost-perfect products in the coming future.

Regards,

Eren ENGUR
erenengur@yahoo.com
Comment
5 of 14
October 1, 2010
I think we'll see the same outcomes as Westinghouse and Tesla's AC current beating out Edison's DC for the distribution grid in the 19th Century. If Edison had won, we'd have DC generating plants scattered every couple miles - otherwise the wires would be so thick you could pole mount them. There is plenty of royalty money to be made is someone can perfect the 'inverter on a microchip', giving it to capability to perform under Moore's law. Also, you gotta love that Enphase GUI. Isolating performance issues down to the panel is going to dramatically reduce O&M costs.
Comment
6 of 14
October 5, 2010
Spencer's andSfortuna's comments do give us the perspectives to meaningfully see the potential of Micro Inverters.

Eren engur, thanks for the list of companies striving in this space.

Hey Bike, you live, breathe Micro inverter and alternate energy or what? Thanks for updating us on some of the developments since the article was written.

I kind of like what Raghu Belur says about the cost of Micro and Central Inverters.

If it looks like what Raghu says at the very beginning of Micro Inverter's humble entry, 'The Innovator's Dilemma' has kicked in already. This is the bottom of the new 'S' curve of innovation.

But remember SMA has already bought a micro inverter company and is doing the tech-studies for the market.

Excitement in BOS!

Moore's play may at last begin in PV from the Power conditioning point of the value chain.

Heralding an Industry-Conditioning??
Comment
7 of 14
October 5, 2010
Back in the 70's, when centralized power was common in electronics (industrial controls, military systems, medical imaging, telecommunications, etc.), we bussed low voltage power (24, 15, 12,and 5 Vdc) to the electronics requiring it. The Distributed DC Power Bus Architecture took flight in order to improve efficiency, lower the cost of the runs and provide design flexibility at the load. It started with just a handful of companies addressing the Telecom Industry need for a battery backed-up, backplane power bus and grew into mainstream electronics. Today the DC bus has taken on several forms including Intermediate bus with Point of Load regulation and Factorized power.

The introduction of the Distributed DC Power Bus Architecture was as disruptive then as the Micro-inverter is today. The germination of the Micro-inverter phase change has started, however the evolution will be long in the tooth. The "module mounted" Micro-inverters we see today will give way to the next technology. There will come a time when the Automated Module production line will "drop" the power conversion (including monitor and MPPT) into the junction box before button-up. Module manufacturers will be power electronic manufacturers as well as customers. The large scale production and integration of the control and even some of the power functions will drastically reduce the price of "module mounted" electronics.

This evolution will also change the face of String and Central Inverters by providing the necessary MPPT at the module. String and Central scale inverters will adapt to the distributed MPPT due the advantages of the technology and the cost benefits of large scale automation. It has always been much less expensive to build hundreds of thousands of something on automated production lines than to build a couple by hand. String and Central scale inverters will always be built by hand, while Micro-inverters and distributed MPPT will not be built by hand. History will repeat itself.
Comment
8 of 14
October 5, 2010
Having designed and installed both string invertor systems and micro inverter systems on residential homes, I can tell you that the micro inverter system is so much easier and cheaper to design and install than the string invertors. Although the micro inverters do cost a bit more, they far outproduce the string invertor over the lifetime of the system. The item that seems to never be addressed residentially by the string inverter representative is warranty of the string invertor. That is a "surprise" to the owners when 10 years they have to replace the invertor. I advise my customers to do their homework and ask me any question they have concerning one system to another and I can give an answer that easy justifies the upfront cost increase of the microinvertor system.

As discussed in the article, if a single panel goes down in a string invertor line, the BOS is reduced and thus the effecientcies are reduced at the central invertor. The microinverter system will only lose the power output of the panel without effecting the other strings of panels output.

I believe with technology that microinverters will overtake the string invertor system in all applications shortly. Just as sfortuna had said above, Tesla had a far superior method to trasport electricity than Edison.

Jim Burpee
jimb@biggreenzero.com
Comment
9 of 14
October 5, 2010
Which inverter would work better for a carport solar setup?

It would be good to have a plug & play system for the new EV's.

http://www.cleanfleetreport.com/renewables/ford-focus-electric-car-plugin-hybrid/

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/virginiapolitics/2010/09/post_697.html
Comment
10 of 14
October 8, 2010
This development also solves the problem of co-linearity. Once solar panels come down sufficiently in price, you could have them on East and West facing roves as well as North facing (New Zealand). What is really exciting, though, is that you could coat all surfaces of an electric car with thin film panels and have all panels contributing their electricity to the battery without interference from each other. A rough calculation suggests you could get between 15 and 25km of electricity for a sun-day. Not bad for someone who drives, say, a couple of hundred kilometers per week.
Comment
11 of 14
October 11, 2010
Enphase has not yet entered into Europe, the North America market demand alone will be big enough to its current capacity.

Except above companies mentioned by Eren engur, Involar in China has been shipping its micro inverter to Spain, Italy, Czech and Greece in small volumes.

www.involar.com
Justin
justin.li@involar.com
Comment
12 of 14
October 20, 2010
You guys are crazy, currently enphase is just a transitional technology, towards ACPV, but how long will it take? Not too long since, Exeltech's is already on the CEC list making it eligible for rebates, all the trouble caused by the monitoring and mounting the inverters under the modules, and the added cost associated with them don't make them cheaper, or easier/faster to install, or more reliable. They already discontinued the 190 and a 200, what happens when peoples inverters begin to fail in a few years and the model isn't around anymore to replace it. A lot of unknowing consumers will be left to pay even more. Any claims of improvements are lost much more quickly in labor repair bills. I prefer to shield my clients from this inevitable long term nightmare, and keep the inverter in the shade, where I can see it and maintain it. Newbies, you'd believe anything with the right marketing campaigns won't you? How many of you have actually been on a roof anyways? I find the install to be more complicated not less, messing with the additional work of mounting th inverters under the scorching modules and data/branch/trunk cables, that cost extra, causes us to be on the roof twice as long. Never again, string inverters are not hard to install by any means.
Comment
13 of 14
November 23, 2010
I believe add on micro-inverters are a transition phase to true AC modules. Once AC modules are out in force who will want to bother installing a DC module and a micro-inverter as separate components with all the extra work that involves?

Watch out for what some manufacturers are currently advertising as AC modules. Mounting a micro-inverter to the back of a DC module and pre-wiring the DC conductors does not make an AC module. These modules still have to comply with all the DC requirements in the NEC. A true AC module will have no exposed DC wiring and will not have to comply with the DC code requirements.

While micro-inverters can reduce the DC BOS part count keep in mind that combining the AC outputs can get expensive because of the NEC requirements for sizing AC panels with more than one source. This is not an issue on residential and small commercial systems but is a big issue once you hit 100kW or so.

Watch out for those MTBF numbers. Even with an MTBF of say 300 years that means that if I have 300 units that I will be replacing on average one a year. So for a fixed mount 100kW system I might be replacing one or two a year and it will probably be my biggest maintenance item in the system. Since they generally come with good monitoring systems it will at least be easy to find the ones that have failed and they are cheap so I can keep some spares on hand.

Also know that MTBF is not an estimate of a device's projected life span. I can make something that only lasts a year and it can still have a MTBF of 1000 years. That just means that during the year it works it probably won't fail. If I have a central inverter with an MTBE of 30 years and a projected life of 15 years I have a shot at getting the 15 years out of it without a failure.
Comment
14 of 14
November 23, 2010
Marvin and Ryle, your comments seem to imply that an "ACPV" module of the future will contain no microinverter. I am not a PV industry insider or expert, but it seems to me that this is just splitting hairs, since a PV module is inherently a DC device that requires an inverter to supply AC power. So, a "true" ACPV module will, I presume, be one which can most completely hide the embedded microinverter from wiring access or visibility to the user?

My earlier comment (first one in this thread) was meant to recognize this miniaturization trend as the key factor in architectural adaptation leading to cost reduction, simplicity of design, and increased ease of installation. So, it looks like the degree to which the PV industry succeeds in approaching an ACPV "ideal module" will be all about these goals.

And it is not all rosy. Marvin and Ryle do make some excellent points regarding tradeoffs concerning AC vs. DC wiring, etc. Back in February, responding to Miles Russell's article on the rise of ACPV, Marvin stated it this way:

"You gain by removing the DC side wiring but no one addresses the problems in AC combining, particularly in light of the NEC requirements that end up making any AC combining panels double oversize with the resulting increase in cost.

Yes the AC side will be lower voltage but lower voltage will result in an increase in current as the systems scale. This increase in current will result in having to use larger conductors and equipment. This is not a problem on smaller systems but will be on larger systems."

Well said, and these will be essential development challenges for which engineers and system designers will find solutions. These problems, too, will pass.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With over 50,000 subscribers and a global readership in 174 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine covers industry, policy, technology, finance and markets for all renewable technologies. Content is aimed ... more »

 

Advertise With Us

Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Solmetric Corporation Prudent Living, Inc. Johnson Controls, Inc. Solar FlexRack SCHOTT Solar PV, Inc. ONTILITY Solar Training
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters