Our Magazines Article Archives
 

U.S. Geothermal Repowers and Expands in Nevada

By Ted J. Clutter, Contributor
August 26, 2010   |   8 Comments
Setting out to rebuild and nearly triple the output of an obsolete 3.6 MW binary power plant 100 miles north of Reno, plans call for adding a new facility that will lift total production to 35 MW.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
August 27, 2010
Clean energy.
Jobs.
Cuts down on the amount of money going overseas for imported oil.
What's not to like about geothermal?
Comment
2 of 8
August 27, 2010
In theory on paper geo is a good idea . Here's the downside . This will cause an earthquake . and 4000 gpm of cooling water ? in Nevada, hmmm. Fracture drilling ? Oh well it was already a wasteland right ? There must be a better way.
Comment
3 of 8
August 27, 2010
Good story, Ted; thanks for writing it. I was tickled by your choice of words when you talk about the unit as "vintage." The USG work at San Emidio looks, to me, like a textbook case study of doing things the smart way. See you around.
Comment
4 of 8
August 27, 2010
This is bad. Instead of the consumer getting tax breaks to help their economic situation, the monopoly utilities grow stronger by using a renewable method, that the average consumer can't partake in. Rates are under control by the utility. Will any savings be passed on?
The terms (side deals cut) between the installer and the utility are usually top secret (why?). Oh yeah, its a trade secret...
It's just another method of a monopolistic enterprise (Bank, Oil, Car, Utility), keeping the status quo going by keeping the average consumer at the mercy of their pricing.
C'mon America, you can do better than this. Get the FIT's going strong so the average consumer ties into the natural resources. Electric cars are around the corner - don't let the utility set the cost of this fuel/energy. Do it from your homes.
Quit using DOE funding for big business. Consumers should be able to tap energy resources (and funds) on an equal basis.
Comment
5 of 8
August 27, 2010
edward - It's faulty logic on your side to assume that just because they drill there'll be an earthquake. I live in Nevada and our fault lines have been well documented for decades. That's one of the reasons we were able to get the Yucca Mountain project abandoned - it sits over an active fault line.

electric38 - You're right. The utilities and developers are getting the tax breaks because THEY are building the facilities. Will savings be passed on? Hopeful, but doubtful. Hey, it's been that way since the days of Solomon and no wishful thinking is going to change it. You want to break that status quo? There's only one way - go completely off-grid. Get yourself solar thermal, solar panel, wind turbine, and, if possible, ground thermal units installed for your home then cut the cord to the local utility.

And no, consumers will not be able to tap energy resources on an equal basis with big business. Unless you can build your own 35MW Geothermal station in your back yard. Welcome to reality.
Comment
6 of 8
August 27, 2010
I haven't heard of any disaster, major or even minor that's related to exploration and operation n of geothermal energy. The steam is re-injected into the ground and there's basically no exhaust. A little bit of hydrogen sulfide which will come out of the surface anyway with or without geothermal exploration.
Comment
7 of 8
August 29, 2010
The pro nuclear people are always saying that geothermal will produce earthquakes, but they have yet to produce any evidence of earthquakes that geothermal have produced. There is a lot of evidence that nuclear can and will produced deadly results and is dangerously polluting. Why don't we take the funding set aside for nuclear and put it into geothermal? If a terrorist hits a geothermal plant, the only thing that will happen is the terrorist will get some stink washed off them; if they hit a nuclear plant, it can wipe out a whole city. It seems to make good sense to go with and stay with geothermal.
Comment
8 of 8
September 2, 2010
Geothermal, PNM/EPRI foil reports, has the highest Heat Rate of 29,050 BTU/kWh of any electric production technology.

Attendee at PNM electric integrated resource planning session reported that geothermal pollutes from minerals contained in water.

See the foil here.

http://home.comcast.net/~bpayne37/eprishumard/eprishumard.htm#specker
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World North America

With 30,000 subscribers, Renewable Energy World North America serves the renewable energy industry, including power generating utilities, local or central governments, energy advisory or planning agencies, manufacturers of... more »

 

Ted Clutter

View Ted Clutter's Profile
About: No information is available on this author at this time. more »

Advertise With Us

Solar Power International 2011 Solmetric Corporation Solar Energy International (SEI) Renewable Energy World Asia Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Natural Power Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters