Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

The Best Peak Oil Investments: Why Invest for Peak Oil?

By Tom Konrad, CFA
August 31, 2010   |   10 Comments
...and Why Not Invest in Oil Companies?

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

10 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 10
Anonymous
September 1, 2010
The lack of any common understanding of energy costs as evidenced by the range of comments appended to this article is astonishing. Renewable energy cannot be the least-cost and the highest-cost energy generation source at the same time.
In fact, utilities, politicians, and the press consistently compare 50-year-old, fully-depreciated, no-pollution controls coal plants with the cost of generation of new renewable plants.
The Prairie State coal plant in Ill is not even completed yet and is 120% over budget (@$4.4 billion) with projected rates coming in at $63/Mwhr; the KCP&L coal plant is 48% over budget at $2.2 billion and still building.
Comparisons to coal are virtually irrelevant for Solar which performs more like "peaker plants", which when powered by Nat Gas cost more like $400/Mwhr on peak. Coal plants don't "peak".

Keep up the good education efforts, and let's encourage readers to maintain an open mind!
Comment
2 of 10
September 1, 2010
Tom - You're a little off on your comments on speculators. They don't just "buy low and sell high". What they were selling were the Futures on oil prices. THAT is what jacked up the prices - they were hanging paper based on futures.
Comment
3 of 10
September 2, 2010
Douglas,
The same argument I applied to speculation in the spot market applies to speculation in the futures market. A oil future is a contract to buy or sell oil at a specified future price and date.
When a speculator buys a future, he is entering a contract to buy oil at a fixed price and future date.
When a speculator sells a future, he is entering a contract to sell oil at a fixed future price and date.

Oil future buyers can increase the price of oil because the entity on the other side of the trade may buy oil in the spot market and store it in order to meet his future obligation to sell.

Oil future sellers can decrease the price of oil because the entity on the other side of the trade will not need to buy oil today to meet future needs, because he now knows he will receive oil at a specified price at a future date.

In short, buying futures can raise the spot price of oil, while selling futures can lower the spot price of oil, just like buying and selling oil itself on the spot market raise and lower the price of oil.

So the entire argument given in the article about the oil spot market applies to oil futures: in order to make money, a futures speculator has to buy futures when oil prices (and oil futures prices) are low, and sell oil futures when prices (of both oil and oil futures) are high.

So *successful* futures speculators dampen volatility the same way spot market speculators do. I left the added complexity of the futures market out of the discussion in order to make the argument clearer.

And, before you bring up other financial instruments, such as options on oil, or options on oil futures, they, too, work the same way.

If a financial instrument increases the demand (and price) of oil, it will act like buying in the spot market (and successful speculators will buy it when oil prices are low, and sell it when oil prices are high.) The opposite holds for financial instruments that increase supply or reduce demand.
Comment
4 of 10
September 2, 2010
Good article, Tom!
You certainly nailed the blame-the-speculators approach that's so popular with the prostitutians. Of course, when the topic is (big) oil, some are capable of believing anything, and logic is no limitation.

Not sure using BP as a yardstick for Big Oil is a valid argument. Under Lord Brown's (mis)management BP cut a lot of corners, you know the new American business model: worry about THIS quater, leave the long term for someone else. I don't think other oil companies are quite than reckless. Any oil producer (pumper, not refiner) would stand to gain much from "Peak Oil." Not only would they pocket HUGE profits from high oil prices, but they would also be able to invest in any workable renewable fuel. And, with oil (i.e. energy) prices high, they would have every incentive to do so. So get used to it: renewable fuels brought to you, at a handsome profit, by Big Oil. Why wouldn't you invest?

Can't say I'm comfortable with most of the investments you recommend:
1. Hydrogen?!?: Sure, take your precious, clean energy and convert it into an intermediate that is expensive to store and transport (and always will be, due to its properties) and see how that competes on the free market. Until your first storage facility goes BOOM. Not to mention, as most hydrogen currently comes from natural gas, this is no carbon-free fuel.
2. Biofuels: Well, who does not hope that biofuels succeed? Problem is they have yet to do so, even with generous help from Uncle Sam. It is a brave investor who puts his money into that.
3. Synthetic Fuels: See #2.
4. Algae: See #2. Multiply concerns by 10.
5. Electricity: While electricity might benefit, the benefits would be indirect. And seeing as most electricity comes from fossil fuels, its hardly guaranteed to be a money-maker.
6. High tech gadgets that reduce congestion: Not so sure cash-strapped customers would flock to these. The internet can do much of this, for free.
7. Vehicle efficiency and natural gas: BINGO!
Comment
5 of 10
September 3, 2010
coenraad-
Regarding your comments about the various investments, you probably should have clicked through to the articles before "disagreeing" with me. We agree on your 1-4, and only partly disagree on your 5-7. I'm surprised you did not address alternative transportation such as mass transit, bikes, and buses, though, since I think those are the best bets.
Comment
6 of 10
September 3, 2010
Yes there are many "definitions" for peak oil. That's because the peak oil "expert" predictions have continually flopped. The whole idea of investing because of some bugus theory is nonsense. And yes the run-up and blowout of oil prices in 2008 was from speculation. There was never any question of supply not meeting demand. US oil stocks are now the largest they've ever been since records have been kept. Proven oil reserves continue to grow. And oil demand in the US IS going down, contrary to your speculations. And could possibly KEEP going down, with the advent of EVs. That Chinese and Indians (with their low wages) will all of a sudden start driving Hummers is absurd.
Comment
7 of 10
September 3, 2010
"There was never any question of supply not meeting demand."
Not? Instead of shouting, let's look at the numbers, courtesy of EIA, demonstrated graphically at:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_yr3xF4J1UVg/SDVfxAwJk2I/AAAAAAAAAXE/8I6arHUlslQ/s1600-h/Oil+Supply+and+Demand.jpg

So, it ain't the speculators.

I agree that I won't base my investment strategy on the theory of Peak Oil (just yet). The main challenge that I see is that when oil prices go up, Americans tend to cry like babies (even supposed lovers of the free market). In a democracy, crying voters make prostitutians nervous. "We have to do SOMETHING!"

Of course, that something usually make things a lot worse, as Mr. Nixon demonstrated in the 70s.

So don't worry about oil markets. Be very affraid of Washington. That should be enough for you to at least consider what you might do...

Tom: My bad, I interpreted your mentioning as support. Limited time and all that.

"I'm surprised you did not address alternative transportation such as mass transit, bikes, and buses, though, since I think those are the best bets."
Not sure I'd call them "best bets", although "bets" is a good description. Much as I HOPE to see these alternatives take root, I don't BELIEVE it strongly enough to invest in them.
Comment
8 of 10
September 3, 2010
John B- I'm glad you consider peak oil a "bogus theory." It's always nice to have someone who's willing to take the other side of the trade.

Coenraad- Agreed that peak oil is not enough to base your whole investment strategy on... I consider it an investment theme that helps me decide which companies to evaluate using conventional criteria. My most precious commodity id the time and effort it takes to value companies. So I use peak oil (and climate change) as investment themes that help me choose where to look for companies that I consider good value. My favorite places to look for companies that are good values are: Alternative transport, electric transmission and distribution, and energy efficiency.
Comment
9 of 10
September 22, 2010
Tom------I think you make some serious underestimates for natural gas in the article linked to on Alt Energy Stocks.

First, you give a C to EVs for fueling infrastructure, and an F to natural gas vehicles. Well, now for the rest of the story(as Paul Harvey would have said). EVs have LONG recharging periods---all the energy to get anywhere and back has to be stored over a period of time. The storage is a function of time. The energy with NG is already stored--the transfer takes only a few seconds. You can fiddle around with the time factor by increasing input with EVs---Tesla cuts recharge time but it comes at the price of an extra $14,000 investment in equipment----AND it requires 660V/70A current draw----industrial grade stuff. A homeowner would need to invest in a whole new electrical input from a line transformer. Something that many homeowners would not be able to get even IF they had the money to do, it could get caught up in all kinds of permit, zoning, and other problems. Generally speaking, that kind of power line is not available in residential neighborhoods even if you could afford to have it installed.

NG has home compressor units available for overnight filling from a household NG hook up. A bit pricey---but, considering the cost difference between equal amounts of energy from NG and petroleum, it could pay back quickly depending on individual drivers mileage. It would be suited for someone who does a long commute for instance.

Climate/Environment---you rate it D with no explanation. I gather you came up with that because it is a fossil fuel. Well, NG(methane)is both a fossil fuel, and a biofuel. Same stuff, methane. Fossil and biomethane can be mixed in any proportion with no loss of performance. And we can make biomethane out of any type of organic matter---even sewage and landfills. Not only that, if we mix 6% biomethane with fossil methane--we get AGW neutral emissions.
Comment
10 of 10
September 22, 2010
I think you have completely missed the hands down winner in the group.

NG can replace petroleum. We do not need to restructure anything. It can be used alone, or in combination with biofuels and/or petroleum. Just flip a switch. Most natural gas vehicles can run on either liquid or gas fuel.

The bulk of the distribution infrastructure is in place already---and the consumer outlets can be added almost overnight by local gas utilities.

And, using NG opens up the possibility to run our vehicles on free solar energy by displacement from heating/cooling buildings and water with solar thermal energy that is low cost/low tech and easy to store.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Tom Konrad

View Tom Konrad's Profile
About: Tom Konrad is a financial analyst, freelance writer, and policy wonk specializing in renewable energy and energy efficiency. He manages green stock market portf... more »

Advertise With Us

Green Power Conferences Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. Renewable Energy World Africa SunWize Technologies HelioSage SolarEdge Technologies Westinghouse Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters