Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Solar Array Design: Parallel Wiring Opens New Doors

The advent of parallel wiring architectures for solar arrays promises to create new levels of freedom and flexibility for designers.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
21 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 21
August 30, 2010
Can you put that in layman's terms? How many solar panels will I need on a six bedroom house, and what will it cost at today's market price?
Comment
2 of 21
August 30, 2010
Plus, what state will I have to move to before I can use solar panels? Right now, I live in West Virginia.
Comment
3 of 21
LAG
August 30, 2010
Is there a manufacturer for this technology? Looks to me as though it does the work of the MPPT software in the inverter. As it stands, designs call for both Parallel and Series circuits in PV arrays. Can't see how we can get the correct voltages for inverters without strings in series.
Comment
4 of 21
August 30, 2010
OK, so you seem to have multiple DC-DC converters all feeding one DC-AC inverter. I can see how that could optimize the efficiency of the inverter, but is the efficiency gain at the inverter sufficient to outweigh the efficiency hit in the DC-DC converters?
Comment
5 of 21
August 30, 2010
Hi:

Yes, I would second the last comment. Using allot of small devices to off-load the voltage reg function of the main inverter, I would doubt is as efficient as letting the main inverter handle the function.

All the text you spend on talking about how the physical layout is dependent on the wiring, I find odd, to say the least. At least from a strict electrical perspective, the physical layout has nothing to do with the series/parallel arrangement of the modules. At most you have physical changes in the wiring layout, may have to run longer here vs there etc..
If all wiring has to be inter-module or is limited by code as to its ability to be externally run, then I can see the "physical" problem. Don't have that info to know if that's a problem or not...

.....Bill
Comment
6 of 21
August 31, 2010
James,

The size of the system is predicated on your monthly energy usage not the size of your home.

I suggest contacting your local solar company and have them come out and take a look at your home.
Comment
7 of 21
August 31, 2010
Guess it depends on the economics vs a microinverter. I'd be interested in those comparative numbers when available. Axismail@verizon.net.
Comment
8 of 21
August 31, 2010
see here for mention of paralexsolar inverters which use parallel wiring
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Sustainable-Energy-Teams-With-Mitsubishi-Electric-Voltaire-Power-Offer-Integrated-Solar-TSX-VENTURE-STG-1274134.htm
Comment
9 of 21
August 31, 2010
At last year's Solarpower Int'l in Anaheim I spent some time at the http://www.solaredge.com/ booth where they use such an approach. To me it looks like it tackles some real problems with the standard inverter model. The crux is the actual lifespan of the electronics that have to be placed under each panel. The certainly are spec-ed to meet very high standards (as in the auto industry). Hopefully it will prove itself.
Comment
10 of 21
August 31, 2010
Excellent article - thanks. The benefits are very well explained.

Definitely need DC-DC converters for a parallel benefit. One solution could be micro-converters (like a micro-inverter). The 230 Watt example, though, is at the limit of a number of current solutions. And, micro-converters may not be the most economic alternative.

It would be better if the DC-DC converter was used for the 'units' blue boxes in the diagram. As AndyR notes, it does need to be high efficiency - capture all the gains without conversion loss.

Rich, I believe that ARDA Power, for example, has such a solution that does operate at high efficiency.

Regards, David (http://d-bits.com)
Comment
11 of 21
August 31, 2010
I can see this "new" method as a way to design for a large commercial power producer. This method though is not as useful for residential installs as a micro-nverter system that basically converts DC power to AC at the panel. The micro inverters are connected together in parallel right at the panel and can have 1 - 15 panels connected together on a single 20A breaker. So therefore the need to "balance" the system is removed. The micro-inverters do cost about 5% more than an equivalent string inverter but they do out perform them for energy production over time. There are pros and cons to both sides of which inverter type is best and each has a place, but a micro-inverter sytem for a residential install is the easiest, provides the most output and has a longer warranty.
Comment
12 of 21
August 31, 2010
Right on. Always thought this was the way to go. For me, it is already in "layman's " terms. Makes good sense and should also allow upgrading an existing system by being able to integrate existing panels and the new without have to develop entirely new architecture.
Comment
13 of 21
September 1, 2010
The product what Mitramax Energy Private Limited in India offers is much more with quality and price that will surprise you!
We call it Intelligent Energy Controller, IEC, that fits behind any PV Solar Panel…We offer such ready to use integrated PV modules from 100Wp to 300Wp ;
IEC converts all Mono and Poly modules to have same constant power output characteristics over a specified output voltage range up to 300V DC..
All such panels of either type and of any Wp and Vp can be hooked in parallel with each panel delivering its peak output..
Comment
14 of 21
September 1, 2010
Thanks Michael, a good article. Now I would like to see you do a comparison of micro-inverters with the technology you have explained . (Efficiency, cost, reliability, simplicity etc.) Here in New Zealand we have a 230 V 50 Hz system. Apart from a reduction in I2R losses wire size for wire size and W for W probably slightly biasing the results towards micro-inverters I suspect it doesn't affect the argument much.
Comment
15 of 21
September 1, 2010
Educationally, it doesn't matter how big your home is. What matters is your use of power in the home. If you have teenagers with stereos blasting, hair dryers blowing, TV's blaring, computers crunching away, you will use a lot more power than two folks, simply watching the evening news in the same size home.

Do you have CFL or LED lighting? That alone will drop your usage by up to 20%. Incandecent bulbs will no longer be sold soon, for that very reason.

Electric heat? Gas cooking? All these matter and add up. I have seen a 6 bedroom home use less power than a two bedroom bungalow. Why? Insulation and energy usage.

So, the size of your home does not matter. The way you use anergy and your habbits does.
Comment
16 of 21
September 1, 2010
It is a good point and would be good for charging lithium batteries. Not only for the home, but for electric vehicle and robotic use. The more power (volt/amp) versatility, the easier it becomes to make the batteries swappable. Some will be in use, while the others are trickle charged.

It would also alleviate the big utilities problem of powering the grid and associated transmission problems, as consumers will be drawing directly from renewable energy sources instead of the grid.

In a worldwide shared renewable energy grid system where one side sleeps while the other produces, this versatility also comes into play.
Comment
17 of 21
September 2, 2010
The crazier thing is that we convert DC to AC and then most of the devices in the home immediately reconvert the AC back to DC. A much better solution would be a pure DC system.
Comment
18 of 21
September 2, 2010
Hi everyone, great questions. I wanted to address the efficiency question, raised by Andy and William.

While there is some loss in the DC-to-DC conversion process, the eIQ Energy vBoost converter typically achieves 98 percent efficiency. And much of that loss is made up for by better efficiency at the inverter, which sees a constant optimized voltage and so is always operating at its best performance levels.

Moreover, there are the additional benefits of running the array's power bus at a higher voltage, which reduces the I2R losses suffered by the system.

More broadly, there are also significant gains from moving MPPT off the inverter and onto the DC-to-DC converters. This provides finer MPPT and better energy harvest through variable environmental conditions. And our regulated voltage boost makes life much easier for the central inverter.

System efficiency questions must be analyzed on a project-by-project basis, and can vary based on a number of factors. But in the year since vBoost came on the market, every case we have seen has been a net positive for the parallel approach.

Thanks for reading the article, and please keep the questions and comments coming!
Comment
19 of 21
September 2, 2010
Probably the best feature of some of the module-specific MPPT controllers is their ability to shut down every module output when the disconnect is thrown and the inverter shuts down... firefighters and the NEC 2011 rules will like this a lot. 600VDC of the roof? Let it burn. Oh, your insurance? You're not covered. This control can't come soon enough.
Comment
20 of 21
September 7, 2010
There is an inverter (SUNERGY) on the market made in Ontario for the FIT requirements which addresses two very important issues. It offers a solution for partial shading due to rooftop obstructions such as HVAC systems, antenna, poles, etc.

Two issues that Sunergy can help resolve - high voltage and dirt (lost of revenue) It comes in models that work with Thin Film as well as crystalline modules and is the only inverter that is rated for extremely low outdoor temperatures.

Sunergy operates at the lowest possible voltages for maximum system safety and its parallel design allows for any dirt and soiling issues to be isolated to small strings, or with thin film each module operates individually.

This allows for maximum energy harvest.

The inverter information and specifications can be found at paralexsolar.com or sustainableenergy.com

Well worth looking into.
Comment
21 of 21
September 24, 2011
Currently series string wiring still remains most effective in producing reliable long lasting power. High Temperature's creates amperage inefficiencies. Inefficiencies are less reliable in making consistent power.
DC-DC converters are not a cost effective benefit VS. over sized conductors used for High Voltage series string systems. Converters create a new point of failure for PV systems that are warrantied for 10 to 20+ years
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World North America

With 30,000 subscribers, Renewable Energy World North America serves the renewable energy industry, including power generating utilities, local or central governments, energy advisory or planning agencies, manufacturers of... more »

 

Advertise With Us

SolarNexus Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) Maritime Geothermal EnPower Systems Inc. North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners Kipp & Zonen Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters