The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, June 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

New UK FIT Spurring PV Market Growth

Jackie Jones, Renewble Energy World Consulting Editor
July 14, 2010  |  23 Comments

Print

Cornwall, the region in the far southwestern corner of England that is associated for many with images of cream teas, fishing boats and childhood seaside holidays, now appears set to lead the UK into new territory: solar farming. According to Ray Noble of the Renewable Energy Association, more than 40 planning applications are about to be submitted for ground-mounted PV systems up to 5 MW in size in this county alone. And the new feed-in tariff – introduced in April this year – will ensure that they generate not only power, but a steady stream of income.

And it’s not just in Cornwall that potential sites are being investigated, but right across southern England, much of which enjoys insolation levels at least as good as those in northern Germany.

With the UK’s new feed-in tariff (FIT) carefully designed to provide gentle, long-term (25 years) support largely to rooftop PV, it is perhaps curious that the opportunity to develop solar farms might be being seized on so readily. As one industry expert said recently: “This interest in large systems is not what the government intended!” Meanwhile of course, the changes in Germany’s feed-in rates make new ground-mounted solar power plants there much less attractive – and perhaps mean there will be a lot of expertise, and investors, looking for new pastures. Those pastures could be in the UK.

At Solarplaza’s “UK PV Conference,” which took place in London in late June, more than half of the participants were potential investors, developers or manufacturers looking to enter – or at any rate explore – the UK market. The message they received from the UK solar veterans was that there is plenty of room; the market has so much scope for growth that, as one speaker put it, “we need all the help we can get” in achieving it.

The FIT in the UK was primarily introduced to stimulate microgeneration and is capped at 5 MW (wind power of 5 MW and above, for instance, is still stimulated by a quota system, the Renewable Obligation). The FIT for PV is designed so that – where power is produced and used on-site – there are three benefits. First, the consumer saves money on the electric power they would have purchased. Second, they receive the generation tariff, paid whether the power is used on-site or exported to the grid. Third, they receive an export bonus set at 3 pence [US $0.0X] per kWh (with an opt-out clause in case system owners wish to negotiate a better rate with a power company). The rooftop rates are higher than those for ground-mounted systems, ranging from 41.3 pence per kWh [US $ 0.62 or 49.8 eurocents] for retrofit systems of 4 kWp or less, down to 29.3 pence per kWh [US $0.44 or 35.3 eurocents] for rooftop systems between 100 kWp and 5 MWp, whether retrofitted or on new build (this is also the rate for ground-mounted systems).

The FIT was designed to provide return on investment in the 5-8% range, which is generally expected to give payback periods of about 12 years. According to Jeremy Leggett, the FIT was not supposed to offer sufficient incentive for utilities and developers to become seriously involved. While the UK has a commitment to produce 15% of its total energy (not just electricity) from renewable sources by 2020, the target is for 700,000 households to have some kind of electricity producing microgeneration installed by 2020, expected mostly to be solar. Policymakers expect all the FIT-eligible technologies combined to supply no more than 2% of UK electricity by 2020 – but this is neither a target nor a cap, and the government has indicated they would welcome a higher proportion.  (By way of calculation, installation of 700,000 3 kWp systems would be total rooftop capacity of 2100 MWp by 2020 – and the most recent UK building code for zero carbon homes requires all houses to generate 10-20% of their electricity on site.)

Yet industry experts think PV penetration levels could grow further, faster, than government targets. The European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA) estimated the market will grow to 20–40 MW in 2010, and 80–100 MW in 2011. Noble – who runs the Renewable Energy Association’s ‘Solar Power’ organization -- thinks that by 2012 the market will be in the range of 200–750 MWp.  And if that pace continued at a steady rate, by 2020 the market would reach more than 4000 MWp or 4 GW.

Money is No Object

With interest rates low and investor’s favourable outlook for solar, it’s likely that UK solar could prove highly attractive to pension fund investors and others looking for a long term, assured income – even if banks are still shy of financing. Several of the conference speakers agreed that finding investors for solar in the UK would not be a problem – as Solar Century’s Jeremy Leggett put it, there are “investors crawling out of Eurostar” (the high-speed train that connects Great Britain with continental Europe).

Leggett has calculated that – in certain circumstances – return on investment (ROI) on large ground-mounted systems could be over 16%. In fact, the Guardian recently reported that the proposed 2 MW facility at Cornwall’s Benbole Farm – which would be the first utility-scale solar farm in the UK – could have a yearly turnover of £700,000 [US $ 1 million] within seven years. According to the business plan, by year 25 of its operation the farm will have generated a total revenue of £13 million [US $19.6 million].   

In order to mobilize much of the potential investment, however, appropriate financial vehicles will be needed that enable institutional investors to invest on a sufficiently large scale, such as in multiple commercial rooftop packages and schemes.

While the financial community is apparently waiting to pour cash into UK solar, there are the usual, and some unusual, hurdles to cross.

Transmission, Permitting and Certification Causing Delays

As always, there are issues of transmission and distribution. The distribution network operators (DNOs) “need to be brought on side,“ said Noble – but mostly it’s a matter of overcoming their lack of familiarity with the PV generation and inverter technologies.  In his experience objections are usually quickly overcome with the right information.

In addition to transmission hurdles, there are permitting and planning challenges. In line with new planning legislation introduced by the previous (Labour) government, planning permission is no longer required for the siting of PV on rooftops (other than on so-called listed buildings – those of special historic or architectural interest). Noble says the planning situation for solar farms can be straightforward too – especially if a flat site is chosen, not overlooked from nearby hills, and preferably a brownfield site (i.e land that has previously been used for non-agricultural purposes).

And one tricky issue, which everyone agrees needs rapid streamlining, is the process for certification of products to receive the FIT in the UK market. The Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS) was designed to ensure that only high quality products enter the UK market, and only certified installers can operate, in order to protect the reputation of PV (and other renewable/microgeneration technologies). However, the MCS – essential for PV installations of up to 50 kWp, which will otherwise not qualify to receive the FIT – is causing headaches for various reasons. One is the sheer number of certifying bodies (and the wide-ranging fees and speeds at which they reportedly act). Another is the backlog created because so many manufacturers had not yet applied to have their products licensed for the UK market and are now seeking to do so. A further issue is whether the UK certification process is in fact contravening European legislation by acting as a market barrier, and whether products certified in other European member states should automatically be approved in the UK. Bodies such as the National Energy Foundation agree that clarification is needed, and say it is on its way.

Leggett warns against complacency, saying lobbying efforts must be continued to ensure that once the FIT has “bedded down,” current policymakers (a new government has come into power since the introduction of the FIT) continue to support it. Meanwhile, it seems the UK is finally serious about PV, and the PV industry is serious about the UK.

Jackie Jones is Consulting Editor, Renewable Energy World magazine.

23 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
November 15, 2010
AD for photovoltaics in Europe / South Italy.
Italy, Sardinia.
Number 6 sites already approved for the installation of central PV photovoltaic
500 kWp for a total of MW 3 kWp 3.000 Yield financial turnover and guaranteed for 20 years from the Energy Account,(Conto Energia)
and purchase of energy produced by the network operator.
Performance 10% of the annual financial investment .
If interested write to e-mail: mondomediale@email.it

Thanks for your attention
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
July 21, 2010
oldfarmer.
Can you contact me direct please on ferrand@madasafish.com Have a lot of initiatives/answers to what you say !
Sandy Henderson
Sandy Henderson
July 21, 2010
Many pertinent comments, but also a few examples of tunnel vision. Electricity is still only about 30% of total energy demand in UK. Also land use for food production seems to be taken for granted and the consequencies of irresponsible marketing not apparent to a public hooked on cheap food. Most solar energy is available in the summer months, which implies a storage problem if it is to play a significant role. Offshore wind is more than twice the price of on shore per unit of generating capacity, yet does not collect twice the energy. Worse still the turbines are inaccessible for more than 10% of the time due to high seas, which makes them a greater insurance risk. No question that the typical horizontal axis machine ( HWAT ) is more aerodynamically efficient than the presently developed vertical axis machines, in their optimal working wind speed range. However this may not remain the case for economic efficiency. VAWT's have more avenues available to improve both efficiency and cost per unit of power produced than HAWT's. Furthermore VAWT's may be more easily integrated into a hybrid with a wave power station, which should produce a downwind area of calmer water to allow access more of the time if sited offshore.In any event energy storage will need the same degree of commitment as generation.Garbage and sewage wastes are both sources of carbon which could be chemically treated with hydrogen from surplus electricity to make storable synthetic fuels. The by product oxygen from the electrolysis could be used for closed cycle incineration at high temperatures for efficient power generation and easier co2 capture. It requires joined up thinking and politicians to really listen to engineers.
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
July 20, 2010
Here comes the Integrated Solar Farm ISF. Solar array with hot water collection eg like that from http://www.solimpeks.com/en/index.php and rain water collection. Hot rain water to an algae bed for processing CO2 from the gas engine of an anaerobic digester system
Products for sale electricity and diesel fuel. ?
Viable chemical engineering project ??
kane hoffman
kane hoffman
July 20, 2010
I am a Solar installer in California, USA. We are presently receiving $.05 per kWh. You are receiving $.45 US dollars for ground mount systems. That is 9 times what we get. The Federal Government gives us a 30% of cost back through a grant program.
That just makes it like we receive about $.08 per kWh equivalent.
If your investors cannot make a good profit at $.45 per kWh then the installer of the system is taking too much profit and charging too much.
jg williams
jg williams
July 20, 2010
Sheep may graze and silage cut if the panels are carefully spaced. Further, regular income can be paid by the array owner into a rural parish trust to tackle rural poverty, generate rural jobs (reducing commuting to towns) and subsidising charities and voluntary organisations in keeping with David Cameron's 'Big Society'. The electricity can also be sold to the village at a discount to the retail price but at a higher price than the export price of 3p/kWh to the grid. Cheaper electricity will encourage job and energy intensive businesses such as laundries for the tourist industry (which are busiest in the summer in Cornwall), horticulture, potteries and business units using converted redundant farm buildings. Villages will prosper rather than act as soulless dormitories for the towns and cities; commuting will be reduced. The regular guaranteed and RPI linked income received by the parish trust for 25 years will be tax free and bankable should the parish wish to undertake capital investments for community projects. The panels can be removed at the end of the 25 years or replaced with more efficient, contemporary panels. Cornwall is one of the sunniest areas in the UK, with over 1541 hours of sunshine per year, with the highest average of 7.6 hours of sunshine per day in July (Met Office). This is 10% more sunshine than, say, Nottingham with 1,400 hours per year. The FITs are designed to incentivise 'Middle England'. Cornwall also benfits from having cool Atlantic summers which result in solar PV having higher than expected outputs during the summer when heat sharply reduces the efficiency of solar PV in places such as southern Spain.
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
July 20, 2010
Ron. In UK on shore wind at present is not popular, [we are a small and crowded island !!] and offshore is more costly per installed kWp than Solar.Albeit the latter has a lower efficiency. Much work is in hand to reduce Solar costs, little to reduce wind costs although there is considerable scope for this using a development of the 3rd Reich Wind Energy Ministry [1935-45] technology.

There are ways round installing inland wind so that it is not "intrusive" and Solar PV over car parks at supermarkets and railway stations can feed directly into users s circuits bypassing the grid, which for UK FIT rules is the most financially rewarding
Ron Peterson
Ron Peterson
July 20, 2010
After some research, I found that an ROC is a renewable obligation certificate and a polytube is a plastic greenhouse.

PV is expensive now and should be used where other sources of electric power aren't available. PV is more efficient in the use of land than growing crops for electric power generation. FIT puts PV where it's not economically efficient.

In the US, wind power is economically viable and will be more so with taller towers. The grid will be able to absorb 10% of the power from wind before storage or other load balancing solutions are needed.

I don't work for big oil and believe that we're at peak oil now.
Jackie Jones
Jackie Jones
July 20, 2010
Thanks for your comments everyone, and I'm not following up on all your points. But for those who have commented about land use issues, I'll just repeat one of the points in the article, that developments should be made on: "preferably a brownfield site", of which there are many.
I wrote the article as a reporter rather than an advocate of ground-mounted systems, yet while my personal preference is to see PV on rooftops and generally within the urban fabric (and especially the rooftops of large commercial buildings) I can see that the existence of large ground-mounted systems could help PV technology be taken seriously as a generator of useful power in the UK. Visually they are no more intrusive than tracts of polytunnels, and we are only looking at a lifespan of 20-25 years...
It would be interesting to follow up MushyPea's concerns about wildlife and ecosystems - I wonder what the experience has been elsewhere when a tract of land has been used for a solar farm. Does wildlife then flourish or is the land likely to be treated chemically to repress vegetation that would potentially shade the modules?
stephen browning
stephen browning
July 20, 2010
Hi there. I've argued for some time that ROCs are useless and the Feed in 'Reward' is not 'FIT' for purpose. In neither case do they carry time of day, day of week, or season of year variations and thus give the wrong message to developers and retail customers. To give some scale to the preceeding arguments, the Peak Demand in GB is @60000MW which will occur on a dark winter weekday evening. On high summer weekdays, the Peak is around 40000 on Summer weekday mornings.

And, looking at the returns. With the Chinese having halved the price of feedstock poly-silicon last year, for a 3kW installation (inc inverters and works) are we still talking £10k+. With the FIT at 41p/kWh for <4kW systems I see that the installers are doing good business.

However, has anyone got a £/wp figure for Thin Film (Cd-Te, CIGS) and a-Si installations??
Now, I thought that these technologuies have quite a high reduction of efficiency with temperature as compared to c-Si; (NOCT @47degC). However, I see from the Optech solutions site and careful re-examination of the data sheets I have from one a-Si distributor that amorphous performs better than TF or A-Si in this respect. Does anyone know of a complex weather databased model (inc panel surface temp taking account of air temperature and cooling power) that can derive annual energy returns for all panel types??

In the UK, the main initiative is big wind in the ocean. However, with a total of 33GW installed, the variability impact on conventional plant operation would be, frankly, unmanageable. So, a lot of initiatives are appearing for 'Big' storage; with multi-day and cross season capability.

I've got a number of articles on Future Power Systems, including the Smart Enterprise, out in the ether.
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
July 19, 2010
To The Mushy Pea,
See my comment re solar above car park bays in my post of 16 July. see also
http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/intelligent-energy/want-some-solar-power-with-you-electric-car/1967/
Alasdair Cameron
Alasdair Cameron
July 19, 2010
Hi Jackie.... while I am a big fan of renewables, and indeed the feed-in tariff (having solar myself), I am not too keen on large-ground mounted PV in places like the UK, for environmental reasons.

Land is very scare here (one of the most densely populated countries on the planet) and rural and undeveloped land is at a premium, from a recreational, wildlife and ecosystem services perspective ... these sorts of schemes run the risk of producing a major backlash against solar, and will produce relatively little energy..

The real advantage of solar in countries like the UK is to produce decentralised power in crowded, land-poor areas, not to subsidize major investors...

Still, no need to get too hysterical just yet, a few solar farms does not a problem make, and I suspect they will have fun and games with the planning...
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
July 16, 2010
Thank you author of comment 2. Re wind energy, work done by the 3rd Reich Wind Energy Ministry 1935-45 has never yet been properly followed up. In principle it removes all gearbox requirements, and due to "point suspension" of rotors should enable floating off shore units

At reported costs for large three bladed turbines off shore wind per kWp installed is about 50% more costly than Solar PV inland [figures from a 2008 report, may be higher now], but the latter has a lower efficiency. Work is in hand in UK to materially reduce Solar panel costs. In USA these are already down to under $1/Wp.
The consortium noted is to explore how costs for car park installations can be radically reduced - through component standardization and the like. The "fit" with Supermarkets looks promising, and I have cash flow and depreciation diagrams available for current costs which are also attractive, given FIT.
One of the largest PV installations so far is
http://www.co-operative.coop/aboutus/ourvaluesandprinciples/ourvaluesinaction/thesolartower/ installed I think in 2005. Perhaps you should ask them how it has got on ?
The point is that in the hands of a concern paying tax on it's profits, with a large own use of electricity and a large car park Solar PV under FIT rules is financially attractive as an investment
ANONYMOUS
July 16, 2010
Regarding Russell's remarks in comment #7: It seems just a bit paranoid to assume that everyone will an opinion differing from yours is an agent of the oil cartels. Also, it is overly simplistic to assume that solar PV even conflicts with the interests of the oil companies. Almost no electricity is generated with oil, most of the displaced demand would come from natural gas generation.
Steven
ANONYMOUS
July 16, 2010
In comment #8 Ferrand writes: "As regards Mr Anonymous comments on wind energy, the UK and indeed most of the world are not applying the most cost effective technology, especially offshore."
I am note quite sure what you mean by "not applying the most cost effective technology", but if true it would seem consistent with their interests in solar PV at exorbitant rates guaranteed for 20 years (although at least the car parks are an application that typically costs more than ordinary rooftop PV). Perhaps you would elaborate....

Incidentally, I prefer "author of comment 2" or "Steven" to "Mr Anonymous" which can be quite vague on a site with many anonymous comments and where people are thus forced to review all the prior comments if they want to know what point you are addressing (also, "Mr" is overly formal and Dr would be more accurate anyway).
Steven
ferrand stobart
ferrand stobart
July 16, 2010
Comment for David Ward. I am involved in setting up a consortium of UK manufacturers to place ground mounted Solar PV over large areas of land, on which nothing can be grown, CAR PARKS Those next to Supermarkets have the added attraction of a "customer" whose energy demands - for air conditioning and refrigeration - are highest in the Summer months.

For railway station car parks a direct feed into the rail electrics seems worthwhile. As would electric car charging points, so that the commuter can return in the evening to a fully functional vehicle.
If charging is fast enough, the same could apply to shoppers at the supermarket. A discussion is already on going with one chain here.

There are about 1.8 million car park bays in UK, The PV above each would be rated at about 2 kWp. Given the figure quoted above for the annual kWh potential gives a very large "source of electric energy ?

As regards Mr Anonymous comments on wind energy, the UK and indeed most of the world are not applying the most cost effective technology, especially offshore.
Russell Judge
Russell Judge
July 16, 2010
I am amazed at all the negative comments on renewable energy FIT's. Is Big Oil behind them? Three immutable facts 1) Oil is finite 2)We are running out of it 3) We will eventually have to switch over to renewable sources of energy. The only question is whether we can make a smooth transition or get banged in the head as we did recently when oil spiked at over $147/barrel!
martin walbank
martin walbank
July 16, 2010
As long as PV and WT's are only very minor periphral power sources there are few economic or system problems. But the need for 100% capacity rapid response backup increases the demand for, and reliance on, natural( non-renewable carbon based) gas standby generators. With growth such high FIT prices lead to cost increases for all users and, when the costs of the investment, maintenance, storage or standby capacity are added, the economic gain becomes negative leading to loss of jobs - 5 - 6 jobs/mWh installed power.
The current proposals make little economic sense. Such 20 or 25 years guarantees of high fixed FIT prices take no account of future improvements in PV efficiencies, storage technologies and distribution systems costs - a potential'licence to print money' and millstone around utility companies necks forcing them to buy an increasing proportion of their power at uneconomic prices. Despite reducing FIT tarrifs countries, France, Germany, Spain... who are far ahead of the UK in the proportion of RE have had to abrogate earlier contracts and cut FIT's to reduce power costs.
We seem to be being railroaded into renewable energy projects for the best of reasons, but with very little objective or accurate information to assess their longer term environmental and econmic outcomes.
David Ward
David Ward
July 16, 2010
For the benefit of Hugh Sharman: The normally quoted ouput for solar PV in Southern UK is 800-1000kWh per year per kWp, so capacity factor of 10-12%.

It weems to me that it is OK to install roof-mounted solar PV if you want to, but I feel it fundamentally wrong to install ground mounted solar PV, when that ground area could be used to grow plants/trees - Especially when that act is being subsidised by electricity consumers like me. Whatever happened to hopes for "grid parity"?
Hugh Sharman
Hugh Sharman
July 16, 2010
The key headline in the following article seems to be "Money is No Object"!

But nowhere in this intriguing article, can I read how much electricity all this capacity is going to generate. What is the capacity factor for UK PV?

Without this key figure, we cannot have any idea of the value for (scarce) money that these massive subsidies will deliver.
Darren Ogborne
Darren Ogborne
July 15, 2010
The performance of thin film PV modules have been shown to operate more effectively in lower light levels than cyrstalline Si types and may well be more suitable for the UK market - see www.optechsolutions.co.uk/page29.html
Thin film is also lower cost /Wp
ANONYMOUS
July 14, 2010
At 62 US cents/kWh too much "success" will cause energy prices to skyrocket. These are the types of prices one only pays when they are spending other peoples money (an FIT is a way for governments to reward a special interest group at the expense of ratepayers and without the transparency of taxes).

Also, peak power demand in the UK is usually during winter nights so solar PV does not even have the advantage displacing peaking power needs (as it does in the southern US). I don't see why the British would want to squander money on PV when they have an ambitious wind plan that always seems to be behind schedule and world-leading research into wave power. More funds for either of those programs would seem to be a better investment.

Steven
Tam Hunt
Tam Hunt
July 14, 2010
This is a very encouraging development and personally gratifying because I grew up in Cornwall when it was a very economically depressed area. It looks like we may soon be able to chalk this new market up as yet another success for feed-in tariffs.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Jackie Jones

Jackie Jones

Jackie Jones is a Consulting Editor of Renewable Energy World Magazine, and is based in the UK.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13 Residential Demand Spurs US Solar Installations in 1Q13
  • Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems Ocean Energy Development: Apply Common Sense to Common Problems
  • Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables” Severn Barrage “No Knight in Shining Armour for UK Renewables”
  • Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy Project Permit: Cutting Red Tape for Green Energy
  • Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options Solar CHP Innovations Offer Efficiency Kick, Future Energy Storage Options

Most Commented

  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 4
    Women in Power – It’s a Natural Fit
  • 4
    Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Not Just Clean, It’s Necessary
  • 3
    Big Apple Anticipates Solar Explosion for 2013

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Affordable Solar Group, LLC
  • US Solar Institute
  • Helios Solar Works
  • Trojan Battery Company
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
  • ASME - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • SolarEdge Technologies
  • Brightergy
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information