Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Salt Water: The Tangy Taste of Energy Freedom

By Jim Lane, Biofuels Digest
April 16, 2010   |   5 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
April 16, 2010
You are absolutely right: the scale of biofuels that would be needed to challenge Big Oil, or save the environment, makes any land-based system a waste of time. We are going to need to use all that open ocean area. And crank up primary production while we're at it. If we do it right, we might even increase marine food production, but that's getting ahead of ourselves a bit.

Nonetheless, some of the specifics in this article does should not go unchallenged.

-- "According to SES, growing seaweed in farms covering an area of just less than 0.05 percent of Europe's coastal regions would yield a yearly production of 75 million tons of seaweed." --
Hang on: we are using the ocean because we need all that area. This "0.05%" seems like utter nonsense.

-- "This biomass could be converted into an estimated 846 Mgy (3.2 billion litters) of ethanol." -- "...that will produce enough ethanol to replace 5 percent of Chilean gasoline consumption." -- "...will produce up to 396 Mgy of ethanol by 2020." --
Careful that you don't contribute to the mistaken idea that biofuel = ethanol. I'm sure Big Ag loves the confusion, and uses it to justify (even) more subsidies.

The fact is that ethanol (regardless of its origin) is a terrible fuel. It burns with a colorless flame, extremely dangerous - hence the current practise of limiting it to no more than 85%. In blends with gasoline it increases the vapor pressure, leading to increased losses and air pollution. It also absorbs moisture, leading to all sorts of storage and transportation "challenges". And if it absorbs enough water, the water phases out, leading to utter chaos, as should be obvious.

We can do better than ethanol. Get Uncle Sam's dirty (and mindless) hands out of the fuel business and we will: It is possible to produce green diesel and biogasoline - drop-in replacements for our favorite liquid fuels. This means it would be possible to have a smooth transition from fossil fuels to biofuels.
Comment
2 of 5
April 16, 2010
This sounds like a good idea overall, but where do they expect to find enough iron? sure, getting enough nitrogen and phosphorous for large populations of algae to photosynthesize can take little effort (especially with fertilizer runoff in various estuaries around the world), but what where do they place iron with the rest of the chemical nutrients added as its the most limiting of all the available resources in the ocean? With saltwater real estate being much less expensive overall, how do they see themselves working beyond the handicap of diffused micronutrients for micro-algae population multiplication as there will be so many salts available to react with the necessary chemical inputs?
Comment
3 of 5
CEA
April 19, 2010
As long as first and second generation biofuels remain, there will always be the food versus fuel debate. This will plague the effectiveness of the industry until more viable solutions are found. Salt-water based biofuels show tremendous promise and avoid many of these nasty issues. Of course the ethanol incentives may be diminished for agriculture. But one cannot not argue against the true savings at the pump if third generation biofuels become commercially available.
Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA's mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.
Comment
4 of 5
April 20, 2010
great article, but as you wade through, you get a sense yeah great research, but what in the field ?

Until now, only land-based biofuels are really getting produced, all the rest is " still pie-in-the-skye, see how it pans out . . ."

US Oil&Gas companies subsidy in 2009 : $36.5 billion.

Exxon NET profit in 2009 = $45 Billion

ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/06/exxon-tax/
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6103RM20100201
Comment
5 of 5
April 28, 2010
To solve North America's energy crisis and level the playing field for all types of energy sources, why not eliminate income taxes for all energy firms?

That way you can eliminate a costly to administer subsidy progam and ensure the best source wins.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Krannich Solar Inc. AEG Power Solutions Concepts NREC REC Solar FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division Solectria Renewables LLC Quick Mount PV
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters