The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Monday, May 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Renewable Energy Past and Present in California's Tehachapi

Herman K. Trabish, Contributor
April 20, 2010  |  10 Comments

The Tehachapi Mountains in central California's Kern County are a wind energy museum. Four generations of turbines are distinguishable on their slopes and ridges, with an installed capacity of more than 800 megawatts of wind power. These hills are alive with the sound of wind power. Kern was once known as oil country and its rich fields supplied much of the oil that made California the oil capital of the U.S back in the 1920s and fueled the U.S. industry's mid-20th century boom. As Ed Duggan of wind developer Oak Creek Energy said, "Kern County knows energy."

Kern knows that energy means wealth and so, as the last of its oil continues to play out, it is now turning excitedly to wind and sun and steam. On the bubble graphs of the most recent California Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI) report, no California bubble is even nearly as big with resource potential as the Tehachapi-Mojave area, and it is also among those positioned lowest in cost and least limited with environmental obstacles. (See map, below.)

Veteran Kern County planner Lorelei Oviatt isn’t even completely sure how much renewable energy development is currently in the works because the boom has spilled over into neighboring San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties. The rapidly expanding list of solar power project applications and plans includes as many as 63 developers because the Tehachapi-Mojave region’s insolation makes it one of the four best regions for solar development in the world.

The definitive amount of proposed or planned wind is equally hard to pin down. In total CEC data suggests there are probably over 40,000 megawatts of proposed renewable projects. That’s two-thirds of California’s grid capacity and enough electricity to power over 20 million homes.

One thing that is certain is that Terra-Gen is preparing ground for the first phase of its Alta-Oak Creek Mojave project and will soon begin putting up the first of 100 1.5-megawatt (MW) GE towers. Once the project is complete (in early 2011), it will boast 320 turbines of varying sizes and an estimated total of 800 MW of capacity. Many major wind developers including Alta Wind, Horizon Wind, Western Wind Energy, enXco and the L.A. Department of Water & Power are also making wind project plans.

Transmission, Too

That will only be the beginning. Windhub, an SCE transmission substation is being completed at the base of the Tehachapis directly across from the wind projects. It is expected to go online this year, completing the first 3 segments of SCE’s CPUC-approved 11-part Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP). It is an enormous undertaking that will ultimately carry 4,500 megawatts of wind, solar, geothermal and biomass power from the Tehachapi-Mojave area to the energy hungry Los Angeles region 200 miles to the southwest.

The Benefits of Being First to the Table

Kern’s foothill valleys have been, since the 19th century, ranch and farm country. But these days, ranchers and farmers are finding that sowing wind, solar and geothermal makes the economics of rural life more equitable, so Kern’s cattle now often graze nonchalantly beneath towering turbines.

Many developers have been in the region for years, some for decades. Newcomers benefit from the on-going public dialogue that started back in the 1980s.  After 30 years of development, everybody agrees where the right sites are, what the benefits of renewables are and what to expect when they see developers coming.

According to both SCE’s Kathy Hart and the Kern Wind Industry Association’s Linda Parker, the U.S. Air Force at nearby Edwards Air Force Base has been so impressed by renewables that it has its own ambitious solar installation plans.  

Kern County was one of the first places in the U.S. to realize that proper planning precludes conflicts. When landowners and economic development associations started exploring the possibility of profiting from the prevailing winds, they turned up issues surrounding Air Force flight paths, avian migration lanes, precious wildlife habitat and neighbors disdainful of turbine sounds and impediments to their vistas.

So the stakeholders got together and drew maps, redlining places where wind installations shouldn’t go, yellowing out places that might be problematic and greening in the places ideal for green energy and green profits. They also started petitioning, imploring and pushing for SCE to bring them new transmission.

Then in 2004 when SCE was thinking about how to meet California’s 2002 Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), it remembered Tehachapi and decided to sit down and make plans with the CEC, the CPUC, county commissions, environmentalists and developers.  It brought Kern country planner Oviatt, Oak Creek CEO Hal Romaonwitz and others who had been turning Kern County maps red, yellow and green for years to the table and from their talks, a detailed picture of a Renewable Energy Zone emerged. It became a veritable prototype for the kind of map a similar group of stakeholders drew up soon afterward for the CEC.

A Template for U.S. Renewable Energy Zone Mapping

The CEC’s maps evolved into California’s RETI, defining where the best and most economically accessible renewable resources are and what transmission routes most readily serve them. The still evolving RETI became the prototype for the Western Governors Association (WGA) Western Renewable Energy Zones (WREZ) Initiative. And that is essentially the template for maps the U.S. Department of Interior is now developing to streamline renewable energy growth and transmission development on the nation’s publicly owned lands.  SCE expects to be ready to establish TRTP interconnections this fall.

Herman K. Trabish is a writes and edits NewEnergyNews and is a regular blogger for RenewableEnergyWorld.com.

10 Comments

Register To Comment
Thomas Garven
Thomas Garven
April 26, 2010
@Gregor-Giebel:

I believe the same thing can be said about solar. When you calculate out the number of kW produced over the life of the system the cost begins to look very good.

Here in Arizona where we get lots of sun, the production cost per kW calculated over 20 years is significantly less than the current rate from our local utilities. The only draw back is the upfront cost which currently limits many people from installing solar. We could easily fix this with a very small change in the existing tax law by doing the following.

Currently a BUSINESS can take the full 30% Federal Tax Credit over several years OR as a CASH GRANT in the year the system is installed and they get the money in 60 days.

Homeowners on the other hand must take the tax credit over several years unless they happen to be in a high tax bracket. For example, someone making $150,000 per year most likely could take advantage of the 30% tax credit in the year their system was installed but they would still have to wait until the end of the year when they filed their taxes.

A homeowner making %50,000 per year would most likely not be able to use all the tax credit in the current year so the benefit is spread out over several years. In both cases the tax payers are required to wait until they file their taxes to take advantage of the credit.

If we made a simple change to the tax law to allow homeowners the same benefit that a business gets, I believe you would see an explosion in solar installations and distributed generation.

That's my opinion - what's yours?
tomgarven@hotmail.com
Gregor Giebel
Gregor Giebel
April 26, 2010
@Keller:
One point you overlook is the price stability wind power provides. You can calculate pretty well what the final price point is going to be for your kWh, and since wind is essentially investment cost, it is going to be that price for the next, say, 20 years. How do you hedge the gas price in a similar fashion? I'm sure there will be banks giving you a 10-year hedge on gas prices, but the premium is going to be astronomic. A few years ago, Bolinger and Wiser analysed the value of wind power as a hedge against volatile gas prices, and found that a 10-year hedge was 24% above the forecast price for 10 years ahead, and (including the predicted price rise) some 70% over current cost. And that was well before the huge spikes just before the financial crisis.
Thomas Garven
Thomas Garven
April 21, 2010
Oh and before I forget again, here is an excellent blog site for students or anyone else I guess interested in energy. It is filed with stories, facts, comments, data and questions you can use to teach.

http://energy.typepad.com/the-energy-blog/

Enjoy
tomgarven@hotmail.com
Thomas Garven
Thomas Garven
April 21, 2010
I agree with Apprentice Teacher we need to be much more focused on creating learning opportunities for our students. Not every student is suited for a government job, becoming a CEO or even becoming a teacher or computer programmer. In fact many of the kids I know today really enjoy building stuff and seeing how it works. You just have to see a couple of kids eyes light up the first time they use a drill to know what needs to be done for them. At one point in my career I was teaching the hard core unemployed how to work together as a team. If you ever want to see the human brain working as a sponge, try becoming a creative teacher and you will see people get excited. The American Solar Energy Society has done a good job so far of establishing learning objectives but much more work needs to be done.

I am sorry but I can't speak with any authority about learning in the wind industry.

tomgarven@hotmail.com
Michael Keller
Michael Keller
April 21, 2010
Anybody know what the rough breakeven cost for wind energy, with no subsidies and all-in (including debt repayment), at Tehachapi? Should be a relatively straight forward calculation, given the "30 years of development"

Mu hunch is that it is pretty expensive and very likely more two times that of combined-cycle power plants, especially with today's low natural gas prices.

Providing Los Angles with thousand of megawatts of expensive power strikes me as less than helpful to industry and consumers.
Apprentice Vinbeazel
Apprentice Vinbeazel
April 21, 2010
With more than 25 years in the Tehachapi Valley; the past ten years dedicated to energy in education...I find the discussion about peak energy capacity to be missing the mark. Three years were spent in oil-gas drilling and maintenance jobs, and the wind industry has floundered because of a lack of corporate commitment to vocational training, beyond safety classes for entry-level 1099 contract jobs...

When are the people going to take hold of this industry as energy and not just wind vs oil? There are some exciting things being developed in the field of hybrids and energy storage; both subjects are ignored by the wind farms and the utilities, because the current scheme is designed to sell power only to the grid, and not to municipal governments. That is why we use internet radio to attract students, who are willing to investigate different models and study the industry as a whole elephant...and not just the wind from its trunk!
Thomas Garven
Thomas Garven
April 21, 2010
rolf-westgard-67277 [said in part] Then as the percent of wind rises, add in plenty of combustion NG peaker plants to back up the wind.

Of course rolf-westgard is both right and wrong. In California [or anyplace else for that matter] about 23,000 megawatts is transmitted over the California ISO grid on a typical day and in the summer some of that may be from a NG peaker. The 800 megawatt of wind referenced in this article however is a very small percentage [about 3.5%] of the total grid load so one single NG peaker plant could easily replace all existing wind resources. So if the wind was not blowing ANYWHERE in California, Arizona Texas or Washington State I guess we would need to start a NG peaking plant ASSUMING that the power to make up the difference was not available anywhere else on the grid.

Utilities are no longer separated from each other but depend on each other to support the electrical grid. All utilities now get their power from a variety of sources which can include nuclear, natural gas, coal, hydro, wind, solar, geothermal and yes they all feed the grid at one time or another. Unless you happen to live in a very small community without a grid connection to somewhere else you are trading power with other people all the time.

It would not be a very wise business decision to put all your eggs so to speak in one basket. For example, I happen to a big supporter of solar because I live in Arizona and happen to believe it will be our energy choice for the future. I am also wise enough to understand that depending on one renewable energy source in one location of the USA would not be too smart either.

tomgarven@hotmail.com
Aaron Moline
Aaron Moline
April 21, 2010
For years, California has led the way for renewable energy. The state possess some of the best RES conditions, hence why it has been so successful. What America needs as it turns to form itself as a competitive force in the renewable energy race is to adopt more aggressive Renewable Energy Standards at a federal level.
Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA's mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.
a b
a b
April 21, 2010
" will soon begin putting up the first of 100 1.5-megawatt (MW) GE towers "

Jesus, what a waste of space, using 1.5MW machines. Didn't they managed to install at least a 2.5MW model, to raise the installed capacity to current wind turbine capacity models ?

100 x 1.5MW = 1500 MW installed x 30% power production factor = 500 MW produced each hour.

100x 2.5MW = 2500 MW installed x 30% power production factor = 750 MW produced each hour.

" add in plenty of combustion NG peaker plants to back up the wind"

Well, you could turn to geothermal energy to produce steam to back up the wind turbines, or alternatively put 4kW solar PV panels on the millions of L.A. home roofs to produce peak power energy when it is needed most, given the great insulation rates in that particular area.

Each MWh produced by RE sources is a MWh of natural gas saved.
rolf westgard
rolf westgard
April 21, 2010
First, divide by four to get the effective capacity factor of these wind farms. And dedicated transmission lines for wind would have the same low utilization. Then as the percent of wind rises, add in plenty of combustion NG peaker plants to back up the wind. Those plants are the least efficient fuel users and take the most maintenance. They are like driving your car in a traffic jam. There is a role for wind, but there is a reason long term EIA forecasts have wind in the single digit range.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement
  • 10
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Martifer Solar USA, Inc.
  • RBI Solar Inc.
  • AR Power Company, Ltd.
  • Solmetric Corporation
  • Upsolar
  • Enphase Energy
  • Delta Rigging & Tools
  • Everblue
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information