Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Permanent Solution?

By Eize de Vries
April 8, 2010   |   11 Comments
The Application of permanent magnet generators is gaining ground in the wind turbine industry.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
11 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 11
April 8, 2010
One of the best articles I've ever read here. I really like that REW is starting to cut deeper into industry details on current technology. It is much more interesting to read about what is actually reaching the market than yet another college professor's bench project (not that those aren't important.)

It's hard to tell what will happen. Nanotech/materials science could find a cheaper PM. (One wonders whether the recent Fe16N2 research will yield a stable macro-scale magnet with workable curie temperature)

Or it could yield vastly cheaper power conversion (e.g. nanotube transitors, or "solid state" MEMs convertors).

They don't share all the advantages of PM, but cheaper and better high power switching might enable variable reluctance generators, which have good efficiency and a passive rotor.
Comment
2 of 11
CEA
April 8, 2010
Wind power efficiency has made huge gains in the last couple of years, and today is still one of the most economical of all the renewable energy technologies. We still have along way before we can truly tap into the wind as a viable resource. Intermittency is a huge barrier that needs to be addressed. Investment in storage and smart grid technologies though can allow us to over come these limitations. We need to keep aggressively seeking solutions towards a more sustainable energy portfolio.
Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA's mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.
No image available
Comment
3 of 11
Anonymous
April 9, 2010
DFIG is ?
The first rule of technical documentation is identifying acronyms with what they represent (all the words)
Comment
4 of 11
April 9, 2010
Permanent Magnet generators were used from 1978 on in smaller WTs in UK like the Trimblemill. This applied contra rotation, and with the advent of the "disk" motor/generator for car and rail traction these can be mechanically converted to contra rotation quite simply.
The multirotor {honneff - ILMA] concept can then be considered.
Remembering always that a WT is an area for income but a volume for cost, and as with all things based on a circle, there is most probably a "maximum economic diameter" above which it is more cost effective to have more than one "circle" ?
No image available
Comment
5 of 11
Anonymous
April 9, 2010
It is up there at the beginning, just below the photo of 3 workers.

(...)From the second half of the 1990s variable speed operation steadily gained ground, with the doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) becoming the semi-standard wind industry solution.(...)
Comment
6 of 11
Very interesting study !

PMG appears to have its origin in Europe, but the market share increased only after Chinese manufacturers adopted the technology and implmented it in China in large scale very recently.

Enercon had a PMG in their range, but preferred to use self excited type field excitation. Specific advantages and comparative field performance results for PMG technology is not readily available. It may be too early to conclude whether it is a improved technology. Longer proven track record is a must.

Clipper, Multibrid and Winwind are yet to disclose the field performance results. Industry is aware that there were serious problems in some of the installations.

Alternative drive system option with 'hydraulic transmission' for converting variable speed to constant speed for using conventional Synchronous Generators appears to be a attractive and simplified technology, but is again taking time field acceptance.

knsh06@gmail.com
Comment
7 of 11
April 22, 2010
Data from public meeting at Llandeilo, uk July 2005
regarding proposed "Windfarm"
Cost of farm -------------- 160M Euro
Annual return from energy supplied ------- 220k Euro
which is less than 0.2 % of cost returned p.a. ?!
This is not energy supply, it is energy "laundering".
Meanwhile swea.co.uk will have us believe that they provide a
return of 200 to 300% p.a. !?!
Why invest in anything else ! ? I think this was how HBOS (RBoS?)
was sunk by American estate agents ?

Maybe it's the magnets ?! - yes great idea ! - no, hang-on, maybe the colour we paint them ? - the width of the blades ? Are you sure it's not wings they need to be ?
No, it's the generators. Old-fashioned !
It is quite possible to get several Whole percent of cost
returned - annually - from a Sensible design of Turbine-ALTERNATOR
Device. - TAD
I stress "Alternator", to highlight the fact, to which, you may
notice, reference is never made in talk of "windfarms". A fat lot
of use is a Turbine without an Alternator !
So now at last we hear of the other half of the TAD !

There are three or four simple ( but not to find ! ) reasons which
account - very well - for the disparity in these figures i.e. C
5%p.a. (from a sensible design) cf a fraction of 1 % p.a. from
current
(80m high) "technology".
Look away now if you think it will be easy to find them !
I shall list them, and then explain all but C)
A) Economy of Size (It's necklace shaped. Min cost for sizes where T cost is about = A cost)
B) Mode of operation (Constant rev or constant pitch)
C) Betz limit (ANY object placed in a wind causes the wind to diverge
and therefore slow to
get around it. This effect can be taken into account and,
effectively, reduced quite a bit)
D) The bigger the "TAD" the less able it is to face a veering wind,
and the bigger problem from "Wind shear", i.e. windspeed changes a lot
over 40 m ? of height.
details bertdotwindonatgmaildotcom
Comment
8 of 11
April 22, 2010
Alternative drive system options – some still under development or at a semi-commercial development stage – either involve a mechanical-hydraulic or fully-mechanical variable speed gearbox system, or a 'fully-hydraulic' transmission. These latter solutions enable variable speed rotor operation combined with a fixed-speed directly grid-connected generator, effectively

"eliminating the need for an electronic power converter".
but requiring the need to burn-out the generator or close-down in very otherwise useable winds. If the rotor runs at constant pitch, and revs to suit the wind, then the power it transfers from the wind is very much cubicly related to windspeed. If the generator's load volts are fixed, then the current will be cubicly related to windspeed if a variable gear-box
is employed. This will make the heating in the copper related by the 6th power (cube squared I^2.R) of windspeed. This is not a useful situation.
To avoid this, the gearbox needs to be ideally in the other way round (but they wouldn't listen to that) or a fixed ratio can give good efficiency over an octave or decade of windspeeds.
And electrical/electronic conversion will be completely essential.
I'm saving-up for a bag of dog-biskits now.

"For various reasons, fixed-speed systems with direct grid-connection are,
however, now only a minority segment".
Well well. Fancy that.
Comment
9 of 11
April 22, 2010
The advantage of using PMs is drastic reduction of Auxilliary consumption of the Wind Turbine. The generator does not require the power from grid for excitation. The auxilliary consumption is as little as 0.2% in case of direct drive PM turbines as compared to the turbines needing excitation which is never less than 1%
Comment
10 of 11
April 27, 2010
Modern technology in electricity generation is growing rapidly and this status will remain for a long time. Certainly I admit that the article systematise knowledge of these technologies. It is worth to spend more time learning, could rise even more so interesting publication.
No image available
Comment
11 of 11
Anonymous
June 6, 2010
DFIG = doubly-fed induction generator (in the 4th paragraph) from WIKI: Doubly-fed electric machines are electric motors or electric generators that have windings on both stationary and rotating parts, where both windings transfer significant power between the shaft and the electrical system. Doubly-fed machines are useful in applications that require varying speed of the machine's shaft for a fixed power system frequency.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With over 50,000 subscribers and a global readership in 174 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine covers industry, policy, technology, finance and markets for all renewable technologies. Content is aimed ... more »

 

Eize de Vries

View Eize de Vries's Profile
About: Eize de Vries was from 2001 to March 2010 Wind Technology Correspondent for Renewable Energy World magazine. He currently works as a Technology Writer and Techn... more »

Advertise With Us

Conergy Inc. Schneider Electric Fairtrade-Messe Solmetric Corporation Solar Energy International (SEI) Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut) Canadian Solar Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters