Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Accelerating Solar: A Look at the Next Decade

By Dr. Charlie Gay, Applied Materials
April 26, 2010   |   6 Comments

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
6 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 6
April 26, 2010
I believe Dr. Gay's analysis and article are right on target. However I believe we can do much more. For example:

Here in Arizona where we get lots of sun, the production cost per kW over 20 years is less than the current rate per kW from our local utilities. The only drawback to installing more solar is our existing tax law and the upfront cost. I believe we could easily fix this with a very small change in the existing tax code.

Currently a BUSINESS can take the full 30% Federal Tax Credit over several years OR as a CASH GRANT in the year the system is installed and they get the money in 60 days.

Homeowners on the other hand must take the tax credit over several years unless they happen to be in a high tax bracket. For example, someone making $150,000 or more per year will most likely be able to take advantage of the 30% tax credit in the year their system is installed. This causes two problems

1. Everyone waits until Nov/Dec to buy a system, and;

2. Some solar installers draw unemployment until Nov/Dec and then work 70 hours a week trying to meet customer demand.

This is of course an extreme example but hopefully you get the picture. Sometimes I really question if we are the sharpest cheddar in the deli case LOL.

However a homeowner making $50,000 per year would most likely not be able to use all of the tax credit in the current year. So the benefit is spread out over several years which results in a large upfront cost. In both cases the homeowners are required to wait until they file their taxes to take advantage of the credit.

Making the tax code uniform and consistent for both businesses and homeowners would significantly increase the number of individuals who could afford to go solar.

That's my opinion - what's yours?
tomgarven@hotmail.com
Comment
2 of 6
April 27, 2010
Dr Charlie Gray's article is the typical article I would want to read more in REW. Concise, clear, to the point, no drama articles like this one are what make conversion to green technologies doable for the manifold uninformed critical non believers.

The figures stated in this article are correct. I live in Belgium, and just purchased a 4.2kW solar PV installation (Photovoltech cells installed in Bisol 245W panels, 2x SMA 2100TL inverters, yearly sun insulation rates equaling 850kWh per 1000kWh installed capacity).

I paid 15 520 euro to get it all installed, I produce 3540 kWh of power the first year.
If I do account for the yearly 0.008 power production loss factor due to older getting PV cells, then over 20 years, my installation produces 65 674 kWh.

15 520 Euro divided by 65 674 kWh produced = 24 cents per produced kWh for the next decades.

I can get a 40% tax rebate capped at 3600 euro per year. 40% of 15 520 euro = 6 200 euro.

I am allowed to ask for this tax rebate in the following 4 tax returns (2011 till 2015). I therefore have to wait for two tax returns refunds to be able to capitalize the tax rebate on this investment.

Once the tax rebates earned, my capital investment drops to 15 520 – 6 200 = 9 320 euro.

9 320 euro divided by 65 674 kWh produced = 14 cents per kWh !!!!

14 cents per kWh is less than half the utility peak power price now being paid in California by home owners using fossil fuel generated electrical power.

Quad erat demonstrandum.

alain_verbeke@hotmail.com
Comment
3 of 6
April 27, 2010
Another important point is the combination of solar PV panels with a home air heating heat pump and solar water heating panels, for home applications (renovation or new).

A new home can install a ground water/ home water heat pump to heat the home, being powered by a solar PV installation (the grid meter turns back when the sun shines and turns forth during the night, when electricity is cheaper). The solar water heating panels are great to provide sanitary hot water during spring-summer-autumn, and have to be combined with a winter heating system.

A renovation home can do the same, but has to use newer air/water heat pumps using compressors in cascade to get to 65°C plus room heating water temperatures.

You then basically are home heating, home powering and providing sanitary hot water for 'free' for decades, using zero fossil energy carbon to get it all done.
Comment
4 of 6
April 27, 2010
I think Dr. Gray is correct that the main problem in comparing coal energy production with Solar energy production is that the cost of fuel for solar is free while the cost of fuel (coal) is spread out over the lifetime of the power plant. So solar has more up front costs. It is hard to compete with cheap, plentiful, dirty power plants. We must figure out a way to count the "total costs" including pollution/ fly ash, etc. or the cheap, plentiful and dirty will continue to dominate.

Randy
SimpleEnergyWorks.com
Comment
5 of 6
April 27, 2010
The marginal cost of solar energy is low, but I don't think that it eliminates the need for natural gas peaking plant.

Including government incentives in calculating costs can also be a problem because those incentives could be used for other purposes.
Comment
6 of 6
April 27, 2010
Although solar is just a small bit right now in nation's energy mix but still it can play an enormous role in energy production. Currently around 50 solar projects are still in pipeline which should be developed and bring up to stream.
Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA's mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.
Muhammad Makki
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World North America

With 30,000 subscribers, Renewable Energy World North America serves the renewable energy industry, including power generating utilities, local or central governments, energy advisory or planning agencies, manufacturers of... more »

 

Advertise With Us

KACO new energy, Inc. Comdel Schletter Inc. Alpha Technologies Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group AltE Session Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters