Article Rating
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 3 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Wind Industry Fires Back, Calls for RES

Published: March 9, 2010

Washington, D.C. United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com] A group of wind energy executives as well as the CEO of the American Wind Energy Association called on the U.S. Congress today to quickly enact a strong federal renewable energy standard in order to save American jobs. They also stated that they would fight the recently introduced Schumer legislation that could cripple the industry.

In a press conference, Denise Bode, CEO, AWEA, Donald Furman, Senior Vice President, Iberdrola Renewables, John W. Grabner, Executive Director, Cardinal Fastener & Specialty Company Inc., and Ned Hall, Executive Vice President, AES Wind Generation explained that passing a national RES is crucial to maintaining and creating more jobs in the U.S.

John Grabner of Ohio-based Cardinal Fastener explained how his company has gone through a complete retooling in order to sell into the wind turbine industry.  He said that orders from turbine manufacturers have already boosted the company’s revenues by 20%.  But demand is slipping, he said. “The RES has 3 main points to it: jobs, jobs, and jobs,” he said.

GE has seen its turbine manufacturing business increase 6 fold and the domestic content of its turbines increase to just over 50% since 2005, according to a representative from the company at the press conference.  An RES will help ensure that demand is steady and will attract more supply chain manufactures to set up shop in the U.S.

Made in the USA?

The panel had strong reactions to the recently introduced Schumer legislation that would restrict any renewable energy project that uses less than 100% U.S. made components from receiving tax payer subsidies and grants.

If you have a discretionary process in place, said Bode, it causes projects not to get financing.  Even the discussion of it has had a “chilling effect” on the market, she said.

The panel said that developers and manufactureres want to purchase U.S. made parts because the cost of shipping parts overseas can be as high as 20% of the total project cost.

But manufacturers are reluctant to open facilities in the U.S. because the policy environment is seen as unstable, according to the panel, which is why they believe that passing a strong national RES is key right now.

Don Furman of Iberdrola explained that the U.S. “owns this business, most of the technology was invented here!” He said that for 25 years the wind industry has had no stable policy support and as a result of that, manufacturing went overseas.  And while “that has turned around a bit,” with several manufacturers opening major plants in the U.S. in the past year, the country still doesn’t have the full supply chain of U.S. built parts in place.

Furman believes that if the country had had an RES at the time that the recovery act was passed, even more manufacturing jobs would have been created.  Overall, the industry says 85,000 wind energy jobs were created through the stimulus.

“It would be tragedy if the growth stopped because we don’t have an RES,” said Furman.

Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 3
March 10, 2010
When will the political leaders in the USA ever finally figure out that a long term stable policy will attract foreign investments into component manufacturing?

The history of the PTC with its boom and bust cycles translating to making or breaking developers pipelines (and thus manufacturers orders) should be a clear enough indication as to why component manufacturing corporations see the States as a risky long term investment.

Policy creates markets. No long term policy, no long term manufacturing supply chain. Who missed risk management and macro-economics on Capital Hill?
No image available
Comment
2 of 3
March 10, 2010
Renewable energy standards are OK if they are met by feed-in tariffs for all renewable energy technologies - wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and small-hydro. Unfortunately, the wind industry has made a deal with the utility monopolies to support competitive bidding. Competitive bidding has generally been rigged by utilities to favor their own company, affiliates and friends, particularly their friends in the windpower industry. Bids can be rigged because utilities are allowed to opt out of bidding altogether and just build their own, bid only certain technologies, particularly windpower, and select higher cost bids through the use of subjective bidding criteria.
No image available
Comment
3 of 3
March 10, 2010
Schumer has the right idea but he's addressing it the wrong way. The bitch and moan from the wind industry is all about subsidies. So, instead demanding 100% American made wind projects to collect subsidies (which I can understand, if anything just to create jobs at home), place the subsidies in direct proportion of the project's cost in relation to materials and labor. If 65% of your project is materials made overseas, you only get 35% of potential subsidies. Something like that.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
AWS Truepower, LLC GlobalData AEE Solar SolarCraft SANYO Energy (USA) Corp. Amonix Inc. Kipp & Zonen
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters