Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Wave and Tidal Power Development Status

By Jeff Postelwait
March 16, 2010   |   9 Comments
Great potential exists for wave and tidal power development. However, the technology still must prove itself before it can be widely deployed.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

PennWell's Hydro Group publishes Hydro Review and HRW-Hydro Review Worldwide. Hydro Review, the magazine of the North American hydro industry, offers practical, useful information, helpful examples, and constructive guidance from experts. Each issue has an average readership of more than 50,000. HRW's mission is to share practical, technical information and expertise on hydroelectric power to the international hydro community. The magazine has circulation of more than 10,000.

9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
March 31, 2010
I have designed a system that removes the consistently inconsistent nature of waves allowing for a synchronous connection to the power grid. It really was not that complicated. I am going to own the Saltire Prize. Atlantis Marine Energy -Brian Meano
Comment
2 of 9
March 31, 2010
Its a shame Atlantis had to steal the IP from a small Spanish charity, but what do you expect. From the same bankers,who did the dirty on Tesla . We now have a even better ideas ready for development ,for any honest company. www.sims.tv
Comment
3 of 9
March 31, 2010
The author writes, "wave and tidal technologies can be three to four times more expensive than wind power per megawatt." What's the basis for such a statement. Given the early stages of development of these technologies, it's unfair to compare their costs with the mature wind turbine technologies of today. A better comparison would be with the costs of wind conversion facilities back in their earlier stages of development and before the ubiquitous slender-bladed, horizontal-axis systems proved their merit.

Today wave and current development projects span the full range of technical approaches and more ideas pop up regularly. Ultimately things will converge on a small number of designs that depend on the setting - near-shore or deep.

The author characterizes Scotland's Orkney Islands as offering "the best wave climates." For who? Would the top of Mount Everest be the best wind climate? I think not. But this attitude epitomizes the misguided infatuation of many in the hydrokinetic industry with extreme conditions and the sector will suffer until it realizes that it's kW/$ delivered that matters, not kW/m in a remote location.
Comment
4 of 9
April 3, 2010
I am very much in favour of wave and tidal power but not sure how well wave power will withstand raging winter storms.
But what about energy storage. Pumping water uphill as an energy store has been used with some success but how efficient is it? Why not generate hydrogen from electrical energy and allow that to be our energy store. Then we should be able to develop a hydrogen economy and power both domestic heating and transport using hydrogen fuel cell technology with the added bonus of freeing ourselves somewhat from the 'shackles' of oil and all it's political ramifications.
Comment
5 of 9
April 8, 2010
Hi Cliff. Good word above. I understand kW/$, but what is your definition of kW/m?
Comment
6 of 9
April 9, 2010
Sled, kW/m is a common metric for the wave-power potential of a location. It is the average wave-energy flux encountered per meter of coastline. A typical example of such values plotted on a global map can be found at: http://www.oceanor.no/projects/wave_energy/images/globb3.gif From this you can see why attention is drawn to the western coasts in the higher latitudes.

Such data includes the wave power over the full depth of the water column and the more energetic locations generally mean that energy penetrates to a greater depth. Depending on the type of wave energy converter, only a portion of this flux is harvestable and it is likely that the most highly energetic locations are not the most attractive from a cost perspective.
Comment
7 of 9
May 28, 2010
The technologies for producing energy from wave, better than the one shown, (and many others) already exists.
The error (or cunning), is that these technologies do not say never the %.
If the PV makes 15%, wind in - shore 20% , the wind off - shore 30%; what makes the system shown?
I cannot post pictures, but data on the production of Korean TRITON system are:
average production , minimum, 50/60%.
This means that now there is a wave system performance, (the best performance), it produces a percentage (minimum), as the European nuclear power stations, 60%. Now, what we do of these projects?
I'm sorry, I forgot, May 17 to complete the certification system at the University of Ulsan, Korea, minimum production 50/60% (three times the wind, twelve times photovoltaics).
Piccinini G. Raoul. r.piccinini@kienergy.co.kr
Comment
8 of 9
May 30, 2010
PROPOSAL
3-systems are proposed, details at www.renewableenergypumps.com
I. Wave Gear Drive-WGD1.
Converts sea wave energy to mechanical using and a buoyant float directly acting on a spiral spring or rack and pinion and VSG gear, to drive a water pump,collect its output and feed it to a hydro turbo generator. or;
2. To drive a Variable Speed gear directly coupled to a 3-phase generators that run in parallel with other A.C. generators.
3. Ideal for use on offshore oil rigs to generate electric power using direct drive generators or water pumps to generate electric power or to pump cold water from 1,60m meters below and use the water temperature difference for air conditioning (SWAC), or to generate additional electric power.
4. Should be a requirement to be installed on inhabited off shore oil platforms for air conditioning and electric power generation.

II. Wave Water Pumps - WWP
Utilize the wave energy to pump a small quantity of water to a high head, collect it and feed it to a hydro-turbo generator.A set of pumps up to ten and a mile wide may be installed in line with the incoming wave to extract most of the wave energy.

III. Wave Air Pumps - WAP
1. Utilize the kinetic energy of the wave to compresses a small quantity of air to a high pressure, collect it and feed it to the air inlet of a turbo generator.
2. Fuel is injected as needed to maintain turbo generator output irrespective of availability of waves.
3. Dependability of producing energy irrespective of availability of wave energy is achieved by controlling injected fuel 4. The WAP is ideal for sea water aeration. The WAP may be used to inject compressed air into the sea to enhance the oxidation process of organic materials.
Comment
9 of 9
February 3, 2011
@Cliff well explained good points
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Hydro Review

Hydro Review's goal is to provide readers with reliable, relevant information on the issues and challenges encountered in the hydro industry. Hydro Review offers practical, useful information, helpful examples, and constru... more »

 

Advertise With Us

Rich Hessler Solar Business Development Delta Rigging & Tools Concepts NREC Interstate Renewable Energy Council Black & Veatch Corporation Westinghouse Solar Talesun Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters