The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

Stimulus Suspension Would Put 85,000 Wind Jobs at Risk

Carl Levesque, AWEA
March 08, 2010  |  6 Comments

AWEA and the wind energy industry reacted strongly to an initiative by four Senators that would suspend crucial renewable energy development incentives in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that the industry views as a huge success and a lifeline in the economic crisis.

The four Senators—Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Bob Casey (D-Penn.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) — on Wednesday urged the Obama Administration to suspend the U.S. Treasury grant program (offered in lieu of the production tax credit and investment tax credit) indefinitely because of concerns that some of the funds may be going to foreign companies. But the notion is completely erroneous, said AWEA, which pointed out that by law stimulus funds must be spent in the U.S. — and that the dollars being invested in the wind industry are creating and sustaining jobs at wind projects across the country.

Suspending the program, in fact, would have a highly negative effect on U.S. jobs, AWEA said. “At a time when the construction unemployment rate is nearly 25% and the manufacturing unemployment rate is 13%, this proposal could cost 85,000 American workers their jobs,” AWEA CEO Denise Bode said in a statement. “This proposal would torpedo one of the most successful job creation efforts of the Recovery Act, which has already preserved half of the 85,000 American jobs in the U.S. wind industry.”

The U.S. Department of Energy also responded with deep concern. “Other countries are not pressing the pause button on clean energy industries, and they will move quickly to capture America’s share of the global market while we sit on the sidelines,” said DOE Press Secretary Stephanie Mueller, explaining that every dollar in the program helps put Americans to work. “The longer we delay, the longer we remain dependent on foreign oil instead of America’s homegrown, clean energy resources.”

Beyond the jobs created directly at U.S. wind power projects, over half of the components in wind turbines deployed in the U.S. are built here, and that percentage continues to rise as the U.S. has implemented incentive policies reflecting at least a short-term commitment to renewables. As AWEA has said repeatedly, to achieve even more significant job creation within the U.S. wind power supply chain, long-term policy certainty is needed—specifically, a national renewable electricity standard.

“Rather than adopt policies that will kill American jobs, Congress should enact policies that will create jobs by encouraging manufacturers to invest in U.S. plants,” said Bode. “That means passing a renewable electricity standard now.”

Bode, who spent the better part of the week reaching out to the media (she spoke on CNBC, for example) to set the record straight, continued, “The Recovery Act has been creating jobs by helping finance new American wind energy projects that have broken ground or been completed since the Act was passed. The proposed moratorium and legislation would kill this effort and destroy the momentum for one of the few industries that has been creating jobs and economic growth.

“It is unfortunate that the proponents of this moratorium and legislation are using a deeply flawed study as the basis for a policy that would destroy tens of thousands of American jobs.

“We support the goal of continuing the rapid expansion of U.S. wind manufacturing. More than half of the value of wind turbines used in U.S. wind projects is domestically produced, and that percentage is increasing every year as more turbine makers build U.S. manufacturing capability.  We do not have the capability today to produce 100% of wind turbine components in the U.S., but we can grow our manufacturing base and add 274,000 American jobs if Congress passes a strong Renewable Electricity Standard.”

6 Comments

Register To Comment
Gregory Wilson
Gregory Wilson
March 14, 2010
It would be interesting to know the four Senators connection, if any, to the coal industry.
Raymond X. Nolan
Raymond X. Nolan
March 14, 2010
Some times it is really difficult trying to figure out why you're so bent out of shape so often. I'm a commercial wind developer who hopes to have more than 300 towers up and operational in/on some modest mountains in New Hampshire. I'm concerned about raising the necessary capital for the test towers and than taking the next steps to secure permanent finacing. If my location is right, or correct, or accurate....and the commercial wind will be there and all the pieces will fall together, when as and or if if I can find the financing. If you want to fight about something....fight with our President for not getting more monies to underwrite these kind of risk investments. Other than that...have a lovely day!!! Ray
Derek Boyle
Derek Boyle
March 10, 2010
I've enjoyed watching the growth of our domestic wind industry this past decade, from Zoltec providing Carbon Fiber to Vestas, who is opening multiple manufacturing facilities in the US to GE becoming the top Wind blade manufacturer to Broadband Wind being one of the most successful installers and O&M service companies. That being said, if I want to take advantage of Free WInd Energy now, instead of waiting 5 years, and creating Jobs and expanded industries now, instead of 5 years from now, we want to take an all-the-above approach to install Turbines now, even if some percentage of the parts are made overseas, as we put more emphases on building up our domestic industries so they can provide 80% or more of the parts. We are playing catchup to Germany and other countries that have made larger investments than we have so far; so be it ~ we just have to fight harder to catch up. That doesn't mean stopping current installs that use US workers and parts to use US natural resources. It's both where the tools are made, and where they are used, that provides the greatest benefits for us.
Douglas Prince
Douglas Prince
March 10, 2010
Carl - Your statement that "over half of the components in wind turbines deployed in the U.S. are built here" is bullshit. Nuts and bolts aren't the big picture. What about the blades? What about the towers? What about having the blades and towers manufactured here in the US instead just being screwed together?
I propose this addendum to Schumer's suspension of subsidies -- Tie subsidies in direct proportion to the TOTAL project cost in regards to US manufactured materials. If 65% of your project materials are produced outside of the US boundary, then you only get 35% in subsidies.
As your group likes to harp, it's all about jobs. Well, now you can start making them.
ANONYMOUS
March 10, 2010
"Rather than adopt policies that will kill American jobs, Congress should enact policies that will create jobs by encouraging manufacturers to invest in U.S. plants,"? What does she think this program was supposed to be? The sad fact is that those that are complaining the most about the actions of the senators are the one that should be held accountable. With the one instance of 300 American jobs versus 3000 Chinese jobs - which country is being helped the most?

If those companies made the effort to produce the components here in the US (and yes, there are plenty of locations in the US that would offer other incentives to have an opportunity), then the US could easily provide all the components. The organization that Bode represents is about equally divided between domestic and foreign interests. It is American taxpayer money that is doing the funding - not those foreign interests.
Lindsay Reed
Lindsay Reed
March 10, 2010
Do we have a statement from the senators explaining in detail what they are concerned about? Once we know their stand, we can write to them to get them aware of "the rest of the story."

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Carl Levesque

Carl Levesque

Carl is Editor & Publications Manager at the American Wind Energy Association, where has worked since 2006. At AWEA he oversees AWEA's online and print publications including the Wind Energy Weekly, Windpower Update, and other products....
  • About
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 6
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador
  • 5
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Rotork plc
  • Karbone
  • EnergyDreams LLC
  • Second Wind Inc.
  • Intertek
  • Delta Rigging & Tools
  • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
  • Prudent Living, Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information