Article Rating
5 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 11 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Solar Cooling: Proving the Paradox

When buildings use almost 50% of their energy for heating and cooling, we must turn to innovative alternatives.
by Dan Radu
Published: March 4, 2010

There is a myth that we must lower our standard of living in order to avoid the effects of climate change but the reality is that alternative solutions do not sacrifice comfort.

The thermal comfort we enjoy in buildings, where we spend most of our days and nights, comes usually with very high environmental costs. Space heating, cooling and water heating constitutes for 47% of the energy consumption in buildings, according to DOE’s Building Energy Data Book 2008. The problem is that the electricity consumed comes from burning fossil fuels, a process that produces the environmentally unfriendly CO2 gas.

Simply asking consumers to cut down on their comfort is not a realistic solution to avoid the implications of climate change. No matter how much environmental awareness is being created, the majority of consumers will not change their standard of living simply for that reason. Instead, the main reason that consumers would change would be convenience and comfort.

The burden then falls on the industry to find realistic and innovative solutions. These feasible solutions must cut CO2 emissions without sacrificing comfort. This partly requires thinking in a fresh way by breaking away from conventional energy sources and starting to look into new renewable energy sources, breaking paradigms and proving paradoxes. This article is about how the sun can be used both to heat and cool our buildings and how that paradox is being proven as we speak.

Figure 1: Total U.S. Building Energy Use.

Myth:  Alternative sources cannot provide all the energy we need.

Reality: There is more free solar energy available than we could ever need.

The sun is the largest source of energy available to us today. Within 45 seconds, the Earth’s surface receives enough solar energy to fully meet the world’s entire energy needs for that day according to the DESERTEC Foundation.  This is the most abundant energy source available to achieve independence from fossil fuels.

Solar technology is very promising, but energy storage during night time and bad weather conditions still remains a technical problem faced by many systems today.

The current paradigm considers the sun as only a source for heating and electricity. Four major categories of solar technologies currently exist that harness the sun’s potential in order to provide heating solutions in the case of solar thermal technology and electricity in the case of photovoltaic (PV), concentrated solar power (CSP)  and solar chimney tower technologies.

Myth: The sun can only be harnessed for heating or electricity

Reality: Introducing Solar Cooling

Moving forward, we have to use the sun in new innovative ways and that is where Solar Cooling comes into play. Solar Cooling uses solar thermal technology to capture solar energy and then creates cooling without using electricity.

The sun’s radiation is more effectively used for cooling. The sun provides the most energy for heating during summer; however the demand for heating is very low during the hot summer period. The time of year when cooling is needed is when the sun offers the most energy. Therefore the potential to use the sun’s radiation for cooling will make use of a lot of energy which otherwise goes unused.

Solar Cooling offers substantial environmental, financial and social benefits over the conventional compressor driven cooling systems. Disadvantages with compressor driven systems are that they consume a lot of electricity and use refrigerants which damage the ozone layer of the atmosphere. Due to high electricity prices and high cooling demand in certain countries their use also becomes a high cost. Extended use of energy-guzzling systems during peak hours can also lead to electrical grid overload and black outs.

However, an innovative combination between heating, hot water and cooling technologies is the ideal solution. Using the sun’s energy for heating during winter and cooling during summer fully uses its potential all year round.

Figure 2: Single Family Home in Europe – Annual Energy Demand

Myth:  A technology providing renewable heating and cooling is still a thing of the future.

Reality:  Solar Cooling is a proven paradox.

Solar Cooling installations in operation successfully provide energy reductions and a minimum carbon footprint, without sacrificing comfort. Systems in operation today provide space heating, pool heating, cooling and domestic hot water (DHW) for high end villas, condos, blocks of flats, hotels, office buildings and hospitals around the world. The buildings are serviced with comfortable cooling during the summer, heating in the winter and plenty of DHW by day and night.

A typical Solar Cooling system is composed of solar thermal collectors, a ClimateWell SolarChiller, a heat sink and a distribution system. Solar thermal collectors capture the free solar radiation. The ClimateWell SolarChiller transforms the heat into cooling during summer without using electricity or refrigerants. The free solar radiation, which is not transformed into cooling, is used to warm up DHW and pool water where applicable. The pool acts as a heat sink used for heat rejection. Cooling towers, air-cooled condensers and geothermal boreholes can also be used for heat rejection. The indoor cooling and heating comfort is finally distributed throughout the building by a build-in radiant floor distribution systems, fan-coils or air ducts. The unique storage capability of this particular system allows it to service the building with comfort even during night time and bad weather conditions.

An investment in this system saves energy and generates financial savings over time. The energy savings generate CO2 reductions. Grid overload and black outs are also less likely during peak hours.

The proven technology paradox harnesses the most abounded source of energy, breaks away from polluting conventional energy sources and shows that comfort can be achieved without high costs.

 

Figure 3: Solar Cooling 3-in-1 Solution, Credit: ClimateWell.

Dan Radu is part of the Sales & Marketing team at ClimateWell in Stockholm. He was born in Romania, studied in Canada, worked in Russia, Canada and now in Sweden. Before ClimateWell, Dan Radu worked at Fortune 500, Small Medium Enterprise and Non-Profit organizations. ClimateWell sells Solar Cooling solutions. Its technology stores energy from a solar panel in a battery using salt, which can then be used to generate either cooling or heating.

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 11
March 4, 2010
With concentrating solar power (CSP), it is relatively easy and cheap to store solar heat so that the generation of electricity may continue at night and on cloudy days. See http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/csp/no_sun.htm .
No image available
Comment
2 of 11
March 6, 2010
"There is a myth that we must lower our standard of living in order to avoid the effects of climate change but the reality is that alternative solutions do not sacrifice comfort."

Ah... a cornucopian! Gotta love these fools that still worship at the altar of unlimited growth, unlimited consumption and development... on a finite planet.

Massive solar installations to compensate for waste and unconscious consumption is more of the same thinking that got us into this mess. I suppose you think McMansions and hybrid suv's are just fine too? We can't sacrifice our "comfort" now, can we... sigh.

Please consider and tell me how your savior of all our ills (solar) will provide solutions for depleting, non-renewable resources like zinc, copper, lead, topsoil & potable water? Every calorie of food we eat contains between 2 and 200 calories of fossil fuel energy (fossil fuel based fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, diesel powered tractors and trucks). How is solar going to resolve that? Asphalt roads paved with what, solar panels?

Please do not perpetuate these myths that our solutions do not first lie in the obvious low hanging fruit of fewer people, consuming FAR less. Yes, for most this means less "comfort". Conservation is NOT a dirty word. It is job one! The resource pie is only so large and a global population of 7 billion (and growing) is already more than our planet can support. People changing their behavior is the first thing on the list.

If everyone used what I use (which is about 20% of the national average) we would still need two planets to provide the resources for that. Dan, you do our species a great disservice by spewing this kind of BS.
No image available
Comment
3 of 11
Anonymous
March 7, 2010
People like Todd are the ones to bring wrong ideas (insulting and pushing) to the world, the world must be saved by saving energy appliances and equiptment and new sources of clean energy but nobody have the right to insult other persons ideas to push their own.
No image available
Comment
4 of 11
March 8, 2010
@ Anonymous... if you think it is wrong to insult and push the selfish, greedy little adult children who are hell bent on self destruction... so be it. Did you read what I wrote? WE LIVE ON A FINITE PLANET WITH FINITE RESOURCES! This is not an "idea" (as you say) that I am "pushing", but a FACT.

Renewable energy can help, but ONLY after people change their behavior first. If "comfort" is in your mind some kind of sacred cow, then you are indeed no smarter than yeast in a test tube, who mindlessly grow, consume all their resources and die in the waste. Changing behavior is job one. This is VERY serious stuff. We are talking about the survival of our species.

I'm sorry if you find strong, pushy dialogue about the importance that offensive. What are your suggestions to get people to take this seriously, especially in the light of a ridiculous article stating that sacrificing "comfort" is somehow off the table?
No image available
Comment
5 of 11
March 8, 2010
@"TUDE"-cory-154245... so you're saying that even if we all lived like you, if I were to believe your argument, Doomsday is still just around the corner. So please explain how your doomsday rhetoric isn't even more BS than Dan's sales pitch for solar cooling/heating. At least Dan's argument offers a more efficient use of renewable energy while your just trying to scare people. If your so big on conserving energy why not conserve some of that negative energy you spewing and offer something positive instead. Efficiency is always the answer, and if that can be accomplished without diminishing our comfort level I say why not. Solar energy isn't the panacea but it is a better alternative than our current fossil fuel based system.
No image available
Comment
6 of 11
March 9, 2010
Anyone that knows anything about efficiency and renewables or anything having to do with energy understands this:

Some efficiency measures are low hanging fruit.
Some efficiency measures are very expensive, take decades to payback.
There is only so much energy that one can really save or conserve depending on their particular conditions.
In some cases, Renewables or other alternative resources are more cost effective.
Renewables are reaching price parity, and in some cases, already have surpassed prices of conventional fuels.

The reality is that we need to do both efficiency and renewables. BOTH.

The author is advocating that we can have our cake and eat it. The author is 100% correct. Going sustainable does not mean that we cannot have hot coffee and cold beer. Our quality of life can survive the green movement, we do not have to loose anything. Yes, we have to change our ways, but it does not mean we have so sacrifice necessarily.


OK, now as for the actual topic of the story....

Solar Thermally Driven Cooling represents the biggest missed opportunity out there. I am a HVAC engineer and this design concept, when integrated with other efficiency and optimization measures, is the path towards reducing the energy and emissions footprint of our buildings. In some cases, it's much better to deploy a thermal system that handles a building's energy, heating and cooling needs.

What the US needs right now is a stronger focus on Solar Thermal Heating and Cooling. Our industries: Solar, HVAC and others involved with the built environment, are essentially ignoring this technology. The elegance and marrying Solar Thermal with a building's cooling load makes incredible sense. Simply put, ST arrays out there sit stagnant during the summer if they are designed for Heating demands that are minimized during the cooling season. This is the time when these units can perform the best, in some cases, better than PV in the heat.

SH&C makes a lot of sense...
Comment
7 of 11
March 9, 2010
We can be led to the awareness that conservation is extremely important in energy, soil use agriculture, home construction, transportation, etc.
If we are told we are stupid, we will invariably do the stupid things.
Both conservation and renewables are important to crank down a society cranked up with rampant consumerism, which has the goal of promoting itself.
We can also use and recycle durable goods that make the best use of limited resources, yes? Indeed, we must.
Being angry at wild consumers is counterproductive, as is any form of projection. The insane antics of the majority are merely laughable, because the human mind is unlimited in it's capability and resolve when it has awakened. Awakening only happens with willingness, and the dreamer will stay asleep as long as there is a threat in awakening.
I believe there is peaceful abundance in using current solar energy.

On that note, checking the pages of "Climatewell" mentioned in Dan's article, they have no offerings for the USA, and do not answer questions about how they get cooling to be absorbed downward and without moisture condensation. They seem to be absorbing investment with (at least some) suspect technology.
That said, there is great need for absorptive cooling development in the US.
I say "bring it on".
"Git er done with the sun" son.
No image available
Comment
8 of 11
March 9, 2010
Todd, I must interject! Are you saying that CSP and (molten salts) are bad? Did WE not just use coal and gas powered juice to argue these points? Come on, if you are going to !!! about CSP, then you must STOP using FF's (and quite being hypocritical nimby slash enviro that would destroy the planet by enacting RE roadblocks)! Sad but true... Now before you dis solar, please consider...
Solar troughs ARE irresponsible (they do require large areas to be paved over) so... enter the proven power tower concept that has heliostats mounted on posts (no more envitro crap here uh!) that can utilize the Brayton cycle (for 20 to 30% more efficiency), and of course can store energy in proportion to mirror field verses turbine.

Also consider... global warming is going to be very real and thus we need to stop using FF's. To kill a watt is to only advance (already worn out) awareness. As the auther basically said, nobody is going to conserve enough to do any good (including us, obviously).

Now, a total, Apollo style approach to making mirrors in robotic factories and mass producing the Brayton closed cycle gas turbine is needed, infact is the ONLY way (besides closed cycle nuclear) that would REDUCE power requirements EVEN as the human population grows! WHY? Because the electric infrastructure is WAAAY more efficient than anything else. Consider that led lighting will be three times better than CFLs (which are already 4 times better than incandescents). Consider that electric vehicals are about 4 times more efficient! Surely, energy demands will go down. And since only about 10% of the deserts would be needed to power TEN times total global energy demands... well you know, only a FF supporter would want to argue with that.

Note that the 60% of coal being wasted for electricity, the 80% of gasoline being wasted for mobility, and etc obviously supports this argument that more CSP in an (almost) all electric infra = less waste.

YES ON SOLAR EXPONENTIATION!
No image available
Comment
9 of 11
March 9, 2010
"well you know, only a FF supporter would want to argue with that." Actually, I do support fossil fuels, because without them, we won't be able to build the power towers in mass. We all need to promote them because the costs of storing heat in molten salts is on the order of twenty times less that utility scale batteries. On a grand scale, powerlines and such storage is "NILL" compared to the costs of capacity (as with any source of power). Thus our focus has to be: How do we make millions of power towers very cheap and reliable.

This is where we have to "argue"... What best ways to make the heliostat motors and what not, last for 30 years, Brayton cycle working "fluid", etc.

Also, heat pumps use less energy too!
Thanks for showing us how it works!
No image available
Comment
10 of 11
March 10, 2010
Back to our regularly scheduled program....the article is nothing more than an infomercial. I expect higher standards from REW.
No image available
Comment
11 of 11
Subject: The Maisotsenko Cycle for Solar Cooling
Renewable resource as solar energy (solar thermal and solar photovoltaic) is critical to the future of our planet. Solar energy and the proven Maisotsenko Cycle (M-Cycle) can work in perfect synergy with each other and, together, they could provide a total efficient solution for powering, heating and cooling our buildings using 100% renewable energy.
The M-Cycle is a revolutionary new breakthrough in thermodynamics, which utilizes the psychrometric energy (or the potential energy) available from the latent heat of water evaporating into the air. Atmospheric air is a clean renewable energy source as solar energy, and it can be used for many applications through the M-Cycle (see attachment 1 and our U.S. Patents No6,497,10 7; 6,581,402; 6,705,096; 6,776,001; 6,779,351; 6,854,278; 6,948,558; 7,007,453; 7,197,887; 7,228,669; etc.). High degree of thermodynamic perfection of the M-Cycle allows atmospheric air to be cooled (without humidification) not the wet-bulb temperature, but the dew point temperature, and it increases psychrometric temperature difference and, consequently, energy resource of the atmospheric air.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published the FEMP review (DOE/GO-102007-2325): "Coolerado Cooler Helps to Save Cooling Energy and Dollars". http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/tir_coolerado.pdf). We have the ability to harness the power of the sun and psychrometric energy from air through the M-Cycle simultaneously, greatly reducing consumption energy and pollution. For example, our product, the Solar Coolerado Air Conditioner R600 can cool a 2,500 square foot space and only uses about 700 watts of power. That means it only needs four, 200 watt photovoltaic panels to power it. A
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
National Hydropower Association TurboCare The Switch HUBER+SUHNER AG Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. PVPowered Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters