Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Solar Cooling: Proving the Paradox

By Dan Radu
March 4, 2010   |   9 Comments
When buildings use almost 50% of their energy for heating and cooling, we must turn to innovative alternatives.

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
March 4, 2010
With concentrating solar power (CSP), it is relatively easy and cheap to store solar heat so that the generation of electricity may continue at night and on cloudy days. See http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/csp/no_sun.htm .
Comment
2 of 9
March 6, 2010
"There is a myth that we must lower our standard of living in order to avoid the effects of climate change but the reality is that alternative solutions do not sacrifice comfort."

Ah... a cornucopian! Gotta love these fools that still worship at the altar of unlimited growth, unlimited consumption and development... on a finite planet.

Massive solar installations to compensate for waste and unconscious consumption is more of the same thinking that got us into this mess. I suppose you think McMansions and hybrid suv's are just fine too? We can't sacrifice our "comfort" now, can we... sigh.

Please consider and tell me how your savior of all our ills (solar) will provide solutions for depleting, non-renewable resources like zinc, copper, lead, topsoil & potable water? Every calorie of food we eat contains between 2 and 200 calories of fossil fuel energy (fossil fuel based fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, diesel powered tractors and trucks). How is solar going to resolve that? Asphalt roads paved with what, solar panels?

Please do not perpetuate these myths that our solutions do not first lie in the obvious low hanging fruit of fewer people, consuming FAR less. Yes, for most this means less "comfort". Conservation is NOT a dirty word. It is job one! The resource pie is only so large and a global population of 7 billion (and growing) is already more than our planet can support. People changing their behavior is the first thing on the list.

If everyone used what I use (which is about 20% of the national average) we would still need two planets to provide the resources for that. Dan, you do our species a great disservice by spewing this kind of BS.
No image available
Comment
3 of 9
Anonymous
March 7, 2010
People like Todd are the ones to bring wrong ideas (insulting and pushing) to the world, the world must be saved by saving energy appliances and equiptment and new sources of clean energy but nobody have the right to insult other persons ideas to push their own.
Comment
4 of 9
March 8, 2010
@ Anonymous... if you think it is wrong to insult and push the selfish, greedy little adult children who are hell bent on self destruction... so be it. Did you read what I wrote? WE LIVE ON A FINITE PLANET WITH FINITE RESOURCES! This is not an "idea" (as you say) that I am "pushing", but a FACT.

Renewable energy can help, but ONLY after people change their behavior first. If "comfort" is in your mind some kind of sacred cow, then you are indeed no smarter than yeast in a test tube, who mindlessly grow, consume all their resources and die in the waste. Changing behavior is job one. This is VERY serious stuff. We are talking about the survival of our species.

I'm sorry if you find strong, pushy dialogue about the importance that offensive. What are your suggestions to get people to take this seriously, especially in the light of a ridiculous article stating that sacrificing "comfort" is somehow off the table?
Comment
5 of 9
March 8, 2010
@"TUDE"-cory-154245... so you're saying that even if we all lived like you, if I were to believe your argument, Doomsday is still just around the corner. So please explain how your doomsday rhetoric isn't even more BS than Dan's sales pitch for solar cooling/heating. At least Dan's argument offers a more efficient use of renewable energy while your just trying to scare people. If your so big on conserving energy why not conserve some of that negative energy you spewing and offer something positive instead. Efficiency is always the answer, and if that can be accomplished without diminishing our comfort level I say why not. Solar energy isn't the panacea but it is a better alternative than our current fossil fuel based system.
Comment
6 of 9
March 9, 2010
Anyone that knows anything about efficiency and renewables or anything having to do with energy understands this:

Some efficiency measures are low hanging fruit.
Some efficiency measures are very expensive, take decades to payback.
There is only so much energy that one can really save or conserve depending on their particular conditions.
In some cases, Renewables or other alternative resources are more cost effective.
Renewables are reaching price parity, and in some cases, already have surpassed prices of conventional fuels.

The reality is that we need to do both efficiency and renewables. BOTH.

The author is advocating that we can have our cake and eat it. The author is 100% correct. Going sustainable does not mean that we cannot have hot coffee and cold beer. Our quality of life can survive the green movement, we do not have to loose anything. Yes, we have to change our ways, but it does not mean we have so sacrifice necessarily.


OK, now as for the actual topic of the story....

Solar Thermally Driven Cooling represents the biggest missed opportunity out there. I am a HVAC engineer and this design concept, when integrated with other efficiency and optimization measures, is the path towards reducing the energy and emissions footprint of our buildings. In some cases, it's much better to deploy a thermal system that handles a building's energy, heating and cooling needs.

What the US needs right now is a stronger focus on Solar Thermal Heating and Cooling. Our industries: Solar, HVAC and others involved with the built environment, are essentially ignoring this technology. The elegance and marrying Solar Thermal with a building's cooling load makes incredible sense. Simply put, ST arrays out there sit stagnant during the summer if they are designed for Heating demands that are minimized during the cooling season. This is the time when these units can perform the best, in some cases, better than PV in the heat.

SH&C makes a lot of sense...
Comment
7 of 9
March 9, 2010
We can be led to the awareness that conservation is extremely important in energy, soil use agriculture, home construction, transportation, etc.
If we are told we are stupid, we will invariably do the stupid things.
Both conservation and renewables are important to crank down a society cranked up with rampant consumerism, which has the goal of promoting itself.
We can also use and recycle durable goods that make the best use of limited resources, yes? Indeed, we must.
Being angry at wild consumers is counterproductive, as is any form of projection. The insane antics of the majority are merely laughable, because the human mind is unlimited in it's capability and resolve when it has awakened. Awakening only happens with willingness, and the dreamer will stay asleep as long as there is a threat in awakening.
I believe there is peaceful abundance in using current solar energy.

On that note, checking the pages of "Climatewell" mentioned in Dan's article, they have no offerings for the USA, and do not answer questions about how they get cooling to be absorbed downward and without moisture condensation. They seem to be absorbing investment with (at least some) suspect technology.
That said, there is great need for absorptive cooling development in the US.
I say "bring it on".
"Git er done with the sun" son.
Comment
8 of 9
March 10, 2010
Back to our regularly scheduled program....the article is nothing more than an infomercial. I expect higher standards from REW.
Comment
9 of 9
Subject: The Maisotsenko Cycle for Solar Cooling
Renewable resource as solar energy (solar thermal and solar photovoltaic) is critical to the future of our planet. Solar energy and the proven Maisotsenko Cycle (M-Cycle) can work in perfect synergy with each other and, together, they could provide a total efficient solution for powering, heating and cooling our buildings using 100% renewable energy.
The M-Cycle is a revolutionary new breakthrough in thermodynamics, which utilizes the psychrometric energy (or the potential energy) available from the latent heat of water evaporating into the air. Atmospheric air is a clean renewable energy source as solar energy, and it can be used for many applications through the M-Cycle (see attachment 1 and our U.S. Patents No6,497,10 7; 6,581,402; 6,705,096; 6,776,001; 6,779,351; 6,854,278; 6,948,558; 7,007,453; 7,197,887; 7,228,669; etc.). High degree of thermodynamic perfection of the M-Cycle allows atmospheric air to be cooled (without humidification) not the wet-bulb temperature, but the dew point temperature, and it increases psychrometric temperature difference and, consequently, energy resource of the atmospheric air.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published the FEMP review (DOE/GO-102007-2325): "Coolerado Cooler Helps to Save Cooling Energy and Dollars". http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/tir_coolerado.pdf). We have the ability to harness the power of the sun and psychrometric energy from air through the M-Cycle simultaneously, greatly reducing consumption energy and pollution. For example, our product, the Solar Coolerado Air Conditioner R600 can cool a 2,500 square foot space and only uses about 700 watts of power. That means it only needs four, 200 watt photovoltaic panels to power it. A
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

SkyFuel RussTech Inc. Intersolar Westinghouse Solar Trojan Battery Company Nextronex, Inc. UnThink Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters