Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

PV – A Question of Scale

By J. Peter Lynch, Financial Anaylst
March 23, 2010   |   7 Comments
PV is already the fastest growing industry in the world. But if it is going to play a significant role in future worldwide electricity production, it all comes down to one word – scalability.

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

7 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 7
Anonymous
March 23, 2010
The author also writes: "This will be especially true of generation of electricity with coal, which currently supplies over 50% of the electricity generated in the U.S."

Again, this is untrue. EIA figures show that Coal has generated less than 50% of electricity in every year since 2004 and its share of the market has monotonically decreased since then (as the share of natural gas has grown). In 2008 coal was responsible for 48.2% and in 2009 (an atypical year) it was responsible for 44.7%.
Steven
No image available
Comment
2 of 7
Anonymous
March 23, 2010
The author writes "The current U.S. electricity demand is roughly 4 trillion watts (4 Terawatts or TW) and is growing at approximately 2.5% per year. Current projections place demand somewhere between 11 TW and 18 TW by 2050."

Apparently the author does not understand basic units of energy which should give anyone pause before accepting investment advise from him. US nameplate power generation capacity is ~1.104 TW and energy consumption was ~4120 TWh. Apparently the author is talking about energy consumption even though he is using units of power and is off by a factor of 1000. Electricity demand was down sharply in 2009 due to the recession. If we consider only the period from 1995 to 2008 average year over year demand increase was 1.6%, a far cry from 2.5%.
Steven
No image available
Comment
3 of 7
Anonymous
March 23, 2010
This site:
http://www.solarbuzz.com/Marketbuzz2009-intro.htm
Suggest 2008 world PV manufacturing capacity was ~6 GW and 2009 data is significantly higher. If we look at the author's table "U.S. Electricity Demand 2010 vs. Current PV Industry Capacity" he states 44 GW of capacity is 20 times world capacity, suggesting he believes world capacity is 2.2 GW. Clearly his data is woefully out of date. For 44 GW of PV to be needed to generate 1% of US electricity would mean that capacity factors would have to be only 10.6%. This is a very low value--it seems very roughly a factor of 2 lower than optimal placement would provide. Perhaps Mr Lynch would care to explain why he assumes such a low value and/or revise and extend his data....
Steven
Comment
4 of 7
March 23, 2010
I would agree with the user above. The numbers cited are ambiguous, and do not correspond to anything I can detect. They appear to be pulled out of thin air, in addition to mixing energy units incorrectly. This article is conspicuously similar to a lecture video I was viewing recently from an "environmental scientist" making the case for massive nuclear development. It was that lecture that prompted me to write the below blog post on US energy consumption:

http://energy.typepad.com/the-energy-blog/2010/03/us-energy-consumption.html
Comment
5 of 7
March 24, 2010
I agree with the author. There is tremendous potential and the whole industry going through it's infancy stage. Somehow European nations are much more committed to this cause than US. Till President Obama came on the board this industry really had no future in this country.
As consumer this industry lot of standardization. As a potential customer there are so less but many different options available, its almost confusing. This will to an extent prohibit to achieve the economies of scale for the PV manufacturer and the sellers.

Deepak Sarode
Marketing- PV
Comment
6 of 7
March 24, 2010
definately an exciting time! Huge growth industry means jobs, jobs, jobs!! our school will get you NABCEP, LEED or RESNET certified fast!
http://www.training4green.com
Comment
7 of 7
March 26, 2010
I think reducing permitting and installation costs are much more important that reducing equipment prices--solar panels are becoming much less important to installed costs. Production, length of useful life, and O&M costs are about is commercialization. New/silver bullet solar technologies are not coming around the corner, despite what the VC community would have you believe.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Peter Lynch

View Peter Lynch's Profile
About: I have worked, for 33 years as an independent analyst and investor in small emerging technology companies. I have been actively involved in following developmen... more »

Advertise With Us

Talesun Solar Stoel Rives LLP Geothermal Resources Council Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc Prudent Living, Inc. 3TIER Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters