Article Rating
2 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 15 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

MIT Researchers Tip Their Cards

Published: March 9, 2010

Boston, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com] Last week, as part of the 2010 MIT Energy Conference, the institute opened the doors to its energy research projects. Press and other interested parties got a first look at technologies that could one day make renewable energy abundant, cheap and more deployable. These cutting-edge technologies were presented by a handful of MIT faculty and students who showed some innovations in the solar, hydrogen and energy storage areas that are on the road to commercialization.

While each of these technologies seem disparate, MIT Energy Initiative director Moniz emphasized that they all have one goal, to make renewable energy cheaper and easier to implement around the world, reducing reliance on carbon intensive sources of energy and helping to bring about a fundamental shift in the way the world produces and consumes electricity.

Energy is huge business at MIT, with a full 20% of its faculty involved in some kind of energy research. MIT Energy Initiative director Ernest Moniz said that the the goal of all MIT's energy research is to partner with the renewable energy and power industries to commercialize technology, because, unlike in IT, energy technologies can't go from an idea to commercialization in a garage.

Researchers at MIT have been particularly active in the solar energy sector, having already spun-out companies including 1366 Technologies, and the school is now home to one of 40 nation-wide Energy Frontier Research Centers that are funded by the U.S. Department of Energy with stimulus funds. The Center for EXcitonics is studying the application of excitons, quasiparticles consisting of a bound state of an electron and an imaginary particle called an electron hole in insulators and semiconductors, for solar lighting.

Excitons are the main mechanism for light emission in semiconductors and Dr. Marc Baldo, director of the center and professor of engineering, thinks they may be the way to offset the electricity demands of lighting, which makes up close to 30% of overall electricity usage.

In order to take advantage of these particles, Baldo and the rest of the team at the center are developing disordered materials, such as quantum dots, that can be sprayed on substrates. The example Baldo presented was called "luminescent solar concentrators," which are pieces of glass that concentrate light onto edges coated with the quantum dots.

When light is concentrated on the dots, excitons are formed. The advantage of this type of technology, Baldo said, is that disordered materials, unlike traditional crystalline materials that are used for solar energy technologies, are cheap and much easier to work with and produce.

"If we do solar right, it can be very, very, very cheap," Baldo said.

The center is still in the early stages of its research and the goal is to learn how to control the particles and movements to generate a charge. The ultimate end-game is to build thin-film, non-tracking solar cells with power efficiencies exceeding 30%.

Solar Thermoelectrics

While Baldo and the team working on excitons are looking at new ways to use the sun to generate electricity, engineering professor Dr. Gang Chen and the team at the Solid-State Solar Thermal Energy Conversion Center are looking at how plastics can replace copper parts in solar hot water systems, and be used to convert heat into electricity at CSP and possibly geothermal energy plants.

Chen's team is researching what it calls solar thermoelectrics. The technology involves using Fresnel lenses to concentrate light and in effect heat, onto a solid state converter made of plastics, which uses the heat differential on either side to create electricity. The same converter could also be used in what Chen referred to as thermophotovoltaics.

In this case, heat from any source could be exposed to one side of the converter, the other side would be used to create light which could then be focused on a photovoltaic panel, potentially allowing solar plants to produce electricity even when the sun isn't shining.

Energy Storage

If technologies like those being developed by Baldo and Chen, in addition to those already working in the field, are deployed at the scale that is necessary to reduce dependence on fossil fuel generating technologies, then large-scale storage will have to play a role. Dr. Luis Oritz from the materials science department said that not only are large scale storage solutions necessary for renewable energy deployment, but they're also important from a security vantage point.

Currently only 2.5% of the capacity of the U.S. grid is able to be stored, compared with 10% in Europe and 15% in Japan, which in the event of a grid failure could mean trouble for the U.S. Ortiz said that this is why his team, which is led by Professor Donald Sadoway, has received US $7 million from the U.S. Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E), $4 million from French oil company Total and support from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and MIT.

The goal of Sadoway's research is to bring the cost of large scale energy storage facilities in line with the cost of natural gas plants. He said that in order to do this, incredibly large liquid metal batteries will need to be built and the facilities will need to be used in much the same way that flywheel storage plants are expected to be used, as frequency regulators that are capable of dispatching energy quickly in the event of an emergency. 

The basic principle behind the technology is to place three layers of liquid inside a container: Two different metal alloys, and one layer of a salt. The three materials are chosen so that they have different densities that allow them to separate naturally into three distinct layers, with the salt in the middle separating the two metal layers — like novelty drinks with different layers. 

The energy is stored in the liquid metals that want to react with one another but can do so only by transferring ions — electrically charged atoms of one of the metals — across the electrolyte, which results in the flow of electric current out of the battery.

When the battery is being charged, some ions migrate through the insulating salt layer to collect at one of the terminals. Then, when the power is being drained from the battery, those ions migrate back through the salt and collect at the opposite terminal. The whole device is kept at a high temperature, around 700°C, so that the layers remain molten.

While each of these technologies has a lot of lab work left before it's ready for field testing on a large scale, chemistry professor Dr. Dan Nocera and the company he helped found Sun Catalytix are working to commercialize a catalyst that can be used to split water.

The basis of Sun Catalytix's technology is a cobalt phosphate catalyst that Nocera said is more efficient at splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen than other materials. He said that the catalyst can work within normal ambient temperatures and with water sources as diverse as tap water and water straight out of the Charles River in Boston.

While commercial electrolyzers that split water to make hydrogen already exist, Nocera said that they're far too expensive and require a significant amount of energy to run. Sun Catalytix is in the process of testing an electroylzer that is built with its proprietary catalyst that can be manufactured using PVC plastic.

A completed 100-watt system would work like this: solar PV panels would power an electrolyzer, which would then produce hydrogen that would be stored in tanks and then used as fuel for a fuel cell for electricity or to power a hydrogen vehicle. Nocera said that three liters of water a day could power a home.

He said the ultimate goal of the Sun Catalytix system is use cheaper solar panels and fuel cells (still a stumbling block) to implement systems like this in the developing world where there is little-to-no electricity generating infrastructure in place and where three liters of even low-quality water per day could dramatically increase the quality of life of the people living there.

Development of the technology is being financed by more than $1 million from Polaris Venture Partners. Nocera said that he expects a working prototype to be completed in the next 5-8 years and that the company has already been approached by solar companies interested in having their panels used in the system.

While each of these technologies seem disparate, MIT Energy Initiative director Moniz emphasized that they all have one goal, to make renewable energy cheaper and easier to implement around the world, reducing reliance on carbon intensive sources of energy and helping to bring about a fundamental shift in the way the world produces and consumes electricity.

Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 15
March 9, 2010
I applaud the great research being conducted by MIT Faculty and students. Renewable energy is the future of this planet if it's going to have one. In the last 2 years I have seen no less than 5 Disruptive technologies that when adapted and placed in the main stream energy marketplace, will render the use of fossil fuel power obsolete. Solar, Wind, Biomass technologies are on the horizon that will change our lives for the better. We are in the process of entering into the age of Clean, Cheap, Inexhaustible Green Energy. I am proud to have the opportunity to see the industry bloom. Good Job MIT.
No image available
Comment
2 of 15
March 10, 2010
Whenever I hear MIT I cringe for they were major critics of hydrogen with intitial Pons and Fleischmann cold fusion announcement for reasons which are more clear now than ever, GREED. MIT was worried about the gov. grant tap being diverted away from traditional energy alternatives, so they ripped hydrogen fusion at the time.

Now they are finally falling in line, again, for GREED as the gov. money flows again into hydrogen fusion development. I also think back to Chu who announced a huge cut in funding for hydrogen fusion, and then three months later it is restored which clearly is an indication gov doen't know what is going on in the garages and basements around the world and just how close hydrogen fusion energy is to being introduced. Sounds like they didn't want to be labeled idiots for pulling funding on the most promising of all renewable energy alternatives just before they come to market. Just another GREEDY example of what is going on behind the scenes which is nothing new, just research how Tesla was treated.
No image available
Comment
3 of 15
March 10, 2010
Boy and I was so looking forward to the anarchy everyone was talking about! And I spent all that money on guns and bullets ...
<;-P

'If it ain't science it ain't nothin!'
No image available
Comment
4 of 15
March 10, 2010
Nanomike - I agree that greed is an inherent factor in the development of any industry. Hell, do you think people started building PV systems out of the goodness of their heart? Hell, no! It was a business opportunity, a way to make money. If it helped the environment, fine. But if there was no market for it, I guarantee you they would have all given up and moved on to other things. Come off your high, white cloud, you dingbat. Greed is an inherent motivator in ALL of humanity, whether it's greed for money, for land, or for the perfect slice of pizza. I'm just glad the "greed" you misrepresent here are some of the finest minds on the planet and I thank god they're on our side.
No image available
Comment
5 of 15
March 10, 2010
Once you find the technical solutions to the problem, your troubles are just starting. Then you have to fight the vested interests such as the coal, automobile and oil industries, just to mention three. MIT needs a course on ethics and how not to prostitute yourself by selling patents to vested intrests so that they can sit on them; a course on law and how to fight the legal challenges of vested interests and a course on the economy and how to start up a firm and make it successful without ending up capital poor in the first stages which allows the big boys to buy you out.
No image available
Comment
6 of 15
March 10, 2010
Energy storing sounds very boring,
Yet is very important if the lines go down,
Chemical methods, a partial answer,
We should keep looking 'till new ways are found.
No image available
Comment
7 of 15
March 10, 2010
Complements to MIT. My company is close to commercializing its RET, a high efficiency, low cost, multifuel heat engine. RET engines can turn generators to produce off grid electricity at $.04 /kWh using NG, less if biomethane etc. A Low tech core works, does not disrupt the infrastructure, e.g., no need for new logistics if Hydrogen, and gives an ROI in 2 years from fuel savings! RET- Powered trucks, still using diesel would save over 1 Billion bbls imported oil. Run on NG, savings are more. RETs are an enabling technology. To conquer energy means, confering disruptive economic benefit to the users/ buyers, not just changing the Pay To address on the checks. JR Sannerprojects, Inc Sannerwind@gmail.com
No image available
Comment
8 of 15
Anonymous
March 10, 2010
Douglas, anyone who thinks everyone is motivated by greed is the real dingbat? In a few months you will see a technology introduced which will impact the world regarding clean renewable energy, and we haven't taken a dime from anyone, so where is this greed you think exists in all companies?
No image available
Comment
9 of 15
March 16, 2010
Hi its good for Energy research point of view, how can be a research member in MIT as being a Energy Engineer, its my interest in Energy saving.
No image available
Comment
10 of 15
March 16, 2010
The simplest form of electricity storage is through pumped storage. If the US laid out a HVDC grid (minimal transmission losses compared to HVAC), they could use solar PV & Concentrated Solar Power and windpower, all of which are intermittent, to pump water up hill to lakes in the Rockies and other mountain ranges. The water could then be released to generate instantanous hydro-electricity when required to balance the grid and meet unexpected surges in power demand.

Gage Williams, Renewable Energy Office for Cornwall, UK
No image available
Comment
11 of 15
March 16, 2010
What percentage of this MIT graduating class will be able to stay in the Unitied States and keep working on developing these innovations? Or will they need to reenroll in some other degree to stay on?
Comment
12 of 15
March 16, 2010
Avoiding the need for the greatest share of electrical energy storage is also an option. Sleeping when the sun does is one way. Pumping water is highly inefficient. Natural rainfall does it so well.
Making hydrogen with excess power may be a more useful battery and for transportation as in fuel cells as well. Solar heat can be easily stored for off sun uses and is far more efficient to gather from current sunshine. Over half of our national energy is used for heating. That could be easily laid off onto distributed current sunshine. Once installed, the energy is free.
This doesn't get the press and politic because it is...........................(fill in this blank).
No image available
Comment
13 of 15
CEA
March 18, 2010
In order to keep the hopes of America remaining competitive in the "clean energy revolution", the government needs to take all steps to supply the necessary funding as well as incentives to develop and research into these emerging technologies. Domestic energy production is key to strengthening the economic, social, and environmental conditions in the United States. Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA's mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.
No image available
Comment
14 of 15
March 19, 2010
Phil - water pumps generally have +90% hydraulic efficiency and well designed hydro pumped storage will generally return about 80% of the energy used to store the water in the higher reservoir. In general, in engineering such efficiencies are very very good. In comparsion a coal fire power station is may be 35 - 40% effiecnt overall and internal combustion enginer about 30 - 35%. Making hydrogen has much higher losses than pumped hydro storage.

Storing electricity is useful as it is a high grade/form of energy (i.e. it can be converted in heat or motion with high efficiency). Whereas turning heat energy into electricity has high losses (as given above).

You are correct that about 50% of gross primary energy is low grade heat and solar thermal is a very important technology but electricity is really very useful too. Both technologies are needed.
No image available
Comment
15 of 15
July 19, 2010
The principle of storing energy in a battery functioning on ionic movements in stratified liquid metal layers is good. The problem of handling high temperature liquid metal alloys and the large scale supply of these metals has to taken care of. Moreover, this technique may work well in specified industrial locations.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
Tyco Electronics ET Solar Group Trina Solar Ltd. OPEL Solar, Inc. HUBER+SUHNER AG ADI-NQN - Agencia de Desarrollo de Inversiones del Neuquén - Argentina Interstate Renewable Energy Council
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters